# HG changeset patch
# User Christian Urban <christian dot urban at kcl dot ac dot uk>
# Date 1438760881 -7200
# Node ID 8098bde3118587601ed59af81dcf9e076de90ee5
# Parent  3145f522774ceee7fb626c7437403c9a2514402d
typos

diff -r 3145f522774c -r 8098bde31185 handouts/ho03.pdf
Binary file handouts/ho03.pdf has changed
diff -r 3145f522774c -r 8098bde31185 handouts/ho03.tex
--- a/handouts/ho03.tex	Wed Aug 05 09:46:37 2015 +0200
+++ b/handouts/ho03.tex	Wed Aug 05 09:48:01 2015 +0200
@@ -210,7 +210,7 @@
 stack to its old state and crucially sets the return address
 where the computation should resume (Line 9 in the code on the
 left-hand side). The instruction \code{ret} then transfers
-control back to the function \pcode{main} to the the
+control back to the function \pcode{main} to the
 instruction just after the call to \pcode{foo}, that is Line
 9.
  
@@ -686,7 +686,7 @@
 bit more predictable). The third is important as it switches
 off defences like the stack canaries. The fourth again makes it
 a bit easier to read the code. The final option makes the
-stack executable, thus the the example in Figure~\ref{C3}
+stack executable, thus the example in Figure~\ref{C3}
 works as intended. While this might be considered
 cheating....since I explicitly switched off all defences, I
 hope I was able convey that this is actually not too far from