107
|
1 |
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"
|
|
2 |
"http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/loose.dtd">
|
|
3 |
<HEAD>
|
|
4 |
<TITLE>Nominal Unification</TITLE>
|
|
5 |
<BASE HREF="http://www4.in.tum.de/~urbanc/Unification">
|
|
6 |
</HEAD>
|
|
7 |
|
|
8 |
<BODY TEXT="#000000"
|
|
9 |
BGCOLOR="#4169E1"
|
|
10 |
LINK="#0000EF"
|
|
11 |
VLINK="#51188E"
|
|
12 |
ALINK="#FF0000">
|
|
13 |
|
|
14 |
<TABLE WIDTH="100%"
|
|
15 |
BGCOLOR="#4169E1"
|
|
16 |
BORDER="0"
|
|
17 |
FRAME="border"
|
|
18 |
CELLPADDING="10"
|
|
19 |
CELLSPACING="2"
|
|
20 |
RULES="all">
|
|
21 |
|
|
22 |
<!-- right column -->
|
|
23 |
<TR>
|
|
24 |
<TD BGCOLOR="#FFFFFF" WIDTH="75%">
|
|
25 |
<H2>Nominal Unification [<a HREF="http://www4.in.tum.de/~urbanc/Unification/nomu-tcs.ps">ps</a>]</H2>
|
|
26 |
|
|
27 |
<A HREF="http://www4.in.tum.de/~urbanc/">Christian Urban</A>,
|
|
28 |
<A HREF="http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~amp12/">Andrew Pitts</A>,
|
|
29 |
Murdoch Gabbay
|
|
30 |
<p>
|
|
31 |
We present a generalisation of first-order unification to the
|
|
32 |
practically important case of equations between terms involving
|
|
33 |
<i>binding operations</i>. A substitution of terms for variables
|
|
34 |
solves such an equation if it makes the equated terms
|
|
35 |
<i>alpha-equivalent</i>, i.e. equal up to renaming bound names.
|
|
36 |
For the applications we have in mind, we must consider the simple,
|
|
37 |
textual form of substitution in which names occurring in terms may
|
|
38 |
be captured within the scope of binders upon substitution. We are
|
|
39 |
able to take a "nominal" approach to binding in which bound
|
|
40 |
entities are explicitly named (rather than using nameless,
|
|
41 |
de Bruijn-style representations) and yet get a version of this
|
|
42 |
form of substitution that respects alpha-equivalence and
|
|
43 |
possesses good algorithmic properties. We achieve this by adapting
|
|
44 |
an existing idea and introducing a key new idea. The existing
|
|
45 |
idea is terms involving explicit substitutions of names for names,
|
|
46 |
except that here we only use <i>explicit permutations</i>
|
|
47 |
|
|
48 |
(bijective substitutions). The key new idea is that the
|
|
49 |
unification algorithm should solve not only equational problems,
|
|
50 |
but also problems about the <i>freshness</i> of names for
|
|
51 |
terms. There is a simple generalisation of the classical
|
|
52 |
first-order unification algorithm to this setting which retains
|
|
53 |
the latter's pleasant properties: unification problems involving
|
|
54 |
alpha-equivalence and freshness are decidable; and solvable
|
|
55 |
problems possess most general solutions.
|
|
56 |
<BR><BR>
|
|
57 |
|
|
58 |
In an <a HREF="http://www4.in.tum.de/~urbanc/Unification/app-nomu.ps">appendix</a> we
|
|
59 |
discuss some issues about the relationship between nominal unification and higher-order
|
|
60 |
pattern unification.
|
|
61 |
|
|
62 |
<BR><BR><BR><BR>
|
|
63 |
All results in the paper have been verified in
|
|
64 |
<A HREF="http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/Research/HVG/Isabelle/">Isabelle</A> (2004 version).
|
|
65 |
Below are the theory files.
|
|
66 |
|
|
67 |
<ul>
|
|
68 |
<li><A HREF="Unification/Swap.thy">Swap.thy</A>
|
|
69 |
<br /> amongst other facts proves that swapping is a bijection (on atoms)
|
|
70 |
<li><A HREF="Unification/Atoms.thy">Atoms.thy</A>
|
|
71 |
<br /> facts about atoms occurring in swappings
|
|
72 |
<li><A HREF="Unification/Terms.thy">Terms.thy</A>
|
|
73 |
<br /> defines terms, occurs check and the notion of subterms
|
|
74 |
<li><A HREF="Unification/Disagreement.thy">Disagreement.thy</A>
|
|
75 |
<br /> proves various facts about disagreement sets
|
|
76 |
<li><A HREF="Unification/Fresh.thy">Fresh.thy</A>
|
|
77 |
<br /> defines the freshness relation and shows facts about its behaviour under swapping
|
|
78 |
<li><A HREF="Unification/PreEqu.thy">PreEqu.thy</A>
|
|
79 |
<br /> defines the relation capturing the notion of alpha-equivalence (on open terms)
|
|
80 |
and proves a long lemma by mutual induction over the depth of terms which
|
|
81 |
is needed to show that the relation is an equivalence relation
|
|
82 |
<li><A HREF="Unification/Equ.thy">Equ.thy</A>
|
|
83 |
<br /> proves various facts about the equivalence relations
|
|
84 |
<li><A HREF="Unification/Substs.thy">Substs.thy</A>
|
|
85 |
<br /> defines substitutions and composition of substitutions, and establishes
|
|
86 |
some facts of substitution and our equivalence relation
|
|
87 |
<li><A HREF="Unification/Mgu.thy">Mgu.thy</A>
|
|
88 |
<br /> defines the notion of unification problems and reduction rules over sets
|
|
89 |
of such problems; proves that every reduction leading to the empty set
|
|
90 |
produces an mgu
|
|
91 |
<li><A HREF="Unification/Termination.thy">Termination.thy</A>
|
|
92 |
<br /> shows that every reduction reduces a (well-founded) measure, thus
|
|
93 |
proves that every reduction sequence must terminate
|
|
94 |
<li><A HREF="Unification/Unification.thy">Unification.thy</A>
|
|
95 |
<br /> proves that all solvable problems reduce only to the empty set
|
|
96 |
(the "ok" configuration which provides an mgu) and all unsolvable
|
|
97 |
problems reduce to a "fail" configuration
|
|
98 |
(for which no unifier exists)
|
|
99 |
</uL><BR>
|
|
100 |
The old Isabelle-2002 files can be downloaded
|
|
101 |
<A HREF="http://www4.in.tum.de/~urbanc/Unification/nomu-2002.tgz">here</A>.
|
|
102 |
<BR><BR>
|
|
103 |
A "quick and dirty" implementation of nominal unification in
|
|
104 |
<A HREF="http://caml.inria.fr/">Ocaml</A> can be
|
|
105 |
downloaded
|
|
106 |
<A HREF="http://www4.in.tum.de/~urbanc/Unification/unification.ml">elsewhere</A>.
|
|
107 |
|
|
108 |
|
|
109 |
<BR><BR><BR><BR>
|
|
110 |
|
|
111 |
</TABLE>
|
|
112 |
<P><!-- Created: Tue Mar 4 00:23:25 GMT 1997 -->
|
|
113 |
<!-- hhmts start -->
|
|
114 |
Last modified: Thu Feb 28 20:24:23 CET 2008
|
|
115 |
<!-- hhmts end -->
|
|
116 |
<a href="http://validator.w3.org/check/referer">[Validate this page.]</a>
|
|
117 |
</BODY>
|
|
118 |
</HTML>
|