theory TypeSchemes

imports "../Nominal2"

begin

section {*** Type Schemes ***}

atom_decl name

(* defined as a single nominal datatype *)

nominal_datatype ty =

  Var "name"

| Fun "ty" "ty"

and tys =

  All xs::"name fset" ty::"ty" bind (res) xs in ty

thm ty_tys.distinct

thm ty_tys.induct

thm ty_tys.exhaust

thm ty_tys.fv_defs

thm ty_tys.bn_defs

thm ty_tys.perm_simps

thm ty_tys.eq_iff

thm ty_tys.fv_bn_eqvt

thm ty_tys.size_eqvt

thm ty_tys.supports

thm ty_tys.supp

thm ty_tys.fresh

(* defined as two separate nominal datatypes *)

nominal_datatype ty2 =

  Var2 "name"

| Fun2 "ty2" "ty2"

nominal_datatype tys2 =

  All2 xs::"name fset" ty::"ty2" bind (res) xs in ty

thm tys2.distinct

thm tys2.induct

thm tys2.exhaust

thm tys2.fv_defs

thm tys2.bn_defs

thm tys2.perm_simps

thm tys2.eq_iff

thm tys2.fv_bn_eqvt

thm tys2.size_eqvt

thm tys2.supports

thm tys2.supp

thm tys2.fresh

text {* *}

(*

lemma strong_induct:

  assumes a1: "\<And>name b. P b (Var name)"

  and     a2: "\<And>t1 t2 b. \<lbrakk>\<And>c. P c t1; \<And>c. P c t2\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> P b (Fun t1 t2)"

  shows "P (a :: 'a :: pt) t \<and> P' (d :: 'b :: {fs}) ts "

proof -

  have " (\<forall>p a. P a (p \<bullet> t)) \<and> (\<forall>p d. P' d (p \<bullet> ts))"

    apply (rule ty_tys.induct)

    apply (simp add: a1)

    apply (simp)

    apply (rule allI)+

    apply (rule a2)

    apply simp

    apply simp

    apply (rule allI)

    apply (rule allI)

    apply clarify

    apply(rule_tac t="p \<bullet> All fset ty" and 

                   s="pa \<bullet> (p \<bullet> All fset ty)" in subst)

    apply (rule supp_perm_eq)

    apply assumption

    apply (simp only: ty_tys.perm_simps)

    apply (rule a3)

    apply(erule_tac x="(pa + p)" in allE)

    apply simp

    apply (simp add: eqvts eqvts_raw)

    apply (rule at_set_avoiding2)

    apply (simp add: finite_supp)

    apply (simp add: eqvts finite_supp)

    apply (rule_tac p=" -p" in permute_boolE)

    apply(simp add: eqvts)

    apply(simp add: permute_fun_def atom_eqvt)

    apply (simp add: fresh_star_def)

    apply clarify

    apply (simp add: fresh_def)

    apply(auto)

    apply (simp add: ty_tys.supp)

    done

  then have "P a (0 \<bullet> t) \<and> P' d (0 \<bullet> ts)" by blast

  then show ?thesis by simp

qed

lemma

  shows "All {|a, b|} (Fun (Var a) (Var b)) = All {|b, a|} (Fun (Var a) (Var b))"

  apply(simp add: ty_tys.eq_iff)

  apply(rule_tac x="0::perm" in exI)

  apply(simp add: alphas)

  apply(simp add: fresh_star_def fresh_zero_perm supp_at_base)

  done

lemma

  shows "All {|a, b|} (Fun (Var a) (Var b)) = All {|a, b|} (Fun (Var b) (Var a))"

  apply(simp add: ty_tys.eq_iff)

  apply(rule_tac x="(atom a \<rightleftharpoons> atom b)" in exI)

  apply(simp add: alphas fresh_star_def eqvts supp_at_base)

  done

lemma

  shows "All {|a, b, c|} (Fun (Var a) (Var b)) = All {|a, b|} (Fun (Var a) (Var b))"

  apply(simp add: ty_tys.eq_iff)

  apply(rule_tac x="0::perm" in exI)

  apply(simp add: alphas fresh_star_def eqvts ty_tys.eq_iff supp_at_base)

done

lemma

  assumes a: "a \<noteq> b"

  shows "\<not>(All {|a, b|} (Fun (Var a) (Var b)) = All {|c|} (Fun (Var c) (Var c)))"

  using a

  apply(simp add: ty_tys.eq_iff)

  apply(clarify)

  apply(simp add: alphas fresh_star_def eqvts ty_tys.eq_iff supp_at_base)

  apply auto

  done

fun

  lookup :: "(name \<times> ty) list \<Rightarrow> name \<Rightarrow> ty"

where

  "lookup [] n = Var n"

| "lookup ((p, s) # t) n = (if p = n then s else lookup t n)"

locale subst_loc =

fixes

    subst  :: "(name \<times> ty) list \<Rightarrow> ty \<Rightarrow> ty"

and substs :: "(name \<times> ty) list \<Rightarrow> tys \<Rightarrow> tys"

assumes

    s1: "subst \<theta> (Var n) = lookup \<theta> n"

and s2: "subst \<theta> (Fun l r) = Fun (subst \<theta> l) (subst \<theta> r)"

begin

lemma subst_ty:

  assumes x: "atom x \<sharp> t"

  shows "subst [(x, S)] t = t"

  using x

  apply (induct t rule: ty_tys.induct[of _ "\<lambda>t. True" _ , simplified])

  by (simp_all add: s1 s2 fresh_def ty_tys.fv[simplified ty_tys.supp] supp_at_base)

lemma subst_tyS:

  shows "atom x \<sharp> T \<longrightarrow> substs [(x, S)] T = T"

  apply (rule strong_induct[of

    "\<lambda>a t. True" "\<lambda>(x, S) T. (atom x \<sharp> T \<longrightarrow> substs [(x, S)] T = T)" _ "t" "(x, S)", simplified])

  apply clarify

  apply (subst s3)

  apply (simp add: fresh_star_def fresh_Cons fresh_Nil)

  apply (subst subst_ty)

  apply (simp_all add: fresh_star_prod_elim)

  apply (drule fresh_star_atom)

  apply (simp add: fresh_def ty_tys.fv[simplified ty_tys.supp])

  apply blast

  apply (metis supp_finite_atom_set finite_fset)

  done

lemma subst_lemma_pre:

  "z \<sharp> (N,L) \<longrightarrow> z \<sharp> (subst [(y, L)] N)"

  apply (induct N rule: ty_tys.induct[of _ "\<lambda>t. True" _ , simplified])

  apply (simp add: s1)

  apply (auto simp add: fresh_Pair)

  apply (auto simp add: fresh_def ty_tys.fv[simplified ty_tys.supp])[3]

  apply (simp add: s2)

  apply (auto simp add: fresh_def ty_tys.fv[simplified ty_tys.supp])

  done

lemma substs_lemma_pre:

  "atom z \<sharp> (N,L) \<longrightarrow> atom z \<sharp> (substs [(y, L)] N)"

  apply (rule strong_induct[of

    "\<lambda>a t. True" "\<lambda>(z, y, L) N. (atom z \<sharp> (N, L) \<longrightarrow> atom z \<sharp> (substs [(y, L)] N))" _ _ "(z, y, L)", simplified])

  apply clarify

  apply (subst s3)

  apply (simp add: fresh_star_def fresh_Cons fresh_Nil fresh_Pair)

  apply (simp_all add: fresh_star_prod_elim fresh_Pair)

  apply clarify

  apply (drule fresh_star_atom)

  apply (drule fresh_star_atom)

  apply (simp add: fresh_def)

  apply (simp only: ty_tys.fv[simplified ty_tys.supp])

  apply (subgoal_tac "atom a \<notin> supp (subst [(aa, b)] t)")

  apply blast

  apply (subgoal_tac "atom a \<notin> supp t")

  apply (fold fresh_def)[1]

  apply (rule mp[OF subst_lemma_pre])

  apply (simp add: fresh_Pair)

  apply blast

  apply (metis supp_finite_atom_set finite_fset)

  done

lemma subst_lemma:

  shows "x \<noteq> y \<and> atom x \<sharp> L \<longrightarrow>

    subst [(y, L)] (subst [(x, N)] M) =

    subst [(x, (subst [(y, L)] N))] (subst [(y, L)] M)"

  apply (induct M rule: ty_tys.induct[of _ "\<lambda>t. True" _ , simplified])

  apply (simp_all add: s1 s2)

  apply clarify

  apply (subst (2) subst_ty)

  apply simp_all

  done

lemma substs_lemma:

  shows "x \<noteq> y \<and> atom x \<sharp> L \<longrightarrow>

    substs [(y, L)] (substs [(x, N)] M) =

    substs [(x, (subst [(y, L)] N))] (substs [(y, L)] M)"

  apply (rule strong_induct[of

    "\<lambda>a t. True" "\<lambda>(x, y, N, L) M. x \<noteq> y \<and> atom x \<sharp> L \<longrightarrow>

    substs [(y, L)] (substs [(x, N)] M) =

    substs [(x, (subst [(y, L)] N))] (substs [(y, L)] M)" _ _ "(x, y, N, L)", simplified])

  apply clarify

  apply (simp_all add: fresh_star_prod_elim fresh_Pair)

  apply (subst s3)

  apply (unfold fresh_star_def)[1]

  apply (simp add: fresh_Cons fresh_Nil fresh_Pair)

  apply (subst s3)

  apply (unfold fresh_star_def)[1]

  apply (simp add: fresh_Cons fresh_Nil fresh_Pair)

  apply (subst s3)

  apply (unfold fresh_star_def)[1]

  apply (simp add: fresh_Cons fresh_Nil fresh_Pair)

  apply (subst s3)

  apply (unfold fresh_star_def)[1]

  apply (simp add: fresh_Cons fresh_Nil fresh_Pair)

  apply (rule ballI)

  apply (rule mp[OF subst_lemma_pre])

  apply (simp add: fresh_Pair)

  apply (subst subst_lemma)

  apply simp_all

  done

end

*)

end