sen-material: comparison slides03.tex

equal deleted inserted replaced

-:24116ce8c294
+:7dd341037669
 \mode<presentation>{
 \begin{frame}[c]
 \frametitle{\begin{tabular}{@ {}c@ {}}Security Levels (2)\end{tabular}}
 \begin{itemize}
-\item Bell --- La Pudela preserves data secrecy, but not data integrity\bigskip\pause
+\item Bell --- La Padula preserves data secrecy, but not data integrity\bigskip\pause
 \item Biba model is for data integrity
 \begin{itemize}
 \item read: your own level and above
 \begin{frame}[c]
 \frametitle{\begin{tabular}{@ {}c@ {}}Schneier: Step 3\end{tabular}}
 {\bf How well does the security solution mitigate those risks?}\bigskip
-Another seemingly obvious question, but one that is frequently ignored. If the security solution doesnÕt solve the problem, itÕs no good. This is not as simple as looking at the security solution and seeing how well it works. It involves looking at how the security solution interacts with everything around it, evaluating both its operation and its failures.
+Another seemingly obvious question, but one that is frequently ignored. If the security solution doesnÕt solve the problem, it's no good. This is not as simple as looking at the security solution and seeing how well it works. It involves looking at how the security solution interacts with everything around it, evaluating both its operation and its failures.
 \end{frame}}
 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%