updated
authorChristian Urban <christian dot urban at kcl dot ac dot uk>
Sat, 30 Nov 2013 13:52:21 +0000
changeset 144 fdd0c7fa1b65
parent 143 5d6c0e3b4ebb
child 145 279fa5a06231
updated
hws/hw01.pdf
hws/hw02.pdf
hws/hw03.pdf
hws/hw03.tex
hws/hw04.pdf
hws/hw05.pdf
hws/hw06.pdf
hws/hw07.pdf
Binary file hws/hw01.pdf has changed
Binary file hws/hw02.pdf has changed
Binary file hws/hw03.pdf has changed
--- a/hws/hw03.tex	Tue Nov 26 15:00:51 2013 +0000
+++ b/hws/hw03.tex	Sat Nov 30 13:52:21 2013 +0000
@@ -34,8 +34,8 @@
 \item How can the choice of a programming language help with buffer overflow attacks?
 (Hint: Why are C-programs prone to such attacks, but not Java programs.)
 
-\item How can a system that separates between \emph{users} and \emph{root} 
-be of any help with buffer overflow attacks?
+%\item How can a system that separates between \emph{users} and \emph{root} 
+%be of any help with buffer overflow attacks?
 \end{enumerate}
 
 \end{document}
Binary file hws/hw04.pdf has changed
Binary file hws/hw05.pdf has changed
Binary file hws/hw06.pdf has changed
Binary file hws/hw07.pdf has changed