theory TypeSchemes2

imports "../Nominal2"

begin

section {*** Type Schemes defined as a single nominal datatype ***}

atom_decl name 

nominal_datatype ty =

  Var "name"

| Fun "ty" "ty"

and tys =

  All xs::"name fset" ty::"ty" binds (set+) xs in ty

thm ty_tys.distinct

thm ty_tys.induct

thm ty_tys.inducts

thm ty_tys.exhaust 

thm ty_tys.strong_exhaust

thm ty_tys.fv_defs

thm ty_tys.bn_defs

thm ty_tys.perm_simps

thm ty_tys.eq_iff

thm ty_tys.fv_bn_eqvt

thm ty_tys.size_eqvt

thm ty_tys.supports

thm ty_tys.supp

thm ty_tys.fresh

fun

  lookup :: "(name \<times> ty) list \<Rightarrow> name \<Rightarrow> ty"

where

  "lookup [] Y = Var Y"

| "lookup ((X, T) # Ts) Y = (if X = Y then T else lookup Ts Y)"

lemma lookup_eqvt[eqvt]:

  shows "(p \<bullet> lookup Ts T) = lookup (p \<bullet> Ts) (p \<bullet> T)"

apply(induct Ts T rule: lookup.induct)

apply(simp_all)

done

lemma TEST1:

  assumes "x = Inl y"

  shows "(p \<bullet> Sum_Type.Projl x) = Sum_Type.Projl (p \<bullet> x)"

using assms by simp

lemma TEST2:

  assumes "x = Inr y"

  shows "(p \<bullet> Sum_Type.Projr x) = Sum_Type.Projr (p \<bullet> x)"

using assms by simp

lemma test:

  assumes a: "\<exists>y. f x = Inl y"

  shows "(p \<bullet> (Sum_Type.Projl (f x))) = Sum_Type.Projl ((p \<bullet> f) (p \<bullet> x))"

using a

apply clarify

apply(frule_tac p="p" in permute_boolI)

apply(simp (no_asm_use) only: eqvts)

apply(subst (asm) permute_fun_app_eq)

back

apply(simp)

done

lemma test2:

  assumes a: "\<exists>y. f x = Inl y"

  shows "(p \<bullet> (Sum_Type.Projl (f x))) = Sum_Type.Projl (p \<bullet> (f x))"

using a

apply clarify

apply(frule_tac p="p" in permute_boolI)

apply(simp (no_asm_use) only: eqvts)

apply(subst (asm) permute_fun_app_eq)

back

apply(simp)

done

nominal_primrec (default "sum_case (\<lambda>x. Inl undefined) (\<lambda>x. Inr undefined)")

    subst  :: "(name \<times> ty) list \<Rightarrow> ty \<Rightarrow> ty"

and substs :: "(name \<times> ty) list \<Rightarrow> tys \<Rightarrow> tys"

where

  "subst \<theta> (Var X) = lookup \<theta> X"

| "subst \<theta> (Fun T1 T2) = Fun (subst \<theta> T1) (subst \<theta> T2)"

| "fset (map_fset atom xs) \<sharp>* \<theta> \<Longrightarrow> substs \<theta> (All xs T) = All xs (subst \<theta> T)"

(*unfolding subst_substs_graph_def eqvt_def

apply rule

apply perm_simp

apply (subst test3)

defer

apply (subst test3)

defer

apply (subst test3)

defer

apply rule*)

thm subst_substs_graph.intros

apply(subgoal_tac "\<And>p x r. subst_substs_graph x r \<Longrightarrow> subst_substs_graph (p \<bullet> x) (p \<bullet> r)")

apply(simp add: eqvt_def)

apply(rule allI)

apply(simp add: permute_fun_def permute_bool_def)

apply(rule ext)

apply(rule ext)

apply(rule iffI)

apply(drule_tac x="p" in meta_spec)

apply(drule_tac x="- p \<bullet> x" in meta_spec)

apply(drule_tac x="- p \<bullet> xa" in meta_spec)

apply(simp)

apply(drule_tac x="-p" in meta_spec)

apply(drule_tac x="x" in meta_spec)

apply(drule_tac x="xa" in meta_spec)

apply(simp)

--"Eqvt One way"

apply(erule subst_substs_graph.induct)

apply(perm_simp)

apply(rule subst_substs_graph.intros)

apply(erule subst_substs_graph.cases)

apply(simp (no_asm_use) only: eqvts)

apply(subst test)

back

apply (rule exI)

apply(assumption)

apply(rotate_tac 1)

apply(erule subst_substs_graph.cases)

apply(subst test)

back

apply (rule exI)

apply(assumption)

apply(perm_simp)

apply(rule subst_substs_graph.intros)

apply(assumption)

apply(assumption)

apply(subst test)

back

apply (rule exI)

apply(assumption)

apply(perm_simp)

apply(rule subst_substs_graph.intros)

apply(assumption)

apply(assumption)

apply(simp)

--"A"

apply(simp (no_asm_use) only: eqvts)

apply(subst test)

back

apply (rule exI)

apply(assumption)

apply(rotate_tac 1)

apply(erule subst_substs_graph.cases)

apply(subst test)

back

apply (rule exI)

apply(assumption)

apply(perm_simp)

apply(rule subst_substs_graph.intros)

apply(assumption)

apply(assumption)

apply(subst test)

back

apply (rule exI)

apply(assumption)

apply(perm_simp)

apply(rule subst_substs_graph.intros)

apply(assumption)

apply(assumption)

apply(simp)

--"A"

apply(simp)

apply(erule subst_substs_graph.cases)

apply(simp (no_asm_use) only: eqvts)

apply(subst test)

back

back

apply (rule exI)

apply(assumption)

apply(rule subst_substs_graph.intros)

apply (simp add: eqvts)

apply (subgoal_tac "(p \<bullet> (atom ` fset xs)) \<sharp>* (p \<bullet> \<theta>)")

apply (simp add: image_eqvt eqvts_raw eqvts)

apply (simp add: fresh_star_permute_iff)

apply(perm_simp)

apply(assumption)

apply(simp (no_asm_use) only: eqvts)

apply(subst test)

back

back

apply (rule exI)

apply(assumption)

apply(rule subst_substs_graph.intros)

apply (simp add: eqvts)

apply (subgoal_tac "(p \<bullet> (atom ` fset xs)) \<sharp>* (p \<bullet> \<theta>)")

apply (simp add: image_eqvt eqvts_raw eqvts)

apply (simp add: fresh_star_permute_iff)

apply(perm_simp)

apply(assumption)

apply(simp)

--"Eqvt done"

apply(rule TrueI)

apply (case_tac x)

apply simp apply clarify 

apply (rule_tac y="b" in ty_tys.exhaust(1))

apply (auto)[1]

apply (auto)[1]

apply simp apply clarify 

apply (rule_tac ya="b" and c="a" in ty_tys.strong_exhaust(2))

apply (auto)[1]

apply (auto)[5]

--"LAST GOAL"

apply (simp add: meta_eq_to_obj_eq[OF subst_def, symmetric, unfolded fun_eq_iff])

apply (subgoal_tac "eqvt_at (\<lambda>(l, r). subst l r) (\<theta>', T)")

apply (thin_tac "eqvt_at subst_substs_sumC (Inl (\<theta>', T))")

apply (thin_tac "eqvt_at subst_substs_sumC (Inl (\<theta>', Ta))")

prefer 2

apply (simp add: eqvt_at_def subst_def)

apply rule

apply (subst test2)

apply (simp add: subst_substs_sumC_def)

apply (simp add: THE_default_def)

apply (case_tac "Ex1 (subst_substs_graph (Inl (\<theta>', T)))")

prefer 2

apply simp

apply (simp add: the1_equality)

apply auto[1]

apply (erule_tac x="x" in allE)

apply simp

apply(cases rule: subst_substs_graph.cases)

apply assumption

apply (rule_tac x="lookup \<theta> X" in exI)

apply clarify

apply (rule the1_equality)

apply blast apply assumption

apply (rule_tac x="(Fun (Sum_Type.Projl (subst_substs_sum (Inl (\<theta>, T1))))

                  (Sum_Type.Projl (subst_substs_sum (Inl (\<theta>, T2)))))" in exI)

apply clarify

apply (rule the1_equality)

apply blast apply assumption

apply clarify

apply simp

--"-"

apply clarify

  apply (frule supp_eqvt_at)

  apply (simp add: finite_supp)

  apply (erule Abs_res_fcb)

  apply (simp add: Abs_fresh_iff)

  apply (simp add: Abs_fresh_iff)

  apply auto[1]

  apply (simp add: fresh_def fresh_star_def)

  apply (erule contra_subsetD)

  apply (simp add: supp_Pair)

  apply blast

  apply clarify

  apply (simp)

  apply (simp add: eqvt_at_def)

  apply (subst Abs_eq_iff)

  apply (rule_tac x="0::perm" in exI)

  apply (subgoal_tac "p \<bullet> \<theta>' = \<theta>'")

  apply (simp add: alphas fresh_star_zero)

  apply (subgoal_tac "\<And>x. x \<in> supp (subst \<theta>' (p \<bullet> T)) \<Longrightarrow> x \<in> p \<bullet> atom ` fset xs \<longleftrightarrow> x \<in> atom ` fset xsa")

  apply blast

  apply (subgoal_tac "x \<in> supp(p \<bullet> \<theta>', p \<bullet> T)")

  apply (simp add: supp_Pair eqvts eqvts_raw)

  apply auto[1]

  apply (subgoal_tac "(atom ` fset (p \<bullet> xs)) \<sharp>* \<theta>'")

  apply (simp add: fresh_star_def fresh_def)

  apply(drule_tac p1="p" in iffD2[OF fresh_star_permute_iff])

  apply (simp add: eqvts eqvts_raw)

  apply (simp add: fresh_star_def fresh_def)

  apply (simp (no_asm) only: supp_eqvt[symmetric] Pair_eqvt[symmetric])

  apply (subgoal_tac "p \<bullet> supp (subst \<theta>' T) \<subseteq> p \<bullet> supp (\<theta>', T)")

  apply (erule subsetD)

  apply (simp add: supp_eqvt)

  apply (rule perm_supp_eq)

  apply (simp add: fresh_def fresh_star_def)

  apply blast

  done

termination (eqvt) by lexicographic_order

text {* Some Tests about Alpha-Equality *}

lemma

  shows "All {|a, b|} (Fun (Var a) (Var b)) = All {|b, a|} (Fun (Var a) (Var b))"

  apply(simp add: Abs_eq_iff)

  apply(rule_tac x="0::perm" in exI)

  apply(simp add: alphas fresh_star_def ty_tys.supp supp_at_base)

  done

lemma

  shows "All {|a, b|} (Fun (Var a) (Var b)) = All {|a, b|} (Fun (Var b) (Var a))"

  apply(simp add: Abs_eq_iff)

  apply(rule_tac x="(atom a \<rightleftharpoons> atom b)" in exI)

  apply(simp add: alphas fresh_star_def supp_at_base ty_tys.supp)

  done

lemma

  shows "All {|a, b, c|} (Fun (Var a) (Var b)) = All {|a, b|} (Fun (Var a) (Var b))"

  apply(simp add: Abs_eq_iff)

  apply(rule_tac x="0::perm" in exI)

  apply(simp add: alphas fresh_star_def ty_tys.supp supp_at_base)

done

lemma

  assumes a: "a \<noteq> b"

  shows "\<not>(All {|a, b|} (Fun (Var a) (Var b)) = All {|c|} (Fun (Var c) (Var c)))"

  using a

  apply(simp add: Abs_eq_iff)

  apply(clarify)

  apply(simp add: alphas fresh_star_def ty_tys.supp supp_at_base)

  apply auto

  done

end