diff -r e5bfdd2d1ac8 -r a3b4eed091d2 prio/Happen_within.thy
--- a/prio/Happen_within.thy	Sun Feb 05 14:29:08 2012 +0000
+++ /dev/null	Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
@@ -1,126 +0,0 @@
-theory Happen_within
-imports Main Moment
-begin
-
-(* 
-  lemma 
-  fixes P :: "('a list) \<Rightarrow> bool"
-  and Q :: "('a list) \<Rightarrow> bool"
-  and k :: nat
-  and f :: "('a list) \<Rightarrow> nat"
-  assumes "\<And> s t. \<lbrakk>P s; \<not> Q s; P (t@s); k < length t\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> f (t@s) < f s"
-  shows "\<And> s t. \<lbrakk> P s;  P(t @ s); f(s) * k < length t\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> Q (t@s)"
-  sorry
-*)
-
-text {* 
-  The following two notions are introduced to improve the situation.
-  *}
-
-definition all_future :: "(('a list) \<Rightarrow> bool) \<Rightarrow> (('a list) \<Rightarrow> bool) \<Rightarrow> ('a list) \<Rightarrow> bool"
-where "all_future G R s = (\<forall> t. G (t@s) \<longrightarrow> R t)"
-
-definition happen_within :: "(('a list) \<Rightarrow> bool) \<Rightarrow> (('a list) \<Rightarrow> bool) \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> ('a list) \<Rightarrow> bool"
-where "happen_within G R k s = all_future G (\<lambda> t. k < length t \<longrightarrow> 
-                                  (\<exists> i \<le> k. R (moment i t @ s) \<and> G (moment i t @ s))) s"
-
-lemma happen_within_intro:
-  fixes P :: "('a list) \<Rightarrow> bool"
-  and Q :: "('a list) \<Rightarrow> bool"
-  and k :: nat
-  and f :: "('a list) \<Rightarrow> nat"
-  assumes 
-  lt_k: "0 < k"
-  and step: "\<And> s. \<lbrakk>P s; \<not> Q s\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> happen_within P (\<lambda> s'. f s' < f s) k s"
-  shows "\<And> s. P s \<Longrightarrow> happen_within P Q ((f s + 1) * k) s"
-proof -
-  fix s
-  assume "P s"
-  thus "happen_within P Q ((f s + 1) * k) s"
-  proof(induct n == "f s + 1" arbitrary:s rule:nat_less_induct)
-    fix s
-    assume ih [rule_format]: "\<forall>m<f s + 1. \<forall>x. m = f x + 1 \<longrightarrow> P x 
-                                 \<longrightarrow> happen_within P Q ((f x + 1) * k) x"
-      and ps: "P s"
-    show "happen_within P Q ((f s + 1) * k) s"
-    proof(cases "Q s")
-      case True
-      show ?thesis 
-      proof -
-        { fix t
-          from True and ps have "0 \<le> ((f s + 1)*k) \<and> Q (moment 0 t @ s) \<and> P (moment 0 t @ s)" by auto
-          hence "\<exists>i\<le>(f s + 1) * k. Q (moment i t @ s) \<and> P (moment i t @ s)" by auto
-        } thus ?thesis by (auto simp: happen_within_def all_future_def)
-      qed
-    next
-      case False
-      from step [OF ps False] have kk: "happen_within P (\<lambda>s'. f s' < f s) k s" .
-      show ?thesis
-      proof -
-        { fix t
-          assume pts: "P (t @ s)" and ltk: "(f s + 1) * k < length t"
-          from ltk have lt_k_lt: "k < length t" by auto
-          with kk pts obtain i 
-            where le_ik: "i \<le> k" 
-            and lt_f: "f (moment i t @ s) < f s" 
-            and p_m: "P (moment i t @ s)"
-            by (auto simp:happen_within_def all_future_def)
-          from ih [of "f (moment i t @ s) + 1" "(moment i t @ s)", OF _ _ p_m] and lt_f
-          have hw: "happen_within P Q ((f (moment i t @ s) + 1) * k) (moment i t @ s)" by auto
-          have "(\<exists>j\<le>(f s + 1) * k. Q (moment j t @ s) \<and>  P (moment j t @ s))" (is "\<exists> j. ?T j")
-          proof -
-            let ?t = "restm i t"
-            have eq_t: "t = ?t @ moment i t" by (simp add:moment_restm_s) 
-            have h1: "P (restm i t @ moment i t @ s)" 
-            proof -
-              from pts and eq_t have "P ((restm i t @ moment i t) @ s)" by simp
-              thus ?thesis by simp
-            qed
-            moreover have h2: "(f (moment i t @ s) + 1) * k < length (restm i t)"
-            proof -
-              have h: "\<And> x y z. (x::nat) \<le> y \<Longrightarrow> x * z \<le> y * z" by simp
-              from lt_f have "(f (moment i t @ s) + 1) \<le> f s " by simp
-              from h [OF this, of k]
-              have "(f (moment i t @ s) + 1) * k \<le> f s * k" .
-              moreover from le_ik have "\<dots> \<le> ((f s) * k + k - i)" by simp
-              moreover from le_ik lt_k_lt and ltk have "(f s) * k + k - i < length t - i" by simp
-              moreover have "length (restm i t) = length t - i" using length_restm by metis
-              ultimately show ?thesis by simp
-            qed
-            from hw [unfolded happen_within_def all_future_def, rule_format, OF h1 h2]
-            obtain m where le_m: "m \<le> (f (moment i t @ s) + 1) * k"
-              and q_m: "Q (moment m ?t @ moment i t @ s)" 
-              and p_m: "P (moment m ?t @ moment i t @ s)" by auto
-            have eq_mm: "moment m ?t @ moment i t @ s = (moment (m+i) t)@s"
-            proof -
-              have "moment m (restm i t) @ moment i t = moment (m + i) t"
-                using moment_plus_split by metis
-              thus ?thesis by simp
-            qed
-            let ?j = "m + i"
-            have "?T ?j"
-            proof -
-              have "m + i \<le> (f s + 1) * k"
-              proof -
-                have h: "\<And> x y z. (x::nat) \<le> y \<Longrightarrow> x * z \<le> y * z" by simp
-                from lt_f have "(f (moment i t @ s) + 1) \<le> f s " by simp
-                from h [OF this, of k]
-                have "(f (moment i t @ s) + 1) * k \<le> f s * k" .
-                with le_m have "m \<le> f s * k" by simp
-                hence "m + i \<le> f s * k + i" by simp
-                with le_ik show ?thesis by simp
-              qed
-              moreover from eq_mm q_m have " Q (moment (m + i) t @ s)" by metis
-              moreover from eq_mm p_m have " P (moment (m + i) t @ s)" by metis
-              ultimately show ?thesis by blast
-            qed
-            thus ?thesis by blast
-          qed
-        } thus ?thesis by  (simp add:happen_within_def all_future_def firstn.simps)
-      qed
-    qed
-  qed
-qed
-
-end
-