Paper/document/root.tex
changeset 236 6b6d71d14e75
parent 233 e0a7ee9842d6
child 237 06a6db387cd2
equal deleted inserted replaced
235:0b9c893cfd1b 236:6b6d71d14e75
    60 and relate them to abacus machines and recursive functions. We ``tie
    60 and relate them to abacus machines and recursive functions. We ``tie
    61 the know'' between these three computational models by formalising a
    61 the know'' between these three computational models by formalising a
    62 universal function and obtaining from it a universal Turing machine by
    62 universal function and obtaining from it a universal Turing machine by
    63 our verified translation from recursive functions to abacus programs
    63 our verified translation from recursive functions to abacus programs
    64 and from abacus programs to Turing machine programs.  Hoare-style reasoning techniques allow us
    64 and from abacus programs to Turing machine programs.  Hoare-style reasoning techniques allow us
    65 to reason about Turing machine and abacus programs. Our theory can be
    65 to reason about concrete Turing machine and abacus programs. 
    66 used to formalise other computability results.
    66 %Our theory can be
       
    67 %used to formalise other computability results.
    67 %We give one example about the computational equivalence of 
    68 %We give one example about the computational equivalence of 
    68 %single-sided Turing machines. 
    69 %single-sided Turing machines. 
    69 %{\it we give one example about the undecidability of Wang's tiling problem, whose proof uses
    70 %{\it we give one example about the undecidability of Wang's tiling problem, whose proof uses
    70 %the notion of a universal Turing machine.}
    71 %the notion of a universal Turing machine.}
    71 \end{abstract}
    72 \end{abstract}