diff -r 87dc0c744ab2 -r e0d36fd0a8fd projects.html
--- a/projects.html	Sat Dec 03 01:52:30 2011 +0000
+++ b/projects.html	Tue Dec 06 08:45:38 2011 +0000
@@ -30,8 +30,9 @@
 
 <H2>2011/12 MSc Individual Projects</H2>
 <H4>Supervisor: Christian Urban</H4> 
-<H4>Email: @kcl   Office: Strand Building S6.30</H4>
-<H4>If you are interested in a project, please send me email and we can discuss details.</H4> 
+<H4>Email: christian dot urban at kcl dot ac dot uk,  Office: Strand Building S6.30</H4>
+<H4>If you are interested in a project, please send me an email and we can discuss details. Please include
+a short description about your programming and computer science background in your first email. Thanks.</H4> 
 
 <ul class="striped">
 <li> <H4>[CU1] Implementing a SAT-Solver in a Functional Programming Language</H4>
@@ -199,14 +200,14 @@
   Lexing and parsing are usually done using automated tools, like 
   <A HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lex_programming_tool">lex</A> and 
   <A HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yacc">yacc</A>. The problem 
-  with them is that they "work when they work", but if not, they are
+  with them is that they "work when they work", but if they do not, then they are
   <A HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_box">black boxes</A>
   which are difficult to debug and change. They are really quite 
-  clumsy, to the point that Might wrote a paper titled 
+  clumsy to the point that Might and Darais wrote a paper titled 
   "<A HREF="http://arxiv.org/pdf/1010.5023v1">Yacc is dead</A>".</p>
  
   <p>
-  There is simple algorithm for regular expression matching (that is lexing).
+  There is a simple algorithm for regular expression matching (that is lexing).
   This algorithm was introduced by 
   <A HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Janusz_Brzozowski_(computer_scientist)">Brzozowski</A> 
   in 1964. It is based on the notion of derivatives of regular expressions and 
@@ -239,14 +240,18 @@
   <B>Description:</B> 
   Solving the problem of deciding equivalence of regular expressions can be used
   to decide a number of problems in automated reasoning. Therefore one likes to
-  have a method for equivalence checking that is as fast as possible. 
+  have a method for equivalence checking that is as fast as possible. There have
+  been a number of algorithms proposed in the past, but one based on a method
+  by Antimirov and Mosses seems relatively simple and easy to implement.
   </p>		      
   
   <p>
   <B>Tasks:</B>
   The task is to implement the algorithm by Antimirov and Mosses and compare it to
   other methods. Hopefully the algorithm can be tuned to be faster than other
-  methods.
+  methods. The project can be carried out in almost all programming languages, but
+  as usual functional programming languages such Scala, ML, Haskell have an edge
+  for this kind of problems.
   </p>
 
   <p>
@@ -254,6 +259,8 @@
   Central to this project is the paper <A HREF="http://www.dcc.fc.up.pt/~nam/publica/ijcs08.pdf">here</A>.
   Other methods have been described, for example, 
   <A HREF="http://www4.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/~krauss/papers/rexp.pdf">here</A>.
+  A relatively complicated method, based on automata, is described 
+  <A HREF="http://sardes.inrialpes.fr/~braibant/atbr/">here</A>.
   </p>  
 
 </ul>
@@ -263,7 +270,7 @@
 
 <P><!-- Created: Tue Mar  4 00:23:25 GMT 1997 -->
 <!-- hhmts start -->
-Last modified: Fri Dec  2 03:26:32 GMT 2011
+Last modified: Tue Dec  6 08:41:27 GMT 2011
 <!-- hhmts end -->
 <a href="http://validator.w3.org/check/referer">[Validate this page.]</a>
 </BODY>