--- a/no_shm_selinux/Enrich.thy Thu Dec 19 10:05:13 2013 +0800
+++ b/no_shm_selinux/Enrich.thy Fri Dec 20 10:58:00 2013 +0800
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@
then Open dp f (remove_create_flag flags) fd opt # Open p f flags fd opt # (enrich_proc s tp dp)
else Open p f flags fd opt # (enrich_proc s tp dp))"
| "enrich_proc (CloseFd p fd # s) tp dp = (
- if (tp = p)
+ if (tp = p \<and> fd \<in> proc_file_fds s p)
then CloseFd dp fd # CloseFd p fd # (enrich_proc s tp dp)
else CloseFd p fd # (enrich_proc s tp dp))"
(*
@@ -163,6 +163,53 @@
by (simp add:inherit_fds_check_def)
qed
+
+lemma enrich_inherit_fds_check_dup:
+ assumes grant: "inherit_fds_check s (up, nr, nt) p fds" and vd: "valid s"
+ and cfd2sfd: "\<forall> fd. fd \<in> proc_file_fds s p \<longrightarrow> cfd2sfd s' p' fd = cfd2sfd s p fd"
+ and fd_in: "fds' \<subseteq> fds \<inter> proc_file_fds s p"
+ shows "inherit_fds_check s' (up, nr, nt) p' fds'"
+proof-
+ have "sectxts_of_fds s' p' fds' \<subseteq> sectxts_of_fds s p fds"
+ proof-
+ have "\<And> fd sfd. \<lbrakk>fd \<in> fds'; sectxt_of_obj s' (O_fd p' fd) = Some sfd\<rbrakk>
+ \<Longrightarrow> \<exists> fd \<in> fds. sectxt_of_obj s (O_fd p fd) = Some sfd"
+ proof-
+ fix fd sfd
+ assume fd_in_fds': "fd \<in> fds'"
+ and sec: "sectxt_of_obj s' (O_fd p' fd) = Some sfd"
+ from fd_in_fds' fd_in
+ have fd_in_fds: "fd \<in> fds" and fd_in_cfds: "fd \<in> proc_file_fds s p"
+ by auto
+ from fd_in_cfds obtain f where ffd: "file_of_proc_fd s p fd = Some f"
+ by (auto simp:proc_file_fds_def)
+ moreover have "flags_of_proc_fd s p fd \<noteq> None"
+ using ffd vd by (auto dest:current_filefd_has_flags)
+ moreover have "cf2sfile s f \<noteq> None"
+ apply (rule notI)
+ apply (drule current_file_has_sfile')
+ using ffd
+ by (auto simp:vd is_file_in_current dest:file_of_pfd_is_file)
+ moreover have "sectxt_of_obj s (O_fd p fd) \<noteq> None"
+ using fd_in_cfds vd
+ apply (rule_tac notI)
+ by (auto dest!:current_has_sec' file_fds_subset_pfds[where p = p] intro:vd)
+ ultimately
+ have "sectxt_of_obj s (O_fd p fd) = Some sfd"
+ using fd_in_cfds cfd2sfd sec
+ apply (erule_tac x = fd in allE)
+ apply (auto simp:cfd2sfd_def split:option.splits)
+ done
+ thus "\<exists> fd \<in> fds. sectxt_of_obj s (O_fd p fd) = Some sfd"
+ using fd_in_fds
+ by (rule_tac x = fd in bexI, auto)
+ qed
+ thus ?thesis by (auto simp:sectxts_of_fds_def)
+ qed
+ thus ?thesis using grant
+ by (auto simp:inherit_fds_check_def inherit_fds_check_ctxt_def)
+qed
+
lemma not_all_procs_cons:
"p \<notin> all_procs (e # s) \<Longrightarrow> p \<notin> all_procs s"
by (case_tac e, auto)
@@ -1105,15 +1152,22 @@
dest:not_all_procs_prop3 split:if_splits option.splits)
done
+lemma enrich_proc_dup_ffd':
+ "\<lbrakk>file_of_proc_fd (enrich_proc s p p') p' fd = Some f; is_created_proc s p; p' \<notin> all_procs s; valid s\<rbrakk>
+ \<Longrightarrow> file_of_proc_fd s p fd = Some f"
+apply (induct s, simp add:is_created_proc_def)
+apply (frule vt_grant_os, frule vd_cons)
+apply (case_tac a, auto simp:is_created_proc_def proc_file_fds_def
+ dest:not_all_procs_prop3 split:if_splits option.splits)
+done
+
lemma current_fflag_in_fds:
"\<lbrakk>flags_of_proc_fd s p fd = Some flag; valid s\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> fd \<in> current_proc_fds s p"
apply (induct s arbitrary:p)
apply (simp add:flags_of_proc_fd.simps file_of_proc_fd.simps init_oflags_prop2)
apply (frule vd_cons, frule vt_grant_os, case_tac a)
apply (auto split:if_splits option.splits dest:proc_fd_in_fds)
-apply (auto simp:proc_file_fds_def)
-sorry
-
+done
lemma current_fflag_has_ffd:
"\<lbrakk>flags_of_proc_fd s p fd = Some flag; valid s\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> \<exists> f. file_of_proc_fd s p fd = Some f"
@@ -1121,17 +1175,27 @@
apply (simp add: file_of_proc_fd.simps init_fileflag_valid)
apply (frule vd_cons, frule vt_grant_os, case_tac a)
apply (auto split:if_splits option.splits dest:proc_fd_in_fds)
-apply (auto simp:proc_file_fds_def)
-sorry
+done
lemma enrich_proc_dup_fflags:
- "\<lbrakk>flags_of_proc_fd s p fd = Some f; is_created_proc s p; p' \<notin> all_procs s; valid s\<rbrakk>
- \<Longrightarrow> flags_of_proc_fd (enrich_proc s p p') p' fd = Some f"
-apply (induct s, simp add:is_created_proc_def)
+ "\<lbrakk>flags_of_proc_fd s p fd = Some flag; is_created_proc s p; p' \<notin> all_procs s; valid s\<rbrakk>
+ \<Longrightarrow> flags_of_proc_fd (enrich_proc s p p') p' fd = Some (remove_create_flag flag) \<or>
+ flags_of_proc_fd (enrich_proc s p p') p' fd = Some flag"
+apply (induct s arbitrary:p, simp add:is_created_proc_def)
apply (frule vt_grant_os, frule vd_cons)
-apply (case_tac a, auto simp:is_created_proc_def proc_file_fds_def
+apply (case_tac a, auto simp:is_created_proc_def proc_file_fds_def is_creat_flag_def
dest:not_all_procs_prop3 split:if_splits option.splits)
-sorry
+done
+
+lemma enrich_proc_dup_ffds:
+ "\<lbrakk>is_created_proc s p; p' \<notin> all_procs s; valid s\<rbrakk>
+ \<Longrightarrow> proc_file_fds (enrich_proc s p p') p' = proc_file_fds s p"
+apply (auto simp:proc_file_fds_def)
+apply (rule_tac x = f in exI)
+apply (erule enrich_proc_dup_ffd', simp+)
+apply (rule_tac x = f in exI)
+apply (erule enrich_proc_dup_ffd, simp+)
+done
lemma enrich_proc_prop:
"\<lbrakk>valid s; is_created_proc s p; p' \<notin> all_procs s\<rbrakk>
@@ -1170,8 +1234,19 @@
(\<forall>tp fd flags.
flags_of_proc_fd s tp fd = Some flags \<longrightarrow> flags_of_proc_fd (enrich_proc s p p') tp fd = Some flags) \<and>
(\<forall>q. msgs_of_queue (enrich_proc s p p') q = msgs_of_queue s q) \<and>
- (\<forall>tp fd. fd \<in> proc_file_fds s tp \<longrightarrow> cfd2sfd (enrich_proc s p p') tp fd = cfd2sfd s tp fd)"
+ (\<forall>tp fd. fd \<in> proc_file_fds s tp \<longrightarrow> cfd2sfd (enrich_proc s p p') tp fd = cfd2sfd s tp fd) \<and>
+ (cp2sproc (enrich_proc s p p') p' = cp2sproc s p) \<and>
+ (\<forall> fd. fd \<in> proc_file_fds s p \<longrightarrow> cfd2sfd (enrich_proc s p p') p' fd = cfd2sfd s p fd)"
using vd all_procs by auto
+ have alive_pre: "is_created_proc s p \<Longrightarrow> (\<forall>obj. alive s obj \<longrightarrow> alive (enrich_proc s p p') obj)"
+ using pre by simp
+ hence curf_pre: "is_created_proc s p \<Longrightarrow> (\<forall>f. f \<in> current_files s \<longrightarrow> f \<in> current_files (enrich_proc s p p'))"
+ using vd apply auto
+ apply (drule is_file_or_dir, simp)
+ apply (erule disjE)
+ apply (erule_tac x = "O_file f" in allE, simp add:is_file_in_current)
+ apply (erule_tac x = "O_dir f" in allE, simp add:is_dir_in_current)
+ done
have "valid (enrich_proc (e # s) p p')"
proof-
from pre have pre': "is_created_proc s p \<Longrightarrow> valid (enrich_proc s p p')" by simp
@@ -1180,14 +1255,99 @@
apply (erule_tac s = s in enrich_valid_intro_cons)
apply (simp_all add:os grant vd pre)
done
- moreover have "\<And>f fds. \<lbrakk>valid (Execve p f fds # enrich_proc s p p'); is_created_proc s p\<rbrakk>
+ moreover have "\<And>f fds. \<lbrakk>valid (Execve p f fds # enrich_proc s p p'); is_created_proc s p;
+ valid (Execve p f fds # s); p' \<notin> all_procs s\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> valid (Execve p' f (fds \<inter> proc_file_fds s p) # Execve p f fds # enrich_proc s p p')"
- apply (frule vt_grant_os, frule vt_grant)
- apply (rule valid.intros(2))
- apply (simp_all split:option.splits add:sectxt_of_obj_simps is_file_simps)
- apply (auto simp add:proc_file_fds_def)[1]
-
- sorry
+ proof-
+ fix f fds
+ assume a1: "valid (Execve p f fds # enrich_proc s p p')" and a2: "is_created_proc s p"
+ and a3: "valid (Execve p f fds # s)" and a0: "p' \<notin> all_procs s"
+ have cp2sp: "\<forall> tp. tp \<in> current_procs s \<longrightarrow> cp2sproc (enrich_proc s p p') tp = cp2sproc s tp"
+ and cf2sf: "\<forall> tf. tf \<in> current_files s \<longrightarrow> cf2sfile (enrich_proc s p p') tf = cf2sfile s tf"
+ and cfd2sfd: "\<forall> tp tfd. tfd \<in> proc_file_fds s tp \<longrightarrow> cfd2sfd (enrich_proc s p p') tp tfd = cfd2sfd s tp tfd"
+ and ffd_remain: "\<forall>tp fd f. file_of_proc_fd s tp fd = Some f \<longrightarrow>
+ file_of_proc_fd (enrich_proc s p p') tp fd = Some f"
+ and dup_sp: "cp2sproc (enrich_proc s p p') p' = cp2sproc s p"
+ and dup_sfd: "\<forall> fd. fd \<in> proc_file_fds s p \<longrightarrow> cfd2sfd (enrich_proc s p p') p' fd = cfd2sfd s p fd"
+ using pre a2 by auto
+ show "valid (Execve p' f (fds \<inter> proc_file_fds s p) # Execve p f fds # enrich_proc s p p')"
+ proof-
+ from a0 a3 have a0': "p' \<noteq> p" by (auto dest!:vt_grant_os not_all_procs_prop3)
+ from a3 have grant: "grant s (Execve p f fds)" and os: "os_grant s (Execve p f fds)"
+ by (auto dest:vt_grant_os vt_grant simp del:os_grant.simps)
+ have f_in: "is_file (enrich_proc s p p') f"
+ proof-
+ from pre a2
+ have a4: "\<forall> obj. alive s obj \<longrightarrow> alive (enrich_proc s p p') obj"
+ by (auto)
+ show ?thesis using a3 a4
+ apply (erule_tac x = "O_file f" in allE)
+ by (auto dest:vt_grant_os)
+ qed
+ moreover have a5: "proc_file_fds s p \<subseteq> proc_file_fds (Execve p f fds # enrich_proc s p p') p'"
+ using a3 a0'
+ apply (frule_tac vt_grant_os)
+ apply (auto simp:proc_file_fds_def)
+ apply (rule_tac x = fa in exI)
+ apply (erule enrich_proc_dup_ffd)
+ apply (simp_all add:vd all_procs a2)
+ done
+ ultimately have "os_grant (Execve p f fds # enrich_proc s p p') (Execve p' f (fds \<inter> proc_file_fds s p))"
+ apply (auto simp:is_file_simps enrich_proc_dup_in a2 vd all_procs a1 enrich_proc_dup_ffds)
+ done
+ moreover have "grant (Execve p f fds # enrich_proc s p p') (Execve p' f (fds \<inter> proc_file_fds s p))"
+ proof-
+ from grant obtain up rp tp uf rf tf
+ where p1: "sectxt_of_obj s (O_proc p) = Some (up, rp, tp)"
+ and p2: "sectxt_of_obj s (O_file f) = Some (uf, rf, tf)"
+ by (simp split:option.splits, blast)
+ with grant obtain pu nr nt where p3: "npctxt_execve (up, rp, tp) (uf, rf, tf) = Some (pu, nr, nt)"
+ by (simp split:option.splits del:npctxt_execve.simps, blast)
+ have p1': "sectxt_of_obj (Execve p f fds # enrich_proc s p p') (O_proc p') = Some (up, rp, tp)"
+ using p1 dup_sp a1 a0'
+ apply (simp add:sectxt_of_obj_simps)
+ by (simp add:cp2sproc_def split:option.splits)
+ from os have f_in': "is_file s f" by simp
+ from vd os have "\<exists> sf. cf2sfile s f = Some sf"
+ by (auto dest!:is_file_in_current current_file_has_sfile)
+ hence p2': "sectxt_of_obj (Execve p f fds # enrich_proc s p p') (O_file f) = Some (uf, rf, tf)"
+ using f_in p2 cf2sf os a1
+ apply (erule_tac x = f in allE)
+ apply (auto dest:is_file_in_current simp:cf2sfile_def sectxt_of_obj_simps split:option.splits)
+ apply (case_tac f, simp)
+ apply (drule_tac s = s in root_is_dir', simp add:vd, simp+)
+ done
+ from dup_sfd a5 have "\<forall>fd. fd \<in> proc_file_fds s p \<longrightarrow>
+ cfd2sfd (Execve p f fds # enrich_proc s p p') p' fd = cfd2sfd s p fd"
+ apply (rule_tac allI)
+ apply (erule_tac x = fd in allE, clarsimp)
+ apply (drule set_mp, simp)
+ apply (auto simp:cfd2sfd_execve proc_file_fds_def a1)
+ done
+ hence "inherit_fds_check (Execve p f fds # enrich_proc s p p') (up, nr, nt) p' (fds \<inter> proc_file_fds s p)"
+ using grant os p1 p2 p3 vd
+ apply (clarsimp)
+ apply (rule_tac s = s and p = p and fds = fds in enrich_inherit_fds_check_dup)
+ apply simp_all
+ done
+ moreover have "search_check (Execve p f fds # enrich_proc s p p') (up, rp, tp) f"
+ using p1 p2 p2' vd cf2sf f_in f_in' grant p3 f_in a1
+ apply (rule_tac s = s in enrich_search_check)
+ apply (simp_all add:is_file_simps)
+ apply (rule allI, rule impI, erule_tac x = fa in allE, simp)
+ apply (drule_tac ff = fa in cf2sfile_other')
+ by (auto simp:a2 curf_pre)
+ ultimately show ?thesis
+ using p1' p2' p3
+ apply (simp split:option.splits)
+ using grant p1 p2
+ apply simp
+ done
+ qed
+ ultimately show ?thesis using a1
+ by (erule_tac valid.intros(2), auto)
+ qed
+ qed
moreover have "\<And>tp fds. \<lbrakk>valid (Clone tp p fds # s); p' \<noteq> p; p' \<notin> all_procs s\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow>
valid (Clone tp p' (fds \<inter> proc_file_fds s tp) # Clone tp p fds # s)"
apply (frule vt_grant_os, frule vt_grant, drule not_all_procs_prop3)
@@ -1200,13 +1360,30 @@
\<lbrakk>valid (Open p f flags fd inum # enrich_proc s p p'); is_created_proc s p\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> valid (Open p' f (remove_create_flag flags) fd inum # Open p f flags fd inum # enrich_proc s p p')"
sorry
- moreover have "\<And>fd. \<lbrakk>valid (CloseFd p fd # enrich_proc s p p'); is_created_proc s p\<rbrakk>
+ moreover have "\<And>fd. \<lbrakk>valid (CloseFd p fd # enrich_proc s p p'); is_created_proc s p;
+ valid (CloseFd p fd # s); p' \<notin> all_procs s\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> valid (CloseFd p' fd # CloseFd p fd # enrich_proc s p p')"
+ proof-
+ fix fd
+ assume a1: "valid (CloseFd p fd # enrich_proc s p p')" and a2: "is_created_proc s p"
+ and a3: "p' \<notin> all_procs s" and a4: "valid (CloseFd p fd # s)"
+ from a4 a3 have a0: "p' \<noteq> p" by (auto dest!:vt_grant_os not_all_procs_prop3)
+ have "p' \<in> current_procs (enrich_proc s p p')"
+ using a2 a3 vd
+ by (auto intro:enrich_proc_dup_in)
+ moreover have "fd \<in> current_proc_fds (enrich_proc s p p') p'"
+ ultimately show "valid (CloseFd p' fd # CloseFd p fd # enrich_proc s p p')"
+ apply (rule valid.intros(2))
+ apply (simp_all add:a1 a0 a2 pre')
+
+
+
sorry
- thus ?thesis using created_cons vd_cons all_procs_cons
+(*
+ thus ?thesis using created_cons vd_cons all_procs_cons
apply (case_tac e)
apply (auto simp:is_created_proc_simps split:if_splits)
-
+ *)
ultimately show ?thesis using created_cons vd_cons all_procs_cons
apply (case_tac e)
apply (auto simp:is_created_proc_simps split:if_splits)