98
|
1 |
<HTML lang=en>
|
|
2 |
<HEAD>
|
|
3 |
<TITLE> Christian Urban </TITLE>
|
|
4 |
<BASE HREF="http://www4.in.tum.de/~urbanc/">
|
|
5 |
</HEAD>
|
|
6 |
|
|
7 |
<BODY TEXT="#000000"
|
|
8 |
BGCOLOR="#000080"
|
|
9 |
LINK="#0000EF"
|
|
10 |
VLINK="#51188E"
|
|
11 |
ALINK="#FF0000">
|
|
12 |
|
|
13 |
<TABLE WIDTH="100%"
|
|
14 |
COLS="2"
|
|
15 |
BGCOLOR="#000080"
|
|
16 |
BORDER="0"
|
|
17 |
FRAME="none"
|
|
18 |
CELLPADDING="10"
|
|
19 |
CELLSPACING="2"
|
|
20 |
RULES="COLS,ROWS">
|
|
21 |
|
|
22 |
<!-- left column -->
|
|
23 |
<TR>
|
|
24 |
<TD BGCOLOR="#FFFFFF"
|
|
25 |
WIDTH="24%"
|
|
26 |
VALIGN="TOP"
|
|
27 |
ROWSPAN="2">
|
|
28 |
|
|
29 |
<B>Links</B><BR>
|
|
30 |
<A HREF="http://www4.in.tum.de/~urbanc/index.html">Home</A><BR>
|
|
31 |
<A HREF="http://www4.in.tum.de/~urbanc/Cut/cutapplet.html">Applet Home</A><BR><BR>
|
|
32 |
|
|
33 |
<B>Java Versions</B><BR>
|
|
34 |
<A HREF="http://www4.in.tum.de/~urbanc/Cut/CL.html">CL</A><BR>
|
|
35 |
<A HREF="http://www4.in.tum.de/~urbanc/Cut/LJT.html">LJT</A><BR>
|
|
36 |
<A HREF="http://www4.in.tum.de/~urbanc/Cut/ND.html">ND</A><BR><BR>
|
|
37 |
|
|
38 |
<B>Plugin Versions</B><BR>
|
|
39 |
<A HREF="http://www4.in.tum.de/~urbanc/Cut/CL-plugin.html">CL</A><BR>
|
|
40 |
<A HREF="http://www4.in.tum.de/~urbanc/Cut/LJT-plugin.html">LJT</A><BR>
|
|
41 |
<A HREF="http://www4.in.tum.de/~urbanc/Cut/ND-plugin.html">ND</A><BR>
|
|
42 |
|
|
43 |
<BR>
|
|
44 |
<BR>
|
|
45 |
|
|
46 |
<A HREF="http://isabelle.in.tum.de/nominal/">
|
|
47 |
<IMG SRC="ribbon.gif" ALT="" style="width: 114px; height: 100px;" align="left">
|
|
48 |
</A>
|
|
49 |
</TD>
|
|
50 |
|
|
51 |
|
|
52 |
<!-- right column -->
|
|
53 |
<TD BGCOLOR="#FFFFFF" WIDTH="75%">
|
|
54 |
|
|
55 |
<H2>What is the Semantics for Classical Logic?</H2>
|
|
56 |
|
|
57 |
In the intuitionistic case, the answer to this question is well-understood -
|
|
58 |
essentially a semantics is given to all proofs in normal form and all other
|
|
59 |
proofs inherit this semantics from the normal forms they reduce to. This
|
|
60 |
implies that:
|
|
61 |
|
|
62 |
<blockquote>
|
|
63 |
(1) reductions preserving the semantics of a proof.
|
|
64 |
</blockquote>
|
|
65 |
|
|
66 |
|
|
67 |
It is widely known that this assumption causes any reasonable semantics
|
|
68 |
for classical logic to collaps. In the literature Lafont's example is
|
|
69 |
often cited for this observation.<p>
|
|
70 |
|
|
71 |
<center>
|
|
72 |
<IMG SRC="Cut/lafont1.jpg" ALT="" ALIGN=CENTER>
|
|
73 |
</center><p>
|
|
74 |
|
|
75 |
|
|
76 |
<center>
|
|
77 |
<IMG SRC="Cut/lafont2.jpg" ALT="" ALIGN=CENTER>
|
|
78 |
<IMG SRC="Cut/lafont3.jpg" ALT="" ALIGN=CENTER>
|
|
79 |
</center><p>
|
|
80 |
|
|
81 |
|
|
82 |
</TD>
|
|
83 |
</TR>
|
|
84 |
|
|
85 |
</TABLE>
|
|
86 |
<P><!-- Created: Tue Jul 3 21:01:42 BST 2001 -->
|
|
87 |
<!-- hhmts start -->
|
|
88 |
Last modified: Sat Mar 3 05:17:53 CET 2007
|
|
89 |
<!-- hhmts end -->
|
|
90 |
</BODY>
|
|
91 |
</HTML>
|