progs/Matcher.thy
author cu
Fri, 20 Oct 2017 00:01:39 +0100
changeset 526 a6093b0ad246
parent 495 7d9d86dc7aa0
child 882 5fcad75ade92
permissions -rw-r--r--
updated

theory Matcher
  imports "Main" 
begin


section {* Regular Expressions *}

datatype rexp =
  ZERO
| ONE
| CHAR char
| SEQ rexp rexp
| ALT rexp rexp
| STAR rexp


section {* Sequential Composition of Sets *}

definition
  Seq :: "string set \<Rightarrow> string set \<Rightarrow> string set" ("_ ;; _" [100,100] 100)
where 
  "A ;; B = {s1 @ s2 | s1 s2. s1 \<in> A \<and> s2 \<in> B}"

text {* Two Simple Properties about Sequential Composition *}

lemma seq_empty [simp]:
  shows "A ;; {[]} = A"
  and   "{[]} ;; A = A"
by (simp_all add: Seq_def)

lemma seq_null [simp]:
  shows "A ;; {} = {}"
  and   "{} ;; A = {}"
by (simp_all add: Seq_def)

section {* Kleene Star for Sets *}

inductive_set
  Star :: "string set \<Rightarrow> string set" ("_\<star>" [101] 102)
  for A :: "string set"
where
  start[intro]: "[] \<in> A\<star>"
| step[intro]:  "\<lbrakk>s1 \<in> A; s2 \<in> A\<star>\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> s1 @ s2 \<in> A\<star>"


text {* A Standard Property of Star *}

lemma star_cases:
  shows "A\<star> = {[]} \<union> A ;; A\<star>"
unfolding Seq_def
by (auto) (metis Star.simps)

lemma star_decomp: 
  assumes a: "c # x \<in> A\<star>" 
  shows "\<exists>a b. x = a @ b \<and> c # a \<in> A \<and> b \<in> A\<star>"
using a
by (induct x\<equiv>"c # x" rule: Star.induct) 
   (auto simp add: append_eq_Cons_conv)


section {* Semantics of Regular Expressions *}
 
fun
  L :: "rexp \<Rightarrow> string set"
where
  "L (ZERO) = {}"
| "L (ONE) = {[]}"
| "L (CHAR c) = {[c]}"
| "L (SEQ r1 r2) = (L r1) ;; (L r2)"
| "L (ALT r1 r2) = (L r1) \<union> (L r2)"
| "L (STAR r) = (L r)\<star>"

section {* The Matcher *}

fun
 nullable :: "rexp \<Rightarrow> bool"
where
  "nullable (ZERO) = False"
| "nullable (ONE) = True"
| "nullable (CHAR c) = False"
| "nullable (ALT r1 r2) = (nullable r1 \<or> nullable r2)"
| "nullable (SEQ r1 r2) = (nullable r1 \<and> nullable r2)"
| "nullable (STAR r) = True"


section {* Correctness Proof for Nullable *}

lemma nullable_correctness:
  shows "nullable r  \<longleftrightarrow> [] \<in> (L r)"
apply(induct r)
(* ZERO case *)
apply(simp only: nullable.simps)
apply(simp only: L.simps)
apply(simp)
(* ONE case *)
apply(simp only: nullable.simps)
apply(simp only: L.simps)
apply(simp)
(* CHAR case *)
apply(simp only: nullable.simps)
apply(simp only: L.simps)
apply(simp)
prefer 2
(* ALT case *)
apply(simp (no_asm) only: nullable.simps)
apply(simp only:)
apply(simp only: L.simps)
apply(simp)
(* SEQ case *)
oops

lemma nullable_correctness:
  shows "nullable r  \<longleftrightarrow> [] \<in> (L r)"
apply(induct r)
apply(simp_all)
(* all easy subgoals are proved except the last 2 *)
(* where the definition of Seq needs to be unfolded. *)
oops

lemma nullable_correctness:
  shows "nullable r  \<longleftrightarrow> [] \<in> (L r)"
apply(induct r)
apply(simp_all add: Seq_def)
(* except the star case every thing is proved *)
(* we need to use the rule for Star.start *)
oops

lemma nullable_correctness:
  shows "nullable r  \<longleftrightarrow> [] \<in> (L r)"
apply(induct r)
apply(simp_all add: Seq_def Star.start)
done


end