equal
deleted
inserted
replaced
106 |
106 |
107 \subsubsection*{Chip-and-PIN is Surely More Secure, No?} |
107 \subsubsection*{Chip-and-PIN is Surely More Secure, No?} |
108 |
108 |
109 The questions is whether the Chip-and-PIN system used with |
109 The questions is whether the Chip-and-PIN system used with |
110 modern credit cards is more secure than the older method of |
110 modern credit cards is more secure than the older method of |
111 signing receipts at the till. On first glance the answer seems |
111 signing receipts at the till? On first glance the answer seems |
112 obvious: Chip-and-PIN must be more secure and indeed improved |
112 obvious: Chip-and-PIN must be more secure and indeed improved |
113 security was the central plank in the ``marketing speak'' of |
113 security was the central plank in the ``marketing speak'' of |
114 the banks behind Chip-and-PIN. The earlier system was based on |
114 the banks behind Chip-and-PIN. The earlier system was based on |
115 a magnetic stripe or a mechanical imprint on the cards and |
115 a magnetic stripe or a mechanical imprint on the cards and |
116 required customers to sign receipts at the till whenever they |
116 required customers to sign receipts at the till whenever they |