diff -r 75cb87ade00f -r 4e15afaadde0 bsc-projects-17.html
--- a/bsc-projects-17.html	Tue Sep 26 20:49:50 2017 +0100
+++ b/bsc-projects-17.html	Tue Sep 26 20:52:56 2017 +0100
@@ -78,9 +78,9 @@
   innocently looking regular expression <code>a?{28}a{28}</code> and match it, say, against the string 
   <code>aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa</code> (that is 28 <code>a</code>s), you will soon notice that your CPU usage goes to 100%. In fact,
   Python and Ruby need approximately 30 seconds of hard work for matching this string. You can try it for yourself:
-  <A HREF="http://www.dcs.kcl.ac.uk/staff/urbanc/cgi-bin/repos.cgi/afl-material/raw-file/tip/progs/catastrophic.py">catastrophic.py</A> (Python version) and 
-  <A HREF="http://www.dcs.kcl.ac.uk/staff/urbanc/cgi-bin/repos.cgi/afl-material/raw-file/tip/progs/catastrophic.rb">catastrophic.rb</A> 
-  (Ruby version). Here is a similar problem in Java: <A HREF="http://www.dcs.kcl.ac.uk/staff/urbanc/cgi-bin/repos.cgi/afl-material/raw-file/tip/progs/catastrophic.rb">catastrophic.java</A> 
+  <A HREF="http://talisker.inf.kcl.ac.uk/cgi-bin/repos.cgi/afl-material/raw-file/tip/progs/catastrophic.py">catastrophic.py</A> (Python version) and 
+  <A HREF="http://talisker.inf.kcl.ac.uk/cgi-bin/repos.cgi/afl-material/raw-file/tip/progs/catastrophic.rb">catastrophic.rb</A> 
+  (Ruby version). Here is a similar problem in Java: <A HREF="http://talisker.inf.kcl.ac.uk/cgi-bin/repos.cgi/afl-material/raw-file/tip/progs/catastrophic.rb">catastrophic.java</A> 
   </p> 
 
   <p>
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@
 
   <p>
   On a rainy afternoon, I implemented 
-  <A HREF="http://www.dcs.kcl.ac.uk/staff/urbanc/cgi-bin/repos.cgi/afl-material/raw-file/tip/progs/re3.scala">this</A> 
+  <A HREF="http://talisker.inf.kcl.ac.uk/cgi-bin/repos.cgi/afl-material/raw-file/tip/progs/re3.scala">this</A> 
   regular expression matcher in Scala. It is not as fast as the official one in Scala, but
   it can match up to 11,000 <code>a</code>s in less than 5 seconds  without raising any exception
   (remember Python and Ruby both need nearly 30 seconds to process 28(!) <code>a</code>s, and Scala's
@@ -183,7 +183,7 @@
   <A HREF="https://www.cs.princeton.edu/~dpw/papers/tal-toplas.pdf">paper</A> 
   (also described <A HREF="https://www.cs.princeton.edu/~dpw/papers/tal-tr.pdf">here</A>).
   My code, written in <A HREF="http://www.scala-lang.org/">Scala</A>, of this compiler is 
-  <A HREF="http://www.dcs.kcl.ac.uk/staff/urbanc/compiler.scala">here</A>.
+  <A HREF="https://nms.kcl.ac.uk/christian.urban/compiler.scala">here</A>.
   The compiler can deal with simple programs involving natural numbers, such
   as Fibonacci numbers or factorial (but it can be easily extended - that is not the point).
   </p>
@@ -545,7 +545,7 @@
 </TABLE>
         
 <P>
-Time-stamp: <- 2017-09-26 11:16:35 by Christian Urban>
+Time-stamp: <- 2017-09-26 20:52:25 by Christian Urban>
 <a href="https://validator.w3.org/check/referer">[Validate this page.]</a>
 </P>
 </BODY>