Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Thu, 04 Feb 2010 15:16:34 +0100] rev 1061
linked versions - instead of copies
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Thu, 04 Feb 2010 14:55:52 +0100] rev 1060
merged
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Thu, 04 Feb 2010 14:55:21 +0100] rev 1059
restored the old behaviour of having an eqvts list; the transformed theorems are stored in eqvts_raw
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 18:28:50 +0100] rev 1058
More let-rec experiments
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 17:36:25 +0100] rev 1057
proposal for an alpha equivalence
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 15:17:29 +0100] rev 1056
Lets different.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:39:19 +0100] rev 1055
Simplified the proof.
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:36:48 +0100] rev 1054
merged
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:36:22 +0100] rev 1053
proved that bv for lists respects alpha for terms
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:28:00 +0100] rev 1052
Finished remains on the let proof.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:22:25 +0100] rev 1051
merge
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:19:53 +0100] rev 1050
Lets are ok.
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:15:07 +0100] rev 1049
merged
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:12:50 +0100] rev 1048
added type-scheme example
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 13:00:37 +0100] rev 1047
merge
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 13:00:07 +0100] rev 1046
Definitions for trm5
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:58:02 +0100] rev 1045
another adaptation for the eqvt-change
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:45:06 +0100] rev 1044
merged
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:44:29 +0100] rev 1043
fixed proofs that broke because of eqvt
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:34:53 +0100] rev 1042
Minor fix.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:34:01 +0100] rev 1041
merge
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:29:45 +0100] rev 1040
alpha5 pseudo-injective
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:31:58 +0100] rev 1039
fixed proofs in Abs.thy
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:13:22 +0100] rev 1038
merged
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:06:10 +0100] rev 1037
added a first eqvt_tac which pushes permutations inside terms
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:11:23 +0100] rev 1036
The alpha-equivalence relation for let-rec. Not sure if correct...
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 11:47:37 +0100] rev 1035
Starting with a let-rec example.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 11:21:34 +0100] rev 1034
Minor
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 10:50:24 +0100] rev 1033
Some cleaning and eqvt proof
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 09:25:21 +0100] rev 1032
The trm1_support lemma explicitly and stated a strong induction principle.