\documentclass{article}

\usepackage{../style}

\begin{document}

\section*{Homework 2}

\begin{enumerate}

\item What is the language recognised by the regular expressions

  $(\varnothing^*)^*$.

\item Review the first handout about sets of strings and read the

  second handout. Assuming the alphabet is the set $\{a, b\}$, decide

  which of the following equations are true in general for arbitrary

  languages $A$, $B$ and $C$:

  \begin{eqnarray}

    (A \cup B) @ C & =^? & A @ C \cup B @ C\nonumber\\

    A^* \cup B^*   & =^? & (A \cup B)^*\nonumber\\

    A^* @ A^*      & =^? & A^*\nonumber\\

    (A \cap B)@ C  & =^? & (A@C) \cap (B@C)\nonumber

  \end{eqnarray}

  \noindent In case an equation is true, give an explanation; otherwise

  give a counter-example.

\item Given the regular expressions $r_1 = \epsilon$ and $r_2 =

  \varnothing$ and $r_3 = a$. How many strings can the regular

  expressions $r_1^*$, $r_2^*$ and $r_3^*$ each match?

\item Give regular expressions for (a) decimal numbers and for (b)

  binary numbers. (Hint: Observe that the empty string is not a

  number. Also observe that leading 0s are normally not written.)

\item Decide whether the following two regular expressions are

  equivalent $(\epsilon + a)^* \equiv^? a^*$ and $(a \cdot b)^* \cdot

  a \equiv^? a \cdot (b \cdot a)^*$.

\item Given the regular expression $r = (a \cdot b + b)^*$.  Compute

  what the derivative of $r$ is with respect to $a$, $b$ and $c$. Is

  $r$ nullable?

\item Prove that for all regular expressions $r$ we have

\begin{center} 

  $\textit{nullable}(r) \quad \text{if and only if} 

  \quad [] \in L(r)$ 

\end{center}

  Write down clearly in each case what you need to prove and

  what are the assumptions. 

\item Define what is meant by the derivative of a regular expressions

  with respoect to a character. (Hint: The derivative is defined

  recursively.)

\item Assume the set $Der$ is defined as

  \begin{center}

    $Der\,c\,A \dn \{ s \;|\;  c\!::\!s \in A\}$

  \end{center}

  What is the relation between $Der$ and the notion of derivative of

  regular expressions?

\item Give a regular expression over the alphabet $\{a,b\}$

  recognising all strings that do not contain any substring $bb$ and

  end in $a$.

\item Do $(a + b)^* \cdot b^+$ and $(a^* \cdot b^+) + (b^*\cdot b^+)$ define 

  the same language?

\item Define the function $zeroable$ by recursion over regular

  expressions. This function should satisfy the property

  \[

  zeroable(r) \;\;\text{if and only if}\;\;L(r) = \varnothing\qquad(*)

  \]

  The function $nullable$ for the not-regular expressions can be defined

  by 

  \[

  nullable(\sim r) \dn \neg(nullable(r))

  \]

  Unfortunately, a similar definition for $zeroable$ does not satisfy

  the property in $(*)$:

  \[

  zeroable(\sim r) \dn \neg(zeroable(r))

  \]

  Find out why?

\item Give a regular expressions that can recognise all strings from the 

  language $\{a^n\;|\;\exists k. n = 3 k + 1 \}$.

\end{enumerate}

\end{document}

%%% Local Variables: 

%%% mode: latex

%%% TeX-master: t

%%% End: