Mercurial Mercurial > hg > public_html / diff
summary | shortlog | changelog | graph | tags | bookmarks | branches | files | changeset | file | latest | revisions | annotate | diff | comparison | raw | help
Find changesets by keywords (author, files, the commit message), revision number or hash, or revset expression.
msc-projects-12.html
changeset 465 4dac76eb27d9
parent 170 a30bbb56c9cc 
--- a/msc-projects-12.html	Sat Jan 28 06:40:19 2017 +0000
+++ b/msc-projects-12.html	Sat Jan 28 07:17:00 2017 +0000
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
 <HEAD>
 <TITLE>2012/13 MSc Projects</TITLE>
-<BASE HREF="http://www.inf.kcl.ac.uk/staff/urbanc/">
+<BASE HREF="http://nms.kcl.ac.uk/christian.urban/">
 <script type="text/javascript" src="striper.js"></script>
 <link rel="stylesheet" href="nominal.css">
 </HEAD>
@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@
   in this project is to find out how good they actually are by implementing the results from their paper. 
   Their approach is based on the concept of partial derivatives introduced in 1994 by
   <A HREF="http://reference.kfupm.edu.sa/content/p/a/partial_derivatives_of_regular_expressio_1319383.pdf">Valentin Antimirov</A>.
-  I used them once myself in a <A HREF="http://www.inf.kcl.ac.uk/staff/urbanc/Publications/rexp.pdf">paper</A> 
+  I used them once myself in a <A HREF="http://nms.kcl.ac.uk/christian.urban/Publications/rexp.pdf">paper</A> 
   in order to prove the <A HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myhill–Nerode_theorem">Myhill-Nerode theorem</A>.
   So I know they are worth their money. Still, it would be interesting to actually compare their results
   with my simple rainy-afternoon matcher and potentially &ldquo;blow away&rdquo; the regular expression matchers
public_html