Tue, 26 Jan 2010 10:53:44 +0100 merged
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Tue, 26 Jan 2010 10:53:44 +0100] rev 936
merged
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 01:42:46 +0100 cleaning of QuotProd; a little cleaning of QuotList
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Tue, 26 Jan 2010 01:42:46 +0100] rev 935
cleaning of QuotProd; a little cleaning of QuotList
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 01:00:35 +0100 added prs and rsp lemmas for Inl and Inr
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Tue, 26 Jan 2010 01:00:35 +0100] rev 934
added prs and rsp lemmas for Inl and Inr
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 00:47:40 +0100 used split_option_all lemma
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Tue, 26 Jan 2010 00:47:40 +0100] rev 933
used split_option_all lemma
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 00:18:48 +0100 used the internal Option.map instead of custom option_map
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Tue, 26 Jan 2010 00:18:48 +0100] rev 932
used the internal Option.map instead of custom option_map
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 09:54:43 +0100 Generalized split_prs and split_rsp
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 26 Jan 2010 09:54:43 +0100] rev 931
Generalized split_prs and split_rsp
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 09:28:32 +0100 All eq_reflections apart from the one of 'id_apply' can be removed.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 26 Jan 2010 09:28:32 +0100] rev 930
All eq_reflections apart from the one of 'id_apply' can be removed.
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 08:55:55 +0100 continued
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 26 Jan 2010 08:55:55 +0100] rev 929
continued
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 08:09:22 +0100 More eqreflection/equiv cleaning.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 26 Jan 2010 08:09:22 +0100] rev 928
More eqreflection/equiv cleaning.
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 07:42:52 +0100 more eq_reflection & other cleaning.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 26 Jan 2010 07:42:52 +0100] rev 927
more eq_reflection & other cleaning.
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 07:14:10 +0100 Removing more eq_reflections.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 26 Jan 2010 07:14:10 +0100] rev 926
Removing more eq_reflections.
Mon, 25 Jan 2010 20:47:20 +0100 ids *cannot* be object equalities
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Mon, 25 Jan 2010 20:47:20 +0100] rev 925
ids *cannot* be object equalities
Mon, 25 Jan 2010 20:35:42 +0100 re-inserted lemma in QuotList
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Mon, 25 Jan 2010 20:35:42 +0100] rev 924
re-inserted lemma in QuotList
Mon, 25 Jan 2010 19:52:53 +0100 added prs and rsp lemmas for Some and None
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Mon, 25 Jan 2010 19:52:53 +0100] rev 923
added prs and rsp lemmas for Some and None
Mon, 25 Jan 2010 19:14:46 +0100 tuned proofs (mainly in QuotProd)
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Mon, 25 Jan 2010 19:14:46 +0100] rev 922
tuned proofs (mainly in QuotProd)
Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:52:22 +0100 properly commented out the "unused lemmas section" and moved actually used lemmas elsewhere; added two minor items to the TODO list
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:52:22 +0100] rev 921
properly commented out the "unused lemmas section" and moved actually used lemmas elsewhere; added two minor items to the TODO list
Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:13:44 +0100 renamed QuotScript to QuotBase
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:13:44 +0100] rev 920
renamed QuotScript to QuotBase
Mon, 25 Jan 2010 17:53:08 +0100 cleaned some theorems
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Mon, 25 Jan 2010 17:53:08 +0100] rev 919
cleaned some theorems
Sun, 24 Jan 2010 23:41:27 +0100 test with splits
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Sun, 24 Jan 2010 23:41:27 +0100] rev 918
test with splits
Sat, 23 Jan 2010 17:25:18 +0100 The alpha equivalence relations for structures in 'Terms'
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Sat, 23 Jan 2010 17:25:18 +0100] rev 917
The alpha equivalence relations for structures in 'Terms'
Sat, 23 Jan 2010 15:41:54 +0100 More experiments with defining the homomorphism directly, lifting of 'distinct' and of 'exhaust'.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Sat, 23 Jan 2010 15:41:54 +0100] rev 916
More experiments with defining the homomorphism directly, lifting of 'distinct' and of 'exhaust'.
Sat, 23 Jan 2010 07:22:27 +0100 Trying to define hom for the lifted type directly.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Sat, 23 Jan 2010 07:22:27 +0100] rev 915
Trying to define hom for the lifted type directly.
Fri, 22 Jan 2010 17:44:46 +0100 Proper alpha equivalence for Sigma calculus.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Fri, 22 Jan 2010 17:44:46 +0100] rev 914
Proper alpha equivalence for Sigma calculus.
Thu, 21 Jan 2010 19:52:46 +0100 Changed fun_map and rel_map to definitions.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Thu, 21 Jan 2010 19:52:46 +0100] rev 913
Changed fun_map and rel_map to definitions.
Thu, 21 Jan 2010 12:50:43 +0100 Lifted Peter's Sigma lemma with Ex1.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Thu, 21 Jan 2010 12:50:43 +0100] rev 912
Lifted Peter's Sigma lemma with Ex1.
Thu, 21 Jan 2010 12:03:47 +0100 Automatic injection of Bexeq
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Thu, 21 Jan 2010 12:03:47 +0100] rev 911
Automatic injection of Bexeq
Thu, 21 Jan 2010 11:11:22 +0100 Automatic cleaning of Bexeq<->Ex1 theorems.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Thu, 21 Jan 2010 11:11:22 +0100] rev 910
Automatic cleaning of Bexeq<->Ex1 theorems.
Thu, 21 Jan 2010 10:55:09 +0100 Using Bexeq_rsp, and manually lifted lemma with Ex1.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Thu, 21 Jan 2010 10:55:09 +0100] rev 909
Using Bexeq_rsp, and manually lifted lemma with Ex1.
Thu, 21 Jan 2010 09:55:05 +0100 Bexeq definition, Ex1_prs lemma, Bex1_rsp lemma, compiles.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Thu, 21 Jan 2010 09:55:05 +0100] rev 908
Bexeq definition, Ex1_prs lemma, Bex1_rsp lemma, compiles.
Thu, 21 Jan 2010 09:02:04 +0100 The missing rule.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Thu, 21 Jan 2010 09:02:04 +0100] rev 907
The missing rule.
Thu, 21 Jan 2010 07:38:34 +0100 Ex1 -> Bex1 Regularization, Preparing Exeq.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Thu, 21 Jan 2010 07:38:34 +0100] rev 906
Ex1 -> Bex1 Regularization, Preparing Exeq.
Wed, 20 Jan 2010 16:50:31 +0100 Added the Sigma Calculus example
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 20 Jan 2010 16:50:31 +0100] rev 905
Added the Sigma Calculus example
Wed, 20 Jan 2010 16:44:31 +0100 Better error messages for non matching quantifiers.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 20 Jan 2010 16:44:31 +0100] rev 904
Better error messages for non matching quantifiers.
Wed, 20 Jan 2010 12:33:19 +0100 Statement of term1_hom_rsp
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 20 Jan 2010 12:33:19 +0100] rev 903
Statement of term1_hom_rsp
Wed, 20 Jan 2010 12:20:18 +0100 proved that the function is a function
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Wed, 20 Jan 2010 12:20:18 +0100] rev 902
proved that the function is a function
Wed, 20 Jan 2010 11:30:32 +0100 term1_hom as a function
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 20 Jan 2010 11:30:32 +0100] rev 901
term1_hom as a function
Tue, 19 Jan 2010 18:17:42 +0100 A version of hom with quantifiers.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 19 Jan 2010 18:17:42 +0100] rev 900
A version of hom with quantifiers.
Sun, 17 Jan 2010 02:24:15 +0100 added permutation functions for the raw calculi
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Sun, 17 Jan 2010 02:24:15 +0100] rev 899
added permutation functions for the raw calculi
Sat, 16 Jan 2010 04:23:27 +0100 fixed broken (partial) proof
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Sat, 16 Jan 2010 04:23:27 +0100] rev 898
fixed broken (partial) proof
Sat, 16 Jan 2010 03:56:00 +0100 used "new" alpha-equivalence relation (according to new scheme); proved equivalence theorems and so on
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Sat, 16 Jan 2010 03:56:00 +0100] rev 897
used "new" alpha-equivalence relation (according to new scheme); proved equivalence theorems and so on
Sat, 16 Jan 2010 02:09:38 +0100 liftin and lifing_tac can now lift several "and"-separated goals at once; the raw-theorems have to be given in the order of goals
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Sat, 16 Jan 2010 02:09:38 +0100] rev 896
liftin and lifing_tac can now lift several "and"-separated goals at once; the raw-theorems have to be given in the order of goals
Fri, 15 Jan 2010 17:09:36 +0100 added a partial proof under which conditions rlam_rec Respects alpha...I guess something like this is true; this means the Hom lemmas need to have preconditions
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Fri, 15 Jan 2010 17:09:36 +0100] rev 895
added a partial proof under which conditions rlam_rec Respects alpha...I guess something like this is true; this means the Hom lemmas need to have preconditions
Fri, 15 Jan 2010 16:13:49 +0100 tried to witness the hom-lemma with the recursion combinator from rlam....does not work yet completely
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Fri, 15 Jan 2010 16:13:49 +0100] rev 894
tried to witness the hom-lemma with the recursion combinator from rlam....does not work yet completely
Fri, 15 Jan 2010 15:56:25 +0100 merged
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Fri, 15 Jan 2010 15:56:25 +0100] rev 893
merged
Fri, 15 Jan 2010 15:56:06 +0100 added free_variable function (do not know about the algorithm yet)
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Fri, 15 Jan 2010 15:56:06 +0100] rev 892
added free_variable function (do not know about the algorithm yet)
Fri, 15 Jan 2010 15:51:25 +0100 hom lifted to hom', so it is true. Infrastructure for partially regularized quantifiers. Nicer errors for regularize.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Fri, 15 Jan 2010 15:51:25 +0100] rev 891
hom lifted to hom', so it is true. Infrastructure for partially regularized quantifiers. Nicer errors for regularize.
Fri, 15 Jan 2010 12:17:30 +0100 slight tuning of relation_error
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Fri, 15 Jan 2010 12:17:30 +0100] rev 890
slight tuning of relation_error
Fri, 15 Jan 2010 11:04:21 +0100 Appropriate respects and a statement of the lifted hom lemma
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Fri, 15 Jan 2010 11:04:21 +0100] rev 889
Appropriate respects and a statement of the lifted hom lemma
Fri, 15 Jan 2010 10:48:49 +0100 recursion-hom for lambda
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Fri, 15 Jan 2010 10:48:49 +0100] rev 888
recursion-hom for lambda
Fri, 15 Jan 2010 10:36:48 +0100 Incorrect version of the homomorphism lemma
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Fri, 15 Jan 2010 10:36:48 +0100] rev 887
Incorrect version of the homomorphism lemma
Thu, 14 Jan 2010 23:51:17 +0100 trivial
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Thu, 14 Jan 2010 23:51:17 +0100] rev 886
trivial
Thu, 14 Jan 2010 23:48:31 +0100 tuned quotient_typ.ML
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Thu, 14 Jan 2010 23:48:31 +0100] rev 885
tuned quotient_typ.ML
Thu, 14 Jan 2010 23:17:21 +0100 tuned quotient_def.ML and cleaned somewhat LamEx.thy
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Thu, 14 Jan 2010 23:17:21 +0100] rev 884
tuned quotient_def.ML and cleaned somewhat LamEx.thy
Thu, 14 Jan 2010 19:03:08 +0100 a few more lemmas...except supp of lambda-abstractions
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Thu, 14 Jan 2010 19:03:08 +0100] rev 883
a few more lemmas...except supp of lambda-abstractions
Thu, 14 Jan 2010 18:41:50 +0100 removed one sorry
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Thu, 14 Jan 2010 18:41:50 +0100] rev 882
removed one sorry
Thu, 14 Jan 2010 18:35:38 +0100 nearly all of the proof
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Thu, 14 Jan 2010 18:35:38 +0100] rev 881
nearly all of the proof
Thu, 14 Jan 2010 17:57:20 +0100 right generalisation
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Thu, 14 Jan 2010 17:57:20 +0100] rev 880
right generalisation
Thu, 14 Jan 2010 17:53:23 +0100 First subgoal.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Thu, 14 Jan 2010 17:53:23 +0100] rev 879
First subgoal.
Thu, 14 Jan 2010 17:13:11 +0100 setup for strong induction
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Thu, 14 Jan 2010 17:13:11 +0100] rev 878
setup for strong induction
Thu, 14 Jan 2010 16:41:17 +0100 exported absrep_const for nitpick.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Thu, 14 Jan 2010 16:41:17 +0100] rev 877
exported absrep_const for nitpick.
(0) -300 -100 -60 +60 +100 +300 +1000 tip