theory UTM
imports Main recursive abacus UF GCD turing_hoare
begin
section {* Wang coding of input arguments *}
text {*
The direct compilation of the universal function @{text "rec_F"} can not give us UTM, because @{text "rec_F"} is of arity 2,
where the first argument represents the Godel coding of the TM being simulated and the second argument represents the right number (in Wang's coding) of the TM tape.
(Notice, left number is always @{text "0"} at the very beginning). However, UTM needs to simulate the execution of any TM which may
very well take many input arguments. Therefore, a initialization TM needs to run before the TM compiled from @{text "rec_F"}, and the sequential
composition of these two TMs will give rise to the UTM we are seeking. The purpose of this initialization TM is to transform the multiple
input arguments of the TM being simulated into Wang's coding, so that it can be consumed by the TM compiled from @{text "rec_F"} as the second
argument.
However, this initialization TM (named @{text "t_wcode"}) can not be constructed by compiling from any resurve function, because every recursive
function takes a fixed number of input arguments, while @{text "t_wcode"} needs to take varying number of arguments and tranform them into
Wang's coding. Therefore, this section give a direct construction of @{text "t_wcode"} with just some parts being obtained from recursive functions.
\newlength{\basewidth}
\settowidth{\basewidth}{xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx}
\newlength{\baseheight}
\settoheight{\baseheight}{$B:R$}
\newcommand{\vsep}{5\baseheight}
The TM used to generate the Wang's code of input arguments is divided into three TMs
executed sequentially, namely $prepare$, $mainwork$ and $adjust$\<exclamdown>\<pounds>According to the
convention, start state of ever TM is fixed to state $1$ while the final state is
fixed to $0$.
The input and output of $prepare$ are illustrated respectively by Figure
\ref{prepare_input} and \ref{prepare_output}.
\begin{figure}[h!]
\centering
\scalebox{1.2}{
\begin{tikzpicture}
[tbox/.style = {draw, thick, inner sep = 5pt}]
\node (0) {};
\node (1) [tbox, text height = 3.5pt, right = -0.9pt of 0] {\wuhao $m$};
\node (2) [tbox, right = -0.9pt of 1] {\wuhao $0$};
\node (3) [tbox, right = -0.9pt of 2] {\wuhao $a_1$};
\node (4) [tbox, right = -0.9pt of 3] {\wuhao $0$};
\node (5) [tbox, right = -0.9pt of 4] {\wuhao $a_2$};
\node (6) [right = -0.9pt of 5] {\ldots \ldots};
\node (7) [tbox, right = -0.9pt of 6] {\wuhao $a_n$};
\draw [->, >=latex, thick] (1)+(0, -4\baseheight) -- (1);
\end{tikzpicture}}
\caption{The input of TM $prepare$} \label{prepare_input}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}[h!]
\centering
\scalebox{1.2}{
\begin{tikzpicture}
\node (0) {};
\node (1) [draw, text height = 3.5pt, right = -0.9pt of 0, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $m$};
\node (2) [draw, right = -0.9pt of 1, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $0$};
\node (3) [draw, right = -0.9pt of 2, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $0$};
\node (4) [draw, right = -0.9pt of 3, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $a_1$};
\node (5) [draw, right = -0.9pt of 4, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $0$};
\node (6) [draw, right = -0.9pt of 5, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $a_2$};
\node (7) [right = -0.9pt of 6] {\ldots \ldots};
\node (8) [draw, right = -0.9pt of 7, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $a_n$};
\node (9) [draw, right = -0.9pt of 8, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $0$};
\node (10) [draw, right = -0.9pt of 9, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $0$};
\node (11) [draw, right = -0.9pt of 10, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $1$};
\draw [->, >=latex, thick] (10)+(0, -4\baseheight) -- (10);
\end{tikzpicture}}
\caption{The output of TM $prepare$} \label{prepare_output}
\end{figure}
As shown in Figure \ref{prepare_input}, the input of $prepare$ is the same as the the input
of UTM, where $m$ is the Godel coding of the TM being interpreted and $a_1$ through $a_n$ are the $n$ input arguments of the TM under interpretation. The purpose of $purpose$ is to transform this initial tape layout to the one shown in Figure \ref{prepare_output},
which is convenient for the generation of Wang's codding of $a_1, \ldots, a_n$. The coding procedure starts from $a_n$ and ends after $a_1$ is encoded. The coding result is stored in an accumulator at the end of the tape (initially represented by the $1$ two blanks right to $a_n$ in Figure \ref{prepare_output}). In Figure \ref{prepare_output}, arguments $a_1, \ldots, a_n$ are separated by two blanks on both ends with the rest so that movement conditions can be implemented conveniently in subsequent TMs, because, by convention,
two consecutive blanks are usually used to signal the end or start of a large chunk of data. The diagram of $prepare$ is given in Figure \ref{prepare_diag}.
\begin{figure}[h!]
\centering
\scalebox{0.9}{
\begin{tikzpicture}
\node[circle,draw] (1) {$1$};
\node[circle,draw] (2) at ($(1)+(0.3\basewidth, 0)$) {$2$};
\node[circle,draw] (3) at ($(2)+(0.3\basewidth, 0)$) {$3$};
\node[circle,draw] (4) at ($(3)+(0.3\basewidth, 0)$) {$4$};
\node[circle,draw] (5) at ($(4)+(0.3\basewidth, 0)$) {$5$};
\node[circle,draw] (6) at ($(5)+(0.3\basewidth, 0)$) {$6$};
\node[circle,draw] (7) at ($(6)+(0.3\basewidth, 0)$) {$7$};
\node[circle,draw] (8) at ($(7)+(0.3\basewidth, 0)$) {$0$};
\draw [->, >=latex] (1) edge [loop above] node[above] {$S_1:L$} (1)
;
\draw [->, >=latex] (1) -- node[above] {$S_0:S_1$} (2)
;
\draw [->, >=latex] (2) edge [loop above] node[above] {$S_1:R$} (2)
;
\draw [->, >=latex] (2) -- node[above] {$S_0:L$} (3)
;
\draw [->, >=latex] (3) edge[loop above] node[above] {$S_1:S_0$} (3)
;
\draw [->, >=latex] (3) -- node[above] {$S_0:R$} (4)
;
\draw [->, >=latex] (4) edge[loop above] node[above] {$S_0:R$} (4)
;
\draw [->, >=latex] (4) -- node[above] {$S_0:R$} (5)
;
\draw [->, >=latex] (5) edge[loop above] node[above] {$S_1:R$} (5)
;
\draw [->, >=latex] (5) -- node[above] {$S_0:R$} (6)
;
\draw [->, >=latex] (6) edge[bend left = 50] node[below] {$S_1:R$} (5)
;
\draw [->, >=latex] (6) -- node[above] {$S_0:R$} (7)
;
\draw [->, >=latex] (7) edge[loop above] node[above] {$S_0:S_1$} (7)
;
\draw [->, >=latex] (7) -- node[above] {$S_1:L$} (8)
;
\end{tikzpicture}}
\caption{The diagram of TM $prepare$} \label{prepare_diag}
\end{figure}
The purpose of TM $mainwork$ is to compute the Wang's encoding of $a_1, \ldots, a_n$. Every bit of $a_1, \ldots, a_n$, including the separating bits, is processed from left to right.
In order to detect the termination condition when the left most bit of $a_1$ is reached,
TM $mainwork$ needs to look ahead and consider three different situations at the start of
every iteration:
\begin{enumerate}
\item The TM configuration for the first situation is shown in Figure \ref{mainwork_case_one_input},
where the accumulator is stored in $r$, both of the next two bits
to be encoded are $1$. The configuration at the end of the iteration
is shown in Figure \ref{mainwork_case_one_output}, where the first 1-bit has been
encoded and cleared. Notice that the accumulator has been changed to
$(r+1) \times 2$ to reflect the encoded bit.
\item The TM configuration for the second situation is shown in Figure
\ref{mainwork_case_two_input},
where the accumulator is stored in $r$, the next two bits
to be encoded are $1$ and $0$. After the first
$1$-bit was encoded and cleared, the second $0$-bit is difficult to detect
and process. To solve this problem, these two consecutive bits are
encoded in one iteration. In this situation, only the first $1$-bit needs
to be cleared since the second one is cleared by definition.
The configuration at the end of the iteration
is shown in Figure \ref{mainwork_case_two_output}.
Notice that the accumulator has been changed to
$(r+1) \times 4$ to reflect the two encoded bits.
\item The third situation corresponds to the case when the last bit of $a_1$ is reached.
The TM configurations at the start and end of the iteration are shown in
Figure \ref{mainwork_case_three_input} and \ref{mainwork_case_three_output}
respectively. For this situation, only the read write head needs to be moved to
the left to prepare a initial configuration for TM $adjust$ to start with.
\end{enumerate}
The diagram of $mainwork$ is given in Figure \ref{mainwork_diag}. The two rectangular nodes
labeled with $2 \times x$ and $4 \times x$ are two TMs compiling from recursive functions
so that we do not have to design and verify two quite complicated TMs.
\begin{figure}[h!]
\centering
\scalebox{1.2}{
\begin{tikzpicture}
\node (0) {};
\node (1) [draw, text height = 3.9pt, right = -0.9pt of 0, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $m$};
\node (2) [draw, right = -0.9pt of 1, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $0$};
\node (3) [draw, right = -0.9pt of 2, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $0$};
\node (4) [draw, right = -0.9pt of 3, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $a_1$};
\node (5) [draw, right = -0.9pt of 4, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $0$};
\node (6) [draw, right = -0.9pt of 5, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $a_2$};
\node (7) [right = -0.9pt of 6] {\ldots \ldots};
\node (8) [draw, right = -0.9pt of 7, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $a_i$};
\node (9) [draw, right = -0.9pt of 8, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $1$};
\node (10) [draw, right = -0.9pt of 9, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $1$};
\node (11) [draw, right = -0.9pt of 10, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $0$};
\node (12) [right = -0.9pt of 11] {\ldots \ldots};
\node (13) [draw, right = -0.9pt of 12, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $0$};
\node (14) [draw, text height = 3.9pt, right = -0.9pt of 13, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $r$};
\draw [->, >=latex, thick] (13)+(0, -4\baseheight) -- (13);
\end{tikzpicture}}
\caption{The first situation for TM $mainwork$ to consider} \label{mainwork_case_one_input}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}[h!]
\centering
\scalebox{1.2}{
\begin{tikzpicture}
\node (0) {};
\node (1) [draw, text height = 3.9pt, right = -0.9pt of 0, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $m$};
\node (2) [draw, right = -0.9pt of 1, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $0$};
\node (3) [draw, right = -0.9pt of 2, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $0$};
\node (4) [draw, right = -0.9pt of 3, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $a_1$};
\node (5) [draw, right = -0.9pt of 4, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $0$};
\node (6) [draw, right = -0.9pt of 5, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $a_2$};
\node (7) [right = -0.9pt of 6] {\ldots \ldots};
\node (8) [draw, right = -0.9pt of 7, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $a_i$};
\node (9) [draw, right = -0.9pt of 8, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $1$};
\node (10) [draw, right = -0.9pt of 9, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $0$};
\node (11) [draw, right = -0.9pt of 10, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $0$};
\node (12) [right = -0.9pt of 11] {\ldots \ldots};
\node (13) [draw, right = -0.9pt of 12, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $0$};
\node (14) [draw, text height = 2.7pt, right = -0.9pt of 13, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $(r+1) \times 2$};
\draw [->, >=latex, thick] (13)+(0, -4\baseheight) -- (13);
\end{tikzpicture}}
\caption{The output for the first case of TM $mainwork$'s processing}
\label{mainwork_case_one_output}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}[h!]
\centering
\scalebox{1.2}{
\begin{tikzpicture}
\node (0) {};
\node (1) [draw, text height = 3.9pt, right = -0.9pt of 0, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $m$};
\node (2) [draw, right = -0.9pt of 1, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $0$};
\node (3) [draw, right = -0.9pt of 2, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $0$};
\node (4) [draw, right = -0.9pt of 3, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $a_1$};
\node (5) [draw, right = -0.9pt of 4, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $0$};
\node (6) [draw, right = -0.9pt of 5, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $a_2$};
\node (7) [right = -0.9pt of 6] {\ldots \ldots};
\node (8) [draw, right = -0.9pt of 7, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $a_i$};
\node (9) [draw, right = -0.9pt of 8, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $1$};
\node (10) [draw, right = -0.9pt of 9, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $0$};
\node (11) [draw, right = -0.9pt of 10, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $1$};
\node (12) [draw, right = -0.9pt of 11, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $0$};
\node (13) [right = -0.9pt of 12] {\ldots \ldots};
\node (14) [draw, right = -0.9pt of 13, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $0$};
\node (15) [draw, text height = 3.9pt, right = -0.9pt of 14, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $r$};
\draw [->, >=latex, thick] (14)+(0, -4\baseheight) -- (14);
\end{tikzpicture}}
\caption{The second situation for TM $mainwork$ to consider} \label{mainwork_case_two_input}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}[h!]
\centering
\scalebox{1.2}{
\begin{tikzpicture}
\node (0) {};
\node (1) [draw, text height = 3.9pt, right = -0.9pt of 0, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $m$};
\node (2) [draw, right = -0.9pt of 1, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $0$};
\node (3) [draw, right = -0.9pt of 2, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $0$};
\node (4) [draw, right = -0.9pt of 3, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $a_1$};
\node (5) [draw, right = -0.9pt of 4, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $0$};
\node (6) [draw, right = -0.9pt of 5, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $a_2$};
\node (7) [right = -0.9pt of 6] {\ldots \ldots};
\node (8) [draw, right = -0.9pt of 7, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $a_i$};
\node (9) [draw, right = -0.9pt of 8, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $1$};
\node (10) [draw, right = -0.9pt of 9, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $0$};
\node (11) [draw, right = -0.9pt of 10, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $0$};
\node (12) [draw, right = -0.9pt of 11, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $0$};
\node (13) [right = -0.9pt of 12] {\ldots \ldots};
\node (14) [draw, right = -0.9pt of 13, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $0$};
\node (15) [draw, text height = 2.7pt, right = -0.9pt of 14, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $(r+1) \times 4$};
\draw [->, >=latex, thick] (14)+(0, -4\baseheight) -- (14);
\end{tikzpicture}}
\caption{The output for the second case of TM $mainwork$'s processing}
\label{mainwork_case_two_output}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}[h!]
\centering
\scalebox{1.2}{
\begin{tikzpicture}
\node (0) {};
\node (1) [draw, text height = 3.9pt, right = -0.9pt of 0, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $m$};
\node (2) [draw, right = -0.9pt of 1, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $0$};
\node (3) [draw, right = -0.9pt of 2, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $0$};
\node (4) [draw, right = -0.9pt of 3, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $1$};
\node (5) [draw, right = -0.9pt of 4, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $0$};
\node (6) [right = -0.9pt of 5] {\ldots \ldots};
\node (7) [draw, right = -0.9pt of 6, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $0$};
\node (8) [draw, text height = 3.9pt, right = -0.9pt of 7, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $r$};
\draw [->, >=latex, thick] (7)+(0, -4\baseheight) -- (7);
\end{tikzpicture}}
\caption{The third situation for TM $mainwork$ to consider} \label{mainwork_case_three_input}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}[h!]
\centering
\scalebox{1.2}{
\begin{tikzpicture}
\node (0) {};
\node (1) [draw, text height = 3.9pt, right = -0.9pt of 0, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $m$};
\node (2) [draw, right = -0.9pt of 1, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $0$};
\node (3) [draw, right = -0.9pt of 2, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $0$};
\node (4) [draw, right = -0.9pt of 3, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $1$};
\node (5) [draw, right = -0.9pt of 4, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $0$};
\node (6) [right = -0.9pt of 5] {\ldots \ldots};
\node (7) [draw, right = -0.9pt of 6, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $0$};
\node (8) [draw, text height = 3.9pt, right = -0.9pt of 7, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $r$};
\draw [->, >=latex, thick] (3)+(0, -4\baseheight) -- (3);
\end{tikzpicture}}
\caption{The output for the third case of TM $mainwork$'s processing}
\label{mainwork_case_three_output}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}[h!]
\centering
\scalebox{0.9}{
\begin{tikzpicture}
\node[circle,draw] (1) {$1$};
\node[circle,draw] (2) at ($(1)+(0.3\basewidth, 0)$) {$2$};
\node[circle,draw] (3) at ($(2)+(0.3\basewidth, 0)$) {$3$};
\node[circle,draw] (4) at ($(3)+(0.3\basewidth, 0)$) {$4$};
\node[circle,draw] (5) at ($(4)+(0.3\basewidth, 0)$) {$5$};
\node[circle,draw] (6) at ($(5)+(0.3\basewidth, 0)$) {$6$};
\node[circle,draw] (7) at ($(2)+(0, -7\baseheight)$) {$7$};
\node[circle,draw] (8) at ($(7)+(0, -7\baseheight)$) {$8$};
\node[circle,draw] (9) at ($(8)+(0.3\basewidth, 0)$) {$9$};
\node[circle,draw] (10) at ($(9)+(0.3\basewidth, 0)$) {$10$};
\node[circle,draw] (11) at ($(10)+(0.3\basewidth, 0)$) {$11$};
\node[circle,draw] (12) at ($(11)+(0.3\basewidth, 0)$) {$12$};
\node[draw] (13) at ($(6)+(0.3\basewidth, 0)$) {$2 \times x$};
\node[circle,draw] (14) at ($(13)+(0.3\basewidth, 0)$) {$j_1$};
\node[draw] (15) at ($(12)+(0.3\basewidth, 0)$) {$4 \times x$};
\node[draw] (16) at ($(15)+(0.3\basewidth, 0)$) {$j_2$};
\node[draw] (17) at ($(7)+(0.3\basewidth, 0)$) {$0$};
\draw [->, >=latex] (1) edge[loop left] node[above] {$S_0:L$} (1)
;
\draw [->, >=latex] (1) -- node[above] {$S_1:L$} (2)
;
\draw [->, >=latex] (2) -- node[above] {$S_1:R$} (3)
;
\draw [->, >=latex] (2) -- node[left] {$S_1:L$} (7)
;
\draw [->, >=latex] (3) edge[loop above] node[above] {$S_1:S_0$} (3)
;
\draw [->, >=latex] (3) -- node[above] {$S_0:R$} (4)
;
\draw [->, >=latex] (4) edge[loop above] node[above] {$S_0:R$} (4)
;
\draw [->, >=latex] (4) -- node[above] {$S_1:R$} (5)
;
\draw [->, >=latex] (5) edge[loop above] node[above] {$S_1:R$} (5)
;
\draw [->, >=latex] (5) -- node[above] {$S_0:S_1$} (6)
;
\draw [->, >=latex] (6) edge[loop above] node[above] {$S_1:L$} (6)
;
\draw [->, >=latex] (6) -- node[above] {$S_0:R$} (13)
;
\draw [->, >=latex] (13) -- (14)
;
\draw (14) -- ($(14)+(0, 6\baseheight)$) -- ($(1) + (0, 6\baseheight)$) node [above,midway] {$S_1:L$}
;
\draw [->, >=latex] ($(1) + (0, 6\baseheight)$) -- (1)
;
\draw [->, >=latex] (7) -- node[above] {$S_0:R$} (17)
;
\draw [->, >=latex] (7) -- node[left] {$S_1:R$} (8)
;
\draw [->, >=latex] (8) -- node[above] {$S_0:R$} (9)
;
\draw [->, >=latex] (9) -- node[above] {$S_0:R$} (10)
;
\draw [->, >=latex] (10) -- node[above] {$S_1:R$} (11)
;
\draw [->, >=latex] (10) edge[loop above] node[above] {$S_0:R$} (10)
;
\draw [->, >=latex] (11) edge[loop above] node[above] {$S_1:R$} (11)
;
\draw [->, >=latex] (11) -- node[above] {$S_0:S_1$} (12)
;
\draw [->, >=latex] (12) -- node[above] {$S_0:R$} (15)
;
\draw [->, >=latex] (12) edge[loop above] node[above] {$S_1:L$} (12)
;
\draw [->, >=latex] (15) -- (16)
;
\draw (16) -- ($(16)+(0, -4\baseheight)$) -- ($(1) + (0, -18\baseheight)$) node [below,midway] {$S_1:L$}
;
\draw [->, >=latex] ($(1) + (0, -18\baseheight)$) -- (1)
;
\end{tikzpicture}}
\caption{The diagram of TM $mainwork$} \label{mainwork_diag}
\end{figure}
The purpose of TM $adjust$ is to encode the last bit of $a_1$. The initial and final configuration
of this TM are shown in Figure \ref{adjust_initial} and \ref{adjust_final} respectively.
The diagram of TM $adjust$ is shown in Figure \ref{adjust_diag}.
\begin{figure}[h!]
\centering
\scalebox{1.2}{
\begin{tikzpicture}
\node (0) {};
\node (1) [draw, text height = 3.9pt, right = -0.9pt of 0, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $m$};
\node (2) [draw, right = -0.9pt of 1, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $0$};
\node (3) [draw, right = -0.9pt of 2, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $0$};
\node (4) [draw, right = -0.9pt of 3, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $1$};
\node (5) [draw, right = -0.9pt of 4, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $0$};
\node (6) [right = -0.9pt of 5] {\ldots \ldots};
\node (7) [draw, right = -0.9pt of 6, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $0$};
\node (8) [draw, text height = 3.9pt, right = -0.9pt of 7, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $r$};
\draw [->, >=latex, thick] (3)+(0, -4\baseheight) -- (3);
\end{tikzpicture}}
\caption{Initial configuration of TM $adjust$} \label{adjust_initial}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}[h!]
\centering
\scalebox{1.2}{
\begin{tikzpicture}
\node (0) {};
\node (1) [draw, text height = 3.9pt, right = -0.9pt of 0, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $m$};
\node (2) [draw, right = -0.9pt of 1, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $0$};
\node (3) [draw, text height = 2.9pt, right = -0.9pt of 2, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $r+1$};
\node (4) [draw, right = -0.9pt of 3, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $0$};
\node (5) [draw, right = -0.9pt of 4, thick, inner sep = 5pt] {\wuhao $0$};
\node (6) [right = -0.9pt of 5] {\ldots \ldots};
\draw [->, >=latex, thick] (1)+(0, -4\baseheight) -- (1);
\end{tikzpicture}}
\caption{Final configuration of TM $adjust$} \label{adjust_final}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}[h!]
\centering
\scalebox{0.9}{
\begin{tikzpicture}
\node[circle,draw] (1) {$1$};
\node[circle,draw] (2) at ($(1)+(0.3\basewidth, 0)$) {$2$};
\node[circle,draw] (3) at ($(2)+(0.3\basewidth, 0)$) {$3$};
\node[circle,draw] (4) at ($(3)+(0.3\basewidth, 0)$) {$4$};
\node[circle,draw] (5) at ($(4)+(0.3\basewidth, 0)$) {$5$};
\node[circle,draw] (6) at ($(5)+(0.3\basewidth, 0)$) {$6$};
\node[circle,draw] (7) at ($(6)+(0.3\basewidth, 0)$) {$7$};
\node[circle,draw] (8) at ($(4)+(0, -7\baseheight)$) {$8$};
\node[circle,draw] (9) at ($(8)+(0.3\basewidth, 0)$) {$9$};
\node[circle,draw] (10) at ($(9)+(0.3\basewidth, 0)$) {$10$};
\node[circle,draw] (11) at ($(10)+(0.3\basewidth, 0)$) {$11$};
\node[circle,draw] (12) at ($(11)+(0.3\basewidth, 0)$) {$0$};
\draw [->, >=latex] (1) -- node[above] {$S_1:R$} (2)
;
\draw [->, >=latex] (1) edge[loop above] node[above] {$S_0:S_1$} (1)
;
\draw [->, >=latex] (2) -- node[above] {$S_1:R$} (3)
;
\draw [->, >=latex] (3) edge[loop above] node[above] {$S_0:R$} (3)
;
\draw [->, >=latex] (3) -- node[above] {$S_1:R$} (4)
;
\draw [->, >=latex] (4) -- node[above] {$S_1:L$} (5)
;
\draw [->, >=latex] (4) -- node[right] {$S_0:L$} (8)
;
\draw [->, >=latex] (5) -- node[above] {$S_0:L$} (6)
;
\draw [->, >=latex] (5) edge[loop above] node[above] {$S_1:S_0$} (5)
;
\draw [->, >=latex] (6) -- node[above] {$S_1:R$} (7)
;
\draw [->, >=latex] (6) edge[loop above] node[above] {$S_0:L$} (6)
;
\draw (7) -- ($(7)+(0, 6\baseheight)$) -- ($(2) + (0, 6\baseheight)$) node [above,midway] {$S_0:S_1$}
;
\draw [->, >=latex] ($(2) + (0, 6\baseheight)$) -- (2)
;
\draw [->, >=latex] (8) edge[loop left] node[left] {$S_1:S_0$} (8)
;
\draw [->, >=latex] (8) -- node[above] {$S_0:L$} (9)
;
\draw [->, >=latex] (9) edge[loop above] node[above] {$S_0:L$} (9)
;
\draw [->, >=latex] (9) -- node[above] {$S_1:L$} (10)
;
\draw [->, >=latex] (10) edge[loop above] node[above] {$S_0:L$} (10)
;
\draw [->, >=latex] (10) -- node[above] {$S_0:L$} (11)
;
\draw [->, >=latex] (11) edge[loop above] node[above] {$S_1:L$} (11)
;
\draw [->, >=latex] (11) -- node[above] {$S_0:R$} (12)
;
\end{tikzpicture}}
\caption{Diagram of TM $adjust$} \label{adjust_diag}
\end{figure}
*}
definition rec_twice :: "recf"
where
"rec_twice = Cn 1 rec_mult [id 1 0, constn 2]"
definition rec_fourtimes :: "recf"
where
"rec_fourtimes = Cn 1 rec_mult [id 1 0, constn 4]"
definition abc_twice :: "abc_prog"
where
"abc_twice = (let (aprog, ary, fp) = rec_ci rec_twice in
aprog [+] dummy_abc ((Suc 0)))"
definition abc_fourtimes :: "abc_prog"
where
"abc_fourtimes = (let (aprog, ary, fp) = rec_ci rec_fourtimes in
aprog [+] dummy_abc ((Suc 0)))"
definition twice_ly :: "nat list"
where
"twice_ly = layout_of abc_twice"
definition fourtimes_ly :: "nat list"
where
"fourtimes_ly = layout_of abc_fourtimes"
definition t_twice_compile :: "instr list"
where
"t_twice_compile= (tm_of abc_twice @ (shift (mopup 1) (length (tm_of abc_twice) div 2)))"
definition t_twice :: "instr list"
where
"t_twice = adjust t_twice_compile"
definition t_fourtimes_compile :: "instr list"
where
"t_fourtimes_compile= (tm_of abc_fourtimes @ (shift (mopup 1) (length (tm_of abc_fourtimes) div 2)))"
definition t_fourtimes :: "instr list"
where
"t_fourtimes = adjust t_fourtimes_compile"
definition t_twice_len :: "nat"
where
"t_twice_len = length t_twice div 2"
definition t_wcode_main_first_part:: "instr list"
where
"t_wcode_main_first_part \<equiv>
[(L, 1), (L, 2), (L, 7), (R, 3),
(R, 4), (W0, 3), (R, 4), (R, 5),
(W1, 6), (R, 5), (R, 13), (L, 6),
(R, 0), (R, 8), (R, 9), (Nop, 8),
(R, 10), (W0, 9), (R, 10), (R, 11),
(W1, 12), (R, 11), (R, t_twice_len + 14), (L, 12)]"
definition t_wcode_main :: "instr list"
where
"t_wcode_main = (t_wcode_main_first_part @ shift t_twice 12 @ [(L, 1), (L, 1)]
@ shift t_fourtimes (t_twice_len + 13) @ [(L, 1), (L, 1)])"
fun bl_bin :: "cell list \<Rightarrow> nat"
where
"bl_bin [] = 0"
| "bl_bin (Bk # xs) = 2 * bl_bin xs"
| "bl_bin (Oc # xs) = Suc (2 * bl_bin xs)"
declare bl_bin.simps[simp del]
type_synonym bin_inv_t = "cell list \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> tape \<Rightarrow> bool"
fun wcode_before_double :: "bin_inv_t"
where
"wcode_before_double ires rs (l, r) =
(\<exists> ln rn. l = Bk # Bk # Bk\<up>(ln) @ Oc # ires \<and>
r = Oc\<up>((Suc (Suc rs))) @ Bk\<up>(rn ))"
declare wcode_before_double.simps[simp del]
fun wcode_after_double :: "bin_inv_t"
where
"wcode_after_double ires rs (l, r) =
(\<exists> ln rn. l = Bk # Bk # Bk\<up>(ln) @ Oc # ires \<and>
r = Oc\<up>(Suc (Suc (Suc 2*rs))) @ Bk\<up>(rn))"
declare wcode_after_double.simps[simp del]
fun wcode_on_left_moving_1_B :: "bin_inv_t"
where
"wcode_on_left_moving_1_B ires rs (l, r) =
(\<exists> ml mr rn. l = Bk\<up>(ml) @ Oc # Oc # ires \<and>
r = Bk\<up>(mr) @ Oc\<up>(Suc rs) @ Bk\<up>(rn) \<and>
ml + mr > Suc 0 \<and> mr > 0)"
declare wcode_on_left_moving_1_B.simps[simp del]
fun wcode_on_left_moving_1_O :: "bin_inv_t"
where
"wcode_on_left_moving_1_O ires rs (l, r) =
(\<exists> ln rn.
l = Oc # ires \<and>
r = Oc # Bk\<up>(ln) @ Bk # Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc rs) @ Bk\<up>(rn))"
declare wcode_on_left_moving_1_O.simps[simp del]
fun wcode_on_left_moving_1 :: "bin_inv_t"
where
"wcode_on_left_moving_1 ires rs (l, r) =
(wcode_on_left_moving_1_B ires rs (l, r) \<or> wcode_on_left_moving_1_O ires rs (l, r))"
declare wcode_on_left_moving_1.simps[simp del]
fun wcode_on_checking_1 :: "bin_inv_t"
where
"wcode_on_checking_1 ires rs (l, r) =
(\<exists> ln rn. l = ires \<and>
r = Oc # Oc # Bk\<up>(ln) @ Bk # Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc rs) @ Bk\<up>(rn))"
fun wcode_erase1 :: "bin_inv_t"
where
"wcode_erase1 ires rs (l, r) =
(\<exists> ln rn. l = Oc # ires \<and>
tl r = Bk\<up>(ln) @ Bk # Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc rs) @ Bk\<up>(rn))"
declare wcode_erase1.simps [simp del]
fun wcode_on_right_moving_1 :: "bin_inv_t"
where
"wcode_on_right_moving_1 ires rs (l, r) =
(\<exists> ml mr rn.
l = Bk\<up>(ml) @ Oc # ires \<and>
r = Bk\<up>(mr) @ Oc\<up>(Suc rs) @ Bk\<up>(rn) \<and>
ml + mr > Suc 0)"
declare wcode_on_right_moving_1.simps [simp del]
declare wcode_on_right_moving_1.simps[simp del]
fun wcode_goon_right_moving_1 :: "bin_inv_t"
where
"wcode_goon_right_moving_1 ires rs (l, r) =
(\<exists> ml mr ln rn.
l = Oc\<up>(ml) @ Bk # Bk # Bk\<up>(ln) @ Oc # ires \<and>
r = Oc\<up>(mr) @ Bk\<up>(rn) \<and>
ml + mr = Suc rs)"
declare wcode_goon_right_moving_1.simps[simp del]
fun wcode_backto_standard_pos_B :: "bin_inv_t"
where
"wcode_backto_standard_pos_B ires rs (l, r) =
(\<exists> ln rn. l = Bk # Bk\<up>(ln) @ Oc # ires \<and>
r = Bk # Oc\<up>((Suc (Suc rs))) @ Bk\<up>(rn ))"
declare wcode_backto_standard_pos_B.simps[simp del]
fun wcode_backto_standard_pos_O :: "bin_inv_t"
where
"wcode_backto_standard_pos_O ires rs (l, r) =
(\<exists> ml mr ln rn.
l = Oc\<up>(ml) @ Bk # Bk # Bk\<up>(ln) @ Oc # ires \<and>
r = Oc\<up>(mr) @ Bk\<up>(rn) \<and>
ml + mr = Suc (Suc rs) \<and> mr > 0)"
declare wcode_backto_standard_pos_O.simps[simp del]
fun wcode_backto_standard_pos :: "bin_inv_t"
where
"wcode_backto_standard_pos ires rs (l, r) = (wcode_backto_standard_pos_B ires rs (l, r) \<or>
wcode_backto_standard_pos_O ires rs (l, r))"
declare wcode_backto_standard_pos.simps[simp del]
lemma [simp]: "<0::nat> = [Oc]"
apply(simp add: tape_of_nat_abv tape_of_nat_list.simps)
done
lemma tape_of_Suc_nat: "<Suc (a ::nat)> = replicate a Oc @ [Oc, Oc]"
apply(simp only: tape_of_nat_abv exp_ind, simp)
done
lemma [simp]: "length (<a::nat>) = Suc a"
apply(simp add: tape_of_nat_abv tape_of_nat_list.simps)
done
lemma [simp]: "<[a::nat]> = <a>"
apply(simp add: tape_of_nat_abv tape_of_nl_abv
tape_of_nat_list.simps)
done
lemma bin_wc_eq: "bl_bin xs = bl2wc xs"
proof(induct xs)
show " bl_bin [] = bl2wc []"
apply(simp add: bl_bin.simps)
done
next
fix a xs
assume "bl_bin xs = bl2wc xs"
thus " bl_bin (a # xs) = bl2wc (a # xs)"
apply(case_tac a, simp_all add: bl_bin.simps bl2wc.simps)
apply(simp_all add: bl2nat.simps bl2nat_double)
done
qed
lemma bl_bin_nat_Suc:
"bl_bin (<Suc a>) = bl_bin (<a>) + 2^(Suc a)"
apply(simp add: tape_of_nat_abv bl_bin.simps)
apply(induct a, auto simp: bl_bin.simps)
done
lemma [simp]: " rev (a\<up>(aa)) = a\<up>(aa)"
apply(simp)
done
lemma tape_of_nl_append_one: "lm \<noteq> [] \<Longrightarrow> <lm @ [a]> = <lm> @ Bk # Oc\<up>Suc a"
apply(induct lm, auto simp: tape_of_nl_cons split:if_splits)
done
lemma tape_of_nl_rev: "rev (<lm::nat list>) = (<rev lm>)"
apply(induct lm, simp, auto)
apply(auto simp: tape_of_nl_cons tape_of_nl_append_one split: if_splits)
apply(simp add: exp_ind[THEN sym])
done
lemma [simp]: "a\<up>(Suc 0) = [a]"
by(simp)
lemma tape_of_nl_cons_app1: "(<a # xs @ [b]>) = (Oc\<up>(Suc a) @ Bk # (<xs@ [b]>))"
apply(case_tac xs, simp add: tape_of_nl_abv tape_of_nat_list.simps tape_of_nat_abv)
apply(simp add: tape_of_nl_abv tape_of_nat_list.simps tape_of_nat_abv)
done
lemma bl_bin_bk_oc[simp]:
"bl_bin (xs @ [Bk, Oc]) =
bl_bin xs + 2*2^(length xs)"
apply(simp add: bin_wc_eq)
using bl2nat_cons_oc[of "xs @ [Bk]"]
apply(simp add: bl2nat_cons_bk bl2wc.simps)
done
lemma tape_of_nat[simp]: "(<a::nat>) = Oc\<up>(Suc a)"
apply(simp add: tape_of_nat_abv)
done
lemma tape_of_nl_cons_app2: "(<c # xs @ [b]>) = (<c # xs> @ Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc b))"
proof(induct "length xs" arbitrary: xs c,
simp add: tape_of_nl_abv tape_of_nat_list.simps)
fix x xs c
assume ind: "\<And>xs c. x = length xs \<Longrightarrow> <c # xs @ [b]> =
<c # xs> @ Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc b)"
and h: "Suc x = length (xs::nat list)"
show "<c # xs @ [b]> = <c # xs> @ Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc b)"
proof(case_tac xs, simp add: tape_of_nl_abv tape_of_nat_list.simps)
fix a list
assume g: "xs = a # list"
hence k: "<a # list @ [b]> = <a # list> @ Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc b)"
apply(rule_tac ind)
using h
apply(simp)
done
from g and k show "<c # xs @ [b]> = <c # xs> @ Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc b)"
apply(simp add: tape_of_nl_abv tape_of_nat_list.simps)
done
qed
qed
lemma [simp]: "length (<aa # a # list>) = Suc (Suc aa) + length (<a # list>)"
apply(simp add: tape_of_nl_abv tape_of_nat_list.simps)
done
lemma [simp]: "bl_bin (Oc\<up>(Suc aa) @ Bk # tape_of_nat_list (a # lista) @ [Bk, Oc]) =
bl_bin (Oc\<up>(Suc aa) @ Bk # tape_of_nat_list (a # lista)) +
2* 2^(length (Oc\<up>(Suc aa) @ Bk # tape_of_nat_list (a # lista)))"
using bl_bin_bk_oc[of "Oc\<up>(Suc aa) @ Bk # tape_of_nat_list (a # lista)"]
apply(simp)
done
declare replicate_Suc[simp del]
lemma [simp]:
"bl_bin (<aa # list>) + (4 * rs + 4) * 2 ^ (length (<aa # list>) - Suc 0)
= bl_bin (Oc\<up>(Suc aa) @ Bk # <list @ [0]>) + rs * (2 * 2 ^ (aa + length (<list @ [0]>)))"
apply(case_tac "list", simp add: add_mult_distrib)
apply(simp add: tape_of_nl_cons_app2 add_mult_distrib)
apply(simp add: tape_of_nl_abv tape_of_nat_list.simps)
done
lemma tape_of_nl_app_Suc: "((<list @ [Suc ab]>)) = (<list @ [ab]>) @ [Oc]"
apply(induct list)
apply(simp add: tape_of_nl_abv tape_of_nat_list.simps exp_ind)
apply(case_tac list)
apply(simp_all add:tape_of_nl_abv tape_of_nat_list.simps exp_ind)
done
lemma [simp]: "bl_bin (Oc # Oc\<up>(aa) @ Bk # <list @ [ab]> @ [Oc])
= bl_bin (Oc # Oc\<up>(aa) @ Bk # <list @ [ab]>) +
2^(length (Oc # Oc\<up>(aa) @ Bk # <list @ [ab]>))"
apply(simp add: bin_wc_eq)
apply(simp add: bl2nat_cons_oc bl2wc.simps)
using bl2nat_cons_oc[of "Oc # Oc\<up>(aa) @ Bk # <list @ [ab]>"]
apply(simp)
done
lemma [simp]: "bl_bin (Oc # Oc\<up>(aa) @ Bk # <list @ [ab]>) + (4 * 2 ^ (aa + length (<list @ [ab]>)) +
4 * (rs * 2 ^ (aa + length (<list @ [ab]>)))) =
bl_bin (Oc # Oc\<up>(aa) @ Bk # <list @ [Suc ab]>) +
rs * (2 * 2 ^ (aa + length (<list @ [Suc ab]>)))"
apply(simp add: tape_of_nl_app_Suc)
done
declare tape_of_nat[simp del]
fun wcode_double_case_inv :: "nat \<Rightarrow> bin_inv_t"
where
"wcode_double_case_inv st ires rs (l, r) =
(if st = Suc 0 then wcode_on_left_moving_1 ires rs (l, r)
else if st = Suc (Suc 0) then wcode_on_checking_1 ires rs (l, r)
else if st = 3 then wcode_erase1 ires rs (l, r)
else if st = 4 then wcode_on_right_moving_1 ires rs (l, r)
else if st = 5 then wcode_goon_right_moving_1 ires rs (l, r)
else if st = 6 then wcode_backto_standard_pos ires rs (l, r)
else if st = 13 then wcode_before_double ires rs (l, r)
else False)"
declare wcode_double_case_inv.simps[simp del]
fun wcode_double_case_state :: "config \<Rightarrow> nat"
where
"wcode_double_case_state (st, l, r) =
13 - st"
fun wcode_double_case_step :: "config \<Rightarrow> nat"
where
"wcode_double_case_step (st, l, r) =
(if st = Suc 0 then (length l)
else if st = Suc (Suc 0) then (length r)
else if st = 3 then
if hd r = Oc then 1 else 0
else if st = 4 then (length r)
else if st = 5 then (length r)
else if st = 6 then (length l)
else 0)"
fun wcode_double_case_measure :: "config \<Rightarrow> nat \<times> nat"
where
"wcode_double_case_measure (st, l, r) =
(wcode_double_case_state (st, l, r),
wcode_double_case_step (st, l, r))"
definition wcode_double_case_le :: "(config \<times> config) set"
where "wcode_double_case_le \<equiv> (inv_image lex_pair wcode_double_case_measure)"
lemma [intro]: "wf lex_pair"
by(auto intro:wf_lex_prod simp:lex_pair_def)
lemma wf_wcode_double_case_le[intro]: "wf wcode_double_case_le"
by(auto intro:wf_inv_image simp: wcode_double_case_le_def )
term fetch
lemma [simp]: "fetch t_wcode_main (Suc 0) Bk = (L, Suc 0)"
apply(simp add: t_wcode_main_def t_wcode_main_first_part_def
fetch.simps nth_of.simps)
done
lemma [simp]: "fetch t_wcode_main (Suc 0) Oc = (L, Suc (Suc 0))"
apply(simp add: t_wcode_main_def t_wcode_main_first_part_def
fetch.simps nth_of.simps)
done
lemma [simp]: "fetch t_wcode_main (Suc (Suc 0)) Oc = (R, 3)"
apply(simp add: t_wcode_main_def t_wcode_main_first_part_def
fetch.simps nth_of.simps)
done
lemma [simp]: "fetch t_wcode_main (Suc (Suc (Suc 0))) Bk = (R, 4)"
apply(simp add: t_wcode_main_def t_wcode_main_first_part_def
fetch.simps nth_of.simps)
done
lemma [simp]: "fetch t_wcode_main (Suc (Suc (Suc 0))) Oc = (W0, 3)"
apply(simp add: t_wcode_main_def t_wcode_main_first_part_def
fetch.simps nth_of.simps)
done
lemma [simp]: "fetch t_wcode_main 4 Bk = (R, 4)"
apply(subgoal_tac "4 = Suc 3")
apply(simp only: t_wcode_main_def t_wcode_main_first_part_def
fetch.simps nth_of.simps, auto)
done
lemma [simp]: "fetch t_wcode_main 4 Oc = (R, 5)"
apply(subgoal_tac "4 = Suc 3")
apply(simp only: t_wcode_main_def t_wcode_main_first_part_def
fetch.simps nth_of.simps, auto)
done
lemma [simp]: "fetch t_wcode_main 5 Oc = (R, 5)"
apply(subgoal_tac "5 = Suc 4")
apply(simp only: t_wcode_main_def t_wcode_main_first_part_def
fetch.simps nth_of.simps, auto)
done
lemma [simp]: "fetch t_wcode_main 5 Bk = (W1, 6)"
apply(subgoal_tac "5 = Suc 4")
apply(simp only: t_wcode_main_def t_wcode_main_first_part_def
fetch.simps nth_of.simps, auto)
done
lemma [simp]: "fetch t_wcode_main 6 Bk = (R, 13)"
apply(subgoal_tac "6 = Suc 5")
apply(simp only: t_wcode_main_def t_wcode_main_first_part_def
fetch.simps nth_of.simps, auto)
done
lemma [simp]: "fetch t_wcode_main 6 Oc = (L, 6)"
apply(subgoal_tac "6 = Suc 5")
apply(simp only: t_wcode_main_def t_wcode_main_first_part_def
fetch.simps nth_of.simps, auto)
done
lemma [elim]: "Bk\<up>(mr) = [] \<Longrightarrow> mr = 0"
apply(case_tac mr, auto)
done
lemma [simp]: "wcode_on_left_moving_1 ires rs (b, []) = False"
apply(simp add: wcode_on_left_moving_1.simps wcode_on_left_moving_1_B.simps
wcode_on_left_moving_1_O.simps)
done
declare wcode_on_checking_1.simps[simp del]
lemmas wcode_double_case_inv_simps =
wcode_on_left_moving_1.simps wcode_on_left_moving_1_O.simps
wcode_on_left_moving_1_B.simps wcode_on_checking_1.simps
wcode_erase1.simps wcode_on_right_moving_1.simps
wcode_goon_right_moving_1.simps wcode_backto_standard_pos.simps
lemma [simp]: "wcode_on_left_moving_1 ires rs (b, r) \<Longrightarrow> b \<noteq> []"
apply(simp add: wcode_double_case_inv_simps, auto)
done
lemma [elim]: "\<lbrakk>wcode_on_left_moving_1 ires rs (b, Bk # list);
tl b = aa \<and> hd b # Bk # list = ba\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow>
wcode_on_left_moving_1 ires rs (aa, ba)"
apply(simp only: wcode_on_left_moving_1.simps wcode_on_left_moving_1_O.simps
wcode_on_left_moving_1_B.simps)
apply(erule_tac disjE)
apply(erule_tac exE)+
apply(case_tac ml, simp)
apply(rule_tac x = "mr - Suc (Suc 0)" in exI, rule_tac x = rn in exI)
apply(case_tac mr, simp, case_tac nat, simp, simp add: exp_ind)
apply(rule_tac disjI1)
apply(rule_tac x = nat in exI, rule_tac x = "Suc mr" in exI, rule_tac x = rn in exI,
simp, simp add: replicate_Suc)
apply(erule_tac exE)+
apply(simp)
done
declare replicate_Suc[simp]
lemma [elim]:
"\<lbrakk>wcode_on_left_moving_1 ires rs (b, Oc # list); tl b = aa \<and> hd b # Oc # list = ba\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> wcode_on_checking_1 ires rs (aa, ba)"
apply(simp only: wcode_double_case_inv_simps)
apply(erule_tac disjE)
apply(erule_tac [!] exE)+
apply(case_tac mr, simp, auto)
done
lemma [simp]: "wcode_on_checking_1 ires rs (b, []) = False"
apply(auto simp: wcode_double_case_inv_simps)
done
lemma [simp]: "wcode_on_checking_1 ires rs (b, Bk # list) = False"
apply(auto simp: wcode_double_case_inv_simps)
done
lemma [elim]: "\<lbrakk>wcode_on_checking_1 ires rs (b, Oc # ba);Oc # b = aa \<and> list = ba\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> wcode_erase1 ires rs (aa, ba)"
apply(simp only: wcode_double_case_inv_simps)
apply(erule_tac exE)+
apply(rule_tac x = ln in exI, rule_tac x = rn in exI, simp)
done
lemma [simp]: "wcode_on_checking_1 ires rs (b, []) = False"
apply(simp add: wcode_double_case_inv_simps)
done
lemma [simp]: "wcode_on_checking_1 ires rs ([], Bk # list) = False"
apply(simp add: wcode_double_case_inv_simps)
done
lemma [simp]: "wcode_erase1 ires rs (b, []) = False"
apply(simp add: wcode_double_case_inv_simps)
done
lemma [simp]: "wcode_on_right_moving_1 ires rs (b, []) = False"
apply(simp add: wcode_double_case_inv_simps)
done
lemma [simp]: "wcode_on_right_moving_1 ires rs (b, []) = False"
apply(simp add: wcode_double_case_inv_simps)
done
lemma [elim]: "\<lbrakk>wcode_on_right_moving_1 ires rs (b, Bk # ba); Bk # b = aa \<and> list = b\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow>
wcode_on_right_moving_1 ires rs (aa, ba)"
apply(simp only: wcode_double_case_inv_simps)
apply(erule_tac exE)+
apply(rule_tac x = "Suc ml" in exI, rule_tac x = "mr - Suc 0" in exI,
rule_tac x = rn in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac mr, simp, simp)
done
lemma [elim]:
"\<lbrakk>wcode_on_right_moving_1 ires rs (b, Oc # ba); Oc # b = aa \<and> list = ba\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> wcode_goon_right_moving_1 ires rs (aa, ba)"
apply(simp only: wcode_double_case_inv_simps)
apply(erule_tac exE)+
apply(rule_tac x = "Suc 0" in exI, rule_tac x = "rs" in exI,
rule_tac x = "ml - Suc (Suc 0)" in exI, rule_tac x = rn in exI)
apply(case_tac mr, simp_all)
apply(case_tac ml, simp, case_tac nat, simp, simp)
done
lemma [simp]:
"wcode_on_right_moving_1 ires rs (b, []) \<Longrightarrow> False"
apply(simp add: wcode_double_case_inv_simps)
done
lemma [elim]: "\<lbrakk>wcode_erase1 ires rs (b, Bk # ba); Bk # b = aa \<and> list = ba; c = Bk # ba\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> wcode_on_right_moving_1 ires rs (aa, ba)"
apply(simp only: wcode_double_case_inv_simps)
apply(erule_tac exE)+
apply(rule_tac x = "Suc 0" in exI, rule_tac x = "Suc (Suc ln)" in exI,
rule_tac x = rn in exI, simp add: exp_ind del: replicate_Suc)
done
lemma [elim]: "\<lbrakk>wcode_erase1 ires rs (aa, Oc # list); b = aa \<and> Bk # list = ba\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow>
wcode_erase1 ires rs (aa, ba)"
apply(simp only: wcode_double_case_inv_simps)
apply(erule_tac exE)+
apply(rule_tac x = ln in exI, rule_tac x = rn in exI, auto)
done
lemma [elim]: "\<lbrakk>wcode_goon_right_moving_1 ires rs (aa, []); b = aa \<and> [Oc] = ba\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> wcode_backto_standard_pos ires rs (aa, ba)"
apply(simp only: wcode_double_case_inv_simps)
apply(erule_tac exE)+
apply(rule_tac disjI2)
apply(simp only:wcode_backto_standard_pos_O.simps)
apply(rule_tac x = ml in exI, rule_tac x = "Suc 0" in exI, rule_tac x = ln in exI,
rule_tac x = rn in exI, simp)
done
lemma [elim]:
"\<lbrakk>wcode_goon_right_moving_1 ires rs (aa, Bk # list); b = aa \<and> Oc # list = ba\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> wcode_backto_standard_pos ires rs (aa, ba)"
apply(simp only: wcode_double_case_inv_simps)
apply(erule_tac exE)+
apply(rule_tac disjI2)
apply(simp only:wcode_backto_standard_pos_O.simps)
apply(rule_tac x = ml in exI, rule_tac x = "Suc 0" in exI, rule_tac x = ln in exI,
rule_tac x = "rn - Suc 0" in exI, simp)
apply(case_tac mr, simp, case_tac rn, simp, simp_all)
done
lemma [elim]: "\<lbrakk>wcode_goon_right_moving_1 ires rs (b, Oc # ba); Oc # b = aa \<and> list = ba\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> wcode_goon_right_moving_1 ires rs (aa, ba)"
apply(simp only: wcode_double_case_inv_simps)
apply(erule_tac exE)+
apply(rule_tac x = "Suc ml" in exI, rule_tac x = "mr - Suc 0" in exI,
rule_tac x = ln in exI, rule_tac x = rn in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac mr, simp, case_tac rn, simp_all)
done
lemma [elim]: "\<lbrakk>wcode_backto_standard_pos ires rs (b, []); Bk # b = aa\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> False"
apply(auto simp: wcode_double_case_inv_simps wcode_backto_standard_pos_O.simps
wcode_backto_standard_pos_B.simps)
done
lemma [elim]: "\<lbrakk>wcode_backto_standard_pos ires rs (b, Bk # ba); Bk # b = aa \<and> list = ba\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> wcode_before_double ires rs (aa, ba)"
apply(simp only: wcode_double_case_inv_simps wcode_backto_standard_pos_B.simps
wcode_backto_standard_pos_O.simps wcode_before_double.simps)
apply(erule_tac disjE)
apply(erule_tac exE)+
apply(rule_tac x = ln in exI, rule_tac x = rn in exI, simp)
apply(auto)
apply(case_tac [!] mr, simp_all)
done
lemma [simp]: "wcode_backto_standard_pos ires rs ([], Oc # list) = False"
apply(auto simp: wcode_backto_standard_pos.simps wcode_backto_standard_pos_B.simps
wcode_backto_standard_pos_O.simps)
done
lemma [simp]: "wcode_backto_standard_pos ires rs (b, []) = False"
apply(auto simp: wcode_backto_standard_pos.simps wcode_backto_standard_pos_B.simps
wcode_backto_standard_pos_O.simps)
done
lemma [elim]: "\<lbrakk>wcode_backto_standard_pos ires rs (b, Oc # list); tl b = aa; hd b # Oc # list = ba\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> wcode_backto_standard_pos ires rs (aa, ba)"
apply(simp only: wcode_backto_standard_pos.simps wcode_backto_standard_pos_B.simps
wcode_backto_standard_pos_O.simps)
apply(erule_tac disjE)
apply(simp)
apply(erule_tac exE)+
apply(case_tac ml, simp)
apply(rule_tac disjI1, rule_tac conjI)
apply(rule_tac x = ln in exI, simp, rule_tac x = rn in exI, simp)
apply(rule_tac disjI2)
apply(rule_tac x = nat in exI, rule_tac x = "Suc mr" in exI, rule_tac x = ln in exI,
rule_tac x = rn in exI, simp)
done
declare nth_of.simps[simp del] fetch.simps[simp del]
lemma wcode_double_case_first_correctness:
"let P = (\<lambda> (st, l, r). st = 13) in
let Q = (\<lambda> (st, l, r). wcode_double_case_inv st ires rs (l, r)) in
let f = (\<lambda> stp. steps0 (Suc 0, Bk # Bk\<up>(m) @ Oc # Oc # ires, Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc rs) @ Bk\<up>(n)) t_wcode_main stp) in
\<exists> n .P (f n) \<and> Q (f (n::nat))"
proof -
let ?P = "(\<lambda> (st, l, r). st = 13)"
let ?Q = "(\<lambda> (st, l, r). wcode_double_case_inv st ires rs (l, r))"
let ?f = "(\<lambda> stp. steps0 (Suc 0, Bk # Bk\<up>(m) @ Oc # Oc # ires, Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc rs) @ Bk\<up>(n)) t_wcode_main stp)"
have "\<exists> n. ?P (?f n) \<and> ?Q (?f (n::nat))"
proof(rule_tac halt_lemma2)
show "wf wcode_double_case_le"
by auto
next
show "\<forall> na. \<not> ?P (?f na) \<and> ?Q (?f na) \<longrightarrow>
?Q (?f (Suc na)) \<and> (?f (Suc na), ?f na) \<in> wcode_double_case_le"
proof(rule_tac allI, case_tac "?f na", simp add: step_red)
fix na a b c
show "a \<noteq> 13 \<and> wcode_double_case_inv a ires rs (b, c) \<longrightarrow>
(case step0 (a, b, c) t_wcode_main of (st, x) \<Rightarrow>
wcode_double_case_inv st ires rs x) \<and>
(step0 (a, b, c) t_wcode_main, a, b, c) \<in> wcode_double_case_le"
apply(rule_tac impI, simp add: wcode_double_case_inv.simps)
apply(auto split: if_splits simp: step.simps,
case_tac [!] c, simp_all, case_tac [!] "(c::cell list)!0")
apply(simp_all add: wcode_double_case_inv.simps wcode_double_case_le_def
lex_pair_def)
apply(auto split: if_splits)
done
qed
next
show "?Q (?f 0)"
apply(simp add: steps.simps wcode_double_case_inv.simps
wcode_on_left_moving_1.simps
wcode_on_left_moving_1_B.simps)
apply(rule_tac disjI1)
apply(rule_tac x = "Suc m" in exI, simp)
apply(rule_tac x = "Suc 0" in exI, simp)
done
next
show "\<not> ?P (?f 0)"
apply(simp add: steps.simps)
done
qed
thus "let P = \<lambda>(st, l, r). st = 13;
Q = \<lambda>(st, l, r). wcode_double_case_inv st ires rs (l, r);
f = steps0 (Suc 0, Bk # Bk\<up>(m) @ Oc # Oc # ires, Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc rs) @ Bk\<up>(n)) t_wcode_main
in \<exists>n. P (f n) \<and> Q (f n)"
apply(simp add: Let_def)
done
qed
lemma tm_append_shift_append_steps:
"\<lbrakk>steps0 (st, l, r) tp stp = (st', l', r');
0 < st';
length tp1 mod 2 = 0
\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> steps0 (st + length tp1 div 2, l, r) (tp1 @ shift tp (length tp1 div 2) @ tp2) stp
= (st' + length tp1 div 2, l', r')"
proof -
assume h:
"steps0 (st, l, r) tp stp = (st', l', r')"
"0 < st'"
"length tp1 mod 2 = 0 "
from h have
"steps (st + length tp1 div 2, l, r) (tp1 @ shift tp (length tp1 div 2), 0) stp =
(st' + length tp1 div 2, l', r')"
by(rule_tac tm_append_second_steps_eq, simp_all)
then have "steps (st + length tp1 div 2, l, r) ((tp1 @ shift tp (length tp1 div 2)) @ tp2, 0) stp =
(st' + length tp1 div 2, l', r')"
using h
apply(rule_tac tm_append_first_steps_eq, simp_all)
done
thus "?thesis"
by simp
qed
lemma t_twice_len_ge: "Suc 0 \<le> length t_twice div 2"
apply(simp add: t_twice_def mopup.simps t_twice_compile_def)
done
lemma [intro]: "rec_calc_rel (recf.id (Suc 0) 0) [rs] rs"
apply(rule_tac calc_id, simp_all)
done
lemma [intro]: "rec_calc_rel (constn 2) [rs] 2"
using prime_rel_exec_eq[of "constn 2" "[rs]" 2]
apply(subgoal_tac "primerec (constn 2) 1", auto)
done
lemma [intro]: "rec_calc_rel rec_mult [rs, 2] (2 * rs)"
using prime_rel_exec_eq[of "rec_mult" "[rs, 2]" "2*rs"]
apply(subgoal_tac "primerec rec_mult (Suc (Suc 0))", auto)
done
declare start_of.simps[simp del]
lemma t_twice_correct:
"\<exists>stp ln rn. steps0 (Suc 0, Bk # Bk # ires, Oc\<up>(Suc rs) @ Bk\<up>(n))
(tm_of abc_twice @ shift (mopup (Suc 0)) ((length (tm_of abc_twice) div 2))) stp =
(0, Bk\<up>(ln) @ Bk # Bk # ires, Oc\<up>(Suc (2 * rs)) @ Bk\<up>(rn))"
proof(case_tac "rec_ci rec_twice")
fix a b c
assume h: "rec_ci rec_twice = (a, b, c)"
have "\<exists>stp m l. steps0 (Suc 0, Bk # Bk # ires, <[rs]> @ Bk\<up>(n)) (tm_of abc_twice @ shift (mopup 1)
(length (tm_of abc_twice) div 2)) stp = (0, Bk\<up>(m) @ Bk # Bk # ires, Oc\<up>(Suc (2*rs)) @ Bk\<up>(l))"
proof(rule_tac recursive_compile_to_tm_correct)
show "rec_ci rec_twice = (a, b, c)" by (simp add: h)
next
show "rec_calc_rel rec_twice [rs] (2 * rs)"
apply(simp add: rec_twice_def)
apply(rule_tac rs = "[rs, 2]" in calc_cn, simp_all)
apply(rule_tac allI, case_tac k, auto)
done
next
show "length [rs] = 1" by simp
next
show "layout_of (a [+] dummy_abc 1) = layout_of (a [+] dummy_abc 1)" by simp
next
show "tm_of abc_twice = tm_of (a [+] dummy_abc 1)"
using h
apply(simp add: abc_twice_def)
done
qed
thus "?thesis"
apply(simp add: tape_of_nl_abv tape_of_nat_list.simps tape_of_nat_abv)
done
qed
declare adjust.simps[simp]
lemma adjust_fetch0:
"\<lbrakk>0 < a; a \<le> length ap div 2; fetch ap a b = (aa, 0)\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> fetch (adjust ap) a b = (aa, Suc (length ap div 2))"
apply(case_tac b, auto simp: fetch.simps nth_of.simps nth_map
split: if_splits)
apply(case_tac [!] a, auto simp: fetch.simps nth_of.simps)
done
lemma adjust_fetch_norm:
"\<lbrakk>st > 0; st \<le> length tp div 2; fetch ap st b = (aa, ns); ns \<noteq> 0\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> fetch (turing_basic.adjust ap) st b = (aa, ns)"
apply(case_tac b, auto simp: fetch.simps nth_of.simps nth_map
split: if_splits)
apply(case_tac [!] st, auto simp: fetch.simps nth_of.simps)
done
declare adjust.simps[simp del]
lemma adjust_step_eq:
assumes exec: "step0 (st,l,r) ap = (st', l', r')"
and wf_tm: "tm_wf (ap, 0)"
and notfinal: "st' > 0"
shows "step0 (st, l, r) (adjust ap) = (st', l', r')"
using assms
proof -
have "st > 0"
using assms
by(case_tac st, simp_all add: step.simps fetch.simps)
moreover hence "st \<le> (length ap) div 2"
using assms
apply(case_tac "st \<le> (length ap) div 2", simp)
apply(case_tac st, auto simp: step.simps fetch.simps)
apply(case_tac "read r", simp_all add: fetch.simps
nth_of.simps adjust.simps tm_wf.simps split: if_splits)
apply(auto simp: mod_ex2)
done
ultimately have "fetch (adjust ap) st (read r) = fetch ap st (read r)"
using assms
apply(case_tac "fetch ap st (read r)")
apply(drule_tac adjust_fetch_norm, simp_all)
apply(simp add: step.simps)
done
thus "?thesis"
using exec
by(simp add: step.simps)
qed
declare adjust.simps[simp del]
lemma adjust_steps_eq:
assumes exec: "steps0 (st,l,r) ap stp = (st', l', r')"
and wf_tm: "tm_wf (ap, 0)"
and notfinal: "st' > 0"
shows "steps0 (st, l, r) (adjust ap) stp = (st', l', r')"
using exec notfinal
proof(induct stp arbitrary: st' l' r')
case 0
thus "?case"
by(simp add: steps.simps)
next
case (Suc stp st' l' r')
have ind: "\<And>st' l' r'. \<lbrakk>steps0 (st, l, r) ap stp = (st', l', r'); 0 < st'\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> steps0 (st, l, r) (turing_basic.adjust ap) stp = (st', l', r')" by fact
have h: "steps0 (st, l, r) ap (Suc stp) = (st', l', r')" by fact
have g: "0 < st'" by fact
obtain st'' l'' r'' where a: "steps0 (st, l, r) ap stp = (st'', l'', r'')"
by (metis prod_cases3)
hence c:"0 < st''"
using h g
apply(simp add: step_red)
apply(case_tac st'', auto)
done
hence b: "steps0 (st, l, r) (turing_basic.adjust ap) stp = (st'', l'', r'')"
using a
by(rule_tac ind, simp_all)
thus "?case"
using assms a b h g
apply(simp add: step_red)
apply(rule_tac adjust_step_eq, simp_all)
done
qed
lemma adjust_halt_eq:
assumes exec: "steps0 (1, l, r) ap stp = (0, l', r')"
and tm_wf: "tm_wf (ap, 0)"
shows "\<exists> stp. steps0 (Suc 0, l, r) (adjust ap) stp =
(Suc (length ap div 2), l', r')"
proof -
have "\<exists> stp. \<not> is_final (steps0 (1, l, r) ap stp) \<and> (steps0 (1, l, r) ap (Suc stp) = (0, l', r'))"
thm before_final using exec
by(erule_tac before_final)
then obtain stpa where a:
"\<not> is_final (steps0 (1, l, r) ap stpa) \<and> (steps0 (1, l, r) ap (Suc stpa) = (0, l', r'))" ..
obtain sa la ra where b:"steps0 (1, l, r) ap stpa = (sa, la, ra)" by (metis prod_cases3)
hence c: "steps0 (Suc 0, l, r) (adjust ap) stpa = (sa, la, ra)"
using assms a
apply(rule_tac adjust_steps_eq, simp_all)
done
have d: "sa \<le> length ap div 2"
using steps_in_range[of "(l, r)" ap stpa] a tm_wf b
by(simp)
obtain ac ns where e: "fetch ap sa (read ra) = (ac, ns)"
by (metis prod.exhaust)
hence f: "ns = 0"
using b a
apply(simp add: step_red step.simps)
done
have k: "fetch (adjust ap) sa (read ra) = (ac, Suc (length ap div 2))"
using a b c d e f
apply(rule_tac adjust_fetch0, simp_all)
done
from a b e f k and c show "?thesis"
apply(rule_tac x = "Suc stpa" in exI)
apply(simp add: step_red, auto)
apply(simp add: step.simps)
done
qed
declare tm_wf.simps[simp del]
lemma [simp]: " tm_wf (t_twice_compile, 0)"
apply(simp only: t_twice_compile_def)
apply(rule_tac t_compiled_correct)
apply(simp_all add: abc_twice_def)
done
lemma t_twice_change_term_state:
"\<exists> stp ln rn. steps0 (Suc 0, Bk # Bk # ires, Oc\<up>(Suc rs) @ Bk\<up>(n)) t_twice stp
= (Suc t_twice_len, Bk\<up>(ln) @ Bk # Bk # ires, Oc\<up>(Suc (2 * rs)) @ Bk\<up>(rn))"
proof -
have "\<exists>stp ln rn. steps0 (Suc 0, Bk # Bk # ires, Oc\<up>(Suc rs) @ Bk\<up>(n))
(tm_of abc_twice @ shift (mopup (Suc 0)) ((length (tm_of abc_twice) div 2))) stp =
(0, Bk\<up>(ln) @ Bk # Bk # ires, Oc\<up>(Suc (2 * rs)) @ Bk\<up>(rn))"
by(rule_tac t_twice_correct)
then obtain stp ln rn where " steps0 (Suc 0, Bk # Bk # ires, Oc\<up>(Suc rs) @ Bk\<up>(n))
(tm_of abc_twice @ shift (mopup (Suc 0)) ((length (tm_of abc_twice) div 2))) stp =
(0, Bk\<up>(ln) @ Bk # Bk # ires, Oc\<up>(Suc (2 * rs)) @ Bk\<up>(rn))" by blast
hence "\<exists> stp. steps0 (Suc 0, Bk # Bk # ires, Oc\<up>(Suc rs) @ Bk\<up>(n))
(adjust t_twice_compile) stp
= (Suc (length t_twice_compile div 2), Bk\<up>(ln) @ Bk # Bk # ires, Oc\<up>(Suc (2 * rs)) @ Bk\<up>(rn))"
thm adjust_halt_eq
apply(rule_tac stp = stp in adjust_halt_eq)
apply(simp add: t_twice_compile_def, auto)
done
then obtain stpb where
"steps0 (Suc 0, Bk # Bk # ires, Oc\<up>(Suc rs) @ Bk\<up>(n))
(adjust t_twice_compile) stpb
= (Suc (length t_twice_compile div 2), Bk\<up>(ln) @ Bk # Bk # ires, Oc\<up>(Suc (2 * rs)) @ Bk\<up>(rn))" ..
thus "?thesis"
apply(simp add: t_twice_def t_twice_len_def)
by metis
qed
lemma [intro]: "length t_wcode_main_first_part mod 2 = 0"
apply(auto simp: t_wcode_main_first_part_def)
done
lemma t_twice_append_pre:
"steps0 (Suc 0, Bk # Bk # ires, Oc\<up>(Suc rs) @ Bk\<up>(n)) t_twice stp
= (Suc t_twice_len, Bk\<up>(ln) @ Bk # Bk # ires, Oc\<up>(Suc (2 * rs)) @ Bk\<up>(rn))
\<Longrightarrow> steps0 (Suc 0 + length t_wcode_main_first_part div 2, Bk # Bk # ires, Oc\<up>(Suc rs) @ Bk\<up>(n))
(t_wcode_main_first_part @ shift t_twice (length t_wcode_main_first_part div 2) @
([(L, 1), (L, 1)] @ shift t_fourtimes (t_twice_len + 13) @ [(L, 1), (L, 1)])) stp
= (Suc (t_twice_len) + length t_wcode_main_first_part div 2,
Bk\<up>(ln) @ Bk # Bk # ires, Oc\<up>(Suc (2 * rs)) @ Bk\<up>(rn))"
by(rule_tac tm_append_shift_append_steps, auto)
lemma t_twice_append:
"\<exists> stp ln rn. steps0 (Suc 0 + length t_wcode_main_first_part div 2, Bk # Bk # ires, Oc\<up>(Suc rs) @ Bk\<up>(n))
(t_wcode_main_first_part @ shift t_twice (length t_wcode_main_first_part div 2) @
([(L, 1), (L, 1)] @ shift t_fourtimes (t_twice_len + 13) @ [(L, 1), (L, 1)])) stp
= (Suc (t_twice_len) + length t_wcode_main_first_part div 2, Bk\<up>(ln) @ Bk # Bk # ires, Oc\<up>(Suc (2 * rs)) @ Bk\<up>(rn))"
using t_twice_change_term_state[of ires rs n]
apply(erule_tac exE)
apply(erule_tac exE)
apply(erule_tac exE)
apply(drule_tac t_twice_append_pre)
apply(rule_tac x = stp in exI, rule_tac x = ln in exI, rule_tac x = rn in exI)
apply(simp)
done
lemma mopup_mod2: "length (mopup k) mod 2 = 0"
apply(auto simp: mopup.simps)
by arith
lemma [simp]: "fetch t_wcode_main (Suc (t_twice_len + length t_wcode_main_first_part div 2)) Oc
= (L, Suc 0)"
apply(subgoal_tac "length (t_twice) mod 2 = 0")
apply(simp add: t_wcode_main_def nth_append fetch.simps t_wcode_main_first_part_def
nth_of.simps t_twice_len_def, auto)
apply(simp add: t_twice_def t_twice_compile_def)
using mopup_mod2[of 1]
apply(simp)
by arith
lemma wcode_jump1:
"\<exists> stp ln rn. steps0 (Suc (t_twice_len) + length t_wcode_main_first_part div 2,
Bk\<up>(m) @ Bk # Bk # ires, Oc\<up>(Suc (2 * rs)) @ Bk\<up>(n))
t_wcode_main stp
= (Suc 0, Bk\<up>(ln) @ Bk # ires, Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc (2 * rs)) @ Bk\<up>(rn))"
apply(rule_tac x = "Suc 0" in exI, rule_tac x = "m" in exI, rule_tac x = n in exI)
apply(simp add: steps.simps step.simps exp_ind)
apply(case_tac m, simp_all)
apply(simp add: exp_ind[THEN sym])
done
lemma wcode_main_first_part_len:
"length t_wcode_main_first_part = 24"
apply(simp add: t_wcode_main_first_part_def)
done
lemma wcode_double_case:
shows "\<exists>stp ln rn. steps0 (Suc 0, Bk # Bk\<up>(m) @ Oc # Oc # ires, Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc rs) @ Bk\<up>(n)) t_wcode_main stp =
(Suc 0, Bk # Bk\<up>(ln) @ Oc # ires, Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc (2 * rs + 2)) @ Bk\<up>(rn))"
proof -
have "\<exists>stp ln rn. steps0 (Suc 0, Bk # Bk\<up>(m) @ Oc # Oc # ires, Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc rs) @ Bk\<up>(n)) t_wcode_main stp =
(13, Bk # Bk # Bk\<up>(ln) @ Oc # ires, Oc\<up>(Suc (Suc rs)) @ Bk\<up>(rn))"
using wcode_double_case_first_correctness[of ires rs m n]
apply(simp)
apply(erule_tac exE)
apply(case_tac "steps0 (Suc 0, Bk # Bk\<up>(m) @ Oc # Oc # ires,
Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc rs) @ Bk\<up>(n)) t_wcode_main na",
auto simp: wcode_double_case_inv.simps
wcode_before_double.simps)
apply(rule_tac x = na in exI, rule_tac x = ln in exI, rule_tac x = rn in exI)
apply(simp)
done
from this obtain stpa lna rna where stp1:
"steps0 (Suc 0, Bk # Bk\<up>(m) @ Oc # Oc # ires, Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc rs) @ Bk\<up>(n)) t_wcode_main stpa =
(13, Bk # Bk # Bk\<up>(lna) @ Oc # ires, Oc\<up>(Suc (Suc rs)) @ Bk\<up>(rna))" by blast
have "\<exists> stp ln rn. steps0 (13, Bk # Bk # Bk\<up>(lna) @ Oc # ires, Oc\<up>(Suc (Suc rs)) @ Bk\<up>(rna)) t_wcode_main stp =
(13 + t_twice_len, Bk # Bk # Bk\<up>(ln) @ Oc # ires, Oc\<up>(Suc (Suc (Suc (2 *rs)))) @ Bk\<up>(rn))"
using t_twice_append[of "Bk\<up>(lna) @ Oc # ires" "Suc rs" rna]
apply(erule_tac exE)
apply(erule_tac exE)
apply(erule_tac exE)
apply(simp add: wcode_main_first_part_len)
apply(rule_tac x = stp in exI, rule_tac x = "ln + lna" in exI,
rule_tac x = rn in exI)
apply(simp add: t_wcode_main_def)
apply(simp add: replicate_Suc[THEN sym] exp_add[THEN sym] del: replicate_Suc)
done
from this obtain stpb lnb rnb where stp2:
"steps0 (13, Bk # Bk # Bk\<up>(lna) @ Oc # ires, Oc\<up>(Suc (Suc rs)) @ Bk\<up>(rna)) t_wcode_main stpb =
(13 + t_twice_len, Bk # Bk # Bk\<up>(lnb) @ Oc # ires, Oc\<up>(Suc (Suc (Suc (2 *rs)))) @ Bk\<up>(rnb))" by blast
have "\<exists>stp ln rn. steps0 (13 + t_twice_len, Bk # Bk # Bk\<up>(lnb) @ Oc # ires,
Oc\<up>(Suc (Suc (Suc (2 *rs)))) @ Bk\<up>(rnb)) t_wcode_main stp =
(Suc 0, Bk # Bk\<up>(ln) @ Oc # ires, Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc (Suc (Suc (2 *rs)))) @ Bk\<up>(rn))"
using wcode_jump1[of lnb "Oc # ires" "Suc rs" rnb]
apply(erule_tac exE)
apply(erule_tac exE)
apply(erule_tac exE)
apply(rule_tac x = stp in exI,
rule_tac x = ln in exI,
rule_tac x = rn in exI, simp add:wcode_main_first_part_len t_wcode_main_def)
apply(subgoal_tac "Bk\<up>(lnb) @ Bk # Bk # Oc # ires = Bk # Bk # Bk\<up>(lnb) @ Oc # ires", simp)
apply(simp add: replicate_Suc[THEN sym] exp_ind[THEN sym] del: replicate_Suc)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: replicate_Suc[THEN sym] exp_ind del: replicate_Suc)
done
from this obtain stpc lnc rnc where stp3:
"steps0 (13 + t_twice_len, Bk # Bk # Bk\<up>(lnb) @ Oc # ires,
Oc\<up>(Suc (Suc (Suc (2 *rs)))) @ Bk\<up>(rnb)) t_wcode_main stpc =
(Suc 0, Bk # Bk\<up>(lnc) @ Oc # ires, Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc (Suc (Suc (2 *rs)))) @ Bk\<up>(rnc))"
by blast
from stp1 stp2 stp3 show "?thesis"
apply(rule_tac x = "stpa + stpb + stpc" in exI, rule_tac x = lnc in exI,
rule_tac x = rnc in exI)
apply(simp add: steps_add)
done
qed
(* Begin: fourtime_case*)
fun wcode_on_left_moving_2_B :: "bin_inv_t"
where
"wcode_on_left_moving_2_B ires rs (l, r) =
(\<exists> ml mr rn. l = Bk\<up>(ml) @ Oc # Bk # Oc # ires \<and>
r = Bk\<up>(mr) @ Oc\<up>(Suc rs) @ Bk\<up>(rn) \<and>
ml + mr > Suc 0 \<and> mr > 0)"
fun wcode_on_left_moving_2_O :: "bin_inv_t"
where
"wcode_on_left_moving_2_O ires rs (l, r) =
(\<exists> ln rn. l = Bk # Oc # ires \<and>
r = Oc # Bk\<up>(ln) @ Bk # Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc rs) @ Bk\<up>(rn))"
fun wcode_on_left_moving_2 :: "bin_inv_t"
where
"wcode_on_left_moving_2 ires rs (l, r) =
(wcode_on_left_moving_2_B ires rs (l, r) \<or>
wcode_on_left_moving_2_O ires rs (l, r))"
fun wcode_on_checking_2 :: "bin_inv_t"
where
"wcode_on_checking_2 ires rs (l, r) =
(\<exists> ln rn. l = Oc#ires \<and>
r = Bk # Oc # Bk\<up>(ln) @ Bk # Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc rs) @ Bk\<up>(rn))"
fun wcode_goon_checking :: "bin_inv_t"
where
"wcode_goon_checking ires rs (l, r) =
(\<exists> ln rn. l = ires \<and>
r = Oc # Bk # Oc # Bk\<up>(ln) @ Bk # Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc rs) @ Bk\<up>(rn))"
fun wcode_right_move :: "bin_inv_t"
where
"wcode_right_move ires rs (l, r) =
(\<exists> ln rn. l = Oc # ires \<and>
r = Bk # Oc # Bk\<up>(ln) @ Bk # Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc rs) @ Bk\<up>(rn))"
fun wcode_erase2 :: "bin_inv_t"
where
"wcode_erase2 ires rs (l, r) =
(\<exists> ln rn. l = Bk # Oc # ires \<and>
tl r = Bk\<up>(ln) @ Bk # Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc rs) @ Bk\<up>(rn))"
fun wcode_on_right_moving_2 :: "bin_inv_t"
where
"wcode_on_right_moving_2 ires rs (l, r) =
(\<exists> ml mr rn. l = Bk\<up>(ml) @ Oc # ires \<and>
r = Bk\<up>(mr) @ Oc\<up>(Suc rs) @ Bk\<up>(rn) \<and> ml + mr > Suc 0)"
fun wcode_goon_right_moving_2 :: "bin_inv_t"
where
"wcode_goon_right_moving_2 ires rs (l, r) =
(\<exists> ml mr ln rn. l = Oc\<up>(ml) @ Bk # Bk # Bk\<up>(ln) @ Oc # ires \<and>
r = Oc\<up>(mr) @ Bk\<up>(rn) \<and> ml + mr = Suc rs)"
fun wcode_backto_standard_pos_2_B :: "bin_inv_t"
where
"wcode_backto_standard_pos_2_B ires rs (l, r) =
(\<exists> ln rn. l = Bk # Bk\<up>(ln) @ Oc # ires \<and>
r = Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc (Suc rs)) @ Bk\<up>(rn))"
fun wcode_backto_standard_pos_2_O :: "bin_inv_t"
where
"wcode_backto_standard_pos_2_O ires rs (l, r) =
(\<exists> ml mr ln rn. l = Oc\<up>(ml )@ Bk # Bk # Bk\<up>(ln) @ Oc # ires \<and>
r = Oc\<up>(mr) @ Bk\<up>(rn) \<and>
ml + mr = (Suc (Suc rs)) \<and> mr > 0)"
fun wcode_backto_standard_pos_2 :: "bin_inv_t"
where
"wcode_backto_standard_pos_2 ires rs (l, r) =
(wcode_backto_standard_pos_2_O ires rs (l, r) \<or>
wcode_backto_standard_pos_2_B ires rs (l, r))"
fun wcode_before_fourtimes :: "bin_inv_t"
where
"wcode_before_fourtimes ires rs (l, r) =
(\<exists> ln rn. l = Bk # Bk # Bk\<up>(ln) @ Oc # ires \<and>
r = Oc\<up>(Suc (Suc rs)) @ Bk\<up>(rn))"
declare wcode_on_left_moving_2_B.simps[simp del] wcode_on_left_moving_2.simps[simp del]
wcode_on_left_moving_2_O.simps[simp del] wcode_on_checking_2.simps[simp del]
wcode_goon_checking.simps[simp del] wcode_right_move.simps[simp del]
wcode_erase2.simps[simp del]
wcode_on_right_moving_2.simps[simp del] wcode_goon_right_moving_2.simps[simp del]
wcode_backto_standard_pos_2_B.simps[simp del] wcode_backto_standard_pos_2_O.simps[simp del]
wcode_backto_standard_pos_2.simps[simp del]
lemmas wcode_fourtimes_invs =
wcode_on_left_moving_2_B.simps wcode_on_left_moving_2.simps
wcode_on_left_moving_2_O.simps wcode_on_checking_2.simps
wcode_goon_checking.simps wcode_right_move.simps
wcode_erase2.simps
wcode_on_right_moving_2.simps wcode_goon_right_moving_2.simps
wcode_backto_standard_pos_2_B.simps wcode_backto_standard_pos_2_O.simps
wcode_backto_standard_pos_2.simps
fun wcode_fourtimes_case_inv :: "nat \<Rightarrow> bin_inv_t"
where
"wcode_fourtimes_case_inv st ires rs (l, r) =
(if st = Suc 0 then wcode_on_left_moving_2 ires rs (l, r)
else if st = Suc (Suc 0) then wcode_on_checking_2 ires rs (l, r)
else if st = 7 then wcode_goon_checking ires rs (l, r)
else if st = 8 then wcode_right_move ires rs (l, r)
else if st = 9 then wcode_erase2 ires rs (l, r)
else if st = 10 then wcode_on_right_moving_2 ires rs (l, r)
else if st = 11 then wcode_goon_right_moving_2 ires rs (l, r)
else if st = 12 then wcode_backto_standard_pos_2 ires rs (l, r)
else if st = t_twice_len + 14 then wcode_before_fourtimes ires rs (l, r)
else False)"
declare wcode_fourtimes_case_inv.simps[simp del]
fun wcode_fourtimes_case_state :: "config \<Rightarrow> nat"
where
"wcode_fourtimes_case_state (st, l, r) = 13 - st"
fun wcode_fourtimes_case_step :: "config \<Rightarrow> nat"
where
"wcode_fourtimes_case_step (st, l, r) =
(if st = Suc 0 then length l
else if st = 9 then
(if hd r = Oc then 1
else 0)
else if st = 10 then length r
else if st = 11 then length r
else if st = 12 then length l
else 0)"
fun wcode_fourtimes_case_measure :: "config \<Rightarrow> nat \<times> nat"
where
"wcode_fourtimes_case_measure (st, l, r) =
(wcode_fourtimes_case_state (st, l, r),
wcode_fourtimes_case_step (st, l, r))"
definition wcode_fourtimes_case_le :: "(config \<times> config) set"
where "wcode_fourtimes_case_le \<equiv> (inv_image lex_pair wcode_fourtimes_case_measure)"
lemma wf_wcode_fourtimes_case_le[intro]: "wf wcode_fourtimes_case_le"
by(auto intro:wf_inv_image simp: wcode_fourtimes_case_le_def)
lemma [simp]: "fetch t_wcode_main (Suc (Suc 0)) Bk = (L, 7)"
apply(simp add: t_wcode_main_def fetch.simps
t_wcode_main_first_part_def nth_of.simps)
done
lemma [simp]: "fetch t_wcode_main 7 Oc = (R, 8)"
apply(subgoal_tac "7 = Suc 6")
apply(simp only: t_wcode_main_def fetch.simps
t_wcode_main_first_part_def nth_of.simps)
apply(auto)
done
lemma [simp]: "fetch t_wcode_main 8 Bk = (R, 9)"
apply(subgoal_tac "8 = Suc 7")
apply(simp only: t_wcode_main_def fetch.simps
t_wcode_main_first_part_def nth_of.simps)
apply(auto)
done
lemma [simp]: "fetch t_wcode_main 9 Bk = (R, 10)"
apply(subgoal_tac "9 = Suc 8")
apply(simp only: t_wcode_main_def fetch.simps
t_wcode_main_first_part_def nth_of.simps)
apply(auto)
done
lemma [simp]: "fetch t_wcode_main 9 Oc = (W0, 9)"
apply(subgoal_tac "9 = Suc 8")
apply(simp only: t_wcode_main_def fetch.simps
t_wcode_main_first_part_def nth_of.simps)
apply(auto)
done
lemma [simp]: "fetch t_wcode_main 10 Bk = (R, 10)"
apply(subgoal_tac "10 = Suc 9")
apply(simp only: t_wcode_main_def fetch.simps
t_wcode_main_first_part_def nth_of.simps)
apply(auto)
done
lemma [simp]: "fetch t_wcode_main 10 Oc = (R, 11)"
apply(subgoal_tac "10 = Suc 9")
apply(simp only: t_wcode_main_def fetch.simps
t_wcode_main_first_part_def nth_of.simps)
apply(auto)
done
lemma [simp]: "fetch t_wcode_main 11 Bk = (W1, 12)"
apply(subgoal_tac "11 = Suc 10")
apply(simp only: t_wcode_main_def fetch.simps
t_wcode_main_first_part_def nth_of.simps)
apply(auto)
done
lemma [simp]: "fetch t_wcode_main 11 Oc = (R, 11)"
apply(subgoal_tac "11 = Suc 10")
apply(simp only: t_wcode_main_def fetch.simps
t_wcode_main_first_part_def nth_of.simps)
apply(auto)
done
lemma [simp]: "fetch t_wcode_main 12 Oc = (L, 12)"
apply(subgoal_tac "12 = Suc 11")
apply(simp only: t_wcode_main_def fetch.simps
t_wcode_main_first_part_def nth_of.simps)
apply(auto)
done
lemma [simp]: "fetch t_wcode_main 12 Bk = (R, t_twice_len + 14)"
apply(subgoal_tac "12 = Suc 11")
apply(simp only: t_wcode_main_def fetch.simps
t_wcode_main_first_part_def nth_of.simps)
apply(auto)
done
lemma [simp]: "wcode_on_left_moving_2 ires rs (b, []) = False"
apply(auto simp: wcode_fourtimes_invs)
done
lemma [simp]: "wcode_on_checking_2 ires rs (b, []) = False"
apply(auto simp: wcode_fourtimes_invs)
done
lemma [simp]: "wcode_goon_checking ires rs (b, []) = False"
apply(auto simp: wcode_fourtimes_invs)
done
lemma [simp]: "wcode_right_move ires rs (b, []) = False"
apply(auto simp: wcode_fourtimes_invs)
done
lemma [simp]: "wcode_erase2 ires rs (b, []) = False"
apply(auto simp: wcode_fourtimes_invs)
done
lemma [simp]: "wcode_on_right_moving_2 ires rs (b, []) = False"
apply(auto simp: wcode_fourtimes_invs)
done
lemma [simp]: "wcode_backto_standard_pos_2 ires rs (b, []) = False"
apply(auto simp: wcode_fourtimes_invs)
done
lemma [simp]: "wcode_on_left_moving_2 ires rs (b, Bk # list) \<Longrightarrow> b \<noteq> []"
apply(simp add: wcode_fourtimes_invs, auto)
done
lemma [simp]: "wcode_on_left_moving_2 ires rs (b, Bk # list) \<Longrightarrow> wcode_on_left_moving_2 ires rs (tl b, hd b # Bk # list)"
apply(simp only: wcode_fourtimes_invs)
apply(erule_tac disjE)
apply(erule_tac exE)+
apply(case_tac ml, simp)
apply(rule_tac x = "mr - (Suc (Suc 0))" in exI, rule_tac x = rn in exI, simp)
apply(case_tac mr, simp, case_tac nat, simp, simp add: exp_ind del: replicate_Suc)
apply(rule_tac disjI1)
apply(rule_tac x = nat in exI, rule_tac x = "Suc mr" in exI, rule_tac x = rn in exI,
simp add: replicate_Suc)
apply(simp)
done
lemma [simp]: "wcode_on_checking_2 ires rs (b, Bk # list) \<Longrightarrow> b \<noteq> []"
apply(auto simp: wcode_fourtimes_invs)
done
lemma [simp]: "wcode_on_checking_2 ires rs (b, Bk # list)
\<Longrightarrow> wcode_goon_checking ires rs (tl b, hd b # Bk # list)"
apply(simp only: wcode_fourtimes_invs)
apply(auto)
done
lemma [simp]: "wcode_goon_checking ires rs (b, Bk # list) = False"
apply(simp add: wcode_fourtimes_invs)
done
lemma [simp]: " wcode_right_move ires rs (b, Bk # list) \<Longrightarrow> b\<noteq> []"
apply(simp add: wcode_fourtimes_invs)
done
lemma [simp]: "wcode_right_move ires rs (b, Bk # list) \<Longrightarrow> wcode_erase2 ires rs (Bk # b, list)"
apply(auto simp:wcode_fourtimes_invs )
apply(rule_tac x = ln in exI, rule_tac x = rn in exI, simp)
done
lemma [simp]: "wcode_erase2 ires rs (b, Bk # list) \<Longrightarrow> b \<noteq> []"
apply(auto simp: wcode_fourtimes_invs)
done
lemma [simp]: "wcode_erase2 ires rs (b, Bk # list) \<Longrightarrow> wcode_on_right_moving_2 ires rs (Bk # b, list)"
apply(auto simp:wcode_fourtimes_invs )
apply(rule_tac x = "Suc (Suc 0)" in exI, simp add: exp_ind)
apply(rule_tac x = "Suc (Suc ln)" in exI, simp add: exp_ind del: replicate_Suc)
done
lemma [simp]: "wcode_on_right_moving_2 ires rs (b, Bk # list) \<Longrightarrow> b \<noteq> []"
apply(auto simp:wcode_fourtimes_invs )
done
lemma [simp]: "wcode_on_right_moving_2 ires rs (b, Bk # list)
\<Longrightarrow> wcode_on_right_moving_2 ires rs (Bk # b, list)"
apply(auto simp: wcode_fourtimes_invs)
apply(rule_tac x = "Suc ml" in exI, simp)
apply(rule_tac x = "mr - 1" in exI, case_tac mr,auto)
done
lemma [simp]: "wcode_goon_right_moving_2 ires rs (b, Bk # list) \<Longrightarrow> b \<noteq> []"
apply(auto simp: wcode_fourtimes_invs)
done
lemma [simp]: "wcode_goon_right_moving_2 ires rs (b, Bk # list) \<Longrightarrow>
wcode_backto_standard_pos_2 ires rs (b, Oc # list)"
apply(simp add: wcode_fourtimes_invs, auto)
apply(rule_tac x = ml in exI, auto)
apply(rule_tac x = "Suc 0" in exI, simp)
apply(case_tac mr, simp_all)
apply(rule_tac x = "rn - 1" in exI, simp)
apply(case_tac rn, simp, simp)
done
lemma [simp]: "wcode_backto_standard_pos_2 ires rs (b, Bk # list) \<Longrightarrow> b \<noteq> []"
apply(simp add: wcode_fourtimes_invs, auto)
done
lemma [simp]: "wcode_on_left_moving_2 ires rs (b, Oc # list) \<Longrightarrow> b \<noteq> []"
apply(simp add: wcode_fourtimes_invs, auto)
done
lemma [simp]: "wcode_on_left_moving_2 ires rs (b, Oc # list) \<Longrightarrow>
wcode_on_checking_2 ires rs (tl b, hd b # Oc # list)"
apply(auto simp: wcode_fourtimes_invs)
apply(case_tac [!] mr, simp_all)
done
lemma [simp]: "wcode_goon_right_moving_2 ires rs (b, []) \<Longrightarrow> b \<noteq> []"
apply(auto simp: wcode_fourtimes_invs)
done
lemma [simp]: "wcode_goon_right_moving_2 ires rs (b, []) \<Longrightarrow>
wcode_backto_standard_pos_2 ires rs (b, [Oc])"
apply(simp only: wcode_fourtimes_invs)
apply(erule_tac exE)+
apply(rule_tac disjI1)
apply(rule_tac x = ml in exI, rule_tac x = "Suc 0" in exI,
rule_tac x = ln in exI, rule_tac x = rn in exI, simp)
done
lemma "wcode_backto_standard_pos_2 ires rs (b, Bk # list)
\<Longrightarrow> (\<exists>ln. b = Bk # Bk\<up>(ln) @ Oc # ires) \<and> (\<exists>rn. list = Oc\<up>(Suc (Suc rs)) @ Bk\<up>(rn))"
apply(auto simp: wcode_fourtimes_invs)
apply(case_tac [!] mr, auto)
done
lemma [simp]: "wcode_on_checking_2 ires rs (b, Oc # list) \<Longrightarrow> False"
apply(simp add: wcode_fourtimes_invs)
done
lemma [simp]: "wcode_goon_checking ires rs (b, Oc # list) \<Longrightarrow>
(b = [] \<longrightarrow> wcode_right_move ires rs ([Oc], list)) \<and>
(b \<noteq> [] \<longrightarrow> wcode_right_move ires rs (Oc # b, list))"
apply(simp only: wcode_fourtimes_invs)
apply(erule_tac exE)+
apply(auto)
done
lemma [simp]: "wcode_right_move ires rs (b, Oc # list) = False"
apply(auto simp: wcode_fourtimes_invs)
done
lemma [simp]: " wcode_erase2 ires rs (b, Oc # list) \<Longrightarrow> b \<noteq> []"
apply(simp add: wcode_fourtimes_invs)
done
lemma [simp]: "wcode_erase2 ires rs (b, Oc # list)
\<Longrightarrow> wcode_erase2 ires rs (b, Bk # list)"
apply(auto simp: wcode_fourtimes_invs)
done
lemma [simp]: "wcode_on_right_moving_2 ires rs (b, Oc # list) \<Longrightarrow> b \<noteq> []"
apply(simp only: wcode_fourtimes_invs)
apply(auto)
done
lemma [simp]: "wcode_on_right_moving_2 ires rs (b, Oc # list)
\<Longrightarrow> wcode_goon_right_moving_2 ires rs (Oc # b, list)"
apply(auto simp: wcode_fourtimes_invs)
apply(case_tac mr, simp_all)
apply(rule_tac x = "Suc 0" in exI, auto)
apply(rule_tac x = "ml - 2" in exI)
apply(case_tac ml, simp, case_tac nat, simp_all)
done
lemma [simp]: "wcode_goon_right_moving_2 ires rs (b, Oc # list) \<Longrightarrow> b \<noteq> []"
apply(simp only:wcode_fourtimes_invs, auto)
done
lemma [simp]: "wcode_backto_standard_pos_2 ires rs (b, Bk # list)
\<Longrightarrow> (\<exists>ln. b = Bk # Bk\<up>(ln) @ Oc # ires) \<and> (\<exists>rn. list = Oc\<up>(Suc (Suc rs)) @ Bk\<up>(rn))"
apply(simp add: wcode_fourtimes_invs, auto)
apply(case_tac [!] mr, simp_all)
done
lemma [simp]: "wcode_on_checking_2 ires rs (b, Oc # list) = False"
apply(simp add: wcode_fourtimes_invs)
done
lemma [simp]: "wcode_goon_right_moving_2 ires rs (b, Oc # list) \<Longrightarrow>
wcode_goon_right_moving_2 ires rs (Oc # b, list)"
apply(simp only:wcode_fourtimes_invs, auto)
apply(rule_tac x = "Suc ml" in exI, simp)
apply(rule_tac x = "mr - 1" in exI)
apply(case_tac mr, case_tac rn, auto)
done
lemma [simp]: "wcode_backto_standard_pos_2 ires rs (b, Oc # list) \<Longrightarrow> b \<noteq> []"
apply(simp only: wcode_fourtimes_invs, auto)
done
lemma [simp]: "wcode_backto_standard_pos_2 ires rs (b, Oc # list)
\<Longrightarrow> wcode_backto_standard_pos_2 ires rs (tl b, hd b # Oc # list)"
apply(simp only: wcode_fourtimes_invs)
apply(erule_tac disjE)
apply(erule_tac exE)+
apply(case_tac ml, auto)
apply(rule_tac x = nat in exI, auto)
apply(rule_tac x = "Suc mr" in exI, simp)
done
lemma wcode_fourtimes_case_first_correctness:
shows "let P = (\<lambda> (st, l, r). st = t_twice_len + 14) in
let Q = (\<lambda> (st, l, r). wcode_fourtimes_case_inv st ires rs (l, r)) in
let f = (\<lambda> stp. steps0 (Suc 0, Bk # Bk\<up>(m) @ Oc # Bk # Oc # ires, Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc rs) @ Bk\<up>(n)) t_wcode_main stp) in
\<exists> n .P (f n) \<and> Q (f (n::nat))"
proof -
let ?P = "(\<lambda> (st, l, r). st = t_twice_len + 14)"
let ?Q = "(\<lambda> (st, l, r). wcode_fourtimes_case_inv st ires rs (l, r))"
let ?f = "(\<lambda> stp. steps0 (Suc 0, Bk # Bk\<up>(m) @ Oc # Bk # Oc # ires, Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc rs) @ Bk\<up>(n)) t_wcode_main stp)"
have "\<exists> n . ?P (?f n) \<and> ?Q (?f (n::nat))"
proof(rule_tac halt_lemma2)
show "wf wcode_fourtimes_case_le"
by auto
next
show "\<forall> na. \<not> ?P (?f na) \<and> ?Q (?f na) \<longrightarrow>
?Q (?f (Suc na)) \<and> (?f (Suc na), ?f na) \<in> wcode_fourtimes_case_le"
apply(rule_tac allI,
case_tac "steps0 (Suc 0, Bk # Bk\<up>(m) @ Oc # Bk # Oc # ires, Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc rs) @ Bk\<up>(n)) t_wcode_main na", simp,
rule_tac impI)
apply(simp add: step_red step.simps, case_tac c, simp, case_tac [2] aa, simp_all)
apply(simp_all add: wcode_fourtimes_case_inv.simps
wcode_fourtimes_case_le_def lex_pair_def split: if_splits)
apply(auto simp: wcode_backto_standard_pos_2.simps wcode_backto_standard_pos_2_O.simps
wcode_backto_standard_pos_2_B.simps)
apply(case_tac mr, simp_all)
done
next
show "?Q (?f 0)"
apply(simp add: steps.simps wcode_fourtimes_case_inv.simps)
apply(simp add: wcode_on_left_moving_2.simps wcode_on_left_moving_2_B.simps
wcode_on_left_moving_2_O.simps)
apply(rule_tac x = "Suc m" in exI, simp )
apply(rule_tac x ="Suc 0" in exI, auto)
done
next
show "\<not> ?P (?f 0)"
apply(simp add: steps.simps)
done
qed
thus "?thesis"
apply(erule_tac exE, simp)
done
qed
definition t_fourtimes_len :: "nat"
where
"t_fourtimes_len = (length t_fourtimes div 2)"
lemma t_fourtimes_len_gr: "t_fourtimes_len > 0"
apply(simp add: t_fourtimes_len_def t_fourtimes_def mopup.simps t_fourtimes_compile_def)
done
lemma [intro]: "rec_calc_rel (constn 4) [rs] 4"
using prime_rel_exec_eq[of "constn 4" "[rs]" 4]
apply(subgoal_tac "primerec (constn 4) 1", auto)
done
lemma [intro]: "rec_calc_rel rec_mult [rs, 4] (4 * rs)"
using prime_rel_exec_eq[of "rec_mult" "[rs, 4]" "4*rs"]
apply(subgoal_tac "primerec rec_mult 2", auto simp: numeral_2_eq_2)
done
lemma t_fourtimes_correct:
"\<exists>stp ln rn. steps0 (Suc 0, Bk # Bk # ires, Oc\<up>(Suc rs) @ Bk\<up>(n))
(tm_of abc_fourtimes @ shift (mopup 1) (length (tm_of abc_fourtimes) div 2)) stp =
(0, Bk\<up>(ln) @ Bk # Bk # ires, Oc\<up>(Suc (4 * rs)) @ Bk\<up>(rn))"
proof(case_tac "rec_ci rec_fourtimes")
fix a b c
assume h: "rec_ci rec_fourtimes = (a, b, c)"
have "\<exists>stp m l. steps0 (Suc 0, Bk # Bk # ires, <[rs]> @ Bk\<up>(n)) (tm_of abc_fourtimes @ shift (mopup 1)
(length (tm_of abc_fourtimes) div 2)) stp = (0, Bk\<up>(m) @ Bk # Bk # ires, Oc\<up>(Suc (4*rs)) @ Bk\<up>(l))"
proof(rule_tac recursive_compile_to_tm_correct)
show "rec_ci rec_fourtimes = (a, b, c)" by (simp add: h)
next
show "rec_calc_rel rec_fourtimes [rs] (4 * rs)"
apply(simp add: rec_fourtimes_def)
apply(rule_tac rs = "[rs, 4]" in calc_cn, simp_all)
apply(rule_tac allI, case_tac k, auto simp: mult_lemma)
done
next
show "length [rs] = 1" by simp
next
show "layout_of (a [+] dummy_abc 1) = layout_of (a [+] dummy_abc 1)" by simp
next
show "tm_of abc_fourtimes = tm_of (a [+] dummy_abc 1)"
using h
apply(simp add: abc_fourtimes_def)
done
qed
thus "?thesis"
apply(simp add: tape_of_nl_abv tape_of_nat_list.simps tape_of_nat_abv)
done
qed
lemma wf_fourtimes[intro]: "tm_wf (t_fourtimes_compile, 0)"
apply(simp only: t_fourtimes_compile_def)
apply(rule_tac t_compiled_correct)
apply(simp_all add: abc_twice_def)
done
lemma t_fourtimes_change_term_state:
"\<exists> stp ln rn. steps0 (Suc 0, Bk # Bk # ires, Oc\<up>(Suc rs) @ Bk\<up>(n)) t_fourtimes stp
= (Suc t_fourtimes_len, Bk\<up>(ln) @ Bk # Bk # ires, Oc\<up>(Suc (4 * rs)) @ Bk\<up>(rn))"
proof -
have "\<exists>stp ln rn. steps0 (Suc 0, Bk # Bk # ires, Oc\<up>(Suc rs) @ Bk\<up>(n))
(tm_of abc_fourtimes @ shift (mopup 1) ((length (tm_of abc_fourtimes) div 2))) stp =
(0, Bk\<up>(ln) @ Bk # Bk # ires, Oc\<up>(Suc (4 * rs)) @ Bk\<up>(rn))"
by(rule_tac t_fourtimes_correct)
then obtain stp ln rn where
"steps0 (Suc 0, Bk # Bk # ires, Oc\<up>(Suc rs) @ Bk\<up>(n))
(tm_of abc_fourtimes @ shift (mopup 1) ((length (tm_of abc_fourtimes) div 2))) stp =
(0, Bk\<up>(ln) @ Bk # Bk # ires, Oc\<up>(Suc (4 * rs)) @ Bk\<up>(rn))" by blast
hence "\<exists> stp. steps0 (Suc 0, Bk # Bk # ires, Oc\<up>(Suc rs) @ Bk\<up>(n))
(adjust t_fourtimes_compile) stp
= (Suc (length t_fourtimes_compile div 2), Bk\<up>(ln) @ Bk # Bk # ires, Oc\<up>(Suc (4 * rs)) @ Bk\<up>(rn))"
apply(rule_tac stp = stp in adjust_halt_eq)
apply(simp add: t_fourtimes_compile_def, auto)
done
then obtain stpb where
"steps0 (Suc 0, Bk # Bk # ires, Oc\<up>(Suc rs) @ Bk\<up>(n))
(adjust t_fourtimes_compile) stpb
= (Suc (length t_fourtimes_compile div 2), Bk\<up>(ln) @ Bk # Bk # ires, Oc\<up>(Suc (4 * rs)) @ Bk\<up>(rn))" ..
thus "?thesis"
apply(simp add: t_fourtimes_def t_fourtimes_len_def)
by metis
qed
lemma [intro]: "length t_twice mod 2 = 0"
apply(auto simp: t_twice_def t_twice_compile_def)
done
lemma t_fourtimes_append_pre:
"steps0 (Suc 0, Bk # Bk # ires, Oc\<up>(Suc rs) @ Bk\<up>(n)) t_fourtimes stp
= (Suc t_fourtimes_len, Bk\<up>(ln) @ Bk # Bk # ires, Oc\<up>(Suc (4 * rs)) @ Bk\<up>(rn))
\<Longrightarrow> steps0 (Suc 0 + length (t_wcode_main_first_part @
shift t_twice (length t_wcode_main_first_part div 2) @ [(L, 1), (L, 1)]) div 2,
Bk # Bk # ires, Oc\<up>(Suc rs) @ Bk\<up>(n))
((t_wcode_main_first_part @
shift t_twice (length t_wcode_main_first_part div 2) @ [(L, 1), (L, 1)]) @
shift t_fourtimes (length (t_wcode_main_first_part @
shift t_twice (length t_wcode_main_first_part div 2) @ [(L, 1), (L, 1)]) div 2) @ ([(L, 1), (L, 1)])) stp
= ((Suc t_fourtimes_len) + length (t_wcode_main_first_part @
shift t_twice (length t_wcode_main_first_part div 2) @ [(L, 1), (L, 1)]) div 2,
Bk\<up>(ln) @ Bk # Bk # ires, Oc\<up>(Suc (4 * rs)) @ Bk\<up>(rn))"
apply(rule_tac tm_append_shift_append_steps, simp_all)
apply(auto simp: t_wcode_main_first_part_def)
done
lemma [simp]: "length t_wcode_main_first_part = 24"
apply(simp add: t_wcode_main_first_part_def)
done
lemma [simp]: "(26 + length t_twice) div 2 = (length t_twice) div 2 + 13"
apply(simp add: t_twice_def t_twice_def)
done
lemma [simp]: "((26 + length (shift t_twice 12)) div 2)
= (length (shift t_twice 12) div 2 + 13)"
apply(simp add: t_twice_def)
done
lemma [simp]: "t_twice_len + 14 = 14 + length (shift t_twice 12) div 2"
apply(simp add: t_twice_def t_twice_len_def)
done
lemma t_fourtimes_append:
"\<exists> stp ln rn.
steps0 (Suc 0 + length (t_wcode_main_first_part @ shift t_twice
(length t_wcode_main_first_part div 2) @ [(L, 1), (L, 1)]) div 2,
Bk # Bk # ires, Oc\<up>(Suc rs) @ Bk\<up>(n))
((t_wcode_main_first_part @ shift t_twice (length t_wcode_main_first_part div 2) @
[(L, 1), (L, 1)]) @ shift t_fourtimes (t_twice_len + 13) @ [(L, 1), (L, 1)]) stp
= (Suc t_fourtimes_len + length (t_wcode_main_first_part @ shift t_twice
(length t_wcode_main_first_part div 2) @ [(L, 1), (L, 1)]) div 2, Bk\<up>(ln) @ Bk # Bk # ires,
Oc\<up>(Suc (4 * rs)) @ Bk\<up>(rn))"
using t_fourtimes_change_term_state[of ires rs n]
apply(erule_tac exE)
apply(erule_tac exE)
apply(erule_tac exE)
apply(drule_tac t_fourtimes_append_pre)
apply(rule_tac x = stp in exI, rule_tac x = ln in exI, rule_tac x = rn in exI)
apply(simp add: t_twice_len_def)
done
lemma t_wcode_main_len: "length t_wcode_main = length t_twice + length t_fourtimes + 28"
apply(simp add: t_wcode_main_def)
done
lemma even_twice_len: "length t_twice mod 2 = 0"
apply(auto simp: t_twice_def t_twice_compile_def)
done
lemma even_fourtimes_len: "length t_fourtimes mod 2 = 0"
apply(auto simp: t_fourtimes_def t_fourtimes_compile_def)
done
lemma [simp]: "2 * (length t_twice div 2) = length t_twice"
using even_twice_len
by arith
lemma [simp]: "2 * (length t_fourtimes div 2) = length t_fourtimes"
using even_fourtimes_len
by arith
lemma [simp]: "fetch t_wcode_main (14 + length t_twice div 2 + t_fourtimes_len) Oc
= (L, Suc 0)"
apply(subgoal_tac "14 = Suc 13")
apply(simp only: fetch.simps add_Suc nth_of.simps t_wcode_main_def)
apply(simp add:length_append length_shift Parity.two_times_even_div_two even_twice_len t_fourtimes_len_def)
by arith
lemma [simp]: "fetch t_wcode_main (14 + length t_twice div 2 + t_fourtimes_len) Bk
= (L, Suc 0)"
apply(subgoal_tac "14 = Suc 13")
apply(simp only: fetch.simps add_Suc nth_of.simps t_wcode_main_def)
apply(simp add:length_append length_shift Parity.two_times_even_div_two even_twice_len t_fourtimes_len_def nth_append)
by arith
lemma [simp]: "fetch t_wcode_main (14 + length t_twice div 2 + t_fourtimes_len) b
= (L, Suc 0)"
apply(case_tac b, simp_all)
done
lemma wcode_jump2:
"\<exists> stp ln rn. steps0 (t_twice_len + 14 + t_fourtimes_len
, Bk # Bk # Bk\<up>(lnb) @ Oc # ires, Oc\<up>(Suc (4 * rs + 4)) @ Bk\<up>(rnb)) t_wcode_main stp =
(Suc 0, Bk # Bk\<up>(ln) @ Oc # ires, Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc (4 * rs + 4)) @ Bk\<up>(rn))"
apply(rule_tac x = "Suc 0" in exI)
apply(simp add: steps.simps)
apply(rule_tac x = lnb in exI, rule_tac x = rnb in exI)
apply(simp add: step.simps)
done
lemma wcode_fourtimes_case:
shows "\<exists>stp ln rn.
steps0 (Suc 0, Bk # Bk\<up>(m) @ Oc # Bk # Oc # ires, Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc rs) @ Bk\<up>(n)) t_wcode_main stp =
(Suc 0, Bk # Bk\<up>(ln) @ Oc # ires, Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc (4*rs + 4)) @ Bk\<up>(rn))"
proof -
have "\<exists>stp ln rn.
steps0 (Suc 0, Bk # Bk\<up>(m) @ Oc # Bk # Oc # ires, Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc rs) @ Bk\<up>(n)) t_wcode_main stp =
(t_twice_len + 14, Bk # Bk # Bk\<up>(ln) @ Oc # ires, Oc\<up>(Suc (rs + 1)) @ Bk\<up>(rn))"
using wcode_fourtimes_case_first_correctness[of ires rs m n]
apply(simp add: wcode_fourtimes_case_inv.simps, auto)
apply(rule_tac x = na in exI, rule_tac x = ln in exI,
rule_tac x = rn in exI)
apply(simp)
done
from this obtain stpa lna rna where stp1:
"steps0 (Suc 0, Bk # Bk\<up>(m) @ Oc # Bk # Oc # ires, Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc rs) @ Bk\<up>(n)) t_wcode_main stpa =
(t_twice_len + 14, Bk # Bk # Bk\<up>(lna) @ Oc # ires, Oc\<up>(Suc (rs + 1)) @ Bk\<up>(rna))" by blast
have "\<exists>stp ln rn. steps0 (t_twice_len + 14, Bk # Bk # Bk\<up>(lna) @ Oc # ires, Oc\<up>(Suc (rs + 1)) @ Bk\<up>(rna))
t_wcode_main stp =
(t_twice_len + 14 + t_fourtimes_len, Bk # Bk # Bk\<up>(ln) @ Oc # ires, Oc\<up>(Suc (4*rs + 4)) @ Bk\<up>(rn))"
using t_fourtimes_append[of " Bk\<up>(lna) @ Oc # ires" "rs + 1" rna]
apply(erule_tac exE)
apply(erule_tac exE)
apply(erule_tac exE)
apply(simp add: t_wcode_main_def)
apply(rule_tac x = stp in exI,
rule_tac x = "ln + lna" in exI,
rule_tac x = rn in exI, simp)
apply(simp add: replicate_Suc[THEN sym] exp_add[THEN sym] del: replicate_Suc)
done
from this obtain stpb lnb rnb where stp2:
"steps0 (t_twice_len + 14, Bk # Bk # Bk\<up>(lna) @ Oc # ires, Oc\<up>(Suc (rs + 1)) @ Bk\<up>(rna))
t_wcode_main stpb =
(t_twice_len + 14 + t_fourtimes_len, Bk # Bk # Bk\<up>(lnb) @ Oc # ires, Oc\<up>(Suc (4*rs + 4)) @ Bk\<up>(rnb))"
by blast
have "\<exists>stp ln rn. steps0 (t_twice_len + 14 + t_fourtimes_len,
Bk # Bk # Bk\<up>(lnb) @ Oc # ires, Oc\<up>(Suc (4*rs + 4)) @ Bk\<up>(rnb))
t_wcode_main stp =
(Suc 0, Bk # Bk\<up>(ln) @ Oc # ires, Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc (4*rs + 4)) @ Bk\<up>(rn))"
apply(rule wcode_jump2)
done
from this obtain stpc lnc rnc where stp3:
"steps0 (t_twice_len + 14 + t_fourtimes_len,
Bk # Bk # Bk\<up>(lnb) @ Oc # ires, Oc\<up>(Suc (4*rs + 4)) @ Bk\<up>(rnb))
t_wcode_main stpc =
(Suc 0, Bk # Bk\<up>(lnc) @ Oc # ires, Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc (4*rs + 4)) @ Bk\<up>(rnc))"
by blast
from stp1 stp2 stp3 show "?thesis"
apply(rule_tac x = "stpa + stpb + stpc" in exI,
rule_tac x = lnc in exI, rule_tac x = rnc in exI)
apply(simp add: steps_add)
done
qed
(**********************************************************)
fun wcode_on_left_moving_3_B :: "bin_inv_t"
where
"wcode_on_left_moving_3_B ires rs (l, r) =
(\<exists> ml mr rn. l = Bk\<up>(ml) @ Oc # Bk # Bk # ires \<and>
r = Bk\<up>(mr) @ Oc\<up>(Suc rs) @ Bk\<up>(rn) \<and>
ml + mr > Suc 0 \<and> mr > 0 )"
fun wcode_on_left_moving_3_O :: "bin_inv_t"
where
"wcode_on_left_moving_3_O ires rs (l, r) =
(\<exists> ln rn. l = Bk # Bk # ires \<and>
r = Oc # Bk\<up>(ln) @ Bk # Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc rs) @ Bk\<up>(rn))"
fun wcode_on_left_moving_3 :: "bin_inv_t"
where
"wcode_on_left_moving_3 ires rs (l, r) =
(wcode_on_left_moving_3_B ires rs (l, r) \<or>
wcode_on_left_moving_3_O ires rs (l, r))"
fun wcode_on_checking_3 :: "bin_inv_t"
where
"wcode_on_checking_3 ires rs (l, r) =
(\<exists> ln rn. l = Bk # ires \<and>
r = Bk # Oc # Bk\<up>(ln) @ Bk # Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc rs) @ Bk\<up>(rn))"
fun wcode_goon_checking_3 :: "bin_inv_t"
where
"wcode_goon_checking_3 ires rs (l, r) =
(\<exists> ln rn. l = ires \<and>
r = Bk # Bk # Oc # Bk\<up>(ln) @ Bk # Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc rs) @ Bk\<up>(rn))"
fun wcode_stop :: "bin_inv_t"
where
"wcode_stop ires rs (l, r) =
(\<exists> ln rn. l = Bk # ires \<and>
r = Bk # Oc # Bk\<up>(ln) @ Bk # Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc rs) @ Bk\<up>(rn))"
fun wcode_halt_case_inv :: "nat \<Rightarrow> bin_inv_t"
where
"wcode_halt_case_inv st ires rs (l, r) =
(if st = 0 then wcode_stop ires rs (l, r)
else if st = Suc 0 then wcode_on_left_moving_3 ires rs (l, r)
else if st = Suc (Suc 0) then wcode_on_checking_3 ires rs (l, r)
else if st = 7 then wcode_goon_checking_3 ires rs (l, r)
else False)"
fun wcode_halt_case_state :: "config \<Rightarrow> nat"
where
"wcode_halt_case_state (st, l, r) =
(if st = 1 then 5
else if st = Suc (Suc 0) then 4
else if st = 7 then 3
else 0)"
fun wcode_halt_case_step :: "config \<Rightarrow> nat"
where
"wcode_halt_case_step (st, l, r) =
(if st = 1 then length l
else 0)"
fun wcode_halt_case_measure :: "config \<Rightarrow> nat \<times> nat"
where
"wcode_halt_case_measure (st, l, r) =
(wcode_halt_case_state (st, l, r),
wcode_halt_case_step (st, l, r))"
definition wcode_halt_case_le :: "(config \<times> config) set"
where "wcode_halt_case_le \<equiv> (inv_image lex_pair wcode_halt_case_measure)"
lemma wf_wcode_halt_case_le[intro]: "wf wcode_halt_case_le"
by(auto intro:wf_inv_image simp: wcode_halt_case_le_def)
declare wcode_on_left_moving_3_B.simps[simp del] wcode_on_left_moving_3_O.simps[simp del]
wcode_on_checking_3.simps[simp del] wcode_goon_checking_3.simps[simp del]
wcode_on_left_moving_3.simps[simp del] wcode_stop.simps[simp del]
lemmas wcode_halt_invs =
wcode_on_left_moving_3_B.simps wcode_on_left_moving_3_O.simps
wcode_on_checking_3.simps wcode_goon_checking_3.simps
wcode_on_left_moving_3.simps wcode_stop.simps
lemma [simp]: "fetch t_wcode_main 7 Bk = (R, 0)"
apply(subgoal_tac "7 = Suc 6")
apply(simp only: fetch.simps t_wcode_main_def nth_append nth_of.simps
t_wcode_main_first_part_def)
apply(auto)
done
lemma [simp]: "wcode_on_left_moving_3 ires rs (b, []) = False"
apply(simp only: wcode_halt_invs)
apply(simp)
done
lemma [simp]: "wcode_on_checking_3 ires rs (b, []) = False"
apply(simp add: wcode_halt_invs)
done
lemma [simp]: "wcode_goon_checking_3 ires rs (b, []) = False"
apply(simp add: wcode_halt_invs)
done
lemma [simp]: "wcode_on_left_moving_3 ires rs (b, Bk # list)
\<Longrightarrow> wcode_on_left_moving_3 ires rs (tl b, hd b # Bk # list)"
apply(simp only: wcode_halt_invs)
apply(erule_tac disjE)
apply(erule_tac exE)+
apply(case_tac ml, simp)
apply(rule_tac x = "mr - 2" in exI, rule_tac x = rn in exI)
apply(case_tac mr, simp, simp add: exp_ind del: replicate_Suc)
apply(case_tac nat, simp, simp add: exp_ind del: replicate_Suc)
apply(rule_tac disjI1)
apply(rule_tac x = nat in exI, rule_tac x = "Suc mr" in exI,
rule_tac x = rn in exI, simp)
apply(simp)
done
lemma [simp]: "wcode_goon_checking_3 ires rs (b, Bk # list) \<Longrightarrow>
(b = [] \<longrightarrow> wcode_stop ires rs ([Bk], list)) \<and>
(b \<noteq> [] \<longrightarrow> wcode_stop ires rs (Bk # b, list))"
apply(auto simp: wcode_halt_invs)
done
lemma [simp]: "wcode_on_left_moving_3 ires rs (b, Oc # list) \<Longrightarrow> b \<noteq> []"
apply(auto simp: wcode_halt_invs)
done
lemma [simp]: "wcode_on_left_moving_3 ires rs (b, Oc # list) \<Longrightarrow>
wcode_on_checking_3 ires rs (tl b, hd b # Oc # list)"
apply(simp add:wcode_halt_invs, auto)
apply(case_tac [!] mr, simp_all)
done
lemma [simp]: "wcode_on_checking_3 ires rs (b, Oc # list) = False"
apply(auto simp: wcode_halt_invs)
done
lemma [simp]: "wcode_on_left_moving_3 ires rs (b, Bk # list) \<Longrightarrow> b \<noteq> []"
apply(simp add: wcode_halt_invs, auto)
done
lemma [simp]: "wcode_on_checking_3 ires rs (b, Bk # list) \<Longrightarrow> b \<noteq> []"
apply(auto simp: wcode_halt_invs)
done
lemma [simp]: "wcode_on_checking_3 ires rs (b, Bk # list) \<Longrightarrow>
wcode_goon_checking_3 ires rs (tl b, hd b # Bk # list)"
apply(auto simp: wcode_halt_invs)
done
lemma [simp]: "wcode_goon_checking_3 ires rs (b, Oc # list) = False"
apply(simp add: wcode_goon_checking_3.simps)
done
lemma t_halt_case_correctness:
shows "let P = (\<lambda> (st, l, r). st = 0) in
let Q = (\<lambda> (st, l, r). wcode_halt_case_inv st ires rs (l, r)) in
let f = (\<lambda> stp. steps0 (Suc 0, Bk # Bk\<up>(m) @ Oc # Bk # Bk # ires, Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc rs) @ Bk\<up>(n)) t_wcode_main stp) in
\<exists> n .P (f n) \<and> Q (f (n::nat))"
proof -
let ?P = "(\<lambda> (st, l, r). st = 0)"
let ?Q = "(\<lambda> (st, l, r). wcode_halt_case_inv st ires rs (l, r))"
let ?f = "(\<lambda> stp. steps0 (Suc 0, Bk # Bk\<up>(m) @ Oc # Bk # Bk # ires, Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc rs) @ Bk\<up>(n)) t_wcode_main stp)"
have "\<exists> n. ?P (?f n) \<and> ?Q (?f (n::nat))"
proof(rule_tac halt_lemma2)
show "wf wcode_halt_case_le" by auto
next
show "\<forall> na. \<not> ?P (?f na) \<and> ?Q (?f na) \<longrightarrow>
?Q (?f (Suc na)) \<and> (?f (Suc na), ?f na) \<in> wcode_halt_case_le"
apply(rule_tac allI, rule_tac impI, case_tac "?f na")
apply(simp add: step_red step.simps)
apply(case_tac c, simp, case_tac [2] aa)
apply(simp_all split: if_splits add: wcode_halt_case_le_def lex_pair_def)
done
next
show "?Q (?f 0)"
apply(simp add: steps.simps wcode_halt_invs)
apply(rule_tac x = "Suc m" in exI, simp)
apply(rule_tac x = "Suc 0" in exI, auto)
done
next
show "\<not> ?P (?f 0)"
apply(simp add: steps.simps)
done
qed
thus "?thesis"
apply(auto)
done
qed
declare wcode_halt_case_inv.simps[simp del]
lemma [intro]: "\<exists> xs. (<rev list @ [aa::nat]> :: cell list) = Oc # xs"
apply(case_tac "rev list", simp)
apply(simp add: tape_of_nl_cons)
done
lemma wcode_halt_case:
"\<exists>stp ln rn. steps0 (Suc 0, Bk # Bk\<up>(m) @ Oc # Bk # Bk # ires, Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc rs) @ Bk\<up>(n))
t_wcode_main stp = (0, Bk # ires, Bk # Oc # Bk\<up>(ln) @ Bk # Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc rs) @ Bk\<up>(rn))"
using t_halt_case_correctness[of ires rs m n]
apply(simp)
apply(erule_tac exE)
apply(case_tac "steps0 (Suc 0, Bk # Bk\<up>(m) @ Oc # Bk # Bk # ires,
Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc rs) @ Bk\<up>(n)) t_wcode_main na")
apply(auto simp: wcode_halt_case_inv.simps wcode_stop.simps)
apply(rule_tac x = na in exI, rule_tac x = ln in exI,
rule_tac x = rn in exI, simp)
done
lemma bl_bin_one: "bl_bin [Oc] = Suc 0"
apply(simp add: bl_bin.simps)
done
lemma [simp]: "bl_bin [Oc] = 1"
apply(simp add: bl_bin.simps)
done
lemma [intro]: "2 * 2 ^ a = Suc (Suc (2 * bl_bin (Oc \<up> a)))"
apply(induct a, auto simp: bl_bin.simps)
done
declare replicate_Suc[simp del]
lemma t_wcode_main_lemma_pre:
"\<lbrakk>args \<noteq> []; lm = <args::nat list>\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow>
\<exists> stp ln rn. steps0 (Suc 0, Bk # Bk\<up>(m) @ rev lm @ Bk # Bk # ires, Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc rs) @ Bk\<up>(n)) t_wcode_main
stp
= (0, Bk # ires, Bk # Oc # Bk\<up>(ln) @ Bk # Bk # Oc\<up>(bl_bin lm + rs * 2^(length lm - 1) ) @ Bk\<up>(rn))"
proof(induct "length args" arbitrary: args lm rs m n, simp)
fix x args lm rs m n
assume ind:
"\<And>args lm rs m n.
\<lbrakk>x = length args; (args::nat list) \<noteq> []; lm = <args>\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> \<exists>stp ln rn.
steps0 (Suc 0, Bk # Bk\<up>(m) @ rev lm @ Bk # Bk # ires, Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc rs) @ Bk\<up>(n)) t_wcode_main stp =
(0, Bk # ires, Bk # Oc # Bk\<up>(ln) @ Bk # Bk # Oc\<up>(bl_bin lm + rs * 2 ^ (length lm - 1)) @ Bk\<up>(rn))"
and h: "Suc x = length args" "(args::nat list) \<noteq> []" "lm = <args>"
from h have "\<exists> (a::nat) xs. args = xs @ [a]"
apply(rule_tac x = "last args" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x = "butlast args" in exI, auto)
done
from this obtain a xs where "args = xs @ [a]" by blast
from h and this show
"\<exists>stp ln rn.
steps0 (Suc 0, Bk # Bk\<up>(m) @ rev lm @ Bk # Bk # ires, Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc rs) @ Bk\<up>(n)) t_wcode_main stp =
(0, Bk # ires, Bk # Oc # Bk\<up>(ln) @ Bk # Bk # Oc\<up>(bl_bin lm + rs * 2 ^ (length lm - 1)) @ Bk\<up>(rn))"
proof(case_tac "xs::nat list", simp)
show "\<exists>stp ln rn.
steps0 (Suc 0, Bk # Bk \<up> m @ Oc \<up> Suc a @ Bk # Bk # ires, Bk # Oc \<up> Suc rs @ Bk \<up> n) t_wcode_main stp =
(0, Bk # ires, Bk # Oc # Bk \<up> ln @ Bk # Bk # Oc \<up> (bl_bin (Oc \<up> Suc a) + rs * 2 ^ a) @ Bk \<up> rn)"
proof(induct "a" arbitrary: m n rs ires, simp)
fix m n rs ires
show "\<exists>stp ln rn.
steps0 (Suc 0, Bk # Bk \<up> m @ Oc # Bk # Bk # ires, Bk # Oc \<up> Suc rs @ Bk \<up> n) t_wcode_main stp =
(0, Bk # ires, Bk # Oc # Bk \<up> ln @ Bk # Bk # Oc \<up> Suc rs @ Bk \<up> rn)"
apply(rule_tac wcode_halt_case)
done
next
fix a m n rs ires
assume ind2:
"\<And>m n rs ires.
\<exists>stp ln rn.
steps0 (Suc 0, Bk # Bk \<up> m @ Oc \<up> Suc a @ Bk # Bk # ires, Bk # Oc \<up> Suc rs @ Bk \<up> n) t_wcode_main stp =
(0, Bk # ires, Bk # Oc # Bk \<up> ln @ Bk # Bk # Oc \<up> (bl_bin (Oc \<up> Suc a) + rs * 2 ^ a) @ Bk \<up> rn)"
show " \<exists>stp ln rn.
steps0 (Suc 0, Bk # Bk \<up> m @ Oc \<up> Suc (Suc a) @ Bk # Bk # ires, Bk # Oc \<up> Suc rs @ Bk \<up> n) t_wcode_main stp =
(0, Bk # ires, Bk # Oc # Bk \<up> ln @ Bk # Bk # Oc \<up> (bl_bin (Oc \<up> Suc (Suc a)) + rs * 2 ^ Suc a) @ Bk \<up> rn)"
proof -
have "\<exists>stp ln rn.
steps0 (Suc 0, Bk # Bk\<up>(m) @ rev (<Suc a>) @ Bk # Bk # ires, Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc rs) @ Bk\<up>(n)) t_wcode_main stp =
(Suc 0, Bk # Bk\<up>(ln) @ rev (<a>) @ Bk # Bk # ires, Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc (2 * rs + 2)) @ Bk\<up>(rn))"
apply(simp add: tape_of_nat)
using wcode_double_case[of m "Oc\<up>(a) @ Bk # Bk # ires" rs n]
apply(simp add: replicate_Suc)
done
from this obtain stpa lna rna where stp1:
"steps0 (Suc 0, Bk # Bk\<up>(m) @ rev (<Suc a>) @ Bk # Bk # ires, Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc rs) @ Bk\<up>(n)) t_wcode_main stpa =
(Suc 0, Bk # Bk\<up>(lna) @ rev (<a>) @ Bk # Bk # ires, Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc (2 * rs + 2)) @ Bk\<up>(rna))" by blast
moreover have
"\<exists>stp ln rn.
steps0 (Suc 0, Bk # Bk\<up>(lna) @ rev (<a::nat>) @ Bk # Bk # ires, Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc (2 * rs + 2)) @ Bk\<up>(rna)) t_wcode_main stp =
(0, Bk # ires, Bk # Oc # Bk\<up>(ln) @ Bk # Bk # Oc\<up>(bl_bin (<a>) + (2*rs + 2) * 2 ^ a) @ Bk\<up>(rn))"
using ind2[of lna ires "2*rs + 2" rna] by(simp add: tape_of_nl_abv tape_of_nat_abv)
from this obtain stpb lnb rnb where stp2:
"steps0 (Suc 0, Bk # Bk\<up>(lna) @ rev (<a>) @ Bk # Bk # ires, Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc (2 * rs + 2)) @ Bk\<up>(rna)) t_wcode_main stpb =
(0, Bk # ires, Bk # Oc # Bk\<up>(lnb) @ Bk # Bk # Oc\<up>(bl_bin (<a>) + (2*rs + 2) * 2 ^ a) @ Bk\<up>(rnb))"
by blast
from stp1 and stp2 show "?thesis"
apply(rule_tac x = "stpa + stpb" in exI,
rule_tac x = lnb in exI, rule_tac x = rnb in exI, simp add: tape_of_nat_abv)
apply(simp add: bl_bin.simps replicate_Suc)
apply(auto)
done
qed
qed
next
fix aa list
assume g: "Suc x = length args" "args \<noteq> []" "lm = <args>" "args = xs @ [a::nat]" "xs = (aa::nat) # list"
thus "\<exists>stp ln rn. steps0 (Suc 0, Bk # Bk\<up>(m) @ rev lm @ Bk # Bk # ires, Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc rs) @ Bk\<up>(n)) t_wcode_main stp =
(0, Bk # ires, Bk # Oc # Bk\<up>(ln) @ Bk # Bk # Oc\<up>(bl_bin lm + rs * 2 ^ (length lm - 1)) @ Bk\<up>(rn))"
proof(induct a arbitrary: m n rs args lm, simp_all add: tape_of_nl_rev,
simp only: tape_of_nl_cons_app1, simp)
fix m n rs args lm
have "\<exists>stp ln rn.
steps0 (Suc 0, Bk # Bk\<up>(m) @ Oc # Bk # rev (<(aa::nat) # list>) @ Bk # Bk # ires,
Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc rs) @ Bk\<up>(n)) t_wcode_main stp =
(Suc 0, Bk # Bk\<up>(ln) @ rev (<aa # list>) @ Bk # Bk # ires,
Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc (4*rs + 4)) @ Bk\<up>(rn))"
proof(simp add: tape_of_nl_rev)
have "\<exists> xs. (<rev list @ [aa]>) = Oc # xs" by auto
from this obtain xs where "(<rev list @ [aa]>) = Oc # xs" ..
thus "\<exists>stp ln rn.
steps0 (Suc 0, Bk # Bk\<up>(m) @ Oc # Bk # <rev list @ [aa]> @ Bk # Bk # ires,
Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc rs) @ Bk\<up>(n)) t_wcode_main stp =
(Suc 0, Bk # Bk\<up>(ln) @ <rev list @ [aa]> @ Bk # Bk # ires, Bk # Oc\<up>(5 + 4 * rs) @ Bk\<up>(rn))"
apply(simp)
using wcode_fourtimes_case[of m "xs @ Bk # Bk # ires" rs n]
apply(simp)
done
qed
from this obtain stpa lna rna where stp1:
"steps0 (Suc 0, Bk # Bk\<up>(m) @ Oc # Bk # rev (<aa # list>) @ Bk # Bk # ires,
Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc rs) @ Bk\<up>(n)) t_wcode_main stpa =
(Suc 0, Bk # Bk\<up>(lna) @ rev (<aa # list>) @ Bk # Bk # ires,
Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc (4*rs + 4)) @ Bk\<up>(rna))" by blast
from g have
"\<exists> stp ln rn. steps0 (Suc 0, Bk # Bk\<up>(lna) @ rev (<(aa::nat) # list>) @ Bk # Bk # ires,
Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc (4*rs + 4)) @ Bk\<up>(rna)) t_wcode_main stp = (0, Bk # ires,
Bk # Oc # Bk\<up>(ln) @ Bk # Bk # Oc\<up>(bl_bin (<aa#list>)+ (4*rs + 4) * 2^(length (<aa#list>) - 1) ) @ Bk\<up>(rn))"
apply(rule_tac args = "(aa::nat)#list" in ind, simp_all)
done
from this obtain stpb lnb rnb where stp2:
"steps0 (Suc 0, Bk # Bk\<up>(lna) @ rev (<(aa::nat) # list>) @ Bk # Bk # ires,
Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc (4*rs + 4)) @ Bk\<up>(rna)) t_wcode_main stpb = (0, Bk # ires,
Bk # Oc # Bk\<up>(lnb) @ Bk # Bk # Oc\<up>(bl_bin (<aa#list>)+ (4*rs + 4) * 2^(length (<aa#list>) - 1) ) @ Bk\<up>(rnb))"
by blast
from stp1 and stp2 and h
show "\<exists>stp ln rn.
steps0 (Suc 0, Bk # Bk\<up>(m) @ Oc # Bk # <rev list @ [aa]> @ Bk # Bk # ires,
Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc rs) @ Bk\<up>(n)) t_wcode_main stp =
(0, Bk # ires, Bk # Oc # Bk\<up>(ln) @ Bk #
Bk # Oc\<up>(bl_bin (Oc\<up>(Suc aa) @ Bk # <list @ [0]>) + rs * (2 * 2 ^ (aa + length (<list @ [0]>)))) @ Bk\<up>(rn))"
apply(rule_tac x = "stpa + stpb" in exI, rule_tac x = lnb in exI,
rule_tac x = rnb in exI, simp add: steps_add tape_of_nl_rev)
done
next
fix ab m n rs args lm
assume ind2:
"\<And> m n rs args lm.
\<lbrakk>lm = <aa # list @ [ab]>; args = aa # list @ [ab]\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> \<exists>stp ln rn.
steps0 (Suc 0, Bk # Bk\<up>(m) @ <ab # rev list @ [aa]> @ Bk # Bk # ires,
Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc rs) @ Bk\<up>(n)) t_wcode_main stp =
(0, Bk # ires, Bk # Oc # Bk\<up>(ln) @ Bk #
Bk # Oc\<up>(bl_bin (<aa # list @ [ab]>) + rs * 2 ^ (length (<aa # list @ [ab]>) - Suc 0)) @ Bk\<up>(rn))"
and k: "args = aa # list @ [Suc ab]" "lm = <aa # list @ [Suc ab]>"
show "\<exists>stp ln rn.
steps0 (Suc 0, Bk # Bk\<up>(m) @ <Suc ab # rev list @ [aa]> @ Bk # Bk # ires,
Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc rs) @ Bk\<up>(n)) t_wcode_main stp =
(0, Bk # ires,Bk # Oc # Bk\<up>(ln) @ Bk #
Bk # Oc\<up>(bl_bin (<aa # list @ [Suc ab]>) + rs * 2 ^ (length (<aa # list @ [Suc ab]>) - Suc 0)) @ Bk\<up>(rn))"
proof(simp add: tape_of_nl_cons_app1)
have "\<exists>stp ln rn.
steps0 (Suc 0, Bk # Bk\<up>(m) @ Oc\<up>(Suc (Suc ab)) @ Bk # <rev list @ [aa]> @ Bk # Bk # ires,
Bk # Oc # Oc\<up>(rs) @ Bk\<up>(n)) t_wcode_main stp
= (Suc 0, Bk # Bk\<up>(ln) @ Oc\<up>(Suc ab) @ Bk # <rev list @ [aa]> @ Bk # Bk # ires,
Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc (2*rs + 2)) @ Bk\<up>(rn))"
using wcode_double_case[of m "Oc\<up>(ab) @ Bk # <rev list @ [aa]> @ Bk # Bk # ires"
rs n]
apply(simp add: replicate_Suc)
done
from this obtain stpa lna rna where stp1:
"steps0 (Suc 0, Bk # Bk\<up>(m) @ Oc\<up>(Suc (Suc ab)) @ Bk # <rev list @ [aa]> @ Bk # Bk # ires,
Bk # Oc # Oc\<up>(rs) @ Bk\<up>(n)) t_wcode_main stpa
= (Suc 0, Bk # Bk\<up>(lna) @ Oc\<up>(Suc ab) @ Bk # <rev list @ [aa]> @ Bk # Bk # ires,
Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc (2*rs + 2)) @ Bk\<up>(rna))" by blast
from k have
"\<exists> stp ln rn. steps0 (Suc 0, Bk # Bk\<up>(lna) @ <ab # rev list @ [aa]> @ Bk # Bk # ires,
Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc (2*rs + 2)) @ Bk\<up>(rna)) t_wcode_main stp
= (0, Bk # ires, Bk # Oc # Bk\<up>(ln) @ Bk #
Bk # Oc\<up>(bl_bin (<aa # list @ [ab]> ) + (2*rs + 2)* 2^(length (<aa # list @ [ab]>) - Suc 0)) @ Bk\<up>(rn))"
apply(rule_tac ind2, simp_all)
done
from this obtain stpb lnb rnb where stp2:
"steps0 (Suc 0, Bk # Bk\<up>(lna) @ <ab # rev list @ [aa]> @ Bk # Bk # ires,
Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc (2*rs + 2)) @ Bk\<up>(rna)) t_wcode_main stpb
= (0, Bk # ires, Bk # Oc # Bk\<up>(lnb) @ Bk #
Bk # Oc\<up>(bl_bin (<aa # list @ [ab]> ) + (2*rs + 2)* 2^(length (<aa # list @ [ab]>) - Suc 0)) @ Bk\<up>(rnb))"
by blast
from stp1 and stp2 show
"\<exists>stp ln rn.
steps0 (Suc 0, Bk # Bk\<up>(m) @ Oc\<up>(Suc (Suc ab)) @ Bk # <rev list @ [aa]> @ Bk # Bk # ires,
Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc rs) @ Bk\<up>(n)) t_wcode_main stp =
(0, Bk # ires, Bk # Oc # Bk\<up>(ln) @ Bk # Bk #
Oc\<up>(bl_bin (Oc\<up>(Suc aa) @ Bk # <list @ [Suc ab]>) + rs * (2 * 2 ^ (aa + length (<list @ [Suc ab]>))))
@ Bk\<up>(rn))"
apply(rule_tac x = "stpa + stpb" in exI, rule_tac x = lnb in exI,
rule_tac x = rnb in exI, simp add: steps_add tape_of_nl_cons_app1 replicate_Suc)
done
qed
qed
qed
qed
definition t_wcode_prepare :: "instr list"
where
"t_wcode_prepare \<equiv>
[(W1, 2), (L, 1), (L, 3), (R, 2), (R, 4), (W0, 3),
(R, 4), (R, 5), (R, 6), (R, 5), (R, 7), (R, 5),
(W1, 7), (L, 0)]"
fun wprepare_add_one :: "nat \<Rightarrow> nat list \<Rightarrow> tape \<Rightarrow> bool"
where
"wprepare_add_one m lm (l, r) =
(\<exists> rn. l = [] \<and>
(r = <m # lm> @ Bk\<up>(rn) \<or>
r = Bk # <m # lm> @ Bk\<up>(rn)))"
fun wprepare_goto_first_end :: "nat \<Rightarrow> nat list \<Rightarrow> tape \<Rightarrow> bool"
where
"wprepare_goto_first_end m lm (l, r) =
(\<exists> ml mr rn. l = Oc\<up>(ml) \<and>
r = Oc\<up>(mr) @ Bk # <lm> @ Bk\<up>(rn) \<and>
ml + mr = Suc (Suc m))"
fun wprepare_erase :: "nat \<Rightarrow> nat list \<Rightarrow> tape \<Rightarrow> bool"
where
"wprepare_erase m lm (l, r) =
(\<exists> rn. l = Oc\<up>(Suc m) \<and>
tl r = Bk # <lm> @ Bk\<up>(rn))"
fun wprepare_goto_start_pos_B :: "nat \<Rightarrow> nat list \<Rightarrow> tape \<Rightarrow> bool"
where
"wprepare_goto_start_pos_B m lm (l, r) =
(\<exists> rn. l = Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc m) \<and>
r = Bk # <lm> @ Bk\<up>(rn))"
fun wprepare_goto_start_pos_O :: "nat \<Rightarrow> nat list \<Rightarrow> tape \<Rightarrow> bool"
where
"wprepare_goto_start_pos_O m lm (l, r) =
(\<exists> rn. l = Bk # Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc m) \<and>
r = <lm> @ Bk\<up>(rn))"
fun wprepare_goto_start_pos :: "nat \<Rightarrow> nat list \<Rightarrow> tape \<Rightarrow> bool"
where
"wprepare_goto_start_pos m lm (l, r) =
(wprepare_goto_start_pos_B m lm (l, r) \<or>
wprepare_goto_start_pos_O m lm (l, r))"
fun wprepare_loop_start_on_rightmost :: "nat \<Rightarrow> nat list \<Rightarrow> tape \<Rightarrow> bool"
where
"wprepare_loop_start_on_rightmost m lm (l, r) =
(\<exists> rn mr. rev l @ r = Oc\<up>(Suc m) @ Bk # Bk # <lm> @ Bk\<up>(rn) \<and> l \<noteq> [] \<and>
r = Oc\<up>(mr) @ Bk\<up>(rn))"
fun wprepare_loop_start_in_middle :: "nat \<Rightarrow> nat list \<Rightarrow> tape \<Rightarrow> bool"
where
"wprepare_loop_start_in_middle m lm (l, r) =
(\<exists> rn (mr:: nat) (lm1::nat list).
rev l @ r = Oc\<up>(Suc m) @ Bk # Bk # <lm> @ Bk\<up>(rn) \<and> l \<noteq> [] \<and>
r = Oc\<up>(mr) @ Bk # <lm1> @ Bk\<up>(rn) \<and> lm1 \<noteq> [])"
fun wprepare_loop_start :: "nat \<Rightarrow> nat list \<Rightarrow> tape \<Rightarrow> bool"
where
"wprepare_loop_start m lm (l, r) = (wprepare_loop_start_on_rightmost m lm (l, r) \<or>
wprepare_loop_start_in_middle m lm (l, r))"
fun wprepare_loop_goon_on_rightmost :: "nat \<Rightarrow> nat list \<Rightarrow> tape \<Rightarrow> bool"
where
"wprepare_loop_goon_on_rightmost m lm (l, r) =
(\<exists> rn. l = Bk # <rev lm> @ Bk # Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc m) \<and>
r = Bk\<up>(rn))"
fun wprepare_loop_goon_in_middle :: "nat \<Rightarrow> nat list \<Rightarrow> tape \<Rightarrow> bool"
where
"wprepare_loop_goon_in_middle m lm (l, r) =
(\<exists> rn (mr:: nat) (lm1::nat list).
rev l @ r = Oc\<up>(Suc m) @ Bk # Bk # <lm> @ Bk\<up>(rn) \<and> l \<noteq> [] \<and>
(if lm1 = [] then r = Oc\<up>(mr) @ Bk\<up>(rn)
else r = Oc\<up>(mr) @ Bk # <lm1> @ Bk\<up>(rn)) \<and> mr > 0)"
fun wprepare_loop_goon :: "nat \<Rightarrow> nat list \<Rightarrow> tape \<Rightarrow> bool"
where
"wprepare_loop_goon m lm (l, r) =
(wprepare_loop_goon_in_middle m lm (l, r) \<or>
wprepare_loop_goon_on_rightmost m lm (l, r))"
fun wprepare_add_one2 :: "nat \<Rightarrow> nat list \<Rightarrow> tape \<Rightarrow> bool"
where
"wprepare_add_one2 m lm (l, r) =
(\<exists> rn. l = Bk # Bk # <rev lm> @ Bk # Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc m) \<and>
(r = [] \<or> tl r = Bk\<up>(rn)))"
fun wprepare_stop :: "nat \<Rightarrow> nat list \<Rightarrow> tape \<Rightarrow> bool"
where
"wprepare_stop m lm (l, r) =
(\<exists> rn. l = Bk # <rev lm> @ Bk # Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc m) \<and>
r = Bk # Oc # Bk\<up>(rn))"
fun wprepare_inv :: "nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> nat list \<Rightarrow> tape \<Rightarrow> bool"
where
"wprepare_inv st m lm (l, r) =
(if st = 0 then wprepare_stop m lm (l, r)
else if st = Suc 0 then wprepare_add_one m lm (l, r)
else if st = Suc (Suc 0) then wprepare_goto_first_end m lm (l, r)
else if st = Suc (Suc (Suc 0)) then wprepare_erase m lm (l, r)
else if st = 4 then wprepare_goto_start_pos m lm (l, r)
else if st = 5 then wprepare_loop_start m lm (l, r)
else if st = 6 then wprepare_loop_goon m lm (l, r)
else if st = 7 then wprepare_add_one2 m lm (l, r)
else False)"
fun wprepare_stage :: "config \<Rightarrow> nat"
where
"wprepare_stage (st, l, r) =
(if st \<ge> 1 \<and> st \<le> 4 then 3
else if st = 5 \<or> st = 6 then 2
else 1)"
fun wprepare_state :: "config \<Rightarrow> nat"
where
"wprepare_state (st, l, r) =
(if st = 1 then 4
else if st = Suc (Suc 0) then 3
else if st = Suc (Suc (Suc 0)) then 2
else if st = 4 then 1
else if st = 7 then 2
else 0)"
fun wprepare_step :: "config \<Rightarrow> nat"
where
"wprepare_step (st, l, r) =
(if st = 1 then (if hd r = Oc then Suc (length l)
else 0)
else if st = Suc (Suc 0) then length r
else if st = Suc (Suc (Suc 0)) then (if hd r = Oc then 1
else 0)
else if st = 4 then length r
else if st = 5 then Suc (length r)
else if st = 6 then (if r = [] then 0 else Suc (length r))
else if st = 7 then (if (r \<noteq> [] \<and> hd r = Oc) then 0
else 1)
else 0)"
fun wcode_prepare_measure :: "config \<Rightarrow> nat \<times> nat \<times> nat"
where
"wcode_prepare_measure (st, l, r) =
(wprepare_stage (st, l, r),
wprepare_state (st, l, r),
wprepare_step (st, l, r))"
definition wcode_prepare_le :: "(config \<times> config) set"
where "wcode_prepare_le \<equiv> (inv_image lex_triple wcode_prepare_measure)"
lemma [intro]: "wf lex_pair"
by(auto intro:wf_lex_prod simp:lex_pair_def)
lemma wf_wcode_prepare_le[intro]: "wf wcode_prepare_le"
by(auto intro:wf_inv_image simp: wcode_prepare_le_def
lex_triple_def)
declare wprepare_add_one.simps[simp del] wprepare_goto_first_end.simps[simp del]
wprepare_erase.simps[simp del] wprepare_goto_start_pos.simps[simp del]
wprepare_loop_start.simps[simp del] wprepare_loop_goon.simps[simp del]
wprepare_add_one2.simps[simp del]
lemmas wprepare_invs = wprepare_add_one.simps wprepare_goto_first_end.simps
wprepare_erase.simps wprepare_goto_start_pos.simps
wprepare_loop_start.simps wprepare_loop_goon.simps
wprepare_add_one2.simps
declare wprepare_inv.simps[simp del]
lemma [simp]: "fetch t_wcode_prepare (Suc 0) Bk = (W1, 2)"
apply(simp add: fetch.simps t_wcode_prepare_def nth_of.simps)
done
lemma [simp]: "fetch t_wcode_prepare (Suc 0) Oc = (L, 1)"
apply(simp add: fetch.simps t_wcode_prepare_def nth_of.simps)
done
lemma [simp]: "fetch t_wcode_prepare (Suc (Suc 0)) Bk = (L, 3)"
apply(simp add: fetch.simps t_wcode_prepare_def nth_of.simps)
done
lemma [simp]: "fetch t_wcode_prepare (Suc (Suc 0)) Oc = (R, 2)"
apply(simp add: fetch.simps t_wcode_prepare_def nth_of.simps)
done
lemma [simp]: "fetch t_wcode_prepare (Suc (Suc (Suc 0))) Bk = (R, 4)"
apply(simp add: fetch.simps t_wcode_prepare_def nth_of.simps)
done
lemma [simp]: "fetch t_wcode_prepare (Suc (Suc (Suc 0))) Oc = (W0, 3)"
apply(simp add: fetch.simps t_wcode_prepare_def nth_of.simps)
done
lemma [simp]: "fetch t_wcode_prepare 4 Bk = (R, 4)"
apply(subgoal_tac "4 = Suc 3")
apply(simp_all only: fetch.simps t_wcode_prepare_def nth_of.simps)
apply(auto)
done
lemma [simp]: "fetch t_wcode_prepare 4 Oc = (R, 5)"
apply(subgoal_tac "4 = Suc 3")
apply(simp_all only: fetch.simps t_wcode_prepare_def nth_of.simps)
apply(auto)
done
lemma [simp]: "fetch t_wcode_prepare 5 Oc = (R, 5)"
apply(subgoal_tac "5 = Suc 4")
apply(simp_all only: fetch.simps t_wcode_prepare_def nth_of.simps)
apply(auto)
done
lemma [simp]: "fetch t_wcode_prepare 5 Bk = (R, 6)"
apply(subgoal_tac "5 = Suc 4")
apply(simp_all only: fetch.simps t_wcode_prepare_def nth_of.simps)
apply(auto)
done
lemma [simp]: "fetch t_wcode_prepare 6 Oc = (R, 5)"
apply(subgoal_tac "6 = Suc 5")
apply(simp_all only: fetch.simps t_wcode_prepare_def nth_of.simps)
apply(auto)
done
lemma [simp]: "fetch t_wcode_prepare 6 Bk = (R, 7)"
apply(subgoal_tac "6 = Suc 5")
apply(simp_all only: fetch.simps t_wcode_prepare_def nth_of.simps)
apply(auto)
done
lemma [simp]: "fetch t_wcode_prepare 7 Oc = (L, 0)"
apply(subgoal_tac "7 = Suc 6")
apply(simp_all only: fetch.simps t_wcode_prepare_def nth_of.simps)
apply(auto)
done
lemma [simp]: "fetch t_wcode_prepare 7 Bk = (W1, 7)"
apply(subgoal_tac "7 = Suc 6")
apply(simp_all only: fetch.simps t_wcode_prepare_def nth_of.simps)
apply(auto)
done
lemma [simp]: "lm \<noteq> [] \<Longrightarrow> wprepare_add_one m lm (b, []) = False"
apply(simp add: wprepare_invs)
done
lemma [simp]: "lm \<noteq> [] \<Longrightarrow> wprepare_goto_first_end m lm (b, []) = False"
apply(simp add: wprepare_invs)
done
lemma [simp]: "lm \<noteq> [] \<Longrightarrow> wprepare_erase m lm (b, []) = False"
apply(simp add: wprepare_invs)
done
lemma [simp]: "lm \<noteq> [] \<Longrightarrow> wprepare_goto_start_pos m lm (b, []) = False"
apply(simp add: wprepare_invs)
done
lemma [simp]: "\<lbrakk>lm \<noteq> []; wprepare_loop_start m lm (b, [])\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> b \<noteq> []"
apply(simp add: wprepare_invs)
done
lemma rev_eq: "rev xs = rev ys \<Longrightarrow> xs = ys"
by auto
lemma [simp]: "\<lbrakk>lm \<noteq> []; wprepare_loop_start m lm (b, [])\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow>
wprepare_loop_goon m lm (Bk # b, [])"
apply(simp only: wprepare_invs)
apply(erule_tac disjE)
apply(rule_tac disjI2)
apply(simp add: wprepare_loop_start_on_rightmost.simps
wprepare_loop_goon_on_rightmost.simps, auto)
apply(rule_tac rev_eq, simp add: tape_of_nl_rev)
done
lemma [simp]: "\<lbrakk>lm \<noteq> []; wprepare_loop_goon m lm (b, [])\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> b \<noteq> []"
apply(simp only: wprepare_invs, auto)
done
lemma [simp]:"\<lbrakk>lm \<noteq> []; wprepare_loop_goon m lm (b, [])\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow>
wprepare_add_one2 m lm (Bk # b, [])"
apply(simp only: wprepare_invs, auto split: if_splits)
done
lemma [simp]: "wprepare_add_one2 m lm (b, []) \<Longrightarrow> b \<noteq> []"
apply(simp only: wprepare_invs, auto)
done
lemma [simp]: "wprepare_add_one2 m lm (b, []) \<Longrightarrow> wprepare_add_one2 m lm (b, [Oc])"
apply(simp only: wprepare_invs, auto)
done
lemma [simp]: "Bk # list = <(m::nat) # lm> @ ys = False"
apply(case_tac lm, auto simp: tape_of_nl_cons replicate_Suc)
done
lemma [simp]: "\<lbrakk>lm \<noteq> []; wprepare_add_one m lm (b, Bk # list)\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> (b = [] \<longrightarrow> wprepare_goto_first_end m lm ([], Oc # list)) \<and>
(b \<noteq> [] \<longrightarrow> wprepare_goto_first_end m lm (b, Oc # list))"
apply(simp only: wprepare_invs)
apply(auto simp: tape_of_nl_cons split: if_splits)
apply(rule_tac x = 0 in exI, simp add: replicate_Suc)
apply(case_tac lm, simp, simp add: tape_of_nl_abv tape_of_nat_list.simps replicate_Suc)
done
lemma [simp]: "wprepare_goto_first_end m lm (b, Bk # list) \<Longrightarrow> b \<noteq> []"
apply(simp only: wprepare_invs , auto simp: replicate_Suc)
done
declare replicate_Suc[simp]
lemma [simp]: "wprepare_goto_first_end m lm (b, Bk # list) \<Longrightarrow>
wprepare_erase m lm (tl b, hd b # Bk # list)"
apply(simp only: wprepare_invs, auto)
apply(case_tac mr, simp_all)
apply(case_tac mr, auto)
done
lemma [simp]: "wprepare_erase m lm (b, Bk # list) \<Longrightarrow> b \<noteq> []"
apply(simp only: wprepare_invs, auto)
done
lemma [simp]: "wprepare_erase m lm (b, Bk # list) \<Longrightarrow>
wprepare_goto_start_pos m lm (Bk # b, list)"
apply(simp only: wprepare_invs, auto)
done
lemma [simp]: "\<lbrakk>wprepare_add_one m lm (b, Bk # list)\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> list \<noteq> []"
apply(simp only: wprepare_invs)
apply(case_tac lm, simp_all add: tape_of_nl_abv
tape_of_nat_list.simps tape_of_nat_abv, auto)
done
lemma [simp]: "\<lbrakk>lm \<noteq> []; wprepare_goto_first_end m lm (b, Bk # list)\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> list \<noteq> []"
apply(simp only: wprepare_invs, auto)
apply(case_tac mr, simp_all)
done
lemma [simp]: "\<lbrakk>lm \<noteq> []; wprepare_goto_first_end m lm (b, Bk # list)\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> b \<noteq> []"
apply(simp only: wprepare_invs, auto)
done
lemma [simp]: "\<lbrakk>lm \<noteq> []; wprepare_erase m lm (b, Bk # list)\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> list \<noteq> []"
apply(simp only: wprepare_invs, auto)
done
lemma [simp]: "\<lbrakk>lm \<noteq> []; wprepare_erase m lm (b, Bk # list)\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> b \<noteq> []"
apply(simp only: wprepare_invs, auto)
done
lemma [simp]: "\<lbrakk>lm \<noteq> []; wprepare_goto_start_pos m lm (b, Bk # list)\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> list \<noteq> []"
apply(simp only: wprepare_invs, auto)
apply(case_tac lm, simp, case_tac list)
apply(simp_all add: tape_of_nl_abv tape_of_nat_list.simps tape_of_nat_abv)
done
lemma [simp]: "\<lbrakk>lm \<noteq> []; wprepare_goto_start_pos m lm (b, Bk # list)\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> b \<noteq> []"
apply(simp only: wprepare_invs)
apply(auto)
done
lemma [simp]: "\<lbrakk>lm \<noteq> []; wprepare_loop_goon m lm (b, Bk # list)\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> b \<noteq> []"
apply(simp only: wprepare_invs, auto)
done
lemma [simp]: "\<lbrakk>lm \<noteq> []; wprepare_loop_goon m lm (b, Bk # list)\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow>
(list = [] \<longrightarrow> wprepare_add_one2 m lm (Bk # b, [])) \<and>
(list \<noteq> [] \<longrightarrow> wprepare_add_one2 m lm (Bk # b, list))"
apply(simp only: wprepare_invs, simp)
apply(case_tac list, simp_all split: if_splits, auto)
apply(case_tac [1-3] mr, simp_all add: )
apply(case_tac mr, simp_all)
apply(case_tac [1-2] mr, simp_all add: )
apply(case_tac rn, simp, case_tac nat, auto simp: )
done
lemma [simp]: "wprepare_add_one2 m lm (b, Bk # list) \<Longrightarrow> b \<noteq> []"
apply(simp only: wprepare_invs, simp)
done
lemma [simp]: "wprepare_add_one2 m lm (b, Bk # list) \<Longrightarrow>
(list = [] \<longrightarrow> wprepare_add_one2 m lm (b, [Oc])) \<and>
(list \<noteq> [] \<longrightarrow> wprepare_add_one2 m lm (b, Oc # list))"
apply(simp only: wprepare_invs, auto)
done
lemma [simp]: "wprepare_goto_first_end m lm (b, Oc # list)
\<Longrightarrow> (b = [] \<longrightarrow> wprepare_goto_first_end m lm ([Oc], list)) \<and>
(b \<noteq> [] \<longrightarrow> wprepare_goto_first_end m lm (Oc # b, list))"
apply(simp only: wprepare_invs, auto)
apply(rule_tac x = 1 in exI, auto)
apply(case_tac mr, simp_all add: )
apply(case_tac ml, simp_all add: )
apply(rule_tac x = "Suc ml" in exI, simp_all add: )
apply(rule_tac x = "mr - 1" in exI, simp)
done
lemma [simp]: "wprepare_erase m lm (b, Oc # list) \<Longrightarrow> b \<noteq> []"
apply(simp only: wprepare_invs, auto simp: )
done
lemma [simp]: "wprepare_erase m lm (b, Oc # list)
\<Longrightarrow> wprepare_erase m lm (b, Bk # list)"
apply(simp only:wprepare_invs, auto simp: )
done
lemma [simp]: "\<lbrakk>lm \<noteq> []; wprepare_goto_start_pos m lm (b, Bk # list)\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> wprepare_goto_start_pos m lm (Bk # b, list)"
apply(simp only:wprepare_invs, auto)
apply(case_tac [!] lm, simp, simp_all)
done
lemma [simp]: "wprepare_loop_start m lm (b, aa) \<Longrightarrow> b \<noteq> []"
apply(simp only:wprepare_invs, auto)
done
lemma [elim]: "Bk # list = Oc\<up>(mr) @ Bk\<up>(rn) \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>rn. list = Bk\<up>(rn)"
apply(case_tac mr, simp_all)
apply(case_tac rn, simp_all)
done
lemma rev_equal_iff: "x = y \<Longrightarrow> rev x = rev y"
by simp
lemma tape_of_nl_false1:
"lm \<noteq> [] \<Longrightarrow> rev b @ [Bk] \<noteq> Bk\<up>(ln) @ Oc # Oc\<up>(m) @ Bk # Bk # <lm::nat list>"
apply(auto)
apply(drule_tac rev_equal_iff, simp add: tape_of_nl_rev)
apply(case_tac "rev lm")
apply(case_tac [2] list, auto simp: tape_of_nl_abv tape_of_nat_list.simps tape_of_nat_abv)
done
lemma [simp]: "wprepare_loop_start_in_middle m lm (b, [Bk]) = False"
apply(simp add: wprepare_loop_start_in_middle.simps, auto)
apply(case_tac mr, simp_all add: )
done
declare wprepare_loop_start_in_middle.simps[simp del]
declare wprepare_loop_start_on_rightmost.simps[simp del]
wprepare_loop_goon_in_middle.simps[simp del]
wprepare_loop_goon_on_rightmost.simps[simp del]
lemma [simp]: "wprepare_loop_goon_in_middle m lm (Bk # b, []) = False"
apply(simp add: wprepare_loop_goon_in_middle.simps, auto)
done
lemma [simp]: "\<lbrakk>lm \<noteq> []; wprepare_loop_start m lm (b, [Bk])\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow>
wprepare_loop_goon m lm (Bk # b, [])"
apply(simp only: wprepare_invs, simp)
apply(simp add: wprepare_loop_goon_on_rightmost.simps
wprepare_loop_start_on_rightmost.simps, auto)
apply(case_tac mr, simp_all add: )
apply(rule_tac rev_eq)
apply(simp add: tape_of_nl_rev)
apply(simp add: exp_ind replicate_Suc[THEN sym] del: replicate_Suc)
done
lemma [simp]: "wprepare_loop_start_on_rightmost m lm (b, Bk # a # lista)
\<Longrightarrow> wprepare_loop_goon_in_middle m lm (Bk # b, a # lista) = False"
apply(auto simp: wprepare_loop_start_on_rightmost.simps
wprepare_loop_goon_in_middle.simps)
done
lemma [simp]: "\<lbrakk>lm \<noteq> []; wprepare_loop_start_on_rightmost m lm (b, Bk # a # lista)\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> wprepare_loop_goon_on_rightmost m lm (Bk # b, a # lista)"
apply(simp only: wprepare_loop_start_on_rightmost.simps
wprepare_loop_goon_on_rightmost.simps, auto)
apply(case_tac mr, simp_all add: )
apply(simp add: tape_of_nl_rev)
apply(simp add: replicate_Suc[THEN sym] exp_ind del: replicate_Suc)
done
lemma [simp]: "\<lbrakk>lm \<noteq> []; wprepare_loop_start_in_middle m lm (b, Bk # a # lista)\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> wprepare_loop_goon_on_rightmost m lm (Bk # b, a # lista) = False"
apply(simp add: wprepare_loop_start_in_middle.simps
wprepare_loop_goon_on_rightmost.simps, auto)
apply(case_tac mr, simp_all add: )
apply(case_tac "lm1::nat list", simp_all, case_tac list, simp)
apply(simp add: tape_of_nl_abv tape_of_nat_list.simps tape_of_nat_abv )
apply(case_tac [!] rna, simp_all add: )
apply(case_tac mr, simp_all add: )
apply(case_tac lm1, simp, case_tac list, simp)
apply(simp_all add: tape_of_nl_abv tape_of_nat_list.simps tape_of_nat_abv)
done
lemma [simp]:
"\<lbrakk>lm \<noteq> []; wprepare_loop_start_in_middle m lm (b, Bk # a # lista)\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> wprepare_loop_goon_in_middle m lm (Bk # b, a # lista)"
apply(simp add: wprepare_loop_start_in_middle.simps
wprepare_loop_goon_in_middle.simps, auto)
apply(rule_tac x = rn in exI, simp)
apply(case_tac mr, simp_all add: )
apply(case_tac lm1, simp)
apply(rule_tac x = "Suc aa" in exI, simp)
apply(rule_tac x = list in exI)
apply(case_tac list, simp_all add: tape_of_nl_abv tape_of_nat_list.simps tape_of_nat_abv)
done
lemma [simp]: "\<lbrakk>lm \<noteq> []; wprepare_loop_start m lm (b, Bk # a # lista)\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow>
wprepare_loop_goon m lm (Bk # b, a # lista)"
apply(simp add: wprepare_loop_start.simps
wprepare_loop_goon.simps)
apply(erule_tac disjE, simp, auto)
done
lemma start_2_goon:
"\<lbrakk>lm \<noteq> []; wprepare_loop_start m lm (b, Bk # list)\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow>
(list = [] \<longrightarrow> wprepare_loop_goon m lm (Bk # b, [])) \<and>
(list \<noteq> [] \<longrightarrow> wprepare_loop_goon m lm (Bk # b, list))"
apply(case_tac list, auto)
done
lemma add_one_2_add_one: "wprepare_add_one m lm (b, Oc # list)
\<Longrightarrow> (hd b = Oc \<longrightarrow> (b = [] \<longrightarrow> wprepare_add_one m lm ([], Bk # Oc # list)) \<and>
(b \<noteq> [] \<longrightarrow> wprepare_add_one m lm (tl b, Oc # Oc # list))) \<and>
(hd b \<noteq> Oc \<longrightarrow> (b = [] \<longrightarrow> wprepare_add_one m lm ([], Bk # Oc # list)) \<and>
(b \<noteq> [] \<longrightarrow> wprepare_add_one m lm (tl b, hd b # Oc # list)))"
apply(simp only: wprepare_add_one.simps, auto)
done
lemma [simp]: "wprepare_loop_start m lm (b, Oc # list) \<Longrightarrow> b \<noteq> []"
apply(simp)
done
lemma [simp]: "wprepare_loop_start_on_rightmost m lm (b, Oc # list) \<Longrightarrow>
wprepare_loop_start_on_rightmost m lm (Oc # b, list)"
apply(simp add: wprepare_loop_start_on_rightmost.simps, auto)
apply(rule_tac x = rn in exI, auto)
apply(case_tac mr, simp_all add: )
done
lemma [simp]: "wprepare_loop_start_in_middle m lm (b, Oc # list) \<Longrightarrow>
wprepare_loop_start_in_middle m lm (Oc # b, list)"
apply(simp add: wprepare_loop_start_in_middle.simps, auto)
apply(rule_tac x = rn in exI, auto)
apply(case_tac mr, simp, simp add: )
apply(rule_tac x = nat in exI, simp)
apply(rule_tac x = lm1 in exI, simp)
done
lemma start_2_start: "wprepare_loop_start m lm (b, Oc # list) \<Longrightarrow>
wprepare_loop_start m lm (Oc # b, list)"
apply(simp add: wprepare_loop_start.simps)
apply(erule_tac disjE, simp_all )
done
lemma [simp]: "wprepare_loop_goon m lm (b, Oc # list) \<Longrightarrow> b \<noteq> []"
apply(simp add: wprepare_loop_goon.simps
wprepare_loop_goon_in_middle.simps
wprepare_loop_goon_on_rightmost.simps)
apply(auto)
done
lemma [simp]: "wprepare_goto_start_pos m lm (b, Oc # list) \<Longrightarrow> b \<noteq> []"
apply(simp add: wprepare_goto_start_pos.simps)
done
lemma [simp]: "wprepare_loop_goon_on_rightmost m lm (b, Oc # list) = False"
apply(simp add: wprepare_loop_goon_on_rightmost.simps)
done
lemma wprepare_loop1: "\<lbrakk>rev b @ Oc\<up>(mr) = Oc\<up>(Suc m) @ Bk # Bk # <lm>;
b \<noteq> []; 0 < mr; Oc # list = Oc\<up>(mr) @ Bk\<up>(rn)\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> wprepare_loop_start_on_rightmost m lm (Oc # b, list)"
apply(simp add: wprepare_loop_start_on_rightmost.simps)
apply(rule_tac x = rn in exI, simp)
apply(case_tac mr, simp, simp)
done
lemma wprepare_loop2: "\<lbrakk>rev b @ Oc\<up>(mr) @ Bk # <a # lista> = Oc\<up>(Suc m) @ Bk # Bk # <lm>;
b \<noteq> []; Oc # list = Oc\<up>(mr) @ Bk # <(a::nat) # lista> @ Bk\<up>(rn)\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> wprepare_loop_start_in_middle m lm (Oc # b, list)"
apply(simp add: wprepare_loop_start_in_middle.simps)
apply(rule_tac x = rn in exI, simp)
apply(case_tac mr, simp_all add: )
apply(rule_tac x = nat in exI, simp)
apply(rule_tac x = "a#lista" in exI, simp)
done
lemma [simp]: "wprepare_loop_goon_in_middle m lm (b, Oc # list) \<Longrightarrow>
wprepare_loop_start_on_rightmost m lm (Oc # b, list) \<or>
wprepare_loop_start_in_middle m lm (Oc # b, list)"
apply(simp add: wprepare_loop_goon_in_middle.simps split: if_splits)
apply(case_tac lm1, simp_all add: wprepare_loop1 wprepare_loop2)
done
lemma [simp]: "wprepare_loop_goon m lm (b, Oc # list)
\<Longrightarrow> wprepare_loop_start m lm (Oc # b, list)"
apply(simp add: wprepare_loop_goon.simps
wprepare_loop_start.simps)
done
lemma [simp]: "wprepare_add_one m lm (b, Oc # list)
\<Longrightarrow> b = [] \<longrightarrow> wprepare_add_one m lm ([], Bk # Oc # list)"
apply(auto)
apply(simp add: wprepare_add_one.simps)
done
lemma [simp]: "wprepare_goto_start_pos m [a] (b, Oc # list)
\<Longrightarrow> wprepare_loop_start_on_rightmost m [a] (Oc # b, list) "
apply(auto simp: wprepare_goto_start_pos.simps
wprepare_loop_start_on_rightmost.simps)
apply(rule_tac x = rn in exI, simp)
apply(simp add: replicate_Suc[THEN sym] exp_ind del: replicate_Suc)
done
lemma [simp]: "wprepare_goto_start_pos m (a # aa # listaa) (b, Oc # list)
\<Longrightarrow>wprepare_loop_start_in_middle m (a # aa # listaa) (Oc # b, list)"
apply(auto simp: wprepare_goto_start_pos.simps
wprepare_loop_start_in_middle.simps)
apply(rule_tac x = rn in exI, simp)
apply(simp add: exp_ind[THEN sym])
apply(rule_tac x = a in exI, rule_tac x = "aa#listaa" in exI, simp)
apply(simp add: tape_of_nl_cons)
done
lemma [simp]: "\<lbrakk>lm \<noteq> []; wprepare_goto_start_pos m lm (b, Oc # list)\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> wprepare_loop_start m lm (Oc # b, list)"
apply(case_tac lm, simp_all)
apply(case_tac lista, simp_all add: wprepare_loop_start.simps)
done
lemma [simp]: "wprepare_add_one2 m lm (b, Oc # list) \<Longrightarrow> b \<noteq> []"
apply(auto simp: wprepare_add_one2.simps)
done
lemma add_one_2_stop:
"wprepare_add_one2 m lm (b, Oc # list)
\<Longrightarrow> wprepare_stop m lm (tl b, hd b # Oc # list)"
apply(simp add: wprepare_stop.simps wprepare_add_one2.simps)
done
declare wprepare_stop.simps[simp del]
lemma wprepare_correctness:
assumes h: "lm \<noteq> []"
shows "let P = (\<lambda> (st, l, r). st = 0) in
let Q = (\<lambda> (st, l, r). wprepare_inv st m lm (l, r)) in
let f = (\<lambda> stp. steps0 (Suc 0, [], (<m # lm>)) t_wcode_prepare stp) in
\<exists> n .P (f n) \<and> Q (f n)"
proof -
let ?P = "(\<lambda> (st, l, r). st = 0)"
let ?Q = "(\<lambda> (st, l, r). wprepare_inv st m lm (l, r))"
let ?f = "(\<lambda> stp. steps0 (Suc 0, [], (<m # lm>)) t_wcode_prepare stp)"
have "\<exists> n. ?P (?f n) \<and> ?Q (?f n)"
proof(rule_tac halt_lemma2)
show "wf wcode_prepare_le" by auto
next
show "\<forall> n. \<not> ?P (?f n) \<and> ?Q (?f n) \<longrightarrow>
?Q (?f (Suc n)) \<and> (?f (Suc n), ?f n) \<in> wcode_prepare_le"
using h
apply(rule_tac allI, rule_tac impI, case_tac "?f n",
simp add: step_red step.simps)
apply(case_tac c, simp, case_tac [2] aa)
apply(simp_all add: wprepare_inv.simps wcode_prepare_le_def lex_triple_def lex_pair_def
split: if_splits)
apply(simp_all add: start_2_goon start_2_start
add_one_2_add_one add_one_2_stop)
apply(auto simp: wprepare_add_one2.simps)
done
next
show "?Q (?f 0)"
apply(simp add: steps.simps wprepare_inv.simps wprepare_invs)
done
next
show "\<not> ?P (?f 0)"
apply(simp add: steps.simps)
done
qed
thus "?thesis"
apply(auto)
done
qed
lemma [intro]: "tm_wf (t_wcode_prepare, 0)"
apply(simp add:tm_wf.simps t_wcode_prepare_def)
done
(*
lemma t_correct_termi: "t_correct tp \<Longrightarrow>
list_all (\<lambda>(acn, st). (st \<le> Suc (length tp div 2))) (change_termi_state tp)"
apply(auto simp: t_correct.simps List.list_all_length)
apply(erule_tac x = n in allE, simp)
apply(case_tac "tp!n", auto simp: change_termi_state.simps split: if_splits)
done
*)
lemma t_correct_shift:
"list_all (\<lambda>(acn, st). (st \<le> y)) tp \<Longrightarrow>
list_all (\<lambda>(acn, st). (st \<le> y + off)) (shift tp off) "
apply(auto simp: List.list_all_length)
apply(erule_tac x = n in allE, simp add: length_shift)
apply(case_tac "tp!n", auto simp: shift.simps)
done
(*
lemma [intro]:
"t_correct (tm_of abc_twice @ tMp (Suc 0)
(start_of twice_ly (length abc_twice) - Suc 0))"
apply(rule_tac t_compiled_correct, simp_all)
apply(simp add: twice_ly_def)
done
lemma [intro]: "t_correct (tm_of abc_fourtimes @ tMp (Suc 0)
(start_of fourtimes_ly (length abc_fourtimes) - Suc 0))"
apply(rule_tac t_compiled_correct, simp_all)
apply(simp add: fourtimes_ly_def)
done
*)
lemma [intro]: "(28 + (length t_twice_compile + length t_fourtimes_compile)) mod 2 = 0"
apply(auto simp: t_twice_compile_def t_fourtimes_compile_def)
by arith
lemma [elim]: "(a, b) \<in> set t_wcode_main_first_part \<Longrightarrow>
b \<le> (28 + (length t_twice_compile + length t_fourtimes_compile)) div 2"
apply(auto simp: t_wcode_main_first_part_def t_twice_def)
done
lemma tm_wf_change_termi: "tm_wf (tp, 0) \<Longrightarrow>
list_all (\<lambda>(acn, st). (st \<le> Suc (length tp div 2))) (adjust tp)"
apply(auto simp: tm_wf.simps List.list_all_length)
apply(case_tac "tp!n", auto simp: adjust.simps split: if_splits)
apply(erule_tac x = "(a, b)" in ballE, auto)
by (metis in_set_conv_nth)
lemma tm_wf_shift:
"list_all (\<lambda>(acn, st). (st \<le> y)) tp \<Longrightarrow>
list_all (\<lambda>(acn, st). (st \<le> y + off)) (shift tp off) "
apply(auto simp: tm_wf.simps List.list_all_length)
apply(erule_tac x = n in allE, simp add: length_shift)
apply(case_tac "tp!n", auto simp: shift.simps)
done
declare length_tp'[simp del]
lemma [simp]: "length (mopup (Suc 0)) = 16"
apply(auto simp: mopup.simps)
done
lemma [elim]: "(a, b) \<in> set (shift (turing_basic.adjust t_twice_compile) 12) \<Longrightarrow>
b \<le> (28 + (length t_twice_compile + length t_fourtimes_compile)) div 2"
apply(simp add: t_twice_compile_def t_fourtimes_compile_def)
proof -
assume g: "(a, b) \<in> set (shift (turing_basic.adjust (tm_of abc_twice @ shift (mopup (Suc 0)) (length (tm_of abc_twice) div 2))) 12)"
moreover have "length (tm_of abc_twice) mod 2 = 0" by auto
moreover have "length (tm_of abc_fourtimes) mod 2 = 0" by auto
ultimately have "list_all (\<lambda>(acn, st). (st \<le> (60 + (length (tm_of abc_twice) + length (tm_of abc_fourtimes))) div 2))
(shift (turing_basic.adjust t_twice_compile) 12)"
proof(auto simp: mod_ex1)
fix q qa
assume h: "length (tm_of abc_twice) = 2 * q" "length (tm_of abc_fourtimes) = 2 * qa"
hence "list_all (\<lambda>(acn, st). st \<le> (18 + (q + qa)) + 12) (shift (turing_basic.adjust t_twice_compile) 12)"
proof(rule_tac tm_wf_shift t_twice_compile_def)
have "list_all (\<lambda>(acn, st). st \<le> Suc (length t_twice_compile div 2)) (adjust t_twice_compile)"
by(rule_tac tm_wf_change_termi, auto)
thus "list_all (\<lambda>(acn, st). st \<le> 18 + (q + qa)) (turing_basic.adjust t_twice_compile)"
using h
apply(simp add: t_twice_compile_def, auto simp: List.list_all_length)
done
qed
thus "list_all (\<lambda>(acn, st). st \<le> 30 + (q + qa)) (shift (turing_basic.adjust t_twice_compile) 12)"
by simp
qed
thus "b \<le> (60 + (length (tm_of abc_twice) + length (tm_of abc_fourtimes))) div 2"
using g
apply(auto simp:t_twice_compile_def)
apply(simp add: Ball_set[THEN sym])
apply(erule_tac x = "(a, b)" in ballE, simp, simp)
done
qed
lemma [elim]: "(a, b) \<in> set (shift (turing_basic.adjust t_fourtimes_compile) (t_twice_len + 13))
\<Longrightarrow> b \<le> (28 + (length t_twice_compile + length t_fourtimes_compile)) div 2"
apply(simp add: t_twice_compile_def t_fourtimes_compile_def t_twice_len_def)
proof -
assume g: "(a, b) \<in> set (shift (turing_basic.adjust (tm_of abc_fourtimes @ shift (mopup (Suc 0))
(length (tm_of abc_fourtimes) div 2))) (length t_twice div 2 + 13))"
moreover have "length (tm_of abc_twice) mod 2 = 0" by auto
moreover have "length (tm_of abc_fourtimes) mod 2 = 0" by auto
ultimately have "list_all (\<lambda>(acn, st). (st \<le> (60 + (length (tm_of abc_twice) + length (tm_of abc_fourtimes))) div 2))
(shift (turing_basic.adjust (tm_of abc_fourtimes @ shift (mopup (Suc 0))
(length (tm_of abc_fourtimes) div 2))) (length t_twice div 2 + 13))"
proof(auto simp: mod_ex1 t_twice_def t_twice_compile_def)
fix q qa
assume h: "length (tm_of abc_twice) = 2 * q" "length (tm_of abc_fourtimes) = 2 * qa"
hence "list_all (\<lambda>(acn, st). st \<le> (9 + qa + (21 + q)))
(shift (turing_basic.adjust (tm_of abc_fourtimes @ shift (mopup (Suc 0)) qa)) (21 + q))"
proof(rule_tac tm_wf_shift t_twice_compile_def)
have "list_all (\<lambda>(acn, st). st \<le> Suc (length (tm_of abc_fourtimes @ shift
(mopup (Suc 0)) qa) div 2)) (adjust (tm_of abc_fourtimes @ shift (mopup (Suc 0)) qa))"
apply(rule_tac tm_wf_change_termi)
using wf_fourtimes h
apply(simp add: t_fourtimes_compile_def)
done
thus "list_all (\<lambda>(acn, st). st \<le> 9 + qa) ((turing_basic.adjust (tm_of abc_fourtimes @ shift (mopup (Suc 0)) qa)))"
using h
apply(simp)
done
qed
thus "list_all (\<lambda>(acn, st). st \<le> 30 + (q + qa)) (shift (turing_basic.adjust (tm_of abc_fourtimes @ shift (mopup (Suc 0)) qa)) (21 + q))"
apply(subgoal_tac "qa + q = q + qa")
apply(simp, simp)
done
qed
thus "b \<le> (60 + (length (tm_of abc_twice) + length (tm_of abc_fourtimes))) div 2"
using g
apply(simp add: Ball_set[THEN sym])
apply(erule_tac x = "(a, b)" in ballE, simp, simp)
done
qed
lemma [intro]: "tm_wf (t_wcode_main, 0)"
apply(auto simp: t_wcode_main_def tm_wf.simps
t_twice_def t_fourtimes_def del: List.list_all_iff)
done
declare tm_comp.simps[simp del]
lemma tm_wf_comp: "\<lbrakk>tm_wf (A, 0); tm_wf (B, 0)\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> tm_wf (A |+| B, 0)"
apply(auto simp: tm_wf.simps shift.simps adjust.simps tm_comp_length
tm_comp.simps)
done
lemma [intro]: "tm_wf (t_wcode_prepare |+| t_wcode_main, 0)"
apply(rule_tac tm_wf_comp, auto)
done
lemma prepare_mainpart_lemma:
"args \<noteq> [] \<Longrightarrow>
\<exists> stp ln rn. steps0 (Suc 0, [], <m # args>) (t_wcode_prepare |+| t_wcode_main) stp
= (0, Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc m), Bk # Oc # Bk\<up>(ln) @ Bk # Bk # Oc\<up>(bl_bin (<args>)) @ Bk\<up>(rn))"
proof -
let ?P1 = "(\<lambda> (l, r). (l::cell list) = [] \<and> r = <m # args>)"
let ?Q1 = "(\<lambda> (l, r). wprepare_stop m args (l, r))"
let ?P2 = ?Q1
let ?Q2 = "(\<lambda> (l, r). (\<exists> ln rn. l = Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc m) \<and>
r = Bk # Oc # Bk\<up>(ln) @ Bk # Bk # Oc\<up>(bl_bin (<args>)) @ Bk\<up>(rn)))"
let ?P3 = "\<lambda> tp. False"
assume h: "args \<noteq> []"
have "{?P1} t_wcode_prepare |+| t_wcode_main {?Q2}"
proof(rule_tac Hoare_plus_halt)
show "{?P1} t_wcode_prepare {?Q1}"
proof(rule_tac Hoare_haltI, auto)
show "\<exists>n. is_final (steps0 (Suc 0, [], <m # args>) t_wcode_prepare n) \<and>
wprepare_stop m args holds_for steps0 (Suc 0, [], <m # args>) t_wcode_prepare n"
using wprepare_correctness[of args m] h
apply(auto)
apply(rule_tac x = n in exI, simp add: wprepare_inv.simps)
done
qed
next
show "{?P2} t_wcode_main {?Q2}"
proof(rule_tac Hoare_haltI, auto)
fix l r
assume "wprepare_stop m args (l, r)"
thus "\<exists>n. is_final (steps0 (Suc 0, l, r) t_wcode_main n) \<and>
(\<lambda>(l, r). l = Bk # Oc # Oc \<up> m \<and> (\<exists>ln rn. r = Bk # Oc # Bk \<up> ln @
Bk # Bk # Oc \<up> bl_bin (<args>) @ Bk \<up> rn)) holds_for steps0 (Suc 0, l, r) t_wcode_main n"
proof(auto simp: wprepare_stop.simps)
fix rn
show " \<exists>n. is_final (steps0 (Suc 0, Bk # <rev args> @ Bk # Bk # Oc # Oc \<up> m, Bk # Oc # Bk \<up> rn) t_wcode_main n) \<and>
(\<lambda>(l, r). l = Bk # Oc # Oc \<up> m \<and>
(\<exists>ln rn. r = Bk # Oc # Bk \<up> ln @
Bk # Bk # Oc \<up> bl_bin (<args>) @
Bk \<up> rn)) holds_for steps0 (Suc 0, Bk # <rev args> @ Bk # Bk # Oc # Oc \<up> m, Bk # Oc # Bk \<up> rn) t_wcode_main n"
using t_wcode_main_lemma_pre[of "args" "<args>" 0 "Oc\<up>(Suc m)" 0 rn] h
apply(auto simp: tape_of_nl_rev)
apply(rule_tac x = stp in exI, auto)
done
qed
qed
next
show "tm_wf0 t_wcode_prepare"
by auto
qed
thus "?thesis"
apply(auto simp: Hoare_halt_def)
apply(rule_tac x = n in exI)
apply(case_tac "(steps0 (Suc 0, [], <m # args>)
(turing_basic.adjust t_wcode_prepare @ shift t_wcode_main (length t_wcode_prepare div 2)) n)")
apply(auto simp: tm_comp.simps)
done
qed
definition tinres :: "cell list \<Rightarrow> cell list \<Rightarrow> bool"
where
"tinres xs ys = (\<exists>n. xs = ys @ Bk \<up> n \<or> ys = xs @ Bk \<up> n)"
lemma [simp]: "tinres r r' \<Longrightarrow>
fetch t ss (read r) =
fetch t ss (read r')"
apply(simp add: fetch.simps, auto split: if_splits simp: tinres_def)
apply(case_tac [!] n, simp_all)
done
lemma [intro]: "\<exists> n. (a::cell)\<up>(n) = []"
by auto
lemma [simp]: "\<lbrakk>tinres r r'; r \<noteq> []; r' \<noteq> []\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> hd r = hd r'"
apply(auto simp: tinres_def)
done
lemma [intro]: "hd (Bk\<up>(Suc n)) = Bk"
apply(simp add: )
done
lemma [simp]: "\<lbrakk>tinres r []; r \<noteq> []\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> hd r = Bk"
apply(auto simp: tinres_def)
done
lemma [simp]: "\<lbrakk>tinres [] r'; r' \<noteq> []\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> hd r' = Bk"
apply(auto simp: tinres_def)
done
lemma [intro]: "\<exists>na. tl r = tl (r @ Bk\<up>(n)) @ Bk\<up>(na) \<or> tl (r @ Bk\<up>(n)) = tl r @ Bk\<up>(na)"
apply(case_tac r, simp)
apply(case_tac n, simp, simp)
apply(rule_tac x = nat in exI, simp)
apply(rule_tac x = n in exI, simp)
done
lemma [simp]: "tinres r r' \<Longrightarrow> tinres (tl r) (tl r')"
apply(auto simp: tinres_def)
apply(case_tac r', simp)
apply(case_tac n, simp_all)
apply(rule_tac x = nat in exI, simp)
apply(rule_tac x = n in exI, simp)
done
lemma [simp]: "\<lbrakk>tinres r []; r \<noteq> []\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> tinres (tl r) []"
apply(case_tac r, auto simp: tinres_def)
apply(case_tac n, simp_all add: )
apply(rule_tac x = nat in exI, simp)
done
lemma [simp]: "\<lbrakk>tinres [] r'\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> tinres [] (tl r')"
apply(case_tac r', auto simp: tinres_def)
apply(case_tac n, simp_all add: )
apply(rule_tac x = nat in exI, simp)
done
lemma [simp]: "tinres r r' \<Longrightarrow> tinres (b # r) (b # r')"
apply(auto simp: tinres_def)
done
lemma [simp]: "tinres r [] \<Longrightarrow> tinres (Bk # tl r) [Bk]"
apply(auto simp: tinres_def)
done
lemma [simp]: "tinres r [] \<Longrightarrow> tinres (Oc # tl r) [Oc]"
apply(auto simp: tinres_def)
done
lemma tinres_step2:
"\<lbrakk>tinres r r'; step0 (ss, l, r) t = (sa, la, ra); step0 (ss, l, r') t = (sb, lb, rb)\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> la = lb \<and> tinres ra rb \<and> sa = sb"
apply(case_tac "ss = 0", simp add: step_0)
apply(simp add: step.simps [simp del], auto)
apply(case_tac [!] "fetch t ss (read r')", simp)
apply(auto simp: update.simps)
apply(case_tac [!] a, auto split: if_splits)
done
lemma tinres_steps2:
"\<lbrakk>tinres r r'; steps0 (ss, l, r) t stp = (sa, la, ra); steps0 (ss, l, r') t stp = (sb, lb, rb)\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> la = lb \<and> tinres ra rb \<and> sa = sb"
apply(induct stp arbitrary: sa la ra sb lb rb, simp add: steps.simps)
apply(simp add: step_red)
apply(case_tac "(steps0 (ss, l, r) t stp)")
apply(case_tac "(steps0 (ss, l, r') t stp)")
proof -
fix stp sa la ra sb lb rb a b c aa ba ca
assume ind: "\<And>sa la ra sb lb rb. \<lbrakk>steps0 (ss, l, r) t stp = (sa, la, ra);
steps0 (ss, l, r') t stp = (sb, lb, rb)\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> la = lb \<and> tinres ra rb \<and> sa = sb"
and h: " tinres r r'" "step0 (steps0 (ss, l, r) t stp) t = (sa, la, ra)"
"step0 (steps0 (ss, l, r') t stp) t = (sb, lb, rb)" "steps0 (ss, l, r) t stp = (a, b, c)"
"steps0 (ss, l, r') t stp = (aa, ba, ca)"
have "b = ba \<and> tinres c ca \<and> a = aa"
apply(rule_tac ind, simp_all add: h)
done
thus "la = lb \<and> tinres ra rb \<and> sa = sb"
apply(rule_tac l = b and r = c and ss = a and r' = ca
and t = t in tinres_step2)
using h
apply(simp, simp, simp)
done
qed
definition t_wcode_adjust :: "instr list"
where
"t_wcode_adjust = [(W1, 1), (R, 2), (Nop, 2), (R, 3), (R, 3), (R, 4),
(L, 8), (L, 5), (L, 6), (W0, 5), (L, 6), (R, 7),
(W1, 2), (Nop, 7), (L, 9), (W0, 8), (L, 9), (L, 10),
(L, 11), (L, 10), (R, 0), (L, 11)]"
lemma [simp]: "fetch t_wcode_adjust (Suc 0) Bk = (W1, 1)"
apply(simp add: fetch.simps t_wcode_adjust_def nth_of.simps)
done
lemma [simp]: "fetch t_wcode_adjust (Suc 0) Oc = (R, 2)"
apply(simp add: fetch.simps t_wcode_adjust_def nth_of.simps)
done
lemma [simp]: "fetch t_wcode_adjust (Suc (Suc 0)) Oc = (R, 3)"
apply(simp add: fetch.simps t_wcode_adjust_def nth_of.simps)
done
lemma [simp]: "fetch t_wcode_adjust (Suc (Suc (Suc 0))) Oc = (R, 4)"
apply(simp add: fetch.simps t_wcode_adjust_def nth_of.simps)
done
lemma [simp]: "fetch t_wcode_adjust (Suc (Suc (Suc 0))) Bk = (R, 3)"
apply(simp add: fetch.simps t_wcode_adjust_def nth_of.simps)
done
lemma [simp]: "fetch t_wcode_adjust 4 Bk = (L, 8)"
apply(simp add: fetch.simps t_wcode_adjust_def nth_of.simps numeral_4_eq_4)
done
lemma [simp]: "fetch t_wcode_adjust 4 Oc = (L, 5)"
apply(simp add: fetch.simps t_wcode_adjust_def nth_of.simps numeral_4_eq_4)
done
lemma [simp]: "fetch t_wcode_adjust 5 Oc = (W0, 5)"
apply(simp only: fetch.simps t_wcode_adjust_def nth_of.simps numeral_5_eq_5, simp)
done
lemma [simp]: "fetch t_wcode_adjust 5 Bk = (L, 6)"
apply(simp only: fetch.simps t_wcode_adjust_def nth_of.simps numeral_5_eq_5, auto)
done
thm numeral_6_eq_6
lemma [simp]: "fetch t_wcode_adjust 6 Oc = (R, 7)"
apply(simp add: fetch.simps t_wcode_adjust_def nth_of.simps numeral_6_eq_6)
done
lemma [simp]: "fetch t_wcode_adjust 6 Bk = (L, 6)"
apply(simp add: fetch.simps t_wcode_adjust_def nth_of.simps numeral_6_eq_6)
done
lemma [simp]: "fetch t_wcode_adjust 7 Bk = (W1, 2)"
apply(simp add: fetch.simps t_wcode_adjust_def nth_of.simps numeral_7_eq_7)
done
lemma [simp]: "fetch t_wcode_adjust 8 Bk = (L, 9)"
apply(simp add: fetch.simps t_wcode_adjust_def nth_of.simps numeral_8_eq_8)
done
lemma [simp]: "fetch t_wcode_adjust 8 Oc = (W0, 8)"
apply(simp add: fetch.simps t_wcode_adjust_def nth_of.simps numeral_8_eq_8)
done
lemma [simp]: "fetch t_wcode_adjust 9 Oc = (L, 10)"
apply(simp add: fetch.simps t_wcode_adjust_def nth_of.simps numeral_9_eq_9)
done
lemma [simp]: "fetch t_wcode_adjust 9 Bk = (L, 9)"
apply(simp add: fetch.simps t_wcode_adjust_def nth_of.simps numeral_9_eq_9)
done
lemma [simp]: "fetch t_wcode_adjust 10 Bk = (L, 11)"
apply(simp add: fetch.simps t_wcode_adjust_def nth_of.simps numeral_10_eq_10)
done
lemma [simp]: "fetch t_wcode_adjust 10 Oc = (L, 10)"
apply(simp add: fetch.simps t_wcode_adjust_def nth_of.simps eval_nat_numeral)
done
lemma [simp]: "fetch t_wcode_adjust 11 Oc = (L, 11)"
apply(simp add: fetch.simps t_wcode_adjust_def nth_of.simps eval_nat_numeral)
done
lemma [simp]: "fetch t_wcode_adjust 11 Bk = (R, 0)"
apply(simp add: fetch.simps t_wcode_adjust_def nth_of.simps eval_nat_numeral)
done
fun wadjust_start :: "nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> tape \<Rightarrow> bool"
where
"wadjust_start m rs (l, r) =
(\<exists> ln rn. l = Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc m) \<and>
tl r = Oc # Bk\<up>(ln) @ Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc rs) @ Bk\<up>(rn))"
fun wadjust_loop_start :: "nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> tape \<Rightarrow> bool"
where
"wadjust_loop_start m rs (l, r) =
(\<exists> ln rn ml mr. l = Oc\<up>(ml) @ Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc m) \<and>
r = Oc # Bk\<up>(ln) @ Bk # Oc\<up>(mr) @ Bk\<up>(rn) \<and>
ml + mr = Suc (Suc rs) \<and> mr > 0)"
fun wadjust_loop_right_move :: "nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> tape \<Rightarrow> bool"
where
"wadjust_loop_right_move m rs (l, r) =
(\<exists> ml mr nl nr rn. l = Bk\<up>(nl) @ Oc # Oc\<up>(ml) @ Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc m) \<and>
r = Bk\<up>(nr) @ Oc\<up>(mr) @ Bk\<up>(rn) \<and>
ml + mr = Suc (Suc rs) \<and> mr > 0 \<and>
nl + nr > 0)"
fun wadjust_loop_check :: "nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> tape \<Rightarrow> bool"
where
"wadjust_loop_check m rs (l, r) =
(\<exists> ml mr ln rn. l = Oc # Bk\<up>(ln) @ Bk # Oc # Oc\<up>(ml) @ Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc m) \<and>
r = Oc\<up>(mr) @ Bk\<up>(rn) \<and> ml + mr = (Suc rs))"
fun wadjust_loop_erase :: "nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> tape \<Rightarrow> bool"
where
"wadjust_loop_erase m rs (l, r) =
(\<exists> ml mr ln rn. l = Bk\<up>(ln) @ Bk # Oc # Oc\<up>(ml) @ Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc m) \<and>
tl r = Oc\<up>(mr) @ Bk\<up>(rn) \<and> ml + mr = (Suc rs) \<and> mr > 0)"
fun wadjust_loop_on_left_moving_O :: "nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> tape \<Rightarrow> bool"
where
"wadjust_loop_on_left_moving_O m rs (l, r) =
(\<exists> ml mr ln rn. l = Oc\<up>(ml) @ Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc m )\<and>
r = Oc # Bk\<up>(ln) @ Bk # Bk # Oc\<up>(mr) @ Bk\<up>(rn) \<and>
ml + mr = Suc rs \<and> mr > 0)"
fun wadjust_loop_on_left_moving_B :: "nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> tape \<Rightarrow> bool"
where
"wadjust_loop_on_left_moving_B m rs (l, r) =
(\<exists> ml mr nl nr rn. l = Bk\<up>(nl) @ Oc # Oc\<up>(ml) @ Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc m) \<and>
r = Bk\<up>(nr) @ Bk # Bk # Oc\<up>(mr) @ Bk\<up>(rn) \<and>
ml + mr = Suc rs \<and> mr > 0)"
fun wadjust_loop_on_left_moving :: "nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> tape \<Rightarrow> bool"
where
"wadjust_loop_on_left_moving m rs (l, r) =
(wadjust_loop_on_left_moving_O m rs (l, r) \<or>
wadjust_loop_on_left_moving_B m rs (l, r))"
fun wadjust_loop_right_move2 :: "nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> tape \<Rightarrow> bool"
where
"wadjust_loop_right_move2 m rs (l, r) =
(\<exists> ml mr ln rn. l = Oc # Oc\<up>(ml) @ Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc m) \<and>
r = Bk\<up>(ln) @ Bk # Bk # Oc\<up>(mr) @ Bk\<up>(rn) \<and>
ml + mr = Suc rs \<and> mr > 0)"
fun wadjust_erase2 :: "nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> tape \<Rightarrow> bool"
where
"wadjust_erase2 m rs (l, r) =
(\<exists> ln rn. l = Bk\<up>(ln) @ Bk # Oc # Oc\<up>(Suc rs) @ Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc m) \<and>
tl r = Bk\<up>(rn))"
fun wadjust_on_left_moving_O :: "nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> tape \<Rightarrow> bool"
where
"wadjust_on_left_moving_O m rs (l, r) =
(\<exists> rn. l = Oc\<up>(Suc rs) @ Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc m) \<and>
r = Oc # Bk\<up>(rn))"
fun wadjust_on_left_moving_B :: "nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> tape \<Rightarrow> bool"
where
"wadjust_on_left_moving_B m rs (l, r) =
(\<exists> ln rn. l = Bk\<up>(ln) @ Oc # Oc\<up>(Suc rs) @ Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc m) \<and>
r = Bk\<up>(rn))"
fun wadjust_on_left_moving :: "nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> tape \<Rightarrow> bool"
where
"wadjust_on_left_moving m rs (l, r) =
(wadjust_on_left_moving_O m rs (l, r) \<or>
wadjust_on_left_moving_B m rs (l, r))"
fun wadjust_goon_left_moving_B :: "nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> tape \<Rightarrow> bool"
where
"wadjust_goon_left_moving_B m rs (l, r) =
(\<exists> rn. l = Oc\<up>(Suc m) \<and>
r = Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc (Suc rs)) @ Bk\<up>(rn))"
fun wadjust_goon_left_moving_O :: "nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> tape \<Rightarrow> bool"
where
"wadjust_goon_left_moving_O m rs (l, r) =
(\<exists> ml mr rn. l = Oc\<up>(ml) @ Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc m) \<and>
r = Oc\<up>(mr) @ Bk\<up>(rn) \<and>
ml + mr = Suc (Suc rs) \<and> mr > 0)"
fun wadjust_goon_left_moving :: "nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> tape \<Rightarrow> bool"
where
"wadjust_goon_left_moving m rs (l, r) =
(wadjust_goon_left_moving_B m rs (l, r) \<or>
wadjust_goon_left_moving_O m rs (l, r))"
fun wadjust_backto_standard_pos_B :: "nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> tape \<Rightarrow> bool"
where
"wadjust_backto_standard_pos_B m rs (l, r) =
(\<exists> rn. l = [] \<and>
r = Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc m )@ Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc (Suc rs)) @ Bk\<up>(rn))"
fun wadjust_backto_standard_pos_O :: "nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> tape \<Rightarrow> bool"
where
"wadjust_backto_standard_pos_O m rs (l, r) =
(\<exists> ml mr rn. l = Oc\<up>(ml) \<and>
r = Oc\<up>(mr) @ Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc (Suc rs)) @ Bk\<up>(rn) \<and>
ml + mr = Suc m \<and> mr > 0)"
fun wadjust_backto_standard_pos :: "nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> tape \<Rightarrow> bool"
where
"wadjust_backto_standard_pos m rs (l, r) =
(wadjust_backto_standard_pos_B m rs (l, r) \<or>
wadjust_backto_standard_pos_O m rs (l, r))"
fun wadjust_stop :: "nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> tape \<Rightarrow> bool"
where
"wadjust_stop m rs (l, r) =
(\<exists> rn. l = [Bk] \<and>
r = Oc\<up>(Suc m )@ Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc (Suc rs)) @ Bk\<up>(rn))"
declare wadjust_start.simps[simp del] wadjust_loop_start.simps[simp del]
wadjust_loop_right_move.simps[simp del] wadjust_loop_check.simps[simp del]
wadjust_loop_erase.simps[simp del] wadjust_loop_on_left_moving.simps[simp del]
wadjust_loop_right_move2.simps[simp del] wadjust_erase2.simps[simp del]
wadjust_on_left_moving_O.simps[simp del] wadjust_on_left_moving_B.simps[simp del]
wadjust_on_left_moving.simps[simp del] wadjust_goon_left_moving_B.simps[simp del]
wadjust_goon_left_moving_O.simps[simp del] wadjust_goon_left_moving.simps[simp del]
wadjust_backto_standard_pos.simps[simp del] wadjust_backto_standard_pos_B.simps[simp del]
wadjust_backto_standard_pos_O.simps[simp del] wadjust_stop.simps[simp del]
fun wadjust_inv :: "nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> tape \<Rightarrow> bool"
where
"wadjust_inv st m rs (l, r) =
(if st = Suc 0 then wadjust_start m rs (l, r)
else if st = Suc (Suc 0) then wadjust_loop_start m rs (l, r)
else if st = Suc (Suc (Suc 0)) then wadjust_loop_right_move m rs (l, r)
else if st = 4 then wadjust_loop_check m rs (l, r)
else if st = 5 then wadjust_loop_erase m rs (l, r)
else if st = 6 then wadjust_loop_on_left_moving m rs (l, r)
else if st = 7 then wadjust_loop_right_move2 m rs (l, r)
else if st = 8 then wadjust_erase2 m rs (l, r)
else if st = 9 then wadjust_on_left_moving m rs (l, r)
else if st = 10 then wadjust_goon_left_moving m rs (l, r)
else if st = 11 then wadjust_backto_standard_pos m rs (l, r)
else if st = 0 then wadjust_stop m rs (l, r)
else False
)"
declare wadjust_inv.simps[simp del]
fun wadjust_phase :: "nat \<Rightarrow> config \<Rightarrow> nat"
where
"wadjust_phase rs (st, l, r) =
(if st = 1 then 3
else if st \<ge> 2 \<and> st \<le> 7 then 2
else if st \<ge> 8 \<and> st \<le> 11 then 1
else 0)"
fun wadjust_stage :: "nat \<Rightarrow> config \<Rightarrow> nat"
where
"wadjust_stage rs (st, l, r) =
(if st \<ge> 2 \<and> st \<le> 7 then
rs - length (takeWhile (\<lambda> a. a = Oc)
(tl (dropWhile (\<lambda> a. a = Oc) (rev l @ r))))
else 0)"
fun wadjust_state :: "nat \<Rightarrow> config \<Rightarrow> nat"
where
"wadjust_state rs (st, l, r) =
(if st \<ge> 2 \<and> st \<le> 7 then 8 - st
else if st \<ge> 8 \<and> st \<le> 11 then 12 - st
else 0)"
fun wadjust_step :: "nat \<Rightarrow> config \<Rightarrow> nat"
where
"wadjust_step rs (st, l, r) =
(if st = 1 then (if hd r = Bk then 1
else 0)
else if st = 3 then length r
else if st = 5 then (if hd r = Oc then 1
else 0)
else if st = 6 then length l
else if st = 8 then (if hd r = Oc then 1
else 0)
else if st = 9 then length l
else if st = 10 then length l
else if st = 11 then (if hd r = Bk then 0
else Suc (length l))
else 0)"
fun wadjust_measure :: "(nat \<times> config) \<Rightarrow> nat \<times> nat \<times> nat \<times> nat"
where
"wadjust_measure (rs, (st, l, r)) =
(wadjust_phase rs (st, l, r),
wadjust_stage rs (st, l, r),
wadjust_state rs (st, l, r),
wadjust_step rs (st, l, r))"
definition wadjust_le :: "((nat \<times> config) \<times> nat \<times> config) set"
where "wadjust_le \<equiv> (inv_image lex_square wadjust_measure)"
lemma [intro]: "wf lex_square"
by(auto intro:wf_lex_prod simp: abacus.lex_pair_def lex_square_def
abacus.lex_triple_def)
lemma wf_wadjust_le[intro]: "wf wadjust_le"
by(auto intro:wf_inv_image simp: wadjust_le_def
abacus.lex_triple_def abacus.lex_pair_def)
lemma [simp]: "wadjust_start m rs (c, []) = False"
apply(auto simp: wadjust_start.simps)
done
lemma [simp]: "wadjust_loop_right_move m rs (c, []) \<Longrightarrow> c \<noteq> []"
apply(auto simp: wadjust_loop_right_move.simps)
done
lemma [simp]: "wadjust_loop_right_move m rs (c, [])
\<Longrightarrow> wadjust_loop_check m rs (Bk # c, [])"
apply(simp only: wadjust_loop_right_move.simps wadjust_loop_check.simps)
apply(auto)
done
lemma [simp]: "wadjust_loop_check m rs (c, []) \<Longrightarrow> c \<noteq> []"
apply(simp only: wadjust_loop_check.simps, auto)
done
lemma [simp]: "wadjust_loop_start m rs (c, []) = False"
apply(simp add: wadjust_loop_start.simps)
done
lemma [simp]: "wadjust_loop_right_move m rs (c, []) \<Longrightarrow>
wadjust_loop_right_move m rs (Bk # c, [])"
apply(simp only: wadjust_loop_right_move.simps)
apply(erule_tac exE)+
apply(auto)
done
lemma [simp]: "wadjust_loop_check m rs (c, []) \<Longrightarrow> wadjust_erase2 m rs (tl c, [hd c])"
apply(simp only: wadjust_loop_check.simps wadjust_erase2.simps, auto)
done
lemma [simp]: " wadjust_loop_erase m rs (c, [])
\<Longrightarrow> (c = [] \<longrightarrow> wadjust_loop_on_left_moving m rs ([], [Bk])) \<and>
(c \<noteq> [] \<longrightarrow> wadjust_loop_on_left_moving m rs (tl c, [hd c]))"
apply(simp add: wadjust_loop_erase.simps)
done
lemma [simp]: "wadjust_loop_on_left_moving m rs (c, []) = False"
apply(auto simp: wadjust_loop_on_left_moving.simps)
done
lemma [simp]: "wadjust_loop_right_move2 m rs (c, []) = False"
apply(auto simp: wadjust_loop_right_move2.simps)
done
lemma [simp]: "wadjust_erase2 m rs ([], []) = False"
apply(auto simp: wadjust_erase2.simps)
done
lemma [simp]: "wadjust_on_left_moving_B m rs
(Oc # Oc # Oc\<up>(rs) @ Bk # Oc # Oc\<up>(m), [Bk])"
apply(simp add: wadjust_on_left_moving_B.simps, auto)
done
lemma [simp]: "wadjust_on_left_moving_B m rs
(Bk\<up>(n) @ Bk # Oc # Oc # Oc\<up>(rs) @ Bk # Oc # Oc\<up>(m), [Bk])"
apply(simp add: wadjust_on_left_moving_B.simps , auto)
apply(rule_tac x = "Suc n" in exI, simp add: exp_ind del: replicate_Suc)
done
lemma [simp]: "\<lbrakk>wadjust_erase2 m rs (c, []); c \<noteq> []\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow>
wadjust_on_left_moving m rs (tl c, [hd c])"
apply(simp only: wadjust_erase2.simps)
apply(erule_tac exE)+
apply(case_tac ln, simp_all add: wadjust_on_left_moving.simps)
done
lemma [simp]: "wadjust_erase2 m rs (c, [])
\<Longrightarrow> (c = [] \<longrightarrow> wadjust_on_left_moving m rs ([], [Bk])) \<and>
(c \<noteq> [] \<longrightarrow> wadjust_on_left_moving m rs (tl c, [hd c]))"
apply(auto)
done
lemma [simp]: "wadjust_on_left_moving m rs ([], []) = False"
apply(simp add: wadjust_on_left_moving.simps
wadjust_on_left_moving_O.simps wadjust_on_left_moving_B.simps)
done
lemma [simp]: "wadjust_on_left_moving_O m rs (c, []) = False"
apply(simp add: wadjust_on_left_moving_O.simps)
done
lemma [simp]: " \<lbrakk>wadjust_on_left_moving_B m rs (c, []); c \<noteq> []; hd c = Bk\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow>
wadjust_on_left_moving_B m rs (tl c, [Bk])"
apply(simp add: wadjust_on_left_moving_B.simps, auto)
apply(case_tac [!] ln, simp_all)
done
lemma [simp]: "\<lbrakk>wadjust_on_left_moving_B m rs (c, []); c \<noteq> []; hd c = Oc\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow>
wadjust_on_left_moving_O m rs (tl c, [Oc])"
apply(simp add: wadjust_on_left_moving_B.simps wadjust_on_left_moving_O.simps, auto)
apply(case_tac [!] ln, simp_all add: )
done
lemma [simp]: "\<lbrakk>wadjust_on_left_moving m rs (c, []); c \<noteq> []\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow>
wadjust_on_left_moving m rs (tl c, [hd c])"
apply(simp add: wadjust_on_left_moving.simps)
apply(case_tac "hd c", simp_all)
done
lemma [simp]: "wadjust_on_left_moving m rs (c, [])
\<Longrightarrow> (c = [] \<longrightarrow> wadjust_on_left_moving m rs ([], [Bk])) \<and>
(c \<noteq> [] \<longrightarrow> wadjust_on_left_moving m rs (tl c, [hd c]))"
apply(auto)
done
lemma [simp]: "wadjust_goon_left_moving m rs (c, []) = False"
apply(auto simp: wadjust_goon_left_moving.simps wadjust_goon_left_moving_B.simps
wadjust_goon_left_moving_O.simps)
done
lemma [simp]: "wadjust_backto_standard_pos m rs (c, []) = False"
apply(auto simp: wadjust_backto_standard_pos.simps
wadjust_backto_standard_pos_B.simps wadjust_backto_standard_pos_O.simps)
done
lemma [simp]:
"wadjust_start m rs (c, Bk # list) \<Longrightarrow>
(c = [] \<longrightarrow> wadjust_start m rs ([], Oc # list)) \<and>
(c \<noteq> [] \<longrightarrow> wadjust_start m rs (c, Oc # list))"
apply(auto simp: wadjust_start.simps)
done
lemma [simp]: "wadjust_loop_start m rs (c, Bk # list) = False"
apply(auto simp: wadjust_loop_start.simps)
done
lemma [simp]: "wadjust_loop_right_move m rs (c, b) \<Longrightarrow> c \<noteq> []"
apply(simp only: wadjust_loop_right_move.simps, auto)
done
lemma [simp]: "wadjust_loop_right_move m rs (c, Bk # list)
\<Longrightarrow> wadjust_loop_right_move m rs (Bk # c, list)"
apply(simp only: wadjust_loop_right_move.simps)
apply(erule_tac exE)+
apply(rule_tac x = ml in exI, simp)
apply(rule_tac x = mr in exI, simp)
apply(rule_tac x = "Suc nl" in exI, simp add: )
apply(case_tac nr, simp, case_tac mr, simp_all add: )
apply(rule_tac x = nat in exI, auto)
done
lemma [simp]: "wadjust_loop_check m rs (c, b) \<Longrightarrow> c \<noteq> []"
apply(simp only: wadjust_loop_check.simps, auto)
done
lemma [simp]: "wadjust_loop_check m rs (c, Bk # list)
\<Longrightarrow> wadjust_erase2 m rs (tl c, hd c # Bk # list)"
apply(auto simp: wadjust_loop_check.simps wadjust_erase2.simps)
apply(case_tac [!] mr, simp_all)
done
lemma [simp]: "wadjust_loop_erase m rs (c, b) \<Longrightarrow> c \<noteq> []"
apply(simp only: wadjust_loop_erase.simps, auto)
done
declare wadjust_loop_on_left_moving_O.simps[simp del]
wadjust_loop_on_left_moving_B.simps[simp del]
lemma [simp]: "\<lbrakk>wadjust_loop_erase m rs (c, Bk # list); hd c = Bk\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> wadjust_loop_on_left_moving_B m rs (tl c, Bk # Bk # list)"
apply(simp only: wadjust_loop_erase.simps
wadjust_loop_on_left_moving_B.simps)
apply(erule_tac exE)+
apply(rule_tac x = ml in exI, rule_tac x = mr in exI,
rule_tac x = ln in exI, rule_tac x = 0 in exI, simp)
apply(case_tac ln, simp_all add: , auto)
apply(simp add: exp_ind [THEN sym])
done
lemma [simp]: "\<lbrakk>wadjust_loop_erase m rs (c, Bk # list); c \<noteq> []; hd c = Oc\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow>
wadjust_loop_on_left_moving_O m rs (tl c, Oc # Bk # list)"
apply(simp only: wadjust_loop_erase.simps wadjust_loop_on_left_moving_O.simps,
auto)
apply(case_tac [!] ln, simp_all add: )
done
lemma [simp]: "\<lbrakk>wadjust_loop_erase m rs (c, Bk # list); c \<noteq> []\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow>
wadjust_loop_on_left_moving m rs (tl c, hd c # Bk # list)"
apply(case_tac "hd c", simp_all add:wadjust_loop_on_left_moving.simps)
done
lemma [simp]: "wadjust_loop_on_left_moving m rs (c, b) \<Longrightarrow> c \<noteq> []"
apply(simp add: wadjust_loop_on_left_moving.simps
wadjust_loop_on_left_moving_O.simps wadjust_loop_on_left_moving_B.simps, auto)
done
lemma [simp]: "wadjust_loop_on_left_moving_O m rs (c, Bk # list) = False"
apply(simp add: wadjust_loop_on_left_moving_O.simps)
done
lemma [simp]: "\<lbrakk>wadjust_loop_on_left_moving_B m rs (c, Bk # list); hd c = Bk\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> wadjust_loop_on_left_moving_B m rs (tl c, Bk # Bk # list)"
apply(simp only: wadjust_loop_on_left_moving_B.simps)
apply(erule_tac exE)+
apply(rule_tac x = ml in exI, rule_tac x = mr in exI)
apply(case_tac nl, simp_all add: , auto)
apply(rule_tac x = "Suc nr" in exI, auto simp: )
done
lemma [simp]: "\<lbrakk>wadjust_loop_on_left_moving_B m rs (c, Bk # list); hd c = Oc\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> wadjust_loop_on_left_moving_O m rs (tl c, Oc # Bk # list)"
apply(simp only: wadjust_loop_on_left_moving_O.simps
wadjust_loop_on_left_moving_B.simps)
apply(erule_tac exE)+
apply(rule_tac x = ml in exI, rule_tac x = mr in exI)
apply(case_tac nl, simp_all add: , auto)
done
lemma [simp]: "wadjust_loop_on_left_moving m rs (c, Bk # list)
\<Longrightarrow> wadjust_loop_on_left_moving m rs (tl c, hd c # Bk # list)"
apply(simp add: wadjust_loop_on_left_moving.simps)
apply(case_tac "hd c", simp_all)
done
lemma [simp]: "wadjust_loop_right_move2 m rs (c, b) \<Longrightarrow> c \<noteq> []"
apply(simp only: wadjust_loop_right_move2.simps, auto)
done
lemma [simp]: "wadjust_loop_right_move2 m rs (c, Bk # list) \<Longrightarrow> wadjust_loop_start m rs (c, Oc # list)"
apply(auto simp: wadjust_loop_right_move2.simps wadjust_loop_start.simps)
apply(case_tac ln, simp_all add: )
apply(rule_tac x = 0 in exI, simp)
apply(rule_tac x = rn in exI, simp)
apply(rule_tac x = "Suc ml" in exI, simp add: , auto)
apply(rule_tac x = "Suc nat" in exI, simp add: exp_ind del: replicate_Suc)
apply(rule_tac x = rn in exI, auto)
apply(rule_tac x = "Suc ml" in exI, auto )
done
lemma [simp]: "wadjust_erase2 m rs (c, Bk # list) \<Longrightarrow> c \<noteq> []"
apply(auto simp:wadjust_erase2.simps )
done
lemma [simp]: "wadjust_erase2 m rs (c, Bk # list) \<Longrightarrow>
wadjust_on_left_moving m rs (tl c, hd c # Bk # list)"
apply(auto simp: wadjust_erase2.simps)
apply(case_tac ln, simp_all add: wadjust_on_left_moving.simps
wadjust_on_left_moving_O.simps wadjust_on_left_moving_B.simps)
apply(auto)
apply(rule_tac x = "(Suc (Suc rn))" in exI, simp add: )
apply(rule_tac x = "Suc nat" in exI, simp add: exp_ind del: replicate_Suc)
apply(rule_tac x = "(Suc (Suc rn))" in exI, simp add: )
done
lemma [simp]: "wadjust_on_left_moving m rs (c,b) \<Longrightarrow> c \<noteq> []"
apply(simp only:wadjust_on_left_moving.simps
wadjust_on_left_moving_O.simps
wadjust_on_left_moving_B.simps
, auto)
done
lemma [simp]: "wadjust_on_left_moving_O m rs (c, Bk # list) = False"
apply(simp add: wadjust_on_left_moving_O.simps)
done
lemma [simp]: "\<lbrakk>wadjust_on_left_moving_B m rs (c, Bk # list); hd c = Bk\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> wadjust_on_left_moving_B m rs (tl c, Bk # Bk # list)"
apply(auto simp: wadjust_on_left_moving_B.simps)
apply(case_tac ln, simp_all)
done
lemma [simp]: "\<lbrakk>wadjust_on_left_moving_B m rs (c, Bk # list); hd c = Oc\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> wadjust_on_left_moving_O m rs (tl c, Oc # Bk # list)"
apply(auto simp: wadjust_on_left_moving_O.simps
wadjust_on_left_moving_B.simps)
apply(case_tac ln, simp_all add: )
done
lemma [simp]: "wadjust_on_left_moving m rs (c, Bk # list) \<Longrightarrow>
wadjust_on_left_moving m rs (tl c, hd c # Bk # list)"
apply(simp add: wadjust_on_left_moving.simps)
apply(case_tac "hd c", simp_all)
done
lemma [simp]: "wadjust_goon_left_moving m rs (c, b) \<Longrightarrow> c \<noteq> []"
apply(simp add: wadjust_goon_left_moving.simps
wadjust_goon_left_moving_B.simps
wadjust_goon_left_moving_O.simps , auto)
done
lemma [simp]: "wadjust_goon_left_moving_O m rs (c, Bk # list) = False"
apply(simp add: wadjust_goon_left_moving_O.simps, auto)
apply(case_tac mr, simp_all add: )
done
lemma [simp]: "\<lbrakk>wadjust_goon_left_moving_B m rs (c, Bk # list); hd c = Bk\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> wadjust_backto_standard_pos_B m rs (tl c, Bk # Bk # list)"
apply(auto simp: wadjust_goon_left_moving_B.simps
wadjust_backto_standard_pos_B.simps )
done
lemma [simp]: "\<lbrakk>wadjust_goon_left_moving_B m rs (c, Bk # list); hd c = Oc\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> wadjust_backto_standard_pos_O m rs (tl c, Oc # Bk # list)"
apply(auto simp: wadjust_goon_left_moving_B.simps
wadjust_backto_standard_pos_O.simps)
done
lemma [simp]: "wadjust_goon_left_moving m rs (c, Bk # list) \<Longrightarrow>
wadjust_backto_standard_pos m rs (tl c, hd c # Bk # list)"
apply(case_tac "hd c", simp_all add: wadjust_backto_standard_pos.simps
wadjust_goon_left_moving.simps)
done
lemma [simp]: "wadjust_backto_standard_pos m rs (c, Bk # list) \<Longrightarrow>
(c = [] \<longrightarrow> wadjust_stop m rs ([Bk], list)) \<and> (c \<noteq> [] \<longrightarrow> wadjust_stop m rs (Bk # c, list))"
apply(auto simp: wadjust_backto_standard_pos.simps
wadjust_backto_standard_pos_B.simps
wadjust_backto_standard_pos_O.simps wadjust_stop.simps)
apply(case_tac [!] mr, simp_all add: )
done
lemma [simp]: "wadjust_start m rs (c, Oc # list)
\<Longrightarrow> (c = [] \<longrightarrow> wadjust_loop_start m rs ([Oc], list)) \<and>
(c \<noteq> [] \<longrightarrow> wadjust_loop_start m rs (Oc # c, list))"
apply(auto simp:wadjust_loop_start.simps wadjust_start.simps )
apply(rule_tac x = ln in exI, rule_tac x = rn in exI,
rule_tac x = "Suc 0" in exI, simp)
done
lemma [simp]: "wadjust_loop_start m rs (c, b) \<Longrightarrow> c \<noteq> []"
apply(simp add: wadjust_loop_start.simps, auto)
done
lemma [simp]: "wadjust_loop_start m rs (c, Oc # list)
\<Longrightarrow> wadjust_loop_right_move m rs (Oc # c, list)"
apply(simp add: wadjust_loop_start.simps wadjust_loop_right_move.simps, auto)
apply(rule_tac x = ml in exI, rule_tac x = mr in exI,
rule_tac x = 0 in exI, simp)
apply(rule_tac x = "Suc ln" in exI, simp add: exp_ind del: replicate_Suc)
done
lemma [simp]: "wadjust_loop_right_move m rs (c, Oc # list) \<Longrightarrow>
wadjust_loop_check m rs (Oc # c, list)"
apply(simp add: wadjust_loop_right_move.simps
wadjust_loop_check.simps, auto)
apply(rule_tac [!] x = ml in exI, simp_all add: exp_ind del: replicate_Suc, auto)
apply(case_tac nl, simp_all add: exp_ind del: replicate_Suc)
apply(rule_tac x = "mr - 1" in exI, case_tac mr, simp_all add: )
apply(case_tac [!] nr, simp_all)
done
lemma [simp]: "wadjust_loop_check m rs (c, Oc # list) \<Longrightarrow>
wadjust_loop_erase m rs (tl c, hd c # Oc # list)"
apply(simp only: wadjust_loop_check.simps wadjust_loop_erase.simps)
apply(erule_tac exE)+
apply(rule_tac x = ml in exI, rule_tac x = mr in exI, auto)
apply(case_tac mr, simp_all add: )
done
lemma [simp]: "wadjust_loop_erase m rs (c, Oc # list) \<Longrightarrow>
wadjust_loop_erase m rs (c, Bk # list)"
apply(auto simp: wadjust_loop_erase.simps)
done
lemma [simp]: "wadjust_loop_on_left_moving_B m rs (c, Oc # list) = False"
apply(auto simp: wadjust_loop_on_left_moving_B.simps)
apply(case_tac nr, simp_all add: )
done
lemma [simp]: "wadjust_loop_on_left_moving m rs (c, Oc # list)
\<Longrightarrow> wadjust_loop_right_move2 m rs (Oc # c, list)"
apply(simp add:wadjust_loop_on_left_moving.simps)
apply(auto simp: wadjust_loop_on_left_moving_O.simps
wadjust_loop_right_move2.simps)
done
lemma [simp]: "wadjust_loop_right_move2 m rs (c, Oc # list) = False"
apply(auto simp: wadjust_loop_right_move2.simps )
apply(case_tac ln, simp_all add: )
done
lemma [simp]: "wadjust_erase2 m rs (c, Oc # list)
\<Longrightarrow> (c = [] \<longrightarrow> wadjust_erase2 m rs ([], Bk # list))
\<and> (c \<noteq> [] \<longrightarrow> wadjust_erase2 m rs (c, Bk # list))"
apply(auto simp: wadjust_erase2.simps )
done
lemma [simp]: "wadjust_on_left_moving_B m rs (c, Oc # list) = False"
apply(auto simp: wadjust_on_left_moving_B.simps)
done
lemma [simp]: "\<lbrakk>wadjust_on_left_moving_O m rs (c, Oc # list); hd c = Bk\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow>
wadjust_goon_left_moving_B m rs (tl c, Bk # Oc # list)"
apply(auto simp: wadjust_on_left_moving_O.simps
wadjust_goon_left_moving_B.simps )
done
lemma [simp]: "\<lbrakk>wadjust_on_left_moving_O m rs (c, Oc # list); hd c = Oc\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> wadjust_goon_left_moving_O m rs (tl c, Oc # Oc # list)"
apply(auto simp: wadjust_on_left_moving_O.simps
wadjust_goon_left_moving_O.simps )
apply(auto simp: numeral_2_eq_2)
done
lemma [simp]: "wadjust_on_left_moving m rs (c, Oc # list) \<Longrightarrow>
wadjust_goon_left_moving m rs (tl c, hd c # Oc # list)"
apply(simp add: wadjust_on_left_moving.simps
wadjust_goon_left_moving.simps)
apply(case_tac "hd c", simp_all)
done
lemma [simp]: "wadjust_on_left_moving m rs (c, Oc # list) \<Longrightarrow>
wadjust_goon_left_moving m rs (tl c, hd c # Oc # list)"
apply(simp add: wadjust_on_left_moving.simps
wadjust_goon_left_moving.simps)
apply(case_tac "hd c", simp_all)
done
lemma [simp]: "wadjust_goon_left_moving_B m rs (c, Oc # list) = False"
apply(auto simp: wadjust_goon_left_moving_B.simps)
done
lemma [simp]: "\<lbrakk>wadjust_goon_left_moving_O m rs (c, Oc # list); hd c = Bk\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> wadjust_goon_left_moving_B m rs (tl c, Bk # Oc # list)"
apply(auto simp: wadjust_goon_left_moving_O.simps wadjust_goon_left_moving_B.simps)
apply(case_tac [!] ml, auto simp: )
done
lemma [simp]: "\<lbrakk>wadjust_goon_left_moving_O m rs (c, Oc # list); hd c = Oc\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow>
wadjust_goon_left_moving_O m rs (tl c, Oc # Oc # list)"
apply(auto simp: wadjust_goon_left_moving_O.simps wadjust_goon_left_moving_B.simps)
apply(rule_tac x = "ml - 1" in exI, simp)
apply(case_tac ml, simp_all add: )
apply(rule_tac x = "Suc mr" in exI, auto simp: )
done
lemma [simp]: "wadjust_goon_left_moving m rs (c, Oc # list) \<Longrightarrow>
wadjust_goon_left_moving m rs (tl c, hd c # Oc # list)"
apply(simp add: wadjust_goon_left_moving.simps)
apply(case_tac "hd c", simp_all)
done
lemma [simp]: "wadjust_backto_standard_pos_B m rs (c, Oc # list) = False"
apply(simp add: wadjust_backto_standard_pos_B.simps)
done
lemma [simp]: "wadjust_backto_standard_pos_O m rs (c, Bk # xs) = False"
apply(simp add: wadjust_backto_standard_pos_O.simps, auto)
apply(case_tac mr, simp_all add: )
done
lemma [simp]: "wadjust_backto_standard_pos_O m rs ([], Oc # list) \<Longrightarrow>
wadjust_backto_standard_pos_B m rs ([], Bk # Oc # list)"
apply(auto simp: wadjust_backto_standard_pos_O.simps
wadjust_backto_standard_pos_B.simps)
done
lemma [simp]:
"\<lbrakk>wadjust_backto_standard_pos_O m rs (c, Oc # list); c \<noteq> []; hd c = Bk\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> wadjust_backto_standard_pos_B m rs (tl c, Bk # Oc # list)"
apply(simp add:wadjust_backto_standard_pos_O.simps
wadjust_backto_standard_pos_B.simps, auto)
done
lemma [simp]: "\<lbrakk>wadjust_backto_standard_pos_O m rs (c, Oc # list); c \<noteq> []; hd c = Oc\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> wadjust_backto_standard_pos_O m rs (tl c, Oc # Oc # list)"
apply(simp add: wadjust_backto_standard_pos_O.simps, auto)
apply(case_tac ml, simp_all add: , auto)
done
lemma [simp]: "wadjust_backto_standard_pos m rs (c, Oc # list)
\<Longrightarrow> (c = [] \<longrightarrow> wadjust_backto_standard_pos m rs ([], Bk # Oc # list)) \<and>
(c \<noteq> [] \<longrightarrow> wadjust_backto_standard_pos m rs (tl c, hd c # Oc # list))"
apply(auto simp: wadjust_backto_standard_pos.simps)
apply(case_tac "hd c", simp_all)
done
lemma [simp]: "wadjust_loop_right_move m rs (c, []) = False"
apply(simp only: wadjust_loop_right_move.simps)
apply(rule_tac iffI)
apply(erule_tac exE)+
apply(case_tac nr, simp_all add: )
apply(case_tac mr, simp_all add: )
done
lemma [simp]: "wadjust_loop_erase m rs (c, []) = False"
apply(simp only: wadjust_loop_erase.simps, auto)
done
lemma [simp]: "\<lbrakk>Suc (Suc rs) = a; wadjust_loop_erase m rs (c, Bk # list)\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> a - length (takeWhile (\<lambda>a. a = Oc) (tl (dropWhile (\<lambda>a. a = Oc) (rev (tl c) @ hd c # Bk # list))))
< a - length (takeWhile (\<lambda>a. a = Oc) (tl (dropWhile (\<lambda>a. a = Oc) (rev c @ Bk # list)))) \<or>
a - length (takeWhile (\<lambda>a. a = Oc) (tl (dropWhile (\<lambda>a. a = Oc) (rev (tl c) @ hd c # Bk # list)))) =
a - length (takeWhile (\<lambda>a. a = Oc) (tl (dropWhile (\<lambda>a. a = Oc) (rev c @ Bk # list))))"
apply(simp only: wadjust_loop_erase.simps)
apply(rule_tac disjI2)
apply(case_tac c, simp, simp)
done
lemma [simp]:
"\<lbrakk>Suc (Suc rs) = a; wadjust_loop_on_left_moving m rs (c, Bk # list)\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> a - length (takeWhile (\<lambda>a. a = Oc) (tl (dropWhile (\<lambda>a. a = Oc) (rev (tl c) @ hd c # Bk # list))))
< a - length (takeWhile (\<lambda>a. a = Oc) (tl (dropWhile (\<lambda>a. a = Oc) (rev c @ Bk # list)))) \<or>
a - length (takeWhile (\<lambda>a. a = Oc) (tl (dropWhile (\<lambda>a. a = Oc) (rev (tl c) @ hd c # Bk # list)))) =
a - length (takeWhile (\<lambda>a. a = Oc) (tl (dropWhile (\<lambda>a. a = Oc) (rev c @ Bk # list))))"
apply(subgoal_tac "c \<noteq> []")
apply(case_tac c, simp_all)
done
lemma dropWhile_exp1: "dropWhile (\<lambda>a. a = Oc) (Oc\<up>(n) @ xs) = dropWhile (\<lambda>a. a = Oc) xs"
apply(induct n, simp_all add: )
done
lemma takeWhile_exp1: "takeWhile (\<lambda>a. a = Oc) (Oc\<up>(n) @ xs) = Oc\<up>(n) @ takeWhile (\<lambda>a. a = Oc) xs"
apply(induct n, simp_all add: )
done
lemma [simp]: "\<lbrakk>Suc (Suc rs) = a; wadjust_loop_right_move2 m rs (c, Bk # list)\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> a - length (takeWhile (\<lambda>a. a = Oc) (tl (dropWhile (\<lambda>a. a = Oc) (rev c @ Oc # list))))
< a - length (takeWhile (\<lambda>a. a = Oc) (tl (dropWhile (\<lambda>a. a = Oc) (rev c @ Bk # list))))"
apply(simp add: wadjust_loop_right_move2.simps, auto)
apply(simp add: dropWhile_exp1 takeWhile_exp1)
apply(case_tac ln, simp, simp add: )
done
lemma [simp]: "wadjust_loop_check m rs ([], b) = False"
apply(simp add: wadjust_loop_check.simps)
done
lemma [simp]: "\<lbrakk>Suc (Suc rs) = a; wadjust_loop_check m rs (c, Oc # list)\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> a - length (takeWhile (\<lambda>a. a = Oc) (tl (dropWhile (\<lambda>a. a = Oc) (rev (tl c) @ hd c # Oc # list))))
< a - length (takeWhile (\<lambda>a. a = Oc) (tl (dropWhile (\<lambda>a. a = Oc) (rev c @ Oc # list)))) \<or>
a - length (takeWhile (\<lambda>a. a = Oc) (tl (dropWhile (\<lambda>a. a = Oc) (rev (tl c) @ hd c # Oc # list)))) =
a - length (takeWhile (\<lambda>a. a = Oc) (tl (dropWhile (\<lambda>a. a = Oc) (rev c @ Oc # list))))"
apply(case_tac "c", simp_all)
done
lemma [simp]:
"\<lbrakk>Suc (Suc rs) = a; wadjust_loop_erase m rs (c, Oc # list)\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> a - length (takeWhile (\<lambda>a. a = Oc) (tl (dropWhile (\<lambda>a. a = Oc) (rev c @ Bk # list))))
< a - length (takeWhile (\<lambda>a. a = Oc) (tl (dropWhile (\<lambda>a. a = Oc) (rev c @ Oc # list)))) \<or>
a - length (takeWhile (\<lambda>a. a = Oc) (tl (dropWhile (\<lambda>a. a = Oc) (rev c @ Bk # list)))) =
a - length (takeWhile (\<lambda>a. a = Oc) (tl (dropWhile (\<lambda>a. a = Oc) (rev c @ Oc # list))))"
apply(simp add: wadjust_loop_erase.simps)
apply(rule_tac disjI2)
apply(auto)
apply(simp add: dropWhile_exp1 takeWhile_exp1)
done
declare numeral_2_eq_2[simp del]
lemma [simp]: "wadjust_start m rs (c, Bk # list)
\<Longrightarrow> wadjust_start m rs (c, Oc # list)"
apply(auto simp: wadjust_start.simps)
done
lemma [simp]: "wadjust_backto_standard_pos m rs (c, Bk # list)
\<Longrightarrow> wadjust_stop m rs (Bk # c, list)"
apply(auto simp: wadjust_backto_standard_pos.simps
wadjust_stop.simps wadjust_backto_standard_pos_B.simps)
done
lemma [simp]: "wadjust_start m rs (c, Oc # list)
\<Longrightarrow> wadjust_loop_start m rs (Oc # c, list)"
apply(auto simp: wadjust_start.simps wadjust_loop_start.simps)
apply(rule_tac x = ln in exI, simp)
apply(rule_tac x = "rn" in exI, simp)
apply(rule_tac x = 1 in exI, simp)
done
lemma [simp]:" wadjust_erase2 m rs (c, Oc # list)
\<Longrightarrow> wadjust_erase2 m rs (c, Bk # list)"
apply(auto simp: wadjust_erase2.simps)
done
lemma wadjust_correctness:
shows "let P = (\<lambda> (len, st, l, r). st = 0) in
let Q = (\<lambda> (len, st, l, r). wadjust_inv st m rs (l, r)) in
let f = (\<lambda> stp. (Suc (Suc rs), steps0 (Suc 0, Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc m),
Bk # Oc # Bk\<up>(ln) @ Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc rs) @ Bk\<up>(rn)) t_wcode_adjust stp)) in
\<exists> n .P (f n) \<and> Q (f n)"
proof -
let ?P = "(\<lambda> (len, st, l, r). st = 0)"
let ?Q = "\<lambda> (len, st, l, r). wadjust_inv st m rs (l, r)"
let ?f = "\<lambda> stp. (Suc (Suc rs), steps0 (Suc 0, Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc m),
Bk # Oc # Bk\<up>(ln) @ Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc rs) @ Bk\<up>(rn)) t_wcode_adjust stp)"
have "\<exists> n. ?P (?f n) \<and> ?Q (?f n)"
proof(rule_tac halt_lemma2)
show "wf wadjust_le" by auto
next
show "\<forall> n. \<not> ?P (?f n) \<and> ?Q (?f n) \<longrightarrow>
?Q (?f (Suc n)) \<and> (?f (Suc n), ?f n) \<in> wadjust_le"
apply(rule_tac allI, rule_tac impI, case_tac "?f n", simp)
apply(simp add: step.simps)
apply(case_tac d, case_tac [2] aa, simp_all)
apply(simp_all only: wadjust_inv.simps split: if_splits)
apply(simp_all)
apply(simp_all add: wadjust_inv.simps wadjust_le_def
abacus.lex_triple_def abacus.lex_pair_def lex_square_def split: if_splits)
done
next
show "?Q (?f 0)"
apply(simp add: steps.simps wadjust_inv.simps wadjust_start.simps, auto)
done
next
show "\<not> ?P (?f 0)"
apply(simp add: steps.simps)
done
qed
thus"?thesis"
apply(simp)
done
qed
lemma [intro]: "tm_wf (t_wcode_adjust, 0)"
apply(auto simp: t_wcode_adjust_def tm_wf.simps)
done
declare tm_comp.simps[simp del]
lemma [simp]: "args \<noteq> [] \<Longrightarrow> bl_bin (<args::nat list>) > 0"
apply(case_tac args)
apply(auto simp: tape_of_nl_cons bl_bin.simps split: if_splits)
done
lemma wcode_lemma_pre':
"args \<noteq> [] \<Longrightarrow>
\<exists> stp rn. steps0 (Suc 0, [], <m # args>)
((t_wcode_prepare |+| t_wcode_main) |+| t_wcode_adjust) stp
= (0, [Bk], Oc\<up>(Suc m) @ Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc (bl_bin (<args>))) @ Bk\<up>(rn))"
proof -
let ?P1 = "\<lambda> (l, r). l = [] \<and> r = <m # args>"
let ?Q1 = "\<lambda>(l, r). l = Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc m) \<and>
(\<exists>ln rn. r = Bk # Oc # Bk\<up>(ln) @ Bk # Bk # Oc\<up>(bl_bin (<args>)) @ Bk\<up>(rn))"
let ?P2 = ?Q1
let ?Q2 = "\<lambda> (l, r). (wadjust_stop m (bl_bin (<args>) - 1) (l, r))"
let ?P3 = "\<lambda> tp. False"
assume h: "args \<noteq> []"
hence a: "bl_bin (<args>) > 0"
using h by simp
hence "{?P1} (t_wcode_prepare |+| t_wcode_main) |+| t_wcode_adjust {?Q2}"
proof(rule_tac Hoare_plus_halt)
next
show "tm_wf (t_wcode_prepare |+| t_wcode_main, 0)"
apply(rule_tac tm_wf_comp, auto)
done
next
show "{?P1} t_wcode_prepare |+| t_wcode_main {?Q1}"
proof(rule_tac Hoare_haltI, auto)
show
"\<exists>n. is_final (steps0 (Suc 0, [], <m # args>) (t_wcode_prepare |+| t_wcode_main) n) \<and>
(\<lambda>(l, r). l = Bk # Oc # Oc \<up> m \<and>
(\<exists>ln rn. r = Bk # Oc # Bk \<up> ln @ Bk # Bk # Oc \<up> bl_bin (<args>) @ Bk \<up> rn))
holds_for steps0 (Suc 0, [], <m # args>) (t_wcode_prepare |+| t_wcode_main) n"
using h prepare_mainpart_lemma[of args m]
apply(auto)
apply(rule_tac x = stp in exI, simp)
apply(rule_tac x = ln in exI, auto)
done
qed
next
show "{?P2} t_wcode_adjust {?Q2}"
proof(rule_tac Hoare_haltI, auto del: replicate_Suc)
fix ln rn
show "\<exists>n. is_final (steps0 (Suc 0, Bk # Oc # Oc \<up> m,
Bk # Oc # Bk \<up> ln @ Bk # Bk # Oc \<up> bl_bin (<args>) @ Bk \<up> rn) t_wcode_adjust n) \<and>
wadjust_stop m (bl_bin (<args>) - Suc 0) holds_for steps0
(Suc 0, Bk # Oc # Oc \<up> m, Bk # Oc # Bk \<up> ln @ Bk # Bk # Oc \<up> bl_bin (<args>) @ Bk \<up> rn) t_wcode_adjust n"
using wadjust_correctness[of m "bl_bin (<args>) - 1" "Suc ln" rn]
apply(simp del: replicate_Suc add: replicate_Suc[THEN sym] exp_ind, auto)
apply(rule_tac x = n in exI)
using a
apply(case_tac "bl_bin (<args>)", simp, simp del: replicate_Suc add: exp_ind wadjust_inv.simps)
done
qed
qed
thus "?thesis"
apply(simp add: Hoare_halt_def, auto)
apply(case_tac "(steps0 (Suc 0, [], <(m::nat) # args>)
((t_wcode_prepare |+| t_wcode_main) |+| t_wcode_adjust) n)")
apply(rule_tac x = n in exI, auto simp: wadjust_stop.simps)
using a
apply(case_tac "bl_bin (<args>)", simp_all)
done
qed
text {*
The initialization TM @{text "t_wcode"}.
*}
definition t_wcode :: "instr list"
where
"t_wcode = (t_wcode_prepare |+| t_wcode_main) |+| t_wcode_adjust"
text {*
The correctness of @{text "t_wcode"}.
*}
lemma wcode_lemma_1:
"args \<noteq> [] \<Longrightarrow>
\<exists> stp ln rn. steps0 (Suc 0, [], <m # args>) (t_wcode) stp =
(0, [Bk], Oc\<up>(Suc m) @ Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc (bl_bin (<args>))) @ Bk\<up>(rn))"
apply(simp add: wcode_lemma_pre' t_wcode_def del: replicate_Suc)
done
lemma wcode_lemma:
"args \<noteq> [] \<Longrightarrow>
\<exists> stp ln rn. steps0 (Suc 0, [], <m # args>) (t_wcode) stp =
(0, [Bk], <[m ,bl_bin (<args>)]> @ Bk\<up>(rn))"
using wcode_lemma_1[of args m]
apply(simp add: t_wcode_def tape_of_nl_abv tape_of_nat_list.simps tape_of_nat_abv)
done
section {* The universal TM *}
text {*
This section gives the explicit construction of {\em Universal Turing Machine}, defined as @{text "UTM"} and proves its
correctness. It is pretty easy by composing the partial results we have got so far.
*}
definition UTM :: "instr list"
where
"UTM = (let (aprog, rs_pos, a_md) = rec_ci rec_F in
let abc_F = aprog [+] dummy_abc (Suc (Suc 0)) in
(t_wcode |+| (tm_of abc_F @ shift (mopup (Suc (Suc 0))) (length (tm_of abc_F) div 2))))"
definition F_aprog :: "abc_prog"
where
"F_aprog \<equiv> (let (aprog, rs_pos, a_md) = rec_ci rec_F in
aprog [+] dummy_abc (Suc (Suc 0)))"
definition F_tprog :: "instr list"
where
"F_tprog = tm_of (F_aprog)"
definition t_utm :: "instr list"
where
"t_utm \<equiv>
F_tprog @ shift (mopup (Suc (Suc 0))) (length F_tprog div 2)"
definition UTM_pre :: "instr list"
where
"UTM_pre = t_wcode |+| t_utm"
(*
lemma F_abc_halt_eq:
"\<lbrakk>turing_basic.t_correct tp;
length lm = k;
steps (Suc 0, Bk\<up>(l), <lm>) tp stp = (0, Bk\<up>(m), Oc\<up>(rs)@Bk\<up>(n));
rs > 0\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> \<exists> stp m. abc_steps_l (0, [code tp, bl2wc (<lm>)]) (F_aprog) stp =
(length (F_aprog), code tp # bl2wc (<lm>) # (rs - 1) # 0\<up>(m))"
apply(drule_tac F_t_halt_eq, simp, simp, simp)
apply(case_tac "rec_ci rec_F")
apply(frule_tac abc_append_dummy_complie, simp, simp, erule_tac exE,
erule_tac exE)
apply(rule_tac x = stp in exI, rule_tac x = m in exI)
apply(simp add: F_aprog_def dummy_abc_def)
done
lemma F_abc_utm_halt_eq:
"\<lbrakk>rs > 0;
abc_steps_l (0, [code tp, bl2wc (<lm>)]) F_aprog stp =
(length F_aprog, code tp # bl2wc (<lm>) # (rs - 1) # 0\<up>(m))\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> \<exists>stp m n.(steps (Suc 0, [Bk, Bk], <[code tp, bl2wc (<lm>)]>) t_utm stp =
(0, Bk\<up>(m), Oc\<up>(rs) @ Bk\<up>(n)))"
thm abacus_turing_eq_halt
using abacus_turing_eq_halt
[of "layout_of F_aprog" "F_aprog" "F_tprog" "length (F_aprog)"
"[code tp, bl2wc (<lm>)]" stp "code tp # bl2wc (<lm>) # (rs - 1) # 0\<up>(m)" "Suc (Suc 0)"
"start_of (layout_of (F_aprog)) (length (F_aprog))" "[]" 0]
apply(simp add: F_tprog_def t_utm_def abc_lm_v.simps nth_append)
apply(erule_tac exE)+
apply(rule_tac x = stpa in exI, rule_tac x = "Suc (Suc ma)" in exI,
rule_tac x = l in exI, simp add: exp_ind)
done
declare tape_of_nl_abv_cons[simp del]
lemma t_utm_halt_eq':
"\<lbrakk>turing_basic.t_correct tp;
0 < rs;
steps (Suc 0, Bk\<up>(l), <lm::nat list>) tp stp = (0, Bk\<up>(m), Oc\<up>(rs)@Bk\<up>(n))\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> \<exists>stp m n. steps (Suc 0, [Bk, Bk], <[code tp, bl2wc (<lm>)]>) t_utm stp =
(0, Bk\<up>(m), Oc\<up>(rs) @ Bk\<up>(n))"
apply(drule_tac l = l in F_abc_halt_eq, simp, simp, simp)
apply(erule_tac exE, erule_tac exE)
apply(rule_tac F_abc_utm_halt_eq, simp_all)
done
*)
(*
lemma [simp]: "tinres xs (xs @ Bk\<up>(i))"
apply(auto simp: tinres_def)
done
lemma [elim]: "\<lbrakk>rs > 0; Oc\<up>(rs) @ Bk\<up>(na) = c @ Bk\<up>(n)\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> \<exists>n. c = Oc\<up>(rs) @ Bk\<up>(n)"
apply(case_tac "na > n")
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists> d. na = d + n", auto simp: exp_add)
apply(rule_tac x = "na - n" in exI, simp)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists> d. n = d + na", auto simp: exp_add)
apply(case_tac rs, simp_all add: exp_ind, case_tac d,
simp_all add: exp_ind)
apply(rule_tac x = "n - na" in exI, simp)
done
*)
(*
lemma t_utm_halt_eq'':
"\<lbrakk>turing_basic.t_correct tp;
0 < rs;
steps (Suc 0, Bk\<up>(l), <lm::nat list>) tp stp = (0, Bk\<up>(m), Oc\<up>(rs)@Bk\<up>(n))\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> \<exists>stp m n. steps (Suc 0, [Bk, Bk], <[code tp, bl2wc (<lm>)]> @ Bk\<up>(i)) t_utm stp =
(0, Bk\<up>(m), Oc\<up>(rs) @ Bk\<up>(n))"
apply(drule_tac t_utm_halt_eq', simp_all)
apply(erule_tac exE)+
proof -
fix stpa ma na
assume "steps (Suc 0, [Bk, Bk], <[code tp, bl2wc (<lm>)]>) t_utm stpa = (0, Bk\<up>(ma), Oc\<up>(rs) @ Bk\<up>(na))"
and gr: "rs > 0"
thus "\<exists>stp m n. steps (Suc 0, [Bk, Bk], <[code tp, bl2wc (<lm>)]> @ Bk\<up>(i)) t_utm stp = (0, Bk\<up>(m), Oc\<up>(rs) @ Bk\<up>(n))"
apply(rule_tac x = stpa in exI, rule_tac x = ma in exI, simp)
proof(case_tac "steps (Suc 0, [Bk, Bk], <[code tp, bl2wc (<lm>)]> @ Bk\<up>(i)) t_utm stpa", simp)
fix a b c
assume "steps (Suc 0, [Bk, Bk], <[code tp, bl2wc (<lm>)]>) t_utm stpa = (0, Bk\<up>(ma), Oc\<up>(rs) @ Bk\<up>(na))"
"steps (Suc 0, [Bk, Bk], <[code tp, bl2wc (<lm>)]> @ Bk\<up>(i)) t_utm stpa = (a, b, c)"
thus " a = 0 \<and> b = Bk\<up>(ma) \<and> (\<exists>n. c = Oc\<up>(rs) @ Bk\<up>(n))"
using tinres_steps2[of "<[code tp, bl2wc (<lm>)]>" "<[code tp, bl2wc (<lm>)]> @ Bk\<up>(i)"
"Suc 0" " [Bk, Bk]" t_utm stpa 0 "Bk\<up>(ma)" "Oc\<up>(rs) @ Bk\<up>(na)" a b c]
apply(simp)
using gr
apply(simp only: tinres_def, auto)
apply(rule_tac x = "na + n" in exI, simp add: exp_add)
done
qed
qed
lemma [simp]: "tinres [Bk, Bk] [Bk]"
apply(auto simp: tinres_def)
done
lemma [elim]: "Bk\<up>(ma) = b @ Bk\<up>(n) \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>m. b = Bk\<up>(m)"
apply(subgoal_tac "ma = length b + n")
apply(rule_tac x = "ma - n" in exI, simp add: exp_add)
apply(drule_tac length_equal)
apply(simp)
done
*)
lemma tinres_step1:
"\<lbrakk>tinres l l'; step (ss, l, r) (t, 0) = (sa, la, ra);
step (ss, l', r) (t, 0) = (sb, lb, rb)\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> tinres la lb \<and> ra = rb \<and> sa = sb"
apply(case_tac ss, case_tac [!]r, case_tac [!] "a::cell")
apply(auto simp: step.simps fetch.simps nth_of.simps
split: if_splits )
apply(case_tac [!] "t ! (2 * nat)",
auto simp: tinres_def split: if_splits)
apply(case_tac [1-8] a, auto split: if_splits)
apply(case_tac [!] "t ! (2 * nat)",
auto simp: tinres_def split: if_splits)
apply(case_tac [1-4] a, auto split: if_splits)
apply(case_tac [!] "t ! Suc (2 * nat)",
auto simp: if_splits)
apply(case_tac [!] aa, auto split: if_splits)
done
lemma tinres_steps1:
"\<lbrakk>tinres l l'; steps (ss, l, r) (t, 0) stp = (sa, la, ra);
steps (ss, l', r) (t, 0) stp = (sb, lb, rb)\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> tinres la lb \<and> ra = rb \<and> sa = sb"
apply(induct stp arbitrary: sa la ra sb lb rb, simp add: steps.simps)
apply(simp add: step_red)
apply(case_tac "(steps (ss, l, r) (t, 0) stp)")
apply(case_tac "(steps (ss, l', r) (t, 0) stp)")
proof -
fix stp sa la ra sb lb rb a b c aa ba ca
assume ind: "\<And>sa la ra sb lb rb. \<lbrakk>steps (ss, l, r) (t, 0) stp = (sa, (la::cell list), ra);
steps (ss, l', r) (t, 0) stp = (sb, lb, rb)\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> tinres la lb \<and> ra = rb \<and> sa = sb"
and h: " tinres l l'" "step (steps (ss, l, r) (t, 0) stp) (t, 0) = (sa, la, ra)"
"step (steps (ss, l', r) (t, 0) stp) (t, 0) = (sb, lb, rb)" "steps (ss, l, r) (t, 0) stp = (a, b, c)"
"steps (ss, l', r) (t, 0) stp = (aa, ba, ca)"
have "tinres b ba \<and> c = ca \<and> a = aa"
apply(rule_tac ind, simp_all add: h)
done
thus "tinres la lb \<and> ra = rb \<and> sa = sb"
apply(rule_tac l = b and l' = ba and r = c and ss = a
and t = t in tinres_step1)
using h
apply(simp, simp, simp)
done
qed
lemma [simp]:
"tinres (Bk \<up> m @ [Bk, Bk]) la \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>m. la = Bk \<up> m"
apply(auto simp: tinres_def)
apply(case_tac n, simp add: exp_ind)
apply(rule_tac x ="Suc (Suc m)" in exI, simp only: exp_ind, simp)
apply(simp add: exp_ind del: replicate_Suc)
apply(case_tac nat, simp add: exp_ind)
apply(rule_tac x = "Suc m" in exI, simp only: exp_ind)
apply(simp only: exp_ind, simp)
apply(subgoal_tac "m = length la + nata")
apply(rule_tac x = "m - nata" in exI, simp add: exp_add)
apply(drule_tac length_equal, simp)
apply(simp only: exp_ind[THEN sym] replicate_Suc[THEN sym] replicate_add[THEN sym])
apply(rule_tac x = "m + Suc (Suc n)" in exI, simp)
done
lemma t_utm_halt_eq:
assumes tm_wf: "tm_wf (tp, 0)"
and exec: "steps0 (Suc 0, Bk\<up>(l), <lm::nat list>) tp stp = (0, Bk\<up>(m), Oc\<up>(rs)@Bk\<up>(n))"
and resutl: "0 < rs"
shows "\<exists>stp m n. steps0 (Suc 0, [Bk], <[code tp, bl2wc (<lm>)]> @ Bk\<up>(i)) t_utm stp =
(0, Bk\<up>(m), Oc\<up>(rs) @ Bk\<up>(n))"
proof -
obtain ap arity fp where a: "rec_ci rec_F = (ap, arity, fp)"
by (metis prod_cases3)
moreover have b: "rec_calc_rel rec_F [code tp, (bl2wc (<lm>))] (rs - Suc 0)"
using assms
apply(rule_tac F_correct, simp_all)
done
have "\<exists> stp m l. steps0 (Suc 0, Bk # Bk # [], <[code tp, bl2wc (<lm>)]> @ Bk\<up>i)
(F_tprog @ shift (mopup 2) (length F_tprog div 2)) stp
= (0, Bk\<up>m @ Bk # Bk # [], Oc\<up>Suc (rs - 1) @ Bk\<up>l)"
proof(rule_tac recursive_compile_to_tm_correct)
show "rec_ci rec_F = (ap, arity, fp)" using a by simp
next
show "rec_calc_rel rec_F [code tp, bl2wc (<lm>)] (rs - 1)"
using b by simp
next
show "length [code tp, bl2wc (<lm>)] = 2" by simp
next
show "layout_of (ap [+] dummy_abc 2) = layout_of (ap [+] dummy_abc 2)"
by simp
next
show "F_tprog = tm_of (ap [+] dummy_abc 2)"
using a
apply(simp add: F_tprog_def F_aprog_def numeral_2_eq_2)
done
qed
then obtain stp m l where
"steps0 (Suc 0, Bk # Bk # [], <[code tp, bl2wc (<lm>)]> @ Bk\<up>i)
(F_tprog @ shift (mopup 2) (length F_tprog div 2)) stp
= (0, Bk\<up>m @ Bk # Bk # [], Oc\<up>Suc (rs - 1) @ Bk\<up>l)" by blast
hence "\<exists> m. steps0 (Suc 0, [Bk], <[code tp, bl2wc (<lm>)]> @ Bk\<up>i)
(F_tprog @ shift (mopup 2) (length F_tprog div 2)) stp
= (0, Bk\<up>m, Oc\<up>Suc (rs - 1) @ Bk\<up>l)"
proof -
assume g: "steps0 (Suc 0, [Bk, Bk], <[code tp, bl2wc (<lm>)]> @ Bk \<up> i)
(F_tprog @ shift (mopup 2) (length F_tprog div 2)) stp =
(0, Bk \<up> m @ [Bk, Bk], Oc \<up> Suc (rs - 1) @ Bk \<up> l)"
moreover have "tinres [Bk, Bk] [Bk]"
apply(auto simp: tinres_def)
done
moreover obtain sa la ra where "steps0 (Suc 0, [Bk], <[code tp, bl2wc (<lm>)]> @ Bk\<up>i)
(F_tprog @ shift (mopup 2) (length F_tprog div 2)) stp = (sa, la, ra)"
apply(case_tac "steps0 (Suc 0, [Bk], <[code tp, bl2wc (<lm>)]> @ Bk\<up>i)
(F_tprog @ shift (mopup 2) (length F_tprog div 2)) stp", auto)
done
ultimately show "?thesis"
apply(drule_tac tinres_steps1, auto)
done
qed
thus "?thesis"
apply(auto)
apply(rule_tac x = stp in exI, simp add: t_utm_def)
using assms
apply(case_tac rs, simp_all add: numeral_2_eq_2)
done
qed
lemma [intro]: "tm_wf (t_wcode, 0)"
apply(simp add: t_wcode_def)
apply(rule_tac tm_wf_comp)
apply(rule_tac tm_wf_comp, auto)
done
lemma [intro]: "tm_wf (t_utm, 0)"
apply(simp only: t_utm_def F_tprog_def)
apply(rule_tac t_compiled_correct, auto)
done
lemma UTM_halt_lemma_pre:
assumes wf_tm: "tm_wf (tp, 0)"
and result: "0 < rs"
and args: "args \<noteq> []"
and exec: "steps0 (Suc 0, Bk\<up>(i), <args::nat list>) tp stp = (0, Bk\<up>(m), Oc\<up>(rs)@Bk\<up>(k))"
shows "\<exists>stp m n. steps0 (Suc 0, [], <code tp # args>) UTM_pre stp =
(0, Bk\<up>(m), Oc\<up>(rs) @ Bk\<up>(n))"
proof -
let ?Q2 = "\<lambda> (l, r). (\<exists> ln rn. l = Bk\<up>(ln) \<and> r = Oc\<up>(rs) @ Bk\<up>(rn))"
let ?P1 = "\<lambda> (l, r). l = [] \<and> r = <code tp # args>"
let ?Q1 = "\<lambda> (l, r). (l = [Bk] \<and>
(\<exists> rn. r = Oc\<up>(Suc (code tp)) @ Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc (bl_bin (<args>))) @ Bk\<up>(rn)))"
let ?P2 = ?Q1
let ?P3 = "\<lambda> (l, r). False"
have "{?P1} (t_wcode |+| t_utm) {?Q2}"
proof(rule_tac Hoare_plus_halt)
show "tm_wf (t_wcode, 0)" by auto
next
show "{?P1} t_wcode {?Q1}"
apply(rule_tac Hoare_haltI, auto)
using wcode_lemma_1[of args "code tp"] args
apply(auto)
apply(rule_tac x = stp in exI, simp)
done
next
show "{?P2} t_utm {?Q2}"
proof(rule_tac Hoare_haltI, auto)
fix rn
show "\<exists>n. is_final (steps0 (Suc 0, [Bk], Oc # Oc \<up> code tp @ Bk # Oc # Oc \<up> bl_bin (<args>) @ Bk \<up> rn) t_utm n) \<and>
(\<lambda>(l, r). (\<exists>ln. l = Bk \<up> ln) \<and>
(\<exists>rn. r = Oc \<up> rs @ Bk \<up> rn)) holds_for steps0 (Suc 0, [Bk],
Oc # Oc \<up> code tp @ Bk # Oc # Oc \<up> bl_bin (<args>) @ Bk \<up> rn) t_utm n"
using t_utm_halt_eq[of tp i "args" stp m rs k rn] assms
apply(auto simp: bin_wc_eq)
apply(rule_tac x = stpa in exI, simp add: tape_of_nl_abv tape_of_nat_abv)
done
qed
qed
thus "?thesis"
apply(auto simp: Hoare_halt_def UTM_pre_def)
apply(case_tac "steps0 (Suc 0, [], <code tp # args>) (t_wcode |+| t_utm) n")
apply(rule_tac x = n in exI, simp)
done
qed
text {*
The correctness of @{text "UTM"}, the halt case.
*}
lemma UTM_halt_lemma':
assumes tm_wf: "tm_wf (tp, 0)"
and result: "0 < rs"
and args: "args \<noteq> []"
and exec: "steps0 (Suc 0, Bk\<up>(i), <args::nat list>) tp stp = (0, Bk\<up>(m), Oc\<up>(rs)@Bk\<up>(k))"
shows "\<exists>stp m n. steps0 (Suc 0, [], <code tp # args>) UTM stp =
(0, Bk\<up>(m), Oc\<up>(rs) @ Bk\<up>(n))"
using UTM_halt_lemma_pre[of tp rs args i stp m k] assms
apply(simp add: UTM_pre_def t_utm_def UTM_def F_aprog_def F_tprog_def)
apply(case_tac "rec_ci rec_F", simp)
done
definition TSTD:: "config \<Rightarrow> bool"
where
"TSTD c = (let (st, l, r) = c in
st = 0 \<and> (\<exists> m. l = Bk\<up>(m)) \<and> (\<exists> rs n. r = Oc\<up>(Suc rs) @ Bk\<up>(n)))"
lemma nstd_case1: "0 < a \<Longrightarrow> NSTD (trpl_code (a, b, c))"
apply(simp add: NSTD.simps trpl_code.simps)
done
lemma [simp]: "\<forall>m. b \<noteq> Bk\<up>(m) \<Longrightarrow> 0 < bl2wc b"
apply(rule classical, simp)
apply(induct b, erule_tac x = 0 in allE, simp)
apply(simp add: bl2wc.simps, case_tac a, simp_all
add: bl2nat.simps bl2nat_double)
apply(case_tac "\<exists> m. b = Bk\<up>(m)", erule exE)
apply(erule_tac x = "Suc m" in allE, simp add: , simp)
done
lemma nstd_case2: "\<forall>m. b \<noteq> Bk\<up>(m) \<Longrightarrow> NSTD (trpl_code (a, b, c))"
apply(simp add: NSTD.simps trpl_code.simps)
done
lemma [elim]: "Suc (2 * x) = 2 * y \<Longrightarrow> RR"
apply(induct x arbitrary: y, simp, simp)
apply(case_tac y, simp, simp)
done
declare replicate_Suc[simp del]
lemma bl2nat_zero_eq[simp]: "(bl2nat c 0 = 0) = (\<exists>n. c = Bk\<up>(n))"
apply(auto)
apply(induct c, simp_all add: bl2nat.simps)
apply(case_tac a, auto simp: bl2nat.simps bl2nat_double)
done
lemma bl2wc_exp_ex:
"\<lbrakk>Suc (bl2wc c) = 2 ^ m\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> \<exists> rs n. c = Oc\<up>(rs) @ Bk\<up>(n)"
apply(induct c arbitrary: m, simp add: bl2wc.simps bl2nat.simps)
apply(case_tac a, auto)
apply(case_tac m, simp_all add: bl2wc.simps, auto)
apply(rule_tac x = 0 in exI, rule_tac x = "Suc n" in exI,
simp add: replicate_Suc)
apply(simp add: bl2wc.simps bl2nat.simps bl2nat_double)
apply(case_tac m, simp, simp)
proof -
fix c m nat
assume ind:
"\<And>m. Suc (bl2nat c 0) = 2 ^ m \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>rs n. c = Oc\<up>(rs) @ Bk\<up>(n)"
and h:
"Suc (Suc (2 * bl2nat c 0)) = 2 * 2 ^ nat"
have "\<exists>rs n. c = Oc\<up>(rs) @ Bk\<up>(n)"
apply(rule_tac m = nat in ind)
using h
apply(simp)
done
from this obtain rs n where " c = Oc\<up>(rs) @ Bk\<up>(n)" by blast
thus "\<exists>rs n. Oc # c = Oc\<up>(rs) @ Bk\<up>(n)"
apply(rule_tac x = "Suc rs" in exI, simp add: )
apply(rule_tac x = n in exI, simp add: replicate_Suc)
done
qed
lemma lg_bin:
"\<lbrakk>\<forall>rs n. c \<noteq> Oc\<up>(Suc rs) @ Bk\<up>(n);
bl2wc c = 2 ^ lg (Suc (bl2wc c)) 2 - Suc 0\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> bl2wc c = 0"
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists> m. Suc (bl2wc c) = 2^m", erule_tac exE)
apply(drule_tac bl2wc_exp_ex, simp, erule_tac exE, erule_tac exE)
apply(case_tac rs, simp, simp, erule_tac x = nat in allE,
erule_tac x = n in allE, simp)
using bl2wc_exp_ex[of c "lg (Suc (bl2wc c)) 2"]
apply(case_tac "(2::nat) ^ lg (Suc (bl2wc c)) 2",
simp, simp, erule_tac exE, erule_tac exE, simp)
apply(simp add: bl2wc.simps)
apply(rule_tac x = rs in exI)
apply(case_tac "(2::nat)^rs", simp, simp)
done
lemma nstd_case3:
"\<forall>rs n. c \<noteq> Oc\<up>(Suc rs) @ Bk\<up>(n) \<Longrightarrow> NSTD (trpl_code (a, b, c))"
apply(simp add: NSTD.simps trpl_code.simps)
apply(auto)
apply(drule_tac lg_bin, simp_all)
done
lemma NSTD_1: "\<not> TSTD (a, b, c)
\<Longrightarrow> rec_exec rec_NSTD [trpl_code (a, b, c)] = Suc 0"
using NSTD_lemma1[of "trpl_code (a, b, c)"]
NSTD_lemma2[of "trpl_code (a, b, c)"]
apply(simp add: TSTD_def)
apply(erule_tac disjE, erule_tac nstd_case1)
apply(erule_tac disjE, erule_tac nstd_case2)
apply(erule_tac nstd_case3)
done
lemma nonstop_t_uhalt_eq:
"\<lbrakk>tm_wf (tp, 0);
steps0 (Suc 0, Bk\<up>(l), <lm>) tp stp = (a, b, c);
\<not> TSTD (a, b, c)\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> rec_exec rec_nonstop [code tp, bl2wc (<lm>), stp] = Suc 0"
apply(simp add: rec_nonstop_def rec_exec.simps)
apply(subgoal_tac
"rec_exec rec_conf [code tp, bl2wc (<lm>), stp] =
trpl_code (a, b, c)", simp)
apply(erule_tac NSTD_1)
using rec_t_eq_steps[of tp l lm stp]
apply(simp)
done
lemma nonstop_true:
"\<lbrakk>tm_wf (tp, 0);
\<forall> stp. (\<not> TSTD (steps0 (Suc 0, Bk\<up>(l), <lm>) tp stp))\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> \<forall>y. rec_calc_rel rec_nonstop
([code tp, bl2wc (<lm>), y]) (Suc 0)"
apply(rule_tac allI, erule_tac x = y in allE)
apply(case_tac "steps0 (Suc 0, Bk\<up>(l), <lm>) tp y", simp)
apply(rule_tac nonstop_t_uhalt_eq, simp_all)
done
(*
lemma [simp]:
"\<forall>j<Suc k. Ex (rec_calc_rel (get_fstn_args (Suc k) (Suc k) ! j)
(code tp # lm))"
apply(auto simp: get_fstn_args_nth)
apply(rule_tac x = "(code tp # lm) ! j" in exI)
apply(rule_tac calc_id, simp_all)
done
*)
declare ci_cn_para_eq[simp]
lemma F_aprog_uhalt:
"\<lbrakk>tm_wf (tp,0);
\<forall> stp. (\<not> TSTD (steps0 (Suc 0, Bk\<up>(l), <lm>) tp stp));
rec_ci rec_F = (F_ap, rs_pos, a_md)\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> \<forall> stp. case abc_steps_l (0, [code tp, bl2wc (<lm>)] @ 0\<up>(a_md - rs_pos )
@ suflm) (F_ap) stp of (ss, e) \<Rightarrow> ss < length (F_ap)"
apply(case_tac "rec_ci (Cn (Suc (Suc 0)) rec_right [Cn (Suc (Suc 0)) rec_conf
([id (Suc (Suc 0)) 0, id (Suc (Suc 0)) (Suc 0), rec_halt])])")
apply(simp only: rec_F_def, rule_tac i = 0 and ga = a and gb = b and
gc = c in cn_gi_uhalt, simp, simp, simp, simp, simp, simp, simp)
apply(simp add: ci_cn_para_eq)
apply(case_tac "rec_ci (Cn (Suc (Suc 0)) rec_conf
([id (Suc (Suc 0)) 0, id (Suc (Suc 0)) (Suc 0), rec_halt]))")
apply(rule_tac rf = "(Cn (Suc (Suc 0)) rec_right [Cn (Suc (Suc 0)) rec_conf
([id (Suc (Suc 0)) 0, id (Suc (Suc 0)) (Suc 0), rec_halt])])"
and n = "Suc (Suc 0)" and f = rec_right and
gs = "[Cn (Suc (Suc 0)) rec_conf
([id (Suc (Suc 0)) 0, id (Suc (Suc 0)) (Suc 0), rec_halt])]"
and i = 0 and ga = aa and gb = ba and gc = ca in
cn_gi_uhalt)
apply(simp, simp, simp, simp, simp, simp, simp,
simp add: ci_cn_para_eq)
apply(case_tac "rec_ci rec_halt")
apply(rule_tac rf = "(Cn (Suc (Suc 0)) rec_conf
([id (Suc (Suc 0)) 0, id (Suc (Suc 0)) (Suc 0), rec_halt]))"
and n = "Suc (Suc 0)" and f = "rec_conf" and
gs = "([id (Suc (Suc 0)) 0, id (Suc (Suc 0)) (Suc 0), rec_halt])" and
i = "Suc (Suc 0)" and gi = "rec_halt" and ga = ab and gb = bb and
gc = cb in cn_gi_uhalt)
apply(simp, simp, simp, simp, simp add: nth_append, simp,
simp add: nth_append, simp add: rec_halt_def)
apply(simp only: rec_halt_def)
apply(case_tac [!] "rec_ci ((rec_nonstop))")
apply(rule_tac allI, rule_tac impI, simp)
apply(case_tac j, simp)
apply(rule_tac x = "code tp" in exI, rule_tac calc_id, simp, simp, simp, simp)
apply(rule_tac x = "bl2wc (<lm>)" in exI, rule_tac calc_id, simp, simp, simp)
apply(rule_tac rf = "Mn (Suc (Suc 0)) (rec_nonstop)"
and f = "(rec_nonstop)" and n = "Suc (Suc 0)"
and aprog' = ac and rs_pos' = bc and a_md' = cc in Mn_unhalt)
apply(simp, simp add: rec_halt_def , simp, simp)
apply(drule_tac nonstop_true, simp_all)
apply(rule_tac allI)
apply(erule_tac x = y in allE)+
apply(simp)
done
lemma uabc_uhalt':
"\<lbrakk>tm_wf (tp, 0);
\<forall> stp. (\<not> TSTD (steps0 (Suc 0, Bk\<up>(l), <lm>) tp stp));
rec_ci rec_F = (ap, pos, md)\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> \<forall> stp. case abc_steps_l (0, [code tp, bl2wc (<lm>)]) ap stp of (ss, e)
\<Rightarrow> ss < length ap"
proof(frule_tac F_ap = ap and rs_pos = pos and a_md = md
and suflm = "[]" in F_aprog_uhalt, auto)
fix stp a b
assume h:
"\<forall>stp. case abc_steps_l (0, code tp # bl2wc (<lm>) # 0\<up>(md - pos)) ap stp of
(ss, e) \<Rightarrow> ss < length ap"
"abc_steps_l (0, [code tp, bl2wc (<lm>)]) ap stp = (a, b)"
"tm_wf (tp, 0)"
"rec_ci rec_F = (ap, pos, md)"
moreover have "ap \<noteq> []"
using h apply(rule_tac rec_ci_not_null, simp)
done
ultimately show "a < length ap"
proof(erule_tac x = stp in allE,
case_tac "abc_steps_l (0, code tp # bl2wc (<lm>) # 0\<up>(md - pos)) ap stp", simp)
fix aa ba
assume g: "aa < length ap"
"abc_steps_l (0, code tp # bl2wc (<lm>) # 0\<up>(md - pos)) ap stp = (aa, ba)"
"ap \<noteq> []"
thus "?thesis"
using abc_list_crsp_steps[of "[code tp, bl2wc (<lm>)]"
"md - pos" ap stp aa ba] h
apply(simp)
done
qed
qed
lemma uabc_uhalt:
"\<lbrakk>tm_wf (tp, 0);
\<forall> stp. (\<not> TSTD (steps0 (Suc 0, Bk\<up>(l), <lm>) tp stp))\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> \<forall> stp. case abc_steps_l (0, [code tp, bl2wc (<lm>)]) F_aprog
stp of (ss, e) \<Rightarrow> ss < length F_aprog"
apply(case_tac "rec_ci rec_F", simp add: F_aprog_def)
thm uabc_uhalt'
apply(drule_tac ap = a and pos = b and md = c in uabc_uhalt', simp_all)
proof -
fix a b c
assume
"\<forall>stp. case abc_steps_l (0, [code tp, bl2wc (<lm>)]) a stp of (ss, e)
\<Rightarrow> ss < length a"
"rec_ci rec_F = (a, b, c)"
thus
"\<forall>stp. case abc_steps_l (0, [code tp, bl2wc (<lm>)])
(a [+] dummy_abc (Suc (Suc 0))) stp of (ss, e) \<Rightarrow>
ss < Suc (Suc (Suc (length a)))"
using abc_append_uhalt1[of a "[code tp, bl2wc (<lm>)]"
"a [+] dummy_abc (Suc (Suc 0))" "[]" "dummy_abc (Suc (Suc 0))"]
apply(simp)
done
qed
lemma tutm_uhalt':
assumes tm_wf: "tm_wf (tp,0)"
and unhalt: "\<forall> stp. (\<not> TSTD (steps0 (Suc 0, Bk\<up>(l), <lm>) tp stp))"
shows "\<forall> stp. \<not> is_final (steps0 (Suc 0, [Bk, Bk], <[code tp, bl2wc (<lm>)]>) t_utm stp)"
apply(simp add: t_utm_def)
proof(rule_tac compile_correct_unhalt)
show "layout_of F_aprog = layout_of F_aprog" by simp
next
show "F_tprog = tm_of F_aprog"
by(simp add: F_tprog_def)
next
show "crsp (layout_of F_aprog) (0, [code tp, bl2wc (<lm>)]) (Suc 0, [Bk, Bk], <[code tp, bl2wc (<lm>)]>) []"
by(auto simp: crsp.simps start_of.simps)
next
show "length F_tprog div 2 = length F_tprog div 2" by simp
next
show "\<forall>stp. case abc_steps_l (0, [code tp, bl2wc (<lm>)]) F_aprog stp of (as, am) \<Rightarrow> as < length F_aprog"
using assms
apply(erule_tac uabc_uhalt, simp)
done
qed
lemma tinres_commute: "tinres r r' \<Longrightarrow> tinres r' r"
apply(auto simp: tinres_def)
done
lemma inres_tape:
"\<lbrakk>steps0 (st, l, r) tp stp = (a, b, c); steps0 (st, l', r') tp stp = (a', b', c');
tinres l l'; tinres r r'\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> a = a' \<and> tinres b b' \<and> tinres c c'"
proof(case_tac "steps0 (st, l', r) tp stp")
fix aa ba ca
assume h: "steps0 (st, l, r) tp stp = (a, b, c)"
"steps0 (st, l', r') tp stp = (a', b', c')"
"tinres l l'" "tinres r r'"
"steps0 (st, l', r) tp stp = (aa, ba, ca)"
have "tinres b ba \<and> c = ca \<and> a = aa"
using h
apply(rule_tac tinres_steps1, auto)
done
moreover have "b' = ba \<and> tinres c' ca \<and> a' = aa"
using h
apply(rule_tac tinres_steps2, auto intro: tinres_commute)
done
ultimately show "?thesis"
apply(auto intro: tinres_commute)
done
qed
lemma tape_normalize: "\<forall> stp. \<not> is_final(steps0 (Suc 0, [Bk, Bk], <[code tp, bl2wc (<lm>)]>) t_utm stp)
\<Longrightarrow> \<forall> stp. \<not> is_final (steps0 (Suc 0, Bk\<up>(m), <[code tp, bl2wc (<lm>)]> @ Bk\<up>(n)) t_utm stp)"
apply(rule_tac allI, case_tac "(steps0 (Suc 0, Bk\<up>(m),
<[code tp, bl2wc (<lm>)]> @ Bk\<up>(n)) t_utm stp)", simp)
apply(erule_tac x = stp in allE)
apply(case_tac "steps0 (Suc 0, [Bk, Bk], <[code tp, bl2wc (<lm>)]>) t_utm stp", simp)
apply(drule_tac inres_tape, auto)
apply(auto simp: tinres_def)
apply(case_tac "m > Suc (Suc 0)")
apply(rule_tac x = "m - Suc (Suc 0)" in exI)
apply(case_tac m, simp_all add: , case_tac nat, simp_all add: replicate_Suc)
apply(rule_tac x = "2 - m" in exI, simp add: exp_add[THEN sym])
apply(simp only: numeral_2_eq_2, simp add: replicate_Suc)
done
lemma tutm_uhalt:
"\<lbrakk>tm_wf (tp,0);
\<forall> stp. (\<not> TSTD (steps0 (Suc 0, Bk\<up>(l), <args>) tp stp))\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> \<forall> stp. \<not> is_final (steps0 (Suc 0, Bk\<up>(m), <[code tp, bl2wc (<args>)]> @ Bk\<up>(n)) t_utm stp)"
apply(rule_tac tape_normalize)
apply(rule_tac tutm_uhalt', simp_all)
done
lemma UTM_uhalt_lemma_pre:
assumes tm_wf: "tm_wf (tp, 0)"
and exec: "\<forall> stp. (\<not> TSTD (steps0 (Suc 0, Bk\<up>(l), <args>) tp stp))"
and args: "args \<noteq> []"
shows "\<forall> stp. \<not> is_final (steps0 (Suc 0, [], <code tp # args>) UTM_pre stp)"
proof -
let ?P1 = "\<lambda> (l, r). l = [] \<and> r = <code tp # args>"
let ?Q1 = "\<lambda> (l, r). (l = [Bk] \<and>
(\<exists> rn. r = Oc\<up>(Suc (code tp)) @ Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc (bl_bin (<args>))) @ Bk\<up>(rn)))"
let ?P2 = ?Q1
have "{?P1} (t_wcode |+| t_utm) \<up>"
proof(rule_tac Hoare_plus_unhalt)
show "tm_wf (t_wcode, 0)" by auto
next
show "{?P1} t_wcode {?Q1}"
apply(rule_tac Hoare_haltI, auto)
using wcode_lemma_1[of args "code tp"] args
apply(auto)
apply(rule_tac x = stp in exI, simp)
done
next
show "{?P2} t_utm \<up>"
proof(rule_tac Hoare_unhaltI, auto)
fix n rn
assume h: "is_final (steps0 (Suc 0, [Bk], Oc \<up> Suc (code tp) @ Bk # Oc \<up> Suc (bl_bin (<args>)) @ Bk \<up> rn) t_utm n)"
have "\<forall> stp. \<not> is_final (steps0 (Suc 0, Bk\<up>(Suc 0), <[code tp, bl2wc (<args>)]> @ Bk\<up>(rn)) t_utm stp)"
using assms
apply(rule_tac tutm_uhalt, simp_all)
done
thus "False"
using h
apply(erule_tac x = n in allE)
apply(simp add: tape_of_nl_abv bin_wc_eq tape_of_nat_abv)
done
qed
qed
thus "?thesis"
apply(simp add: Hoare_unhalt_def UTM_pre_def)
done
qed
text {*
The correctness of @{text "UTM"}, the unhalt case.
*}
lemma UTM_uhalt_lemma':
assumes tm_wf: "tm_wf (tp, 0)"
and unhalt: "\<forall> stp. (\<not> TSTD (steps0 (Suc 0, Bk\<up>(l), <args>) tp stp))"
and args: "args \<noteq> []"
shows " \<forall> stp. \<not> is_final (steps0 (Suc 0, [], <code tp # args>) UTM stp)"
using UTM_uhalt_lemma_pre[of tp l args] assms
apply(simp add: UTM_pre_def t_utm_def UTM_def F_aprog_def F_tprog_def)
apply(case_tac "rec_ci rec_F", simp)
done
lemma UTM_halt_lemma:
assumes tm_wf: "tm_wf (p, 0)"
and resut: "rs > 0"
and args: "(args::nat list) \<noteq> []"
and exec: "{(\<lambda>tp. tp = (Bk\<up>i, <args>))} p {(\<lambda>tp. tp = (Bk\<up>m, Oc\<up>rs @ Bk\<up>k))}"
shows "{(\<lambda>tp. tp = ([], <code p # args>))} UTM {(\<lambda>tp. (\<exists> m n. tp = (Bk\<up>m, Oc\<up>rs @ Bk\<up>n)))}"
proof -
have "{(\<lambda> (l, r). l = [] \<and> r = <code p # args>)} (t_wcode |+| t_utm)
{(\<lambda> (l, r). (\<exists> m. l = Bk\<up>m) \<and> (\<exists> n. r = Oc\<up>rs @ Bk\<up>n))}"
proof(rule_tac Hoare_plus_halt)
show "{\<lambda>(l, r). l = [] \<and> r = <code p # args>} t_wcode {\<lambda> (l, r). (l = [Bk] \<and>
(\<exists> rn. r = Oc\<up>(Suc (code p)) @ Bk # Oc\<up>(Suc (bl_bin (<args>))) @ Bk\<up>(rn)))}"
apply(rule_tac Hoare_haltI, auto)
using wcode_lemma_1[of args "code p"] args
apply(auto)
apply(rule_tac x = stp in exI, simp)
done
next
have "\<exists> stp. steps0 (Suc 0, Bk\<up>i, <args>) p stp = (0, Bk\<up>m, Oc\<up>rs @ Bk\<up>k)"
using exec
apply(simp add: Hoare_halt_def, auto)
apply(case_tac "steps0 (Suc 0, Bk \<up> i, <args>) p n", simp)
apply(rule_tac x = n in exI, simp)
done
then obtain stp where k: "steps0 (Suc 0, Bk\<up>i, <args>) p stp = (0, Bk\<up>m, Oc\<up>rs @ Bk\<up>k)"
..
thus "{\<lambda>(l, r). l = [Bk] \<and> (\<exists>rn. r = Oc \<up> Suc (code p) @ Bk # Oc \<up> Suc (bl_bin (<args>)) @ Bk \<up> rn)}
t_utm {\<lambda>(l, r). (\<exists>m. l = Bk \<up> m) \<and> (\<exists>n. r = Oc \<up> rs @ Bk \<up> n)}"
proof(rule_tac Hoare_haltI, auto)
fix rn
show "\<exists>n. is_final (steps0 (Suc 0, [Bk], Oc \<up> Suc (code p) @ Bk # Oc \<up> Suc (bl_bin (<args>)) @ Bk \<up> rn) t_utm n) \<and>
(\<lambda>(l, r). (\<exists>m. l = Bk \<up> m) \<and> (\<exists>n. r = Oc \<up> rs @ Bk \<up> n)) holds_for steps0
(Suc 0, [Bk], Oc \<up> Suc (code p) @ Bk # Oc \<up> Suc (bl_bin (<args>)) @ Bk \<up> rn) t_utm n"
using t_utm_halt_eq[of p i "args" stp m rs k rn] assms k
apply(auto simp: bin_wc_eq, auto)
apply(rule_tac x = stpa in exI, simp add: tape_of_nl_abv tape_of_nat_abv)
done
qed
next
show "tm_wf0 t_wcode" by auto
qed
thus "?thesis"
apply(case_tac "rec_ci rec_F")
apply(simp add: UTM_def t_utm_def F_aprog_def F_tprog_def)
apply(auto simp add: Hoare_halt_def)
apply(rule_tac x="n" in exI)
apply(auto)
apply(case_tac "(steps0 (Suc 0, [], <code p # args>)
(t_wcode |+| ((tm_of (a [+] dummy_abc (Suc (Suc 0)))) @
shift (mopup (Suc (Suc 0)))
(length (tm_of (a [+] dummy_abc (Suc (Suc 0)))) div
2))) n)")
apply(simp)
done
qed
lemma UTM_halt_lemma2:
assumes tm_wf: "tm_wf (p, 0)"
and args: "(args::nat list) \<noteq> []"
and exec: "{(\<lambda>tp. tp = ([], <args>))} p {(\<lambda>tp. tp = (Bk\<up>m, <(n::nat)> @ Bk\<up>k))}"
shows "{(\<lambda>tp. tp = ([], <code p # args>))} UTM {(\<lambda>tp. (\<exists> m k. tp = (Bk\<up>m, <n> @ Bk\<up>k)))}"
using UTM_halt_lemma[OF assms(1) _ assms(2), where i="0"]
using assms(3)
apply(simp add: tape_of_nat_abv)
done
lemma UTM_unhalt_lemma:
assumes tm_wf: "tm_wf (p, 0)"
and unhalt: "{(\<lambda>tp. tp = (Bk\<up>i, <args>))} p \<up>"
and args: "args \<noteq> []"
shows "{(\<lambda>tp. tp = ([], <code p # args>))} UTM \<up>"
proof -
have "\<forall> stp. (\<not> TSTD (steps0 (Suc 0, Bk\<up>(i), <args>) p stp))"
using unhalt
apply(auto simp: Hoare_unhalt_def)
apply(case_tac "steps0 (Suc 0, Bk \<up> i, <args>) p stp", simp)
apply(erule_tac x = stp in allE, simp add: TSTD_def)
done
then have "\<forall> stp. \<not> is_final (steps0 (Suc 0, [], <code p # args>) UTM stp)"
using assms
apply(rule_tac UTM_uhalt_lemma', simp_all)
done
thus "?thesis"
apply(simp add: Hoare_unhalt_def)
done
qed
lemma UTM_unhalt_lemma2:
assumes tm_wf: "tm_wf (p, 0)"
and unhalt: "{(\<lambda>tp. tp = ([], <args>))} p \<up>"
and args: "args \<noteq> []"
shows "{(\<lambda>tp. tp = ([], <code p # args>))} UTM \<up>"
using UTM_unhalt_lemma[OF assms(1), where i="0"]
using assms(2-3)
apply(simp add: tape_of_nat_abv)
done
end