Mon, 01 Feb 2010 10:00:03 +0100 slight tuning
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Mon, 01 Feb 2010 10:00:03 +0100] rev 1000
slight tuning
Mon, 01 Feb 2010 09:47:46 +0100 renamed function according to the name of the constant
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Mon, 01 Feb 2010 09:47:46 +0100] rev 999
renamed function according to the name of the constant
Mon, 01 Feb 2010 09:04:22 +0100 fixed problem with Bex1_rel renaming
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Mon, 01 Feb 2010 09:04:22 +0100] rev 998
fixed problem with Bex1_rel renaming
Mon, 01 Feb 2010 09:56:32 +0100 Ported LF to the generic lambda and solved the simpler _supp cases.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Mon, 01 Feb 2010 09:56:32 +0100] rev 997
Ported LF to the generic lambda and solved the simpler _supp cases.
Sat, 30 Jan 2010 12:12:52 +0100 merged
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Sat, 30 Jan 2010 12:12:52 +0100] rev 996
merged
Sat, 30 Jan 2010 11:44:25 +0100 introduced a generic alpha (but not sure whether it is helpful)
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Sat, 30 Jan 2010 11:44:25 +0100] rev 995
introduced a generic alpha (but not sure whether it is helpful)
Fri, 29 Jan 2010 19:42:07 +0100 More in the LF example in the new nominal way, all is clear until support.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Fri, 29 Jan 2010 19:42:07 +0100] rev 994
More in the LF example in the new nominal way, all is clear until support.
Fri, 29 Jan 2010 13:47:05 +0100 Fixed the induction problem + some more proofs.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Fri, 29 Jan 2010 13:47:05 +0100] rev 993
Fixed the induction problem + some more proofs.
Fri, 29 Jan 2010 12:16:08 +0100 equivariance of rfv and alpha.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Fri, 29 Jan 2010 12:16:08 +0100] rev 992
equivariance of rfv and alpha.
Fri, 29 Jan 2010 10:13:07 +0100 Added the experiments with fun and function.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Fri, 29 Jan 2010 10:13:07 +0100] rev 991
Added the experiments with fun and function.
Fri, 29 Jan 2010 07:09:52 +0100 now also final step is proved - the supp of lambdas is now completely characterised
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Fri, 29 Jan 2010 07:09:52 +0100] rev 990
now also final step is proved - the supp of lambdas is now completely characterised
Fri, 29 Jan 2010 00:22:00 +0100 the supp of a lambda can now be characterised, *provided* the notion of free variables coincides with support on lambda terms
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Fri, 29 Jan 2010 00:22:00 +0100] rev 989
the supp of a lambda can now be characterised, *provided* the notion of free variables coincides with support on lambda terms
Thu, 28 Jan 2010 23:47:02 +0100 improved the proof slightly by defining alpha as a function and completely characterised the equality between two abstractions
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Thu, 28 Jan 2010 23:47:02 +0100] rev 988
improved the proof slightly by defining alpha as a function and completely characterised the equality between two abstractions
Thu, 28 Jan 2010 23:36:58 +0100 merged
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Thu, 28 Jan 2010 23:36:58 +0100] rev 987
merged
Thu, 28 Jan 2010 23:36:38 +0100 general abstraction operator and complete characterisation of its support and freshness
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Thu, 28 Jan 2010 23:36:38 +0100] rev 986
general abstraction operator and complete characterisation of its support and freshness
Thu, 28 Jan 2010 19:23:55 +0100 Ported existing part of LF to new permutations and alphas.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Thu, 28 Jan 2010 19:23:55 +0100] rev 985
Ported existing part of LF to new permutations and alphas.
Thu, 28 Jan 2010 15:47:35 +0100 attempt of a general abstraction operator
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Thu, 28 Jan 2010 15:47:35 +0100] rev 984
attempt of a general abstraction operator
Thu, 28 Jan 2010 14:20:26 +0100 attempt to prove equivalence between alpha definitions
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Thu, 28 Jan 2010 14:20:26 +0100] rev 983
attempt to prove equivalence between alpha definitions
Thu, 28 Jan 2010 12:28:50 +0100 End of renaming.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Thu, 28 Jan 2010 12:28:50 +0100] rev 982
End of renaming.
Thu, 28 Jan 2010 12:25:38 +0100 Minor when looking at lam.distinct and lam.inject
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Thu, 28 Jan 2010 12:25:38 +0100] rev 981
Minor when looking at lam.distinct and lam.inject
Thu, 28 Jan 2010 12:24:49 +0100 Renamed Bexeq to Bex1_rel
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Thu, 28 Jan 2010 12:24:49 +0100] rev 980
Renamed Bexeq to Bex1_rel
Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:52:10 +0100 Substracting bounds from free variables.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:52:10 +0100] rev 979
Substracting bounds from free variables.
Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:26:36 +0100 Improper interface for datatype and function packages and proper interface lateron.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:26:36 +0100] rev 978
Improper interface for datatype and function packages and proper interface lateron.
Thu, 28 Jan 2010 09:28:20 +0100 merged
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Thu, 28 Jan 2010 09:28:20 +0100] rev 977
merged
Thu, 28 Jan 2010 09:28:06 +0100 minor
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Thu, 28 Jan 2010 09:28:06 +0100] rev 976
minor
Thu, 28 Jan 2010 01:24:09 +0100 test about supp/freshness for lam (old proofs work in principle - for single binders)
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Thu, 28 Jan 2010 01:24:09 +0100] rev 975
test about supp/freshness for lam (old proofs work in principle - for single binders)
Thu, 28 Jan 2010 08:13:39 +0100 Recommited the changes for nitpick
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Thu, 28 Jan 2010 08:13:39 +0100] rev 974
Recommited the changes for nitpick
Wed, 27 Jan 2010 18:26:01 +0100 Correct types which fixes the printing.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 27 Jan 2010 18:26:01 +0100] rev 973
Correct types which fixes the printing.
Wed, 27 Jan 2010 18:06:14 +0100 fv for subterms
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 27 Jan 2010 18:06:14 +0100] rev 972
fv for subterms
Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:39:13 +0100 Fix the problem with later examples. Maybe need to go back to textual specifications.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:39:13 +0100] rev 971
Fix the problem with later examples. Maybe need to go back to textual specifications.
Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:18:30 +0100 Some processing of variables in constructors to get free variables.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:18:30 +0100] rev 970
Some processing of variables in constructors to get free variables.
Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:40:16 +0100 Parsing of the input as terms and types, and passing them as such to the function package.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:40:16 +0100] rev 969
Parsing of the input as terms and types, and passing them as such to the function package.
Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:07:49 +0100 Undid the parsing, as it is not possible with thy->lthy interaction.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:07:49 +0100] rev 968
Undid the parsing, as it is not possible with thy->lthy interaction.
Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:57:11 +0100 merge
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:57:11 +0100] rev 967
merge
Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:56:58 +0100 Some cleaning of thy vs lthy vs context.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:56:58 +0100] rev 966
Some cleaning of thy vs lthy vs context.
Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:06:34 +0100 merged
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:06:34 +0100] rev 965
merged
Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:06:17 +0100 tuned comment
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:06:17 +0100] rev 964
tuned comment
Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:05:42 +0100 completely ported
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:05:42 +0100] rev 963
completely ported
Wed, 27 Jan 2010 13:44:05 +0100 Another string in the specification.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 27 Jan 2010 13:44:05 +0100] rev 962
Another string in the specification.
Wed, 27 Jan 2010 13:32:28 +0100 Variable takes a 'name'.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 27 Jan 2010 13:32:28 +0100] rev 961
Variable takes a 'name'.
Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:21:40 +0100 merge
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:21:40 +0100] rev 960
merge
Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:19:58 +0100 When commenting discovered a missing case of Babs->Abs regularization.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:19:58 +0100] rev 959
When commenting discovered a missing case of Babs->Abs regularization.
Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:19:21 +0100 merged
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:19:21 +0100] rev 958
merged
Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:19:00 +0100 mostly ported Terms.thy to new Nominal
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:19:00 +0100] rev 957
mostly ported Terms.thy to new Nominal
Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:06:43 +0100 merge
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:06:43 +0100] rev 956
merge
Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:06:24 +0100 Commenting regularize
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:06:24 +0100] rev 955
Commenting regularize
Wed, 27 Jan 2010 11:48:04 +0100 very rough example file for how nominal2 specification can be parsed
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Wed, 27 Jan 2010 11:48:04 +0100] rev 954
very rough example file for how nominal2 specification can be parsed
Wed, 27 Jan 2010 11:31:16 +0100 reordered cases in regularize (will be merged into two cases)
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Wed, 27 Jan 2010 11:31:16 +0100] rev 953
reordered cases in regularize (will be merged into two cases)
Wed, 27 Jan 2010 08:41:42 +0100 use of equiv_relation_chk in quotient_term
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Wed, 27 Jan 2010 08:41:42 +0100] rev 952
use of equiv_relation_chk in quotient_term
Wed, 27 Jan 2010 08:20:31 +0100 some slight tuning
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Wed, 27 Jan 2010 08:20:31 +0100] rev 951
some slight tuning
Wed, 27 Jan 2010 07:49:43 +0100 added Terms to Nominal - Instantiation of two types does not work (ask Florian)
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Wed, 27 Jan 2010 07:49:43 +0100] rev 950
added Terms to Nominal - Instantiation of two types does not work (ask Florian)
Wed, 27 Jan 2010 07:45:01 +0100 added another example with indirect recursion over lists
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Wed, 27 Jan 2010 07:45:01 +0100] rev 949
added another example with indirect recursion over lists
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 20:12:41 +0100 just moved obsolete material into Attic
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Tue, 26 Jan 2010 20:12:41 +0100] rev 948
just moved obsolete material into Attic
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 20:07:50 +0100 added an LamEx example together with the new nominal infrastructure
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Tue, 26 Jan 2010 20:07:50 +0100] rev 947
added an LamEx example together with the new nominal infrastructure
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 16:30:51 +0100 Bex1_Bexeq_regular.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 26 Jan 2010 16:30:51 +0100] rev 946
Bex1_Bexeq_regular.
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 15:59:04 +0100 Hom Theorem with exists unique
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 26 Jan 2010 15:59:04 +0100] rev 945
Hom Theorem with exists unique
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 14:48:25 +0100 2 cases for regularize with split, lemmas with split now lift.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 26 Jan 2010 14:48:25 +0100] rev 944
2 cases for regularize with split, lemmas with split now lift.
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 14:08:47 +0100 Simpler statement that has the problem.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 26 Jan 2010 14:08:47 +0100] rev 943
Simpler statement that has the problem.
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 13:58:28 +0100 Found a term that does not regularize.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 26 Jan 2010 13:58:28 +0100] rev 942
Found a term that does not regularize.
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 13:53:56 +0100 A triple is still ok.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 26 Jan 2010 13:53:56 +0100] rev 941
A triple is still ok.
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 13:38:42 +0100 Combined the simpsets in clean_tac and updated the comment. Now cleaning of splits does work.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 26 Jan 2010 13:38:42 +0100] rev 940
Combined the simpsets in clean_tac and updated the comment. Now cleaning of splits does work.
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 12:24:23 +0100 Changed the lambda_prs_simple_conv to use id_apply, now last eq_reflection can be removed from id_simps.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 26 Jan 2010 12:24:23 +0100] rev 939
Changed the lambda_prs_simple_conv to use id_apply, now last eq_reflection can be removed from id_simps.
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 12:06:47 +0100 Sigma cleaning works with split_prs (still manual proof).
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 26 Jan 2010 12:06:47 +0100] rev 938
Sigma cleaning works with split_prs (still manual proof).
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 11:13:08 +0100 tuned
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Tue, 26 Jan 2010 11:13:08 +0100] rev 937
tuned
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 10:53:44 +0100 merged
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Tue, 26 Jan 2010 10:53:44 +0100] rev 936
merged
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 01:42:46 +0100 cleaning of QuotProd; a little cleaning of QuotList
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Tue, 26 Jan 2010 01:42:46 +0100] rev 935
cleaning of QuotProd; a little cleaning of QuotList
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 01:00:35 +0100 added prs and rsp lemmas for Inl and Inr
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Tue, 26 Jan 2010 01:00:35 +0100] rev 934
added prs and rsp lemmas for Inl and Inr
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 00:47:40 +0100 used split_option_all lemma
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Tue, 26 Jan 2010 00:47:40 +0100] rev 933
used split_option_all lemma
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 00:18:48 +0100 used the internal Option.map instead of custom option_map
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Tue, 26 Jan 2010 00:18:48 +0100] rev 932
used the internal Option.map instead of custom option_map
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 09:54:43 +0100 Generalized split_prs and split_rsp
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 26 Jan 2010 09:54:43 +0100] rev 931
Generalized split_prs and split_rsp
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 09:28:32 +0100 All eq_reflections apart from the one of 'id_apply' can be removed.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 26 Jan 2010 09:28:32 +0100] rev 930
All eq_reflections apart from the one of 'id_apply' can be removed.
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 08:55:55 +0100 continued
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 26 Jan 2010 08:55:55 +0100] rev 929
continued
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 08:09:22 +0100 More eqreflection/equiv cleaning.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 26 Jan 2010 08:09:22 +0100] rev 928
More eqreflection/equiv cleaning.
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 07:42:52 +0100 more eq_reflection & other cleaning.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 26 Jan 2010 07:42:52 +0100] rev 927
more eq_reflection & other cleaning.
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 07:14:10 +0100 Removing more eq_reflections.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 26 Jan 2010 07:14:10 +0100] rev 926
Removing more eq_reflections.
Mon, 25 Jan 2010 20:47:20 +0100 ids *cannot* be object equalities
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Mon, 25 Jan 2010 20:47:20 +0100] rev 925
ids *cannot* be object equalities
Mon, 25 Jan 2010 20:35:42 +0100 re-inserted lemma in QuotList
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Mon, 25 Jan 2010 20:35:42 +0100] rev 924
re-inserted lemma in QuotList
Mon, 25 Jan 2010 19:52:53 +0100 added prs and rsp lemmas for Some and None
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Mon, 25 Jan 2010 19:52:53 +0100] rev 923
added prs and rsp lemmas for Some and None
Mon, 25 Jan 2010 19:14:46 +0100 tuned proofs (mainly in QuotProd)
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Mon, 25 Jan 2010 19:14:46 +0100] rev 922
tuned proofs (mainly in QuotProd)
Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:52:22 +0100 properly commented out the "unused lemmas section" and moved actually used lemmas elsewhere; added two minor items to the TODO list
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:52:22 +0100] rev 921
properly commented out the "unused lemmas section" and moved actually used lemmas elsewhere; added two minor items to the TODO list
Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:13:44 +0100 renamed QuotScript to QuotBase
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:13:44 +0100] rev 920
renamed QuotScript to QuotBase
Mon, 25 Jan 2010 17:53:08 +0100 cleaned some theorems
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Mon, 25 Jan 2010 17:53:08 +0100] rev 919
cleaned some theorems
Sun, 24 Jan 2010 23:41:27 +0100 test with splits
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Sun, 24 Jan 2010 23:41:27 +0100] rev 918
test with splits
Sat, 23 Jan 2010 17:25:18 +0100 The alpha equivalence relations for structures in 'Terms'
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Sat, 23 Jan 2010 17:25:18 +0100] rev 917
The alpha equivalence relations for structures in 'Terms'
Sat, 23 Jan 2010 15:41:54 +0100 More experiments with defining the homomorphism directly, lifting of 'distinct' and of 'exhaust'.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Sat, 23 Jan 2010 15:41:54 +0100] rev 916
More experiments with defining the homomorphism directly, lifting of 'distinct' and of 'exhaust'.
Sat, 23 Jan 2010 07:22:27 +0100 Trying to define hom for the lifted type directly.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Sat, 23 Jan 2010 07:22:27 +0100] rev 915
Trying to define hom for the lifted type directly.
Fri, 22 Jan 2010 17:44:46 +0100 Proper alpha equivalence for Sigma calculus.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Fri, 22 Jan 2010 17:44:46 +0100] rev 914
Proper alpha equivalence for Sigma calculus.
Thu, 21 Jan 2010 19:52:46 +0100 Changed fun_map and rel_map to definitions.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Thu, 21 Jan 2010 19:52:46 +0100] rev 913
Changed fun_map and rel_map to definitions.
Thu, 21 Jan 2010 12:50:43 +0100 Lifted Peter's Sigma lemma with Ex1.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Thu, 21 Jan 2010 12:50:43 +0100] rev 912
Lifted Peter's Sigma lemma with Ex1.
Thu, 21 Jan 2010 12:03:47 +0100 Automatic injection of Bexeq
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Thu, 21 Jan 2010 12:03:47 +0100] rev 911
Automatic injection of Bexeq
Thu, 21 Jan 2010 11:11:22 +0100 Automatic cleaning of Bexeq<->Ex1 theorems.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Thu, 21 Jan 2010 11:11:22 +0100] rev 910
Automatic cleaning of Bexeq<->Ex1 theorems.
Thu, 21 Jan 2010 10:55:09 +0100 Using Bexeq_rsp, and manually lifted lemma with Ex1.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Thu, 21 Jan 2010 10:55:09 +0100] rev 909
Using Bexeq_rsp, and manually lifted lemma with Ex1.
Thu, 21 Jan 2010 09:55:05 +0100 Bexeq definition, Ex1_prs lemma, Bex1_rsp lemma, compiles.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Thu, 21 Jan 2010 09:55:05 +0100] rev 908
Bexeq definition, Ex1_prs lemma, Bex1_rsp lemma, compiles.
Thu, 21 Jan 2010 09:02:04 +0100 The missing rule.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Thu, 21 Jan 2010 09:02:04 +0100] rev 907
The missing rule.
Thu, 21 Jan 2010 07:38:34 +0100 Ex1 -> Bex1 Regularization, Preparing Exeq.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Thu, 21 Jan 2010 07:38:34 +0100] rev 906
Ex1 -> Bex1 Regularization, Preparing Exeq.
Wed, 20 Jan 2010 16:50:31 +0100 Added the Sigma Calculus example
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 20 Jan 2010 16:50:31 +0100] rev 905
Added the Sigma Calculus example
Wed, 20 Jan 2010 16:44:31 +0100 Better error messages for non matching quantifiers.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 20 Jan 2010 16:44:31 +0100] rev 904
Better error messages for non matching quantifiers.
Wed, 20 Jan 2010 12:33:19 +0100 Statement of term1_hom_rsp
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 20 Jan 2010 12:33:19 +0100] rev 903
Statement of term1_hom_rsp
Wed, 20 Jan 2010 12:20:18 +0100 proved that the function is a function
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Wed, 20 Jan 2010 12:20:18 +0100] rev 902
proved that the function is a function
Wed, 20 Jan 2010 11:30:32 +0100 term1_hom as a function
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 20 Jan 2010 11:30:32 +0100] rev 901
term1_hom as a function
Tue, 19 Jan 2010 18:17:42 +0100 A version of hom with quantifiers.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 19 Jan 2010 18:17:42 +0100] rev 900
A version of hom with quantifiers.
Sun, 17 Jan 2010 02:24:15 +0100 added permutation functions for the raw calculi
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Sun, 17 Jan 2010 02:24:15 +0100] rev 899
added permutation functions for the raw calculi
Sat, 16 Jan 2010 04:23:27 +0100 fixed broken (partial) proof
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Sat, 16 Jan 2010 04:23:27 +0100] rev 898
fixed broken (partial) proof
Sat, 16 Jan 2010 03:56:00 +0100 used "new" alpha-equivalence relation (according to new scheme); proved equivalence theorems and so on
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Sat, 16 Jan 2010 03:56:00 +0100] rev 897
used "new" alpha-equivalence relation (according to new scheme); proved equivalence theorems and so on
Sat, 16 Jan 2010 02:09:38 +0100 liftin and lifing_tac can now lift several "and"-separated goals at once; the raw-theorems have to be given in the order of goals
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Sat, 16 Jan 2010 02:09:38 +0100] rev 896
liftin and lifing_tac can now lift several "and"-separated goals at once; the raw-theorems have to be given in the order of goals
Fri, 15 Jan 2010 17:09:36 +0100 added a partial proof under which conditions rlam_rec Respects alpha...I guess something like this is true; this means the Hom lemmas need to have preconditions
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Fri, 15 Jan 2010 17:09:36 +0100] rev 895
added a partial proof under which conditions rlam_rec Respects alpha...I guess something like this is true; this means the Hom lemmas need to have preconditions
Fri, 15 Jan 2010 16:13:49 +0100 tried to witness the hom-lemma with the recursion combinator from rlam....does not work yet completely
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Fri, 15 Jan 2010 16:13:49 +0100] rev 894
tried to witness the hom-lemma with the recursion combinator from rlam....does not work yet completely
Fri, 15 Jan 2010 15:56:25 +0100 merged
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Fri, 15 Jan 2010 15:56:25 +0100] rev 893
merged
Fri, 15 Jan 2010 15:56:06 +0100 added free_variable function (do not know about the algorithm yet)
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Fri, 15 Jan 2010 15:56:06 +0100] rev 892
added free_variable function (do not know about the algorithm yet)
Fri, 15 Jan 2010 15:51:25 +0100 hom lifted to hom', so it is true. Infrastructure for partially regularized quantifiers. Nicer errors for regularize.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Fri, 15 Jan 2010 15:51:25 +0100] rev 891
hom lifted to hom', so it is true. Infrastructure for partially regularized quantifiers. Nicer errors for regularize.
Fri, 15 Jan 2010 12:17:30 +0100 slight tuning of relation_error
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Fri, 15 Jan 2010 12:17:30 +0100] rev 890
slight tuning of relation_error
Fri, 15 Jan 2010 11:04:21 +0100 Appropriate respects and a statement of the lifted hom lemma
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Fri, 15 Jan 2010 11:04:21 +0100] rev 889
Appropriate respects and a statement of the lifted hom lemma
Fri, 15 Jan 2010 10:48:49 +0100 recursion-hom for lambda
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Fri, 15 Jan 2010 10:48:49 +0100] rev 888
recursion-hom for lambda
Fri, 15 Jan 2010 10:36:48 +0100 Incorrect version of the homomorphism lemma
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Fri, 15 Jan 2010 10:36:48 +0100] rev 887
Incorrect version of the homomorphism lemma
Thu, 14 Jan 2010 23:51:17 +0100 trivial
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Thu, 14 Jan 2010 23:51:17 +0100] rev 886
trivial
Thu, 14 Jan 2010 23:48:31 +0100 tuned quotient_typ.ML
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Thu, 14 Jan 2010 23:48:31 +0100] rev 885
tuned quotient_typ.ML
Thu, 14 Jan 2010 23:17:21 +0100 tuned quotient_def.ML and cleaned somewhat LamEx.thy
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Thu, 14 Jan 2010 23:17:21 +0100] rev 884
tuned quotient_def.ML and cleaned somewhat LamEx.thy
Thu, 14 Jan 2010 19:03:08 +0100 a few more lemmas...except supp of lambda-abstractions
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Thu, 14 Jan 2010 19:03:08 +0100] rev 883
a few more lemmas...except supp of lambda-abstractions
Thu, 14 Jan 2010 18:41:50 +0100 removed one sorry
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Thu, 14 Jan 2010 18:41:50 +0100] rev 882
removed one sorry
Thu, 14 Jan 2010 18:35:38 +0100 nearly all of the proof
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Thu, 14 Jan 2010 18:35:38 +0100] rev 881
nearly all of the proof
(0) -120 +120 +1000 tip