--- /dev/null Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
+++ b/Nominal/Nominal2_Base.thy Sun Nov 14 16:34:47 2010 +0000
@@ -0,0 +1,2024 @@
+(* Title: Nominal2_Base
+ Authors: Brian Huffman, Christian Urban
+
+ Basic definitions and lemma infrastructure for
+ Nominal Isabelle.
+*)
+theory Nominal2_Base
+imports Main Infinite_Set
+ "~~/src/HOL/Quotient_Examples/FSet"
+uses ("nominal_library.ML")
+ ("nominal_atoms.ML")
+begin
+
+section {* Atoms and Sorts *}
+
+text {* A simple implementation for atom_sorts is strings. *}
+(* types atom_sort = string *)
+
+text {* To deal with Church-like binding we use trees of
+ strings as sorts. *}
+
+datatype atom_sort = Sort "string" "atom_sort list"
+
+datatype atom = Atom atom_sort nat
+
+
+text {* Basic projection function. *}
+
+primrec
+ sort_of :: "atom \<Rightarrow> atom_sort"
+where
+ "sort_of (Atom s i) = s"
+
+primrec
+ nat_of :: "atom \<Rightarrow> nat"
+where
+ "nat_of (Atom s n) = n"
+
+
+text {* There are infinitely many atoms of each sort. *}
+lemma INFM_sort_of_eq:
+ shows "INFM a. sort_of a = s"
+proof -
+ have "INFM i. sort_of (Atom s i) = s" by simp
+ moreover have "inj (Atom s)" by (simp add: inj_on_def)
+ ultimately show "INFM a. sort_of a = s" by (rule INFM_inj)
+qed
+
+lemma infinite_sort_of_eq:
+ shows "infinite {a. sort_of a = s}"
+ using INFM_sort_of_eq unfolding INFM_iff_infinite .
+
+lemma atom_infinite [simp]:
+ shows "infinite (UNIV :: atom set)"
+ using subset_UNIV infinite_sort_of_eq
+ by (rule infinite_super)
+
+lemma obtain_atom:
+ fixes X :: "atom set"
+ assumes X: "finite X"
+ obtains a where "a \<notin> X" "sort_of a = s"
+proof -
+ from X have "MOST a. a \<notin> X"
+ unfolding MOST_iff_cofinite by simp
+ with INFM_sort_of_eq
+ have "INFM a. sort_of a = s \<and> a \<notin> X"
+ by (rule INFM_conjI)
+ then obtain a where "a \<notin> X" "sort_of a = s"
+ by (auto elim: INFM_E)
+ then show ?thesis ..
+qed
+
+lemma atom_components_eq_iff:
+ fixes a b :: atom
+ shows "a = b \<longleftrightarrow> sort_of a = sort_of b \<and> nat_of a = nat_of b"
+ by (induct a, induct b, simp)
+
+section {* Sort-Respecting Permutations *}
+
+typedef perm =
+ "{f. bij f \<and> finite {a. f a \<noteq> a} \<and> (\<forall>a. sort_of (f a) = sort_of a)}"
+proof
+ show "id \<in> ?perm" by simp
+qed
+
+lemma permI:
+ assumes "bij f" and "MOST x. f x = x" and "\<And>a. sort_of (f a) = sort_of a"
+ shows "f \<in> perm"
+ using assms unfolding perm_def MOST_iff_cofinite by simp
+
+lemma perm_is_bij: "f \<in> perm \<Longrightarrow> bij f"
+ unfolding perm_def by simp
+
+lemma perm_is_finite: "f \<in> perm \<Longrightarrow> finite {a. f a \<noteq> a}"
+ unfolding perm_def by simp
+
+lemma perm_is_sort_respecting: "f \<in> perm \<Longrightarrow> sort_of (f a) = sort_of a"
+ unfolding perm_def by simp
+
+lemma perm_MOST: "f \<in> perm \<Longrightarrow> MOST x. f x = x"
+ unfolding perm_def MOST_iff_cofinite by simp
+
+lemma perm_id: "id \<in> perm"
+ unfolding perm_def by simp
+
+lemma perm_comp:
+ assumes f: "f \<in> perm" and g: "g \<in> perm"
+ shows "(f \<circ> g) \<in> perm"
+apply (rule permI)
+apply (rule bij_comp)
+apply (rule perm_is_bij [OF g])
+apply (rule perm_is_bij [OF f])
+apply (rule MOST_rev_mp [OF perm_MOST [OF g]])
+apply (rule MOST_rev_mp [OF perm_MOST [OF f]])
+apply (simp)
+apply (simp add: perm_is_sort_respecting [OF f])
+apply (simp add: perm_is_sort_respecting [OF g])
+done
+
+lemma perm_inv:
+ assumes f: "f \<in> perm"
+ shows "(inv f) \<in> perm"
+apply (rule permI)
+apply (rule bij_imp_bij_inv)
+apply (rule perm_is_bij [OF f])
+apply (rule MOST_mono [OF perm_MOST [OF f]])
+apply (erule subst, rule inv_f_f)
+apply (rule bij_is_inj [OF perm_is_bij [OF f]])
+apply (rule perm_is_sort_respecting [OF f, THEN sym, THEN trans])
+apply (simp add: surj_f_inv_f [OF bij_is_surj [OF perm_is_bij [OF f]]])
+done
+
+lemma bij_Rep_perm: "bij (Rep_perm p)"
+ using Rep_perm [of p] unfolding perm_def by simp
+
+lemma finite_Rep_perm: "finite {a. Rep_perm p a \<noteq> a}"
+ using Rep_perm [of p] unfolding perm_def by simp
+
+lemma sort_of_Rep_perm: "sort_of (Rep_perm p a) = sort_of a"
+ using Rep_perm [of p] unfolding perm_def by simp
+
+lemma Rep_perm_ext:
+ "Rep_perm p1 = Rep_perm p2 \<Longrightarrow> p1 = p2"
+ by (simp add: fun_eq_iff Rep_perm_inject [symmetric])
+
+instance perm :: size ..
+
+subsection {* Permutations form a group *}
+
+instantiation perm :: group_add
+begin
+
+definition
+ "0 = Abs_perm id"
+
+definition
+ "- p = Abs_perm (inv (Rep_perm p))"
+
+definition
+ "p + q = Abs_perm (Rep_perm p \<circ> Rep_perm q)"
+
+definition
+ "(p1::perm) - p2 = p1 + - p2"
+
+lemma Rep_perm_0: "Rep_perm 0 = id"
+ unfolding zero_perm_def
+ by (simp add: Abs_perm_inverse perm_id)
+
+lemma Rep_perm_add:
+ "Rep_perm (p1 + p2) = Rep_perm p1 \<circ> Rep_perm p2"
+ unfolding plus_perm_def
+ by (simp add: Abs_perm_inverse perm_comp Rep_perm)
+
+lemma Rep_perm_uminus:
+ "Rep_perm (- p) = inv (Rep_perm p)"
+ unfolding uminus_perm_def
+ by (simp add: Abs_perm_inverse perm_inv Rep_perm)
+
+instance
+apply default
+unfolding Rep_perm_inject [symmetric]
+unfolding minus_perm_def
+unfolding Rep_perm_add
+unfolding Rep_perm_uminus
+unfolding Rep_perm_0
+by (simp_all add: o_assoc inv_o_cancel [OF bij_is_inj [OF bij_Rep_perm]])
+
+end
+
+
+section {* Implementation of swappings *}
+
+definition
+ swap :: "atom \<Rightarrow> atom \<Rightarrow> perm" ("'(_ \<rightleftharpoons> _')")
+where
+ "(a \<rightleftharpoons> b) =
+ Abs_perm (if sort_of a = sort_of b
+ then (\<lambda>c. if a = c then b else if b = c then a else c)
+ else id)"
+
+lemma Rep_perm_swap:
+ "Rep_perm (a \<rightleftharpoons> b) =
+ (if sort_of a = sort_of b
+ then (\<lambda>c. if a = c then b else if b = c then a else c)
+ else id)"
+unfolding swap_def
+apply (rule Abs_perm_inverse)
+apply (rule permI)
+apply (auto simp add: bij_def inj_on_def surj_def)[1]
+apply (rule MOST_rev_mp [OF MOST_neq(1) [of a]])
+apply (rule MOST_rev_mp [OF MOST_neq(1) [of b]])
+apply (simp)
+apply (simp)
+done
+
+lemmas Rep_perm_simps =
+ Rep_perm_0
+ Rep_perm_add
+ Rep_perm_uminus
+ Rep_perm_swap
+
+lemma swap_different_sorts [simp]:
+ "sort_of a \<noteq> sort_of b \<Longrightarrow> (a \<rightleftharpoons> b) = 0"
+ by (rule Rep_perm_ext) (simp add: Rep_perm_simps)
+
+lemma swap_cancel:
+ "(a \<rightleftharpoons> b) + (a \<rightleftharpoons> b) = 0"
+ by (rule Rep_perm_ext)
+ (simp add: Rep_perm_simps fun_eq_iff)
+
+lemma swap_self [simp]:
+ "(a \<rightleftharpoons> a) = 0"
+ by (rule Rep_perm_ext, simp add: Rep_perm_simps fun_eq_iff)
+
+lemma minus_swap [simp]:
+ "- (a \<rightleftharpoons> b) = (a \<rightleftharpoons> b)"
+ by (rule minus_unique [OF swap_cancel])
+
+lemma swap_commute:
+ "(a \<rightleftharpoons> b) = (b \<rightleftharpoons> a)"
+ by (rule Rep_perm_ext)
+ (simp add: Rep_perm_swap fun_eq_iff)
+
+lemma swap_triple:
+ assumes "a \<noteq> b" and "c \<noteq> b"
+ assumes "sort_of a = sort_of b" "sort_of b = sort_of c"
+ shows "(a \<rightleftharpoons> c) + (b \<rightleftharpoons> c) + (a \<rightleftharpoons> c) = (a \<rightleftharpoons> b)"
+ using assms
+ by (rule_tac Rep_perm_ext)
+ (auto simp add: Rep_perm_simps fun_eq_iff)
+
+
+section {* Permutation Types *}
+
+text {*
+ Infix syntax for @{text permute} has higher precedence than
+ addition, but lower than unary minus.
+*}
+
+class pt =
+ fixes permute :: "perm \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'a" ("_ \<bullet> _" [76, 75] 75)
+ assumes permute_zero [simp]: "0 \<bullet> x = x"
+ assumes permute_plus [simp]: "(p + q) \<bullet> x = p \<bullet> (q \<bullet> x)"
+begin
+
+lemma permute_diff [simp]:
+ shows "(p - q) \<bullet> x = p \<bullet> - q \<bullet> x"
+ unfolding diff_minus by simp
+
+lemma permute_minus_cancel [simp]:
+ shows "p \<bullet> - p \<bullet> x = x"
+ and "- p \<bullet> p \<bullet> x = x"
+ unfolding permute_plus [symmetric] by simp_all
+
+lemma permute_swap_cancel [simp]:
+ shows "(a \<rightleftharpoons> b) \<bullet> (a \<rightleftharpoons> b) \<bullet> x = x"
+ unfolding permute_plus [symmetric]
+ by (simp add: swap_cancel)
+
+lemma permute_swap_cancel2 [simp]:
+ shows "(a \<rightleftharpoons> b) \<bullet> (b \<rightleftharpoons> a) \<bullet> x = x"
+ unfolding permute_plus [symmetric]
+ by (simp add: swap_commute)
+
+lemma inj_permute [simp]:
+ shows "inj (permute p)"
+ by (rule inj_on_inverseI)
+ (rule permute_minus_cancel)
+
+lemma surj_permute [simp]:
+ shows "surj (permute p)"
+ by (rule surjI, rule permute_minus_cancel)
+
+lemma bij_permute [simp]:
+ shows "bij (permute p)"
+ by (rule bijI [OF inj_permute surj_permute])
+
+lemma inv_permute:
+ shows "inv (permute p) = permute (- p)"
+ by (rule inv_equality) (simp_all)
+
+lemma permute_minus:
+ shows "permute (- p) = inv (permute p)"
+ by (simp add: inv_permute)
+
+lemma permute_eq_iff [simp]:
+ shows "p \<bullet> x = p \<bullet> y \<longleftrightarrow> x = y"
+ by (rule inj_permute [THEN inj_eq])
+
+end
+
+subsection {* Permutations for atoms *}
+
+instantiation atom :: pt
+begin
+
+definition
+ "p \<bullet> a = (Rep_perm p) a"
+
+instance
+apply(default)
+apply(simp_all add: permute_atom_def Rep_perm_simps)
+done
+
+end
+
+lemma sort_of_permute [simp]:
+ shows "sort_of (p \<bullet> a) = sort_of a"
+ unfolding permute_atom_def by (rule sort_of_Rep_perm)
+
+lemma swap_atom:
+ shows "(a \<rightleftharpoons> b) \<bullet> c =
+ (if sort_of a = sort_of b
+ then (if c = a then b else if c = b then a else c) else c)"
+ unfolding permute_atom_def
+ by (simp add: Rep_perm_swap)
+
+lemma swap_atom_simps [simp]:
+ "sort_of a = sort_of b \<Longrightarrow> (a \<rightleftharpoons> b) \<bullet> a = b"
+ "sort_of a = sort_of b \<Longrightarrow> (a \<rightleftharpoons> b) \<bullet> b = a"
+ "c \<noteq> a \<Longrightarrow> c \<noteq> b \<Longrightarrow> (a \<rightleftharpoons> b) \<bullet> c = c"
+ unfolding swap_atom by simp_all
+
+lemma expand_perm_eq:
+ fixes p q :: "perm"
+ shows "p = q \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>a::atom. p \<bullet> a = q \<bullet> a)"
+ unfolding permute_atom_def
+ by (metis Rep_perm_ext ext)
+
+
+subsection {* Permutations for permutations *}
+
+instantiation perm :: pt
+begin
+
+definition
+ "p \<bullet> q = p + q - p"
+
+instance
+apply default
+apply (simp add: permute_perm_def)
+apply (simp add: permute_perm_def diff_minus minus_add add_assoc)
+done
+
+end
+
+lemma permute_self:
+ shows "p \<bullet> p = p"
+ unfolding permute_perm_def
+ by (simp add: diff_minus add_assoc)
+
+lemma permute_eqvt:
+ shows "p \<bullet> (q \<bullet> x) = (p \<bullet> q) \<bullet> (p \<bullet> x)"
+ unfolding permute_perm_def by simp
+
+lemma zero_perm_eqvt:
+ shows "p \<bullet> (0::perm) = 0"
+ unfolding permute_perm_def by simp
+
+lemma add_perm_eqvt:
+ fixes p p1 p2 :: perm
+ shows "p \<bullet> (p1 + p2) = p \<bullet> p1 + p \<bullet> p2"
+ unfolding permute_perm_def
+ by (simp add: expand_perm_eq)
+
+lemma swap_eqvt:
+ shows "p \<bullet> (a \<rightleftharpoons> b) = (p \<bullet> a \<rightleftharpoons> p \<bullet> b)"
+ unfolding permute_perm_def
+ by (auto simp add: swap_atom expand_perm_eq)
+
+lemma uminus_eqvt:
+ fixes p q::"perm"
+ shows "p \<bullet> (- q) = - (p \<bullet> q)"
+ unfolding permute_perm_def
+ by (simp add: diff_minus minus_add add_assoc)
+
+subsection {* Permutations for functions *}
+
+instantiation "fun" :: (pt, pt) pt
+begin
+
+definition
+ "p \<bullet> f = (\<lambda>x. p \<bullet> (f (- p \<bullet> x)))"
+
+instance
+apply default
+apply (simp add: permute_fun_def)
+apply (simp add: permute_fun_def minus_add)
+done
+
+end
+
+lemma permute_fun_app_eq:
+ shows "p \<bullet> (f x) = (p \<bullet> f) (p \<bullet> x)"
+ unfolding permute_fun_def by simp
+
+
+subsection {* Permutations for booleans *}
+
+instantiation bool :: pt
+begin
+
+definition "p \<bullet> (b::bool) = b"
+
+instance
+apply(default)
+apply(simp_all add: permute_bool_def)
+done
+
+end
+
+lemma Not_eqvt:
+ shows "p \<bullet> (\<not> A) = (\<not> (p \<bullet> A))"
+by (simp add: permute_bool_def)
+
+lemma conj_eqvt:
+ shows "p \<bullet> (A \<and> B) = ((p \<bullet> A) \<and> (p \<bullet> B))"
+ by (simp add: permute_bool_def)
+
+lemma imp_eqvt:
+ shows "p \<bullet> (A \<longrightarrow> B) = ((p \<bullet> A) \<longrightarrow> (p \<bullet> B))"
+ by (simp add: permute_bool_def)
+
+lemma ex_eqvt:
+ shows "p \<bullet> (\<exists>x. P x) = (\<exists>x. (p \<bullet> P) x)"
+ unfolding permute_fun_def permute_bool_def
+ by (auto, rule_tac x="p \<bullet> x" in exI, simp)
+
+lemma all_eqvt:
+ shows "p \<bullet> (\<forall>x. P x) = (\<forall>x. (p \<bullet> P) x)"
+ unfolding permute_fun_def permute_bool_def
+ by (auto, drule_tac x="p \<bullet> x" in spec, simp)
+
+lemma permute_boolE:
+ fixes P::"bool"
+ shows "p \<bullet> P \<Longrightarrow> P"
+ by (simp add: permute_bool_def)
+
+lemma permute_boolI:
+ fixes P::"bool"
+ shows "P \<Longrightarrow> p \<bullet> P"
+ by(simp add: permute_bool_def)
+
+subsection {* Permutations for sets *}
+
+lemma permute_set_eq:
+ fixes x::"'a::pt"
+ and p::"perm"
+ shows "(p \<bullet> X) = {p \<bullet> x | x. x \<in> X}"
+ unfolding permute_fun_def
+ unfolding permute_bool_def
+ apply(auto simp add: mem_def)
+ apply(rule_tac x="- p \<bullet> x" in exI)
+ apply(simp)
+ done
+
+lemma permute_set_eq_image:
+ shows "p \<bullet> X = permute p ` X"
+ unfolding permute_set_eq by auto
+
+lemma permute_set_eq_vimage:
+ shows "p \<bullet> X = permute (- p) -` X"
+ unfolding permute_fun_def permute_bool_def
+ unfolding vimage_def Collect_def mem_def ..
+
+lemma swap_set_not_in:
+ assumes a: "a \<notin> S" "b \<notin> S"
+ shows "(a \<rightleftharpoons> b) \<bullet> S = S"
+ unfolding permute_set_eq
+ using a by (auto simp add: swap_atom)
+
+lemma swap_set_in:
+ assumes a: "a \<in> S" "b \<notin> S" "sort_of a = sort_of b"
+ shows "(a \<rightleftharpoons> b) \<bullet> S \<noteq> S"
+ unfolding permute_set_eq
+ using a by (auto simp add: swap_atom)
+
+lemma mem_permute_iff:
+ shows "(p \<bullet> x) \<in> (p \<bullet> X) \<longleftrightarrow> x \<in> X"
+ unfolding mem_def permute_fun_def permute_bool_def
+ by simp
+
+lemma mem_eqvt:
+ shows "p \<bullet> (x \<in> A) \<longleftrightarrow> (p \<bullet> x) \<in> (p \<bullet> A)"
+ unfolding mem_def
+ by (simp add: permute_fun_app_eq)
+
+lemma empty_eqvt:
+ shows "p \<bullet> {} = {}"
+ unfolding empty_def Collect_def
+ by (simp add: permute_fun_def permute_bool_def)
+
+lemma insert_eqvt:
+ shows "p \<bullet> (insert x A) = insert (p \<bullet> x) (p \<bullet> A)"
+ unfolding permute_set_eq_image image_insert ..
+
+
+subsection {* Permutations for units *}
+
+instantiation unit :: pt
+begin
+
+definition "p \<bullet> (u::unit) = u"
+
+instance
+by (default) (simp_all add: permute_unit_def)
+
+end
+
+
+subsection {* Permutations for products *}
+
+instantiation prod :: (pt, pt) pt
+begin
+
+primrec
+ permute_prod
+where
+ Pair_eqvt: "p \<bullet> (x, y) = (p \<bullet> x, p \<bullet> y)"
+
+instance
+by default auto
+
+end
+
+subsection {* Permutations for sums *}
+
+instantiation sum :: (pt, pt) pt
+begin
+
+primrec
+ permute_sum
+where
+ "p \<bullet> (Inl x) = Inl (p \<bullet> x)"
+| "p \<bullet> (Inr y) = Inr (p \<bullet> y)"
+
+instance
+by (default) (case_tac [!] x, simp_all)
+
+end
+
+subsection {* Permutations for lists *}
+
+instantiation list :: (pt) pt
+begin
+
+primrec
+ permute_list
+where
+ "p \<bullet> [] = []"
+| "p \<bullet> (x # xs) = p \<bullet> x # p \<bullet> xs"
+
+instance
+by (default) (induct_tac [!] x, simp_all)
+
+end
+
+lemma set_eqvt:
+ shows "p \<bullet> (set xs) = set (p \<bullet> xs)"
+ by (induct xs) (simp_all add: empty_eqvt insert_eqvt)
+
+subsection {* Permutations for options *}
+
+instantiation option :: (pt) pt
+begin
+
+primrec
+ permute_option
+where
+ "p \<bullet> None = None"
+| "p \<bullet> (Some x) = Some (p \<bullet> x)"
+
+instance
+by (default) (induct_tac [!] x, simp_all)
+
+end
+
+
+subsection {* Permutations for fsets *}
+
+lemma permute_fset_rsp[quot_respect]:
+ shows "(op = ===> list_eq ===> list_eq) permute permute"
+ unfolding fun_rel_def
+ by (simp add: set_eqvt[symmetric])
+
+instantiation fset :: (pt) pt
+begin
+
+quotient_definition
+ "permute_fset :: perm \<Rightarrow> 'a fset \<Rightarrow> 'a fset"
+is
+ "permute :: perm \<Rightarrow> 'a list \<Rightarrow> 'a list"
+
+instance
+proof
+ fix x :: "'a fset" and p q :: "perm"
+ show "0 \<bullet> x = x" by (descending) (simp)
+ show "(p + q) \<bullet> x = p \<bullet> q \<bullet> x" by (descending) (simp)
+qed
+
+end
+
+lemma permute_fset [simp]:
+ fixes S::"('a::pt) fset"
+ shows "(p \<bullet> {||}) = ({||} ::('a::pt) fset)"
+ and "(p \<bullet> insert_fset x S) = insert_fset (p \<bullet> x) (p \<bullet> S)"
+ by (lifting permute_list.simps)
+
+
+
+subsection {* Permutations for @{typ char}, @{typ nat}, and @{typ int} *}
+
+instantiation char :: pt
+begin
+
+definition "p \<bullet> (c::char) = c"
+
+instance
+by (default) (simp_all add: permute_char_def)
+
+end
+
+instantiation nat :: pt
+begin
+
+definition "p \<bullet> (n::nat) = n"
+
+instance
+by (default) (simp_all add: permute_nat_def)
+
+end
+
+instantiation int :: pt
+begin
+
+definition "p \<bullet> (i::int) = i"
+
+instance
+by (default) (simp_all add: permute_int_def)
+
+end
+
+
+section {* Pure types *}
+
+text {* Pure types will have always empty support. *}
+
+class pure = pt +
+ assumes permute_pure: "p \<bullet> x = x"
+
+text {* Types @{typ unit} and @{typ bool} are pure. *}
+
+instance unit :: pure
+proof qed (rule permute_unit_def)
+
+instance bool :: pure
+proof qed (rule permute_bool_def)
+
+text {* Other type constructors preserve purity. *}
+
+instance "fun" :: (pure, pure) pure
+by default (simp add: permute_fun_def permute_pure)
+
+instance prod :: (pure, pure) pure
+by default (induct_tac x, simp add: permute_pure)
+
+instance sum :: (pure, pure) pure
+by default (induct_tac x, simp_all add: permute_pure)
+
+instance list :: (pure) pure
+by default (induct_tac x, simp_all add: permute_pure)
+
+instance option :: (pure) pure
+by default (induct_tac x, simp_all add: permute_pure)
+
+
+subsection {* Types @{typ char}, @{typ nat}, and @{typ int} *}
+
+instance char :: pure
+proof qed (rule permute_char_def)
+
+instance nat :: pure
+proof qed (rule permute_nat_def)
+
+instance int :: pure
+proof qed (rule permute_int_def)
+
+
+subsection {* Supp, Freshness and Supports *}
+
+context pt
+begin
+
+definition
+ supp :: "'a \<Rightarrow> atom set"
+where
+ "supp x = {a. infinite {b. (a \<rightleftharpoons> b) \<bullet> x \<noteq> x}}"
+
+end
+
+definition
+ fresh :: "atom \<Rightarrow> 'a::pt \<Rightarrow> bool" ("_ \<sharp> _" [55, 55] 55)
+where
+ "a \<sharp> x \<equiv> a \<notin> supp x"
+
+lemma supp_conv_fresh:
+ shows "supp x = {a. \<not> a \<sharp> x}"
+ unfolding fresh_def by simp
+
+lemma swap_rel_trans:
+ assumes "sort_of a = sort_of b"
+ assumes "sort_of b = sort_of c"
+ assumes "(a \<rightleftharpoons> c) \<bullet> x = x"
+ assumes "(b \<rightleftharpoons> c) \<bullet> x = x"
+ shows "(a \<rightleftharpoons> b) \<bullet> x = x"
+proof (cases)
+ assume "a = b \<or> c = b"
+ with assms show "(a \<rightleftharpoons> b) \<bullet> x = x" by auto
+next
+ assume *: "\<not> (a = b \<or> c = b)"
+ have "((a \<rightleftharpoons> c) + (b \<rightleftharpoons> c) + (a \<rightleftharpoons> c)) \<bullet> x = x"
+ using assms by simp
+ also have "(a \<rightleftharpoons> c) + (b \<rightleftharpoons> c) + (a \<rightleftharpoons> c) = (a \<rightleftharpoons> b)"
+ using assms * by (simp add: swap_triple)
+ finally show "(a \<rightleftharpoons> b) \<bullet> x = x" .
+qed
+
+lemma swap_fresh_fresh:
+ assumes a: "a \<sharp> x"
+ and b: "b \<sharp> x"
+ shows "(a \<rightleftharpoons> b) \<bullet> x = x"
+proof (cases)
+ assume asm: "sort_of a = sort_of b"
+ have "finite {c. (a \<rightleftharpoons> c) \<bullet> x \<noteq> x}" "finite {c. (b \<rightleftharpoons> c) \<bullet> x \<noteq> x}"
+ using a b unfolding fresh_def supp_def by simp_all
+ then have "finite ({c. (a \<rightleftharpoons> c) \<bullet> x \<noteq> x} \<union> {c. (b \<rightleftharpoons> c) \<bullet> x \<noteq> x})" by simp
+ then obtain c
+ where "(a \<rightleftharpoons> c) \<bullet> x = x" "(b \<rightleftharpoons> c) \<bullet> x = x" "sort_of c = sort_of b"
+ by (rule obtain_atom) (auto)
+ then show "(a \<rightleftharpoons> b) \<bullet> x = x" using asm by (rule_tac swap_rel_trans) (simp_all)
+next
+ assume "sort_of a \<noteq> sort_of b"
+ then show "(a \<rightleftharpoons> b) \<bullet> x = x" by simp
+qed
+
+
+subsection {* supp and fresh are equivariant *}
+
+lemma finite_Collect_bij:
+ assumes a: "bij f"
+ shows "finite {x. P (f x)} = finite {x. P x}"
+by (metis a finite_vimage_iff vimage_Collect_eq)
+
+lemma fresh_permute_iff:
+ shows "(p \<bullet> a) \<sharp> (p \<bullet> x) \<longleftrightarrow> a \<sharp> x"
+proof -
+ have "(p \<bullet> a) \<sharp> (p \<bullet> x) \<longleftrightarrow> finite {b. (p \<bullet> a \<rightleftharpoons> b) \<bullet> p \<bullet> x \<noteq> p \<bullet> x}"
+ unfolding fresh_def supp_def by simp
+ also have "\<dots> \<longleftrightarrow> finite {b. (p \<bullet> a \<rightleftharpoons> p \<bullet> b) \<bullet> p \<bullet> x \<noteq> p \<bullet> x}"
+ using bij_permute by (rule finite_Collect_bij[symmetric])
+ also have "\<dots> \<longleftrightarrow> finite {b. p \<bullet> (a \<rightleftharpoons> b) \<bullet> x \<noteq> p \<bullet> x}"
+ by (simp only: permute_eqvt [of p] swap_eqvt)
+ also have "\<dots> \<longleftrightarrow> finite {b. (a \<rightleftharpoons> b) \<bullet> x \<noteq> x}"
+ by (simp only: permute_eq_iff)
+ also have "\<dots> \<longleftrightarrow> a \<sharp> x"
+ unfolding fresh_def supp_def by simp
+ finally show "(p \<bullet> a) \<sharp> (p \<bullet> x) \<longleftrightarrow> a \<sharp> x" .
+qed
+
+lemma fresh_eqvt:
+ shows "p \<bullet> (a \<sharp> x) = (p \<bullet> a) \<sharp> (p \<bullet> x)"
+ unfolding permute_bool_def
+ by (simp add: fresh_permute_iff)
+
+lemma supp_eqvt:
+ fixes p :: "perm"
+ and x :: "'a::pt"
+ shows "p \<bullet> (supp x) = supp (p \<bullet> x)"
+ unfolding supp_conv_fresh
+ unfolding Collect_def
+ unfolding permute_fun_def
+ by (simp add: Not_eqvt fresh_eqvt)
+
+subsection {* supports *}
+
+definition
+ supports :: "atom set \<Rightarrow> 'a::pt \<Rightarrow> bool" (infixl "supports" 80)
+where
+ "S supports x \<equiv> \<forall>a b. (a \<notin> S \<and> b \<notin> S \<longrightarrow> (a \<rightleftharpoons> b) \<bullet> x = x)"
+
+lemma supp_is_subset:
+ fixes S :: "atom set"
+ and x :: "'a::pt"
+ assumes a1: "S supports x"
+ and a2: "finite S"
+ shows "(supp x) \<subseteq> S"
+proof (rule ccontr)
+ assume "\<not> (supp x \<subseteq> S)"
+ then obtain a where b1: "a \<in> supp x" and b2: "a \<notin> S" by auto
+ from a1 b2 have "\<forall>b. b \<notin> S \<longrightarrow> (a \<rightleftharpoons> b) \<bullet> x = x" unfolding supports_def by auto
+ then have "{b. (a \<rightleftharpoons> b) \<bullet> x \<noteq> x} \<subseteq> S" by auto
+ with a2 have "finite {b. (a \<rightleftharpoons> b)\<bullet>x \<noteq> x}" by (simp add: finite_subset)
+ then have "a \<notin> (supp x)" unfolding supp_def by simp
+ with b1 show False by simp
+qed
+
+lemma supports_finite:
+ fixes S :: "atom set"
+ and x :: "'a::pt"
+ assumes a1: "S supports x"
+ and a2: "finite S"
+ shows "finite (supp x)"
+proof -
+ have "(supp x) \<subseteq> S" using a1 a2 by (rule supp_is_subset)
+ then show "finite (supp x)" using a2 by (simp add: finite_subset)
+qed
+
+lemma supp_supports:
+ fixes x :: "'a::pt"
+ shows "(supp x) supports x"
+unfolding supports_def
+proof (intro strip)
+ fix a b
+ assume "a \<notin> (supp x) \<and> b \<notin> (supp x)"
+ then have "a \<sharp> x" and "b \<sharp> x" by (simp_all add: fresh_def)
+ then show "(a \<rightleftharpoons> b) \<bullet> x = x" by (simp add: swap_fresh_fresh)
+qed
+
+lemma supp_is_least_supports:
+ fixes S :: "atom set"
+ and x :: "'a::pt"
+ assumes a1: "S supports x"
+ and a2: "finite S"
+ and a3: "\<And>S'. finite S' \<Longrightarrow> (S' supports x) \<Longrightarrow> S \<subseteq> S'"
+ shows "(supp x) = S"
+proof (rule equalityI)
+ show "(supp x) \<subseteq> S" using a1 a2 by (rule supp_is_subset)
+ with a2 have fin: "finite (supp x)" by (rule rev_finite_subset)
+ have "(supp x) supports x" by (rule supp_supports)
+ with fin a3 show "S \<subseteq> supp x" by blast
+qed
+
+lemma subsetCI:
+ shows "(\<And>x. x \<in> A \<Longrightarrow> x \<notin> B \<Longrightarrow> False) \<Longrightarrow> A \<subseteq> B"
+ by auto
+
+lemma finite_supp_unique:
+ assumes a1: "S supports x"
+ assumes a2: "finite S"
+ assumes a3: "\<And>a b. \<lbrakk>a \<in> S; b \<notin> S; sort_of a = sort_of b\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> (a \<rightleftharpoons> b) \<bullet> x \<noteq> x"
+ shows "(supp x) = S"
+ using a1 a2
+proof (rule supp_is_least_supports)
+ fix S'
+ assume "finite S'" and "S' supports x"
+ show "S \<subseteq> S'"
+ proof (rule subsetCI)
+ fix a
+ assume "a \<in> S" and "a \<notin> S'"
+ have "finite (S \<union> S')"
+ using `finite S` `finite S'` by simp
+ then obtain b where "b \<notin> S \<union> S'" and "sort_of b = sort_of a"
+ by (rule obtain_atom)
+ then have "b \<notin> S" and "b \<notin> S'" and "sort_of a = sort_of b"
+ by simp_all
+ then have "(a \<rightleftharpoons> b) \<bullet> x = x"
+ using `a \<notin> S'` `S' supports x` by (simp add: supports_def)
+ moreover have "(a \<rightleftharpoons> b) \<bullet> x \<noteq> x"
+ using `a \<in> S` `b \<notin> S` `sort_of a = sort_of b`
+ by (rule a3)
+ ultimately show "False" by simp
+ qed
+qed
+
+section {* Support w.r.t. relations *}
+
+text {*
+ This definition is used for unquotient types, where
+ alpha-equivalence does not coincide with equality.
+*}
+
+definition
+ "supp_rel R x = {a. infinite {b. \<not>(R ((a \<rightleftharpoons> b) \<bullet> x) x)}}"
+
+
+
+section {* Finitely-supported types *}
+
+class fs = pt +
+ assumes finite_supp: "finite (supp x)"
+
+lemma pure_supp:
+ shows "supp (x::'a::pure) = {}"
+ unfolding supp_def by (simp add: permute_pure)
+
+lemma pure_fresh:
+ fixes x::"'a::pure"
+ shows "a \<sharp> x"
+ unfolding fresh_def by (simp add: pure_supp)
+
+instance pure < fs
+by default (simp add: pure_supp)
+
+
+subsection {* Type @{typ atom} is finitely-supported. *}
+
+lemma supp_atom:
+ shows "supp a = {a}"
+apply (rule finite_supp_unique)
+apply (clarsimp simp add: supports_def)
+apply simp
+apply simp
+done
+
+lemma fresh_atom:
+ shows "a \<sharp> b \<longleftrightarrow> a \<noteq> b"
+ unfolding fresh_def supp_atom by simp
+
+instance atom :: fs
+by default (simp add: supp_atom)
+
+section {* Support for finite sets of atoms *}
+
+
+lemma supp_finite_atom_set:
+ fixes S::"atom set"
+ assumes "finite S"
+ shows "supp S = S"
+ apply(rule finite_supp_unique)
+ apply(simp add: supports_def)
+ apply(simp add: swap_set_not_in)
+ apply(rule assms)
+ apply(simp add: swap_set_in)
+done
+
+section {* Type @{typ perm} is finitely-supported. *}
+
+lemma perm_swap_eq:
+ shows "(a \<rightleftharpoons> b) \<bullet> p = p \<longleftrightarrow> (p \<bullet> (a \<rightleftharpoons> b)) = (a \<rightleftharpoons> b)"
+unfolding permute_perm_def
+by (metis add_diff_cancel minus_perm_def)
+
+lemma supports_perm:
+ shows "{a. p \<bullet> a \<noteq> a} supports p"
+ unfolding supports_def
+ unfolding perm_swap_eq
+ by (simp add: swap_eqvt)
+
+lemma finite_perm_lemma:
+ shows "finite {a::atom. p \<bullet> a \<noteq> a}"
+ using finite_Rep_perm [of p]
+ unfolding permute_atom_def .
+
+lemma supp_perm:
+ shows "supp p = {a. p \<bullet> a \<noteq> a}"
+apply (rule finite_supp_unique)
+apply (rule supports_perm)
+apply (rule finite_perm_lemma)
+apply (simp add: perm_swap_eq swap_eqvt)
+apply (auto simp add: expand_perm_eq swap_atom)
+done
+
+lemma fresh_perm:
+ shows "a \<sharp> p \<longleftrightarrow> p \<bullet> a = a"
+ unfolding fresh_def
+ by (simp add: supp_perm)
+
+lemma supp_swap:
+ shows "supp (a \<rightleftharpoons> b) = (if a = b \<or> sort_of a \<noteq> sort_of b then {} else {a, b})"
+ by (auto simp add: supp_perm swap_atom)
+
+lemma fresh_zero_perm:
+ shows "a \<sharp> (0::perm)"
+ unfolding fresh_perm by simp
+
+lemma supp_zero_perm:
+ shows "supp (0::perm) = {}"
+ unfolding supp_perm by simp
+
+lemma fresh_plus_perm:
+ fixes p q::perm
+ assumes "a \<sharp> p" "a \<sharp> q"
+ shows "a \<sharp> (p + q)"
+ using assms
+ unfolding fresh_def
+ by (auto simp add: supp_perm)
+
+lemma supp_plus_perm:
+ fixes p q::perm
+ shows "supp (p + q) \<subseteq> supp p \<union> supp q"
+ by (auto simp add: supp_perm)
+
+lemma fresh_minus_perm:
+ fixes p::perm
+ shows "a \<sharp> (- p) \<longleftrightarrow> a \<sharp> p"
+ unfolding fresh_def
+ unfolding supp_perm
+ apply(simp)
+ apply(metis permute_minus_cancel)
+ done
+
+lemma supp_minus_perm:
+ fixes p::perm
+ shows "supp (- p) = supp p"
+ unfolding supp_conv_fresh
+ by (simp add: fresh_minus_perm)
+
+instance perm :: fs
+by default (simp add: supp_perm finite_perm_lemma)
+
+lemma plus_perm_eq:
+ fixes p q::"perm"
+ assumes asm: "supp p \<inter> supp q = {}"
+ shows "p + q = q + p"
+unfolding expand_perm_eq
+proof
+ fix a::"atom"
+ show "(p + q) \<bullet> a = (q + p) \<bullet> a"
+ proof -
+ { assume "a \<notin> supp p" "a \<notin> supp q"
+ then have "(p + q) \<bullet> a = (q + p) \<bullet> a"
+ by (simp add: supp_perm)
+ }
+ moreover
+ { assume a: "a \<in> supp p" "a \<notin> supp q"
+ then have "p \<bullet> a \<in> supp p" by (simp add: supp_perm)
+ then have "p \<bullet> a \<notin> supp q" using asm by auto
+ with a have "(p + q) \<bullet> a = (q + p) \<bullet> a"
+ by (simp add: supp_perm)
+ }
+ moreover
+ { assume a: "a \<notin> supp p" "a \<in> supp q"
+ then have "q \<bullet> a \<in> supp q" by (simp add: supp_perm)
+ then have "q \<bullet> a \<notin> supp p" using asm by auto
+ with a have "(p + q) \<bullet> a = (q + p) \<bullet> a"
+ by (simp add: supp_perm)
+ }
+ ultimately show "(p + q) \<bullet> a = (q + p) \<bullet> a"
+ using asm by blast
+ qed
+qed
+
+section {* Finite Support instances for other types *}
+
+
+subsection {* Type @{typ "'a \<times> 'b"} is finitely-supported. *}
+
+lemma supp_Pair:
+ shows "supp (x, y) = supp x \<union> supp y"
+ by (simp add: supp_def Collect_imp_eq Collect_neg_eq)
+
+lemma fresh_Pair:
+ shows "a \<sharp> (x, y) \<longleftrightarrow> a \<sharp> x \<and> a \<sharp> y"
+ by (simp add: fresh_def supp_Pair)
+
+lemma supp_Unit:
+ shows "supp () = {}"
+ by (simp add: supp_def)
+
+lemma fresh_Unit:
+ shows "a \<sharp> ()"
+ by (simp add: fresh_def supp_Unit)
+
+instance prod :: (fs, fs) fs
+apply default
+apply (induct_tac x)
+apply (simp add: supp_Pair finite_supp)
+done
+
+
+subsection {* Type @{typ "'a + 'b"} is finitely supported *}
+
+lemma supp_Inl:
+ shows "supp (Inl x) = supp x"
+ by (simp add: supp_def)
+
+lemma supp_Inr:
+ shows "supp (Inr x) = supp x"
+ by (simp add: supp_def)
+
+lemma fresh_Inl:
+ shows "a \<sharp> Inl x \<longleftrightarrow> a \<sharp> x"
+ by (simp add: fresh_def supp_Inl)
+
+lemma fresh_Inr:
+ shows "a \<sharp> Inr y \<longleftrightarrow> a \<sharp> y"
+ by (simp add: fresh_def supp_Inr)
+
+instance sum :: (fs, fs) fs
+apply default
+apply (induct_tac x)
+apply (simp_all add: supp_Inl supp_Inr finite_supp)
+done
+
+
+subsection {* Type @{typ "'a option"} is finitely supported *}
+
+lemma supp_None:
+ shows "supp None = {}"
+by (simp add: supp_def)
+
+lemma supp_Some:
+ shows "supp (Some x) = supp x"
+ by (simp add: supp_def)
+
+lemma fresh_None:
+ shows "a \<sharp> None"
+ by (simp add: fresh_def supp_None)
+
+lemma fresh_Some:
+ shows "a \<sharp> Some x \<longleftrightarrow> a \<sharp> x"
+ by (simp add: fresh_def supp_Some)
+
+instance option :: (fs) fs
+apply default
+apply (induct_tac x)
+apply (simp_all add: supp_None supp_Some finite_supp)
+done
+
+
+subsubsection {* Type @{typ "'a list"} is finitely supported *}
+
+lemma supp_Nil:
+ shows "supp [] = {}"
+ by (simp add: supp_def)
+
+lemma supp_Cons:
+ shows "supp (x # xs) = supp x \<union> supp xs"
+by (simp add: supp_def Collect_imp_eq Collect_neg_eq)
+
+lemma fresh_Nil:
+ shows "a \<sharp> []"
+ by (simp add: fresh_def supp_Nil)
+
+lemma fresh_Cons:
+ shows "a \<sharp> (x # xs) \<longleftrightarrow> a \<sharp> x \<and> a \<sharp> xs"
+ by (simp add: fresh_def supp_Cons)
+
+instance list :: (fs) fs
+apply default
+apply (induct_tac x)
+apply (simp_all add: supp_Nil supp_Cons finite_supp)
+done
+
+
+section {* Support and Freshness for Applications *}
+
+lemma fresh_conv_MOST:
+ shows "a \<sharp> x \<longleftrightarrow> (MOST b. (a \<rightleftharpoons> b) \<bullet> x = x)"
+ unfolding fresh_def supp_def
+ unfolding MOST_iff_cofinite by simp
+
+lemma supp_subset_fresh:
+ assumes a: "\<And>a. a \<sharp> x \<Longrightarrow> a \<sharp> y"
+ shows "supp y \<subseteq> supp x"
+ using a
+ unfolding fresh_def
+ by blast
+
+lemma fresh_fun_app:
+ assumes "a \<sharp> f" and "a \<sharp> x"
+ shows "a \<sharp> f x"
+ using assms
+ unfolding fresh_conv_MOST
+ unfolding permute_fun_app_eq
+ by (elim MOST_rev_mp, simp)
+
+lemma supp_fun_app:
+ shows "supp (f x) \<subseteq> (supp f) \<union> (supp x)"
+ using fresh_fun_app
+ unfolding fresh_def
+ by auto
+
+text {* Support of Equivariant Functions *}
+
+lemma supp_fun_eqvt:
+ assumes a: "\<And>p. p \<bullet> f = f"
+ shows "supp f = {}"
+ unfolding supp_def
+ using a by simp
+
+lemma fresh_fun_eqvt_app:
+ assumes a: "\<And>p. p \<bullet> f = f"
+ shows "a \<sharp> x \<Longrightarrow> a \<sharp> f x"
+proof -
+ from a have "supp f = {}" by (simp add: supp_fun_eqvt)
+ then show "a \<sharp> x \<Longrightarrow> a \<sharp> f x"
+ unfolding fresh_def
+ using supp_fun_app by auto
+qed
+
+
+section {* Support of Finite Sets of Finitely Supported Elements *}
+
+lemma Union_fresh:
+ shows "a \<sharp> S \<Longrightarrow> a \<sharp> (\<Union>x \<in> S. supp x)"
+ unfolding Union_image_eq[symmetric]
+ apply(rule_tac f="\<lambda>S. \<Union> supp ` S" in fresh_fun_eqvt_app)
+ apply(simp add: permute_fun_def UNION_def Collect_def Bex_def ex_eqvt mem_def conj_eqvt)
+ apply(subst permute_fun_app_eq)
+ back
+ apply(simp add: supp_eqvt)
+ apply(assumption)
+ done
+
+lemma Union_supports_set:
+ shows "(\<Union>x \<in> S. supp x) supports S"
+proof -
+ { fix a b
+ have "\<forall>x \<in> S. (a \<rightleftharpoons> b) \<bullet> x = x \<Longrightarrow> (a \<rightleftharpoons> b) \<bullet> S = S"
+ unfolding permute_set_eq by force
+ }
+ then show "(\<Union>x \<in> S. supp x) supports S"
+ unfolding supports_def
+ by (simp add: fresh_def[symmetric] swap_fresh_fresh)
+qed
+
+lemma Union_of_finite_supp_sets:
+ fixes S::"('a::fs set)"
+ assumes fin: "finite S"
+ shows "finite (\<Union>x\<in>S. supp x)"
+ using fin by (induct) (auto simp add: finite_supp)
+
+lemma Union_included_in_supp:
+ fixes S::"('a::fs set)"
+ assumes fin: "finite S"
+ shows "(\<Union>x\<in>S. supp x) \<subseteq> supp S"
+proof -
+ have "(\<Union>x\<in>S. supp x) = supp (\<Union>x\<in>S. supp x)"
+ by (rule supp_finite_atom_set[symmetric])
+ (rule Union_of_finite_supp_sets[OF fin])
+ also have "\<dots> \<subseteq> supp S"
+ by (rule supp_subset_fresh)
+ (simp add: Union_fresh)
+ finally show "(\<Union>x\<in>S. supp x) \<subseteq> supp S" .
+qed
+
+lemma supp_of_finite_sets:
+ fixes S::"('a::fs set)"
+ assumes fin: "finite S"
+ shows "(supp S) = (\<Union>x\<in>S. supp x)"
+apply(rule subset_antisym)
+apply(rule supp_is_subset)
+apply(rule Union_supports_set)
+apply(rule Union_of_finite_supp_sets[OF fin])
+apply(rule Union_included_in_supp[OF fin])
+done
+
+lemma finite_sets_supp:
+ fixes S::"('a::fs set)"
+ assumes "finite S"
+ shows "finite (supp S)"
+using assms
+by (simp only: supp_of_finite_sets Union_of_finite_supp_sets)
+
+lemma supp_of_finite_union:
+ fixes S T::"('a::fs) set"
+ assumes fin1: "finite S"
+ and fin2: "finite T"
+ shows "supp (S \<union> T) = supp S \<union> supp T"
+ using fin1 fin2
+ by (simp add: supp_of_finite_sets)
+
+lemma supp_of_finite_insert:
+ fixes S::"('a::fs) set"
+ assumes fin: "finite S"
+ shows "supp (insert x S) = supp x \<union> supp S"
+ using fin
+ by (simp add: supp_of_finite_sets)
+
+
+subsection {* Type @{typ "'a fset"} is finitely supported *}
+
+lemma fset_eqvt:
+ shows "p \<bullet> (fset S) = fset (p \<bullet> S)"
+ by (lifting set_eqvt)
+
+lemma supp_fset [simp]:
+ shows "supp (fset S) = supp S"
+ unfolding supp_def
+ by (simp add: fset_eqvt fset_cong)
+
+lemma supp_empty_fset [simp]:
+ shows "supp {||} = {}"
+ unfolding supp_def
+ by simp
+
+lemma supp_insert_fset [simp]:
+ fixes x::"'a::fs"
+ and S::"'a fset"
+ shows "supp (insert_fset x S) = supp x \<union> supp S"
+ apply(subst supp_fset[symmetric])
+ apply(simp add: supp_fset supp_of_finite_insert)
+ done
+
+lemma fset_finite_supp:
+ fixes S::"('a::fs) fset"
+ shows "finite (supp S)"
+ by (induct S) (simp_all add: finite_supp)
+
+
+instance fset :: (fs) fs
+ apply (default)
+ apply (rule fset_finite_supp)
+ done
+
+
+section {* Fresh-Star *}
+
+
+text {* The fresh-star generalisation of fresh is used in strong
+ induction principles. *}
+
+definition
+ fresh_star :: "atom set \<Rightarrow> 'a::pt \<Rightarrow> bool" ("_ \<sharp>* _" [80,80] 80)
+where
+ "as \<sharp>* x \<equiv> \<forall>a \<in> as. a \<sharp> x"
+
+lemma fresh_star_supp_conv:
+ shows "supp x \<sharp>* y \<Longrightarrow> supp y \<sharp>* x"
+by (auto simp add: fresh_star_def fresh_def)
+
+lemma fresh_star_prod:
+ fixes as::"atom set"
+ shows "as \<sharp>* (x, y) = (as \<sharp>* x \<and> as \<sharp>* y)"
+ by (auto simp add: fresh_star_def fresh_Pair)
+
+lemma fresh_star_union:
+ shows "(as \<union> bs) \<sharp>* x = (as \<sharp>* x \<and> bs \<sharp>* x)"
+ by (auto simp add: fresh_star_def)
+
+lemma fresh_star_insert:
+ shows "(insert a as) \<sharp>* x = (a \<sharp> x \<and> as \<sharp>* x)"
+ by (auto simp add: fresh_star_def)
+
+lemma fresh_star_Un_elim:
+ "((as \<union> bs) \<sharp>* x \<Longrightarrow> PROP C) \<equiv> (as \<sharp>* x \<Longrightarrow> bs \<sharp>* x \<Longrightarrow> PROP C)"
+ unfolding fresh_star_def
+ apply(rule)
+ apply(erule meta_mp)
+ apply(auto)
+ done
+
+lemma fresh_star_insert_elim:
+ "(insert a as \<sharp>* x \<Longrightarrow> PROP C) \<equiv> (a \<sharp> x \<Longrightarrow> as \<sharp>* x \<Longrightarrow> PROP C)"
+ unfolding fresh_star_def
+ by rule (simp_all add: fresh_star_def)
+
+lemma fresh_star_empty_elim:
+ "({} \<sharp>* x \<Longrightarrow> PROP C) \<equiv> PROP C"
+ by (simp add: fresh_star_def)
+
+lemma fresh_star_unit_elim:
+ shows "(a \<sharp>* () \<Longrightarrow> PROP C) \<equiv> PROP C"
+ by (simp add: fresh_star_def fresh_Unit)
+
+lemma fresh_star_prod_elim:
+ shows "(a \<sharp>* (x, y) \<Longrightarrow> PROP C) \<equiv> (a \<sharp>* x \<Longrightarrow> a \<sharp>* y \<Longrightarrow> PROP C)"
+ by (rule, simp_all add: fresh_star_prod)
+
+lemma fresh_star_zero:
+ shows "as \<sharp>* (0::perm)"
+ unfolding fresh_star_def
+ by (simp add: fresh_zero_perm)
+
+lemma fresh_star_plus:
+ fixes p q::perm
+ shows "\<lbrakk>a \<sharp>* p; a \<sharp>* q\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> a \<sharp>* (p + q)"
+ unfolding fresh_star_def
+ by (simp add: fresh_plus_perm)
+
+lemma fresh_star_permute_iff:
+ shows "(p \<bullet> a) \<sharp>* (p \<bullet> x) \<longleftrightarrow> a \<sharp>* x"
+ unfolding fresh_star_def
+ by (metis mem_permute_iff permute_minus_cancel(1) fresh_permute_iff)
+
+lemma fresh_star_eqvt:
+ shows "(p \<bullet> (as \<sharp>* x)) = (p \<bullet> as) \<sharp>* (p \<bullet> x)"
+unfolding fresh_star_def
+unfolding Ball_def
+apply(simp add: all_eqvt)
+apply(subst permute_fun_def)
+apply(simp add: imp_eqvt fresh_eqvt mem_eqvt)
+done
+
+
+section {* Induction principle for permutations *}
+
+
+lemma perm_struct_induct[consumes 1, case_names zero swap]:
+ assumes S: "supp p \<subseteq> S"
+ and zero: "P 0"
+ and swap: "\<And>p a b. \<lbrakk>P p; supp p \<subseteq> S; a \<in> S; b \<in> S; a \<noteq> b; sort_of a = sort_of b\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> P ((a \<rightleftharpoons> b) + p)"
+ shows "P p"
+proof -
+ have "finite (supp p)" by (simp add: finite_supp)
+ then show "P p" using S
+ proof(induct A\<equiv>"supp p" arbitrary: p rule: finite_psubset_induct)
+ case (psubset p)
+ then have ih: "\<And>q. supp q \<subset> supp p \<Longrightarrow> P q" by auto
+ have as: "supp p \<subseteq> S" by fact
+ { assume "supp p = {}"
+ then have "p = 0" by (simp add: supp_perm expand_perm_eq)
+ then have "P p" using zero by simp
+ }
+ moreover
+ { assume "supp p \<noteq> {}"
+ then obtain a where a0: "a \<in> supp p" by blast
+ then have a1: "p \<bullet> a \<in> S" "a \<in> S" "sort_of (p \<bullet> a) = sort_of a" "p \<bullet> a \<noteq> a"
+ using as by (auto simp add: supp_atom supp_perm swap_atom)
+ let ?q = "(p \<bullet> a \<rightleftharpoons> a) + p"
+ have a2: "supp ?q \<subseteq> supp p" unfolding supp_perm by (auto simp add: swap_atom)
+ moreover
+ have "a \<notin> supp ?q" by (simp add: supp_perm)
+ then have "supp ?q \<noteq> supp p" using a0 by auto
+ ultimately have "supp ?q \<subset> supp p" using a2 by auto
+ then have "P ?q" using ih by simp
+ moreover
+ have "supp ?q \<subseteq> S" using as a2 by simp
+ ultimately have "P ((p \<bullet> a \<rightleftharpoons> a) + ?q)" using as a1 swap by simp
+ moreover
+ have "p = (p \<bullet> a \<rightleftharpoons> a) + ?q" by (simp add: expand_perm_eq)
+ ultimately have "P p" by simp
+ }
+ ultimately show "P p" by blast
+ qed
+qed
+
+lemma perm_simple_struct_induct[case_names zero swap]:
+ assumes zero: "P 0"
+ and swap: "\<And>p a b. \<lbrakk>P p; a \<noteq> b; sort_of a = sort_of b\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> P ((a \<rightleftharpoons> b) + p)"
+ shows "P p"
+by (rule_tac S="supp p" in perm_struct_induct)
+ (auto intro: zero swap)
+
+lemma perm_subset_induct[consumes 1, case_names zero swap plus]:
+ assumes S: "supp p \<subseteq> S"
+ assumes zero: "P 0"
+ assumes swap: "\<And>a b. \<lbrakk>sort_of a = sort_of b; a \<noteq> b; a \<in> S; b \<in> S\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> P (a \<rightleftharpoons> b)"
+ assumes plus: "\<And>p1 p2. \<lbrakk>P p1; P p2; supp p1 \<subseteq> S; supp p2 \<subseteq> S\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> P (p1 + p2)"
+ shows "P p"
+using S
+by (induct p rule: perm_struct_induct)
+ (auto intro: zero plus swap simp add: supp_swap)
+
+lemma supp_perm_eq:
+ assumes "(supp x) \<sharp>* p"
+ shows "p \<bullet> x = x"
+proof -
+ from assms have "supp p \<subseteq> {a. a \<sharp> x}"
+ unfolding supp_perm fresh_star_def fresh_def by auto
+ then show "p \<bullet> x = x"
+ proof (induct p rule: perm_struct_induct)
+ case zero
+ show "0 \<bullet> x = x" by simp
+ next
+ case (swap p a b)
+ then have "a \<sharp> x" "b \<sharp> x" "p \<bullet> x = x" by simp_all
+ then show "((a \<rightleftharpoons> b) + p) \<bullet> x = x" by (simp add: swap_fresh_fresh)
+ qed
+qed
+
+lemma supp_perm_eq_test:
+ assumes "(supp x) \<sharp>* p"
+ shows "p \<bullet> x = x"
+proof -
+ from assms have "supp p \<subseteq> {a. a \<sharp> x}"
+ unfolding supp_perm fresh_star_def fresh_def by auto
+ then show "p \<bullet> x = x"
+ proof (induct p rule: perm_subset_induct)
+ case zero
+ show "0 \<bullet> x = x" by simp
+ next
+ case (swap a b)
+ then have "a \<sharp> x" "b \<sharp> x" by simp_all
+ then show "(a \<rightleftharpoons> b) \<bullet> x = x" by (simp add: swap_fresh_fresh)
+ next
+ case (plus p1 p2)
+ have "p1 \<bullet> x = x" "p2 \<bullet> x = x" by fact+
+ then show "(p1 + p2) \<bullet> x = x" by simp
+ qed
+qed
+
+
+section {* Avoiding of atom sets *}
+
+text {*
+ For every set of atoms, there is another set of atoms
+ avoiding a finitely supported c and there is a permutation
+ which 'translates' between both sets.
+*}
+
+lemma at_set_avoiding_aux:
+ fixes Xs::"atom set"
+ and As::"atom set"
+ assumes b: "Xs \<subseteq> As"
+ and c: "finite As"
+ shows "\<exists>p. (p \<bullet> Xs) \<inter> As = {} \<and> (supp p) \<subseteq> (Xs \<union> (p \<bullet> Xs))"
+proof -
+ from b c have "finite Xs" by (rule finite_subset)
+ then show ?thesis using b
+ proof (induct rule: finite_subset_induct)
+ case empty
+ have "0 \<bullet> {} \<inter> As = {}" by simp
+ moreover
+ have "supp (0::perm) \<subseteq> {} \<union> 0 \<bullet> {}" by (simp add: supp_zero_perm)
+ ultimately show ?case by blast
+ next
+ case (insert x Xs)
+ then obtain p where
+ p1: "(p \<bullet> Xs) \<inter> As = {}" and
+ p2: "supp p \<subseteq> (Xs \<union> (p \<bullet> Xs))" by blast
+ from `x \<in> As` p1 have "x \<notin> p \<bullet> Xs" by fast
+ with `x \<notin> Xs` p2 have "x \<notin> supp p" by fast
+ hence px: "p \<bullet> x = x" unfolding supp_perm by simp
+ have "finite (As \<union> p \<bullet> Xs)"
+ using `finite As` `finite Xs`
+ by (simp add: permute_set_eq_image)
+ then obtain y where "y \<notin> (As \<union> p \<bullet> Xs)" "sort_of y = sort_of x"
+ by (rule obtain_atom)
+ hence y: "y \<notin> As" "y \<notin> p \<bullet> Xs" "sort_of y = sort_of x"
+ by simp_all
+ let ?q = "(x \<rightleftharpoons> y) + p"
+ have q: "?q \<bullet> insert x Xs = insert y (p \<bullet> Xs)"
+ unfolding insert_eqvt
+ using `p \<bullet> x = x` `sort_of y = sort_of x`
+ using `x \<notin> p \<bullet> Xs` `y \<notin> p \<bullet> Xs`
+ by (simp add: swap_atom swap_set_not_in)
+ have "?q \<bullet> insert x Xs \<inter> As = {}"
+ using `y \<notin> As` `p \<bullet> Xs \<inter> As = {}`
+ unfolding q by simp
+ moreover
+ have "supp ?q \<subseteq> insert x Xs \<union> ?q \<bullet> insert x Xs"
+ using p2 unfolding q
+ by (intro subset_trans [OF supp_plus_perm])
+ (auto simp add: supp_swap)
+ ultimately show ?case by blast
+ qed
+qed
+
+lemma at_set_avoiding:
+ assumes a: "finite Xs"
+ and b: "finite (supp c)"
+ obtains p::"perm" where "(p \<bullet> Xs)\<sharp>*c" and "(supp p) \<subseteq> (Xs \<union> (p \<bullet> Xs))"
+ using a b at_set_avoiding_aux [where Xs="Xs" and As="Xs \<union> supp c"]
+ unfolding fresh_star_def fresh_def by blast
+
+lemma at_set_avoiding2:
+ assumes "finite xs"
+ and "finite (supp c)" "finite (supp x)"
+ and "xs \<sharp>* x"
+ shows "\<exists>p. (p \<bullet> xs) \<sharp>* c \<and> supp x \<sharp>* p"
+using assms
+apply(erule_tac c="(c, x)" in at_set_avoiding)
+apply(simp add: supp_Pair)
+apply(rule_tac x="p" in exI)
+apply(simp add: fresh_star_prod)
+apply(rule fresh_star_supp_conv)
+apply(auto simp add: fresh_star_def)
+done
+
+lemma at_set_avoiding2_atom:
+ assumes "finite (supp c)" "finite (supp x)"
+ and b: "a \<sharp> x"
+ shows "\<exists>p. (p \<bullet> a) \<sharp> c \<and> supp x \<sharp>* p"
+proof -
+ have a: "{a} \<sharp>* x" unfolding fresh_star_def by (simp add: b)
+ obtain p where p1: "(p \<bullet> {a}) \<sharp>* c" and p2: "supp x \<sharp>* p"
+ using at_set_avoiding2[of "{a}" "c" "x"] assms a by blast
+ have c: "(p \<bullet> a) \<sharp> c" using p1
+ unfolding fresh_star_def Ball_def
+ by(erule_tac x="p \<bullet> a" in allE) (simp add: permute_set_eq)
+ hence "p \<bullet> a \<sharp> c \<and> supp x \<sharp>* p" using p2 by blast
+ then show "\<exists>p. (p \<bullet> a) \<sharp> c \<and> supp x \<sharp>* p" by blast
+qed
+
+
+section {* Concrete Atoms Types *}
+
+text {*
+ Class @{text at_base} allows types containing multiple sorts of atoms.
+ Class @{text at} only allows types with a single sort.
+*}
+
+class at_base = pt +
+ fixes atom :: "'a \<Rightarrow> atom"
+ assumes atom_eq_iff [simp]: "atom a = atom b \<longleftrightarrow> a = b"
+ assumes atom_eqvt: "p \<bullet> (atom a) = atom (p \<bullet> a)"
+
+class at = at_base +
+ assumes sort_of_atom_eq [simp]: "sort_of (atom a) = sort_of (atom b)"
+
+lemma supp_at_base:
+ fixes a::"'a::at_base"
+ shows "supp a = {atom a}"
+ by (simp add: supp_atom [symmetric] supp_def atom_eqvt)
+
+lemma fresh_at_base:
+ shows "a \<sharp> b \<longleftrightarrow> a \<noteq> atom b"
+ unfolding fresh_def by (simp add: supp_at_base)
+
+instance at_base < fs
+proof qed (simp add: supp_at_base)
+
+lemma at_base_infinite [simp]:
+ shows "infinite (UNIV :: 'a::at_base set)" (is "infinite ?U")
+proof
+ obtain a :: 'a where "True" by auto
+ assume "finite ?U"
+ hence "finite (atom ` ?U)"
+ by (rule finite_imageI)
+ then obtain b where b: "b \<notin> atom ` ?U" "sort_of b = sort_of (atom a)"
+ by (rule obtain_atom)
+ from b(2) have "b = atom ((atom a \<rightleftharpoons> b) \<bullet> a)"
+ unfolding atom_eqvt [symmetric]
+ by (simp add: swap_atom)
+ hence "b \<in> atom ` ?U" by simp
+ with b(1) show "False" by simp
+qed
+
+lemma swap_at_base_simps [simp]:
+ fixes x y::"'a::at_base"
+ shows "sort_of (atom x) = sort_of (atom y) \<Longrightarrow> (atom x \<rightleftharpoons> atom y) \<bullet> x = y"
+ and "sort_of (atom x) = sort_of (atom y) \<Longrightarrow> (atom x \<rightleftharpoons> atom y) \<bullet> y = x"
+ and "atom x \<noteq> a \<Longrightarrow> atom x \<noteq> b \<Longrightarrow> (a \<rightleftharpoons> b) \<bullet> x = x"
+ unfolding atom_eq_iff [symmetric]
+ unfolding atom_eqvt [symmetric]
+ by simp_all
+
+lemma obtain_at_base:
+ assumes X: "finite X"
+ obtains a::"'a::at_base" where "atom a \<notin> X"
+proof -
+ have "inj (atom :: 'a \<Rightarrow> atom)"
+ by (simp add: inj_on_def)
+ with X have "finite (atom -` X :: 'a set)"
+ by (rule finite_vimageI)
+ with at_base_infinite have "atom -` X \<noteq> (UNIV :: 'a set)"
+ by auto
+ then obtain a :: 'a where "atom a \<notin> X"
+ by auto
+ thus ?thesis ..
+qed
+
+lemma supp_finite_set_at_base:
+ assumes a: "finite S"
+ shows "supp S = atom ` S"
+apply(simp add: supp_of_finite_sets[OF a])
+apply(simp add: supp_at_base)
+apply(auto)
+done
+
+section {* Infrastructure for concrete atom types *}
+
+section {* A swapping operation for concrete atoms *}
+
+definition
+ flip :: "'a::at_base \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> perm" ("'(_ \<leftrightarrow> _')")
+where
+ "(a \<leftrightarrow> b) = (atom a \<rightleftharpoons> atom b)"
+
+lemma flip_self [simp]: "(a \<leftrightarrow> a) = 0"
+ unfolding flip_def by (rule swap_self)
+
+lemma flip_commute: "(a \<leftrightarrow> b) = (b \<leftrightarrow> a)"
+ unfolding flip_def by (rule swap_commute)
+
+lemma minus_flip [simp]: "- (a \<leftrightarrow> b) = (a \<leftrightarrow> b)"
+ unfolding flip_def by (rule minus_swap)
+
+lemma add_flip_cancel: "(a \<leftrightarrow> b) + (a \<leftrightarrow> b) = 0"
+ unfolding flip_def by (rule swap_cancel)
+
+lemma permute_flip_cancel [simp]: "(a \<leftrightarrow> b) \<bullet> (a \<leftrightarrow> b) \<bullet> x = x"
+ unfolding permute_plus [symmetric] add_flip_cancel by simp
+
+lemma permute_flip_cancel2 [simp]: "(a \<leftrightarrow> b) \<bullet> (b \<leftrightarrow> a) \<bullet> x = x"
+ by (simp add: flip_commute)
+
+lemma flip_eqvt:
+ fixes a b c::"'a::at_base"
+ shows "p \<bullet> (a \<leftrightarrow> b) = (p \<bullet> a \<leftrightarrow> p \<bullet> b)"
+ unfolding flip_def
+ by (simp add: swap_eqvt atom_eqvt)
+
+lemma flip_at_base_simps [simp]:
+ shows "sort_of (atom a) = sort_of (atom b) \<Longrightarrow> (a \<leftrightarrow> b) \<bullet> a = b"
+ and "sort_of (atom a) = sort_of (atom b) \<Longrightarrow> (a \<leftrightarrow> b) \<bullet> b = a"
+ and "\<lbrakk>a \<noteq> c; b \<noteq> c\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> (a \<leftrightarrow> b) \<bullet> c = c"
+ and "sort_of (atom a) \<noteq> sort_of (atom b) \<Longrightarrow> (a \<leftrightarrow> b) \<bullet> x = x"
+ unfolding flip_def
+ unfolding atom_eq_iff [symmetric]
+ unfolding atom_eqvt [symmetric]
+ by simp_all
+
+text {* the following two lemmas do not hold for at_base,
+ only for single sort atoms from at *}
+
+lemma permute_flip_at:
+ fixes a b c::"'a::at"
+ shows "(a \<leftrightarrow> b) \<bullet> c = (if c = a then b else if c = b then a else c)"
+ unfolding flip_def
+ apply (rule atom_eq_iff [THEN iffD1])
+ apply (subst atom_eqvt [symmetric])
+ apply (simp add: swap_atom)
+ done
+
+lemma flip_at_simps [simp]:
+ fixes a b::"'a::at"
+ shows "(a \<leftrightarrow> b) \<bullet> a = b"
+ and "(a \<leftrightarrow> b) \<bullet> b = a"
+ unfolding permute_flip_at by simp_all
+
+lemma flip_fresh_fresh:
+ fixes a b::"'a::at_base"
+ assumes "atom a \<sharp> x" "atom b \<sharp> x"
+ shows "(a \<leftrightarrow> b) \<bullet> x = x"
+using assms
+by (simp add: flip_def swap_fresh_fresh)
+
+subsection {* Syntax for coercing at-elements to the atom-type *}
+
+syntax
+ "_atom_constrain" :: "logic \<Rightarrow> type \<Rightarrow> logic" ("_:::_" [4, 0] 3)
+
+translations
+ "_atom_constrain a t" => "CONST atom (_constrain a t)"
+
+
+subsection {* A lemma for proving instances of class @{text at}. *}
+
+setup {* Sign.add_const_constraint (@{const_name "permute"}, NONE) *}
+setup {* Sign.add_const_constraint (@{const_name "atom"}, NONE) *}
+
+text {*
+ New atom types are defined as subtypes of @{typ atom}.
+*}
+
+lemma exists_eq_simple_sort:
+ shows "\<exists>a. a \<in> {a. sort_of a = s}"
+ by (rule_tac x="Atom s 0" in exI, simp)
+
+lemma exists_eq_sort:
+ shows "\<exists>a. a \<in> {a. sort_of a \<in> range sort_fun}"
+ by (rule_tac x="Atom (sort_fun x) y" in exI, simp)
+
+lemma at_base_class:
+ fixes sort_fun :: "'b \<Rightarrow>atom_sort"
+ fixes Rep :: "'a \<Rightarrow> atom" and Abs :: "atom \<Rightarrow> 'a"
+ assumes type: "type_definition Rep Abs {a. sort_of a \<in> range sort_fun}"
+ assumes atom_def: "\<And>a. atom a = Rep a"
+ assumes permute_def: "\<And>p a. p \<bullet> a = Abs (p \<bullet> Rep a)"
+ shows "OFCLASS('a, at_base_class)"
+proof
+ interpret type_definition Rep Abs "{a. sort_of a \<in> range sort_fun}" by (rule type)
+ have sort_of_Rep: "\<And>a. sort_of (Rep a) \<in> range sort_fun" using Rep by simp
+ fix a b :: 'a and p p1 p2 :: perm
+ show "0 \<bullet> a = a"
+ unfolding permute_def by (simp add: Rep_inverse)
+ show "(p1 + p2) \<bullet> a = p1 \<bullet> p2 \<bullet> a"
+ unfolding permute_def by (simp add: Abs_inverse sort_of_Rep)
+ show "atom a = atom b \<longleftrightarrow> a = b"
+ unfolding atom_def by (simp add: Rep_inject)
+ show "p \<bullet> atom a = atom (p \<bullet> a)"
+ unfolding permute_def atom_def by (simp add: Abs_inverse sort_of_Rep)
+qed
+
+(*
+lemma at_class:
+ fixes s :: atom_sort
+ fixes Rep :: "'a \<Rightarrow> atom" and Abs :: "atom \<Rightarrow> 'a"
+ assumes type: "type_definition Rep Abs {a. sort_of a \<in> range (\<lambda>x::unit. s)}"
+ assumes atom_def: "\<And>a. atom a = Rep a"
+ assumes permute_def: "\<And>p a. p \<bullet> a = Abs (p \<bullet> Rep a)"
+ shows "OFCLASS('a, at_class)"
+proof
+ interpret type_definition Rep Abs "{a. sort_of a \<in> range (\<lambda>x::unit. s)}" by (rule type)
+ have sort_of_Rep: "\<And>a. sort_of (Rep a) = s" using Rep by (simp add: image_def)
+ fix a b :: 'a and p p1 p2 :: perm
+ show "0 \<bullet> a = a"
+ unfolding permute_def by (simp add: Rep_inverse)
+ show "(p1 + p2) \<bullet> a = p1 \<bullet> p2 \<bullet> a"
+ unfolding permute_def by (simp add: Abs_inverse sort_of_Rep)
+ show "sort_of (atom a) = sort_of (atom b)"
+ unfolding atom_def by (simp add: sort_of_Rep)
+ show "atom a = atom b \<longleftrightarrow> a = b"
+ unfolding atom_def by (simp add: Rep_inject)
+ show "p \<bullet> atom a = atom (p \<bullet> a)"
+ unfolding permute_def atom_def by (simp add: Abs_inverse sort_of_Rep)
+qed
+*)
+
+lemma at_class:
+ fixes s :: atom_sort
+ fixes Rep :: "'a \<Rightarrow> atom" and Abs :: "atom \<Rightarrow> 'a"
+ assumes type: "type_definition Rep Abs {a. sort_of a = s}"
+ assumes atom_def: "\<And>a. atom a = Rep a"
+ assumes permute_def: "\<And>p a. p \<bullet> a = Abs (p \<bullet> Rep a)"
+ shows "OFCLASS('a, at_class)"
+proof
+ interpret type_definition Rep Abs "{a. sort_of a = s}" by (rule type)
+ have sort_of_Rep: "\<And>a. sort_of (Rep a) = s" using Rep by (simp add: image_def)
+ fix a b :: 'a and p p1 p2 :: perm
+ show "0 \<bullet> a = a"
+ unfolding permute_def by (simp add: Rep_inverse)
+ show "(p1 + p2) \<bullet> a = p1 \<bullet> p2 \<bullet> a"
+ unfolding permute_def by (simp add: Abs_inverse sort_of_Rep)
+ show "sort_of (atom a) = sort_of (atom b)"
+ unfolding atom_def by (simp add: sort_of_Rep)
+ show "atom a = atom b \<longleftrightarrow> a = b"
+ unfolding atom_def by (simp add: Rep_inject)
+ show "p \<bullet> atom a = atom (p \<bullet> a)"
+ unfolding permute_def atom_def by (simp add: Abs_inverse sort_of_Rep)
+qed
+
+setup {* Sign.add_const_constraint
+ (@{const_name "permute"}, SOME @{typ "perm \<Rightarrow> 'a::pt \<Rightarrow> 'a"}) *}
+setup {* Sign.add_const_constraint
+ (@{const_name "atom"}, SOME @{typ "'a::at_base \<Rightarrow> atom"}) *}
+
+
+
+section {* The freshness lemma according to Andy Pitts *}
+
+lemma freshness_lemma:
+ fixes h :: "'a::at \<Rightarrow> 'b::pt"
+ assumes a: "\<exists>a. atom a \<sharp> (h, h a)"
+ shows "\<exists>x. \<forall>a. atom a \<sharp> h \<longrightarrow> h a = x"
+proof -
+ from a obtain b where a1: "atom b \<sharp> h" and a2: "atom b \<sharp> h b"
+ by (auto simp add: fresh_Pair)
+ show "\<exists>x. \<forall>a. atom a \<sharp> h \<longrightarrow> h a = x"
+ proof (intro exI allI impI)
+ fix a :: 'a
+ assume a3: "atom a \<sharp> h"
+ show "h a = h b"
+ proof (cases "a = b")
+ assume "a = b"
+ thus "h a = h b" by simp
+ next
+ assume "a \<noteq> b"
+ hence "atom a \<sharp> b" by (simp add: fresh_at_base)
+ with a3 have "atom a \<sharp> h b"
+ by (rule fresh_fun_app)
+ with a2 have d1: "(atom b \<rightleftharpoons> atom a) \<bullet> (h b) = (h b)"
+ by (rule swap_fresh_fresh)
+ from a1 a3 have d2: "(atom b \<rightleftharpoons> atom a) \<bullet> h = h"
+ by (rule swap_fresh_fresh)
+ from d1 have "h b = (atom b \<rightleftharpoons> atom a) \<bullet> (h b)" by simp
+ also have "\<dots> = ((atom b \<rightleftharpoons> atom a) \<bullet> h) ((atom b \<rightleftharpoons> atom a) \<bullet> b)"
+ by (rule permute_fun_app_eq)
+ also have "\<dots> = h a"
+ using d2 by simp
+ finally show "h a = h b" by simp
+ qed
+ qed
+qed
+
+lemma freshness_lemma_unique:
+ fixes h :: "'a::at \<Rightarrow> 'b::pt"
+ assumes a: "\<exists>a. atom a \<sharp> (h, h a)"
+ shows "\<exists>!x. \<forall>a. atom a \<sharp> h \<longrightarrow> h a = x"
+proof (rule ex_ex1I)
+ from a show "\<exists>x. \<forall>a. atom a \<sharp> h \<longrightarrow> h a = x"
+ by (rule freshness_lemma)
+next
+ fix x y
+ assume x: "\<forall>a. atom a \<sharp> h \<longrightarrow> h a = x"
+ assume y: "\<forall>a. atom a \<sharp> h \<longrightarrow> h a = y"
+ from a x y show "x = y"
+ by (auto simp add: fresh_Pair)
+qed
+
+text {* packaging the freshness lemma into a function *}
+
+definition
+ fresh_fun :: "('a::at \<Rightarrow> 'b::pt) \<Rightarrow> 'b"
+where
+ "fresh_fun h = (THE x. \<forall>a. atom a \<sharp> h \<longrightarrow> h a = x)"
+
+lemma fresh_fun_apply:
+ fixes h :: "'a::at \<Rightarrow> 'b::pt"
+ assumes a: "\<exists>a. atom a \<sharp> (h, h a)"
+ assumes b: "atom a \<sharp> h"
+ shows "fresh_fun h = h a"
+unfolding fresh_fun_def
+proof (rule the_equality)
+ show "\<forall>a'. atom a' \<sharp> h \<longrightarrow> h a' = h a"
+ proof (intro strip)
+ fix a':: 'a
+ assume c: "atom a' \<sharp> h"
+ from a have "\<exists>x. \<forall>a. atom a \<sharp> h \<longrightarrow> h a = x" by (rule freshness_lemma)
+ with b c show "h a' = h a" by auto
+ qed
+next
+ fix fr :: 'b
+ assume "\<forall>a. atom a \<sharp> h \<longrightarrow> h a = fr"
+ with b show "fr = h a" by auto
+qed
+
+lemma fresh_fun_apply':
+ fixes h :: "'a::at \<Rightarrow> 'b::pt"
+ assumes a: "atom a \<sharp> h" "atom a \<sharp> h a"
+ shows "fresh_fun h = h a"
+ apply (rule fresh_fun_apply)
+ apply (auto simp add: fresh_Pair intro: a)
+ done
+
+lemma fresh_fun_eqvt:
+ fixes h :: "'a::at \<Rightarrow> 'b::pt"
+ assumes a: "\<exists>a. atom a \<sharp> (h, h a)"
+ shows "p \<bullet> (fresh_fun h) = fresh_fun (p \<bullet> h)"
+ using a
+ apply (clarsimp simp add: fresh_Pair)
+ apply (subst fresh_fun_apply', assumption+)
+ apply (drule fresh_permute_iff [where p=p, THEN iffD2])
+ apply (drule fresh_permute_iff [where p=p, THEN iffD2])
+ apply (simp add: atom_eqvt permute_fun_app_eq [where f=h])
+ apply (erule (1) fresh_fun_apply' [symmetric])
+ done
+
+lemma fresh_fun_supports:
+ fixes h :: "'a::at \<Rightarrow> 'b::pt"
+ assumes a: "\<exists>a. atom a \<sharp> (h, h a)"
+ shows "(supp h) supports (fresh_fun h)"
+ apply (simp add: supports_def fresh_def [symmetric])
+ apply (simp add: fresh_fun_eqvt [OF a] swap_fresh_fresh)
+ done
+
+notation fresh_fun (binder "FRESH " 10)
+
+lemma FRESH_f_iff:
+ fixes P :: "'a::at \<Rightarrow> 'b::pure"
+ fixes f :: "'b \<Rightarrow> 'c::pure"
+ assumes P: "finite (supp P)"
+ shows "(FRESH x. f (P x)) = f (FRESH x. P x)"
+proof -
+ obtain a::'a where "atom a \<notin> supp P"
+ using P by (rule obtain_at_base)
+ hence "atom a \<sharp> P"
+ by (simp add: fresh_def)
+ show "(FRESH x. f (P x)) = f (FRESH x. P x)"
+ apply (subst fresh_fun_apply' [where a=a, OF _ pure_fresh])
+ apply (cut_tac `atom a \<sharp> P`)
+ apply (simp add: fresh_conv_MOST)
+ apply (elim MOST_rev_mp, rule MOST_I, clarify)
+ apply (simp add: permute_fun_def permute_pure fun_eq_iff)
+ apply (subst fresh_fun_apply' [where a=a, OF `atom a \<sharp> P` pure_fresh])
+ apply (rule refl)
+ done
+qed
+
+lemma FRESH_binop_iff:
+ fixes P :: "'a::at \<Rightarrow> 'b::pure"
+ fixes Q :: "'a::at \<Rightarrow> 'c::pure"
+ fixes binop :: "'b \<Rightarrow> 'c \<Rightarrow> 'd::pure"
+ assumes P: "finite (supp P)"
+ and Q: "finite (supp Q)"
+ shows "(FRESH x. binop (P x) (Q x)) = binop (FRESH x. P x) (FRESH x. Q x)"
+proof -
+ from assms have "finite (supp P \<union> supp Q)" by simp
+ then obtain a::'a where "atom a \<notin> (supp P \<union> supp Q)"
+ by (rule obtain_at_base)
+ hence "atom a \<sharp> P" and "atom a \<sharp> Q"
+ by (simp_all add: fresh_def)
+ show ?thesis
+ apply (subst fresh_fun_apply' [where a=a, OF _ pure_fresh])
+ apply (cut_tac `atom a \<sharp> P` `atom a \<sharp> Q`)
+ apply (simp add: fresh_conv_MOST)
+ apply (elim MOST_rev_mp, rule MOST_I, clarify)
+ apply (simp add: permute_fun_def permute_pure fun_eq_iff)
+ apply (subst fresh_fun_apply' [where a=a, OF `atom a \<sharp> P` pure_fresh])
+ apply (subst fresh_fun_apply' [where a=a, OF `atom a \<sharp> Q` pure_fresh])
+ apply (rule refl)
+ done
+qed
+
+lemma FRESH_conj_iff:
+ fixes P Q :: "'a::at \<Rightarrow> bool"
+ assumes P: "finite (supp P)" and Q: "finite (supp Q)"
+ shows "(FRESH x. P x \<and> Q x) \<longleftrightarrow> (FRESH x. P x) \<and> (FRESH x. Q x)"
+using P Q by (rule FRESH_binop_iff)
+
+lemma FRESH_disj_iff:
+ fixes P Q :: "'a::at \<Rightarrow> bool"
+ assumes P: "finite (supp P)" and Q: "finite (supp Q)"
+ shows "(FRESH x. P x \<or> Q x) \<longleftrightarrow> (FRESH x. P x) \<or> (FRESH x. Q x)"
+using P Q by (rule FRESH_binop_iff)
+
+
+section {* Library functions for the nominal infrastructure *}
+
+use "nominal_library.ML"
+
+
+section {* Automation for creating concrete atom types *}
+
+text {* at the moment only single-sort concrete atoms are supported *}
+
+use "nominal_atoms.ML"
+
+
+
+end