--- /dev/null Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
+++ b/CookBook/Package/Ind_Code.thy Thu Jan 29 17:09:56 2009 +0000
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+theory Ind_Code
+imports "../Base" Simple_Inductive_Package
+begin
+
+text {*
+
+ @{ML_chunk [display,gray] induction_rules}
+
+*}
+
+text {*
+
+ @{ML_chunk [display,gray] intro_rules}
+
+*}
+
+text {*
+
+ @{ML_chunk [display,gray] storing}
+
+*}
+end
--- a/CookBook/Package/Ind_Intro.thy Thu Jan 29 17:08:39 2009 +0000
+++ b/CookBook/Package/Ind_Intro.thy Thu Jan 29 17:09:56 2009 +0000
@@ -15,20 +15,20 @@
\end{flushright}
\medskip
- Higher order logic, as implemented in Isabelle/HOL, is based on just a few
- primitive constants, like equality, implication, and the description
- operator, whose properties are described as axioms. All other concepts, such
- as inductive predicates, datatypes, or recursive functions are defined in
- terms of those constants, and the desired properties, for example induction
- theorems, or recursion equations are derived from the definitions by a
- formal proof. Since it would be very tedious for a user to define complex
- inductive predicates or datatypes ``by hand'' just using the primitive
- operators of higher order logic, Isabelle/HOL already contains a number of
- packages automating such work. Thanks to those packages, the user can give a
- high-level specification, like a list of introduction rules or constructors,
- and the package then does all the low-level definitions and proofs behind
- the scenes. In this chapter we explain how such a package can be
- implemented.
+ HOL is based on just a few primitive constants, like equality, implication,
+ and the description operator, whose properties are described as axioms. All
+ other concepts, such as inductive predicates, datatypes, or recursive
+ functions are defined in terms of those constants, and the desired
+ properties, for example induction theorems, or recursion equations are
+ derived from the definitions by a formal proof. Since it would be very
+ tedious for a user to define complex inductive predicates or datatypes ``by
+ hand'' just using the primitive operators of higher order logic,
+ Isabelle/HOL already contains a number of packages automating such
+ work. Thanks to those packages, the user can give a high-level
+ specification, like a list of introduction rules or constructors, and the
+ package then does all the low-level definitions and proofs behind the
+ scenes. In this chapter we explain how such a package can be implemented.
+
%The packages are written in Standard ML, the implementation
%language of Isabelle, and can be invoked by the user from within theory documents
--- a/CookBook/Package/simple_inductive_package.ML Thu Jan 29 17:08:39 2009 +0000
+++ b/CookBook/Package/simple_inductive_package.ML Thu Jan 29 17:09:56 2009 +0000
@@ -42,10 +42,10 @@
end) (preds_syn ~~ preds ~~ Tss) lthy;
val (_, lthy2) = Variable.add_fixes (map (Binding.base_name o fst) params) lthy1;
-
-
+
+
(* proving the induction rules *)
-
+ (* @chunk induction_rules *)
val (Pnames, lthy3) =
Variable.variant_fixes (replicate (length preds) "P") lthy2;
val Ps = map (fn (s, Ts) => Free (s, Ts ---> HOLogic.boolT))
@@ -76,10 +76,10 @@
end;
val indrules = map prove_indrule (preds ~~ Ps ~~ Tss);
-
+ (* @end *)
(* proving the introduction rules *)
-
+ (* @chunk intro_rules *)
val all_elims = fold (fn ct => fn th => th RS inst_spec ct);
val imp_elims = fold (fn th => fn th' => [th', th] MRS mp);
@@ -112,12 +112,13 @@
singleton (ProofContext.export lthy2 lthy1);
val intr_ths = map_index prove_intr intrs;
-
+ (* @end *)
(* storing the theorems *)
-
+ (* @chunk storing *)
val mut_name = space_implode "_" (map (Binding.base_name o fst o fst) preds_syn);
val case_names = map (Binding.base_name o fst o fst) intrs
+ (* @end *)
in
lthy1 |>
LocalTheory.notes Thm.theoremK (map (fn (((a, atts), _), th) =>
@@ -133,7 +134,7 @@
Attrib.internal (K (Induct.induct_pred ""))]), [([th], [])]))
(preds_syn ~~ indrules)) #>> maps snd)
end;
-
+
(* @chunk add_inductive *)
fun add_inductive preds_syn params_syn intro_srcs lthy =
let