| Sat, 24 Oct 2009 08:34:14 +0200 | cek | Undid wrong merge | changeset | files |
| Sat, 24 Oct 2009 08:29:11 +0200 | cek | Tried rolling back | changeset | files |
| Sat, 24 Oct 2009 08:24:26 +0200 | cek | Cleaning the mess | changeset | files |
| Sat, 24 Oct 2009 08:09:40 +0200 | cek | Merge | changeset | files |
| Sat, 24 Oct 2009 08:09:09 +0200 | cek | Better tactic and simplified the proof further | changeset | files |
| Sat, 24 Oct 2009 01:33:29 +0200 | Christian Urban | fixed problem with incorrect ABS/REP name | changeset | files |
| Fri, 23 Oct 2009 18:20:06 +0200 | Cezary Kaliszyk | Stronger tactic, simpler proof. | changeset | files |
| Fri, 23 Oct 2009 16:34:20 +0200 | Cezary Kaliszyk | Split Finite Set example into separate file | changeset | files |
| Fri, 23 Oct 2009 16:01:13 +0200 | Cezary Kaliszyk | eqsubst_tac | changeset | files |
| Fri, 23 Oct 2009 11:24:43 +0200 | Cezary Kaliszyk | Trying to get a simpler lemma with the whole infrastructure | changeset | files |
| Fri, 23 Oct 2009 09:21:45 +0200 | Cezary Kaliszyk | Using RANGE tactical allows getting rid of the quotients immediately. | changeset | files |
| Thu, 22 Oct 2009 17:35:40 +0200 | Cezary Kaliszyk | Further developing the tactic and simplifying the proof | changeset | files |
| Thu, 22 Oct 2009 16:24:02 +0200 | Cezary Kaliszyk | res_forall_rsp_tac further simplifies the proof | changeset | files |
| Thu, 22 Oct 2009 16:10:06 +0200 | Cezary Kaliszyk | Working on the proof and the tactic. | changeset | files |
| Thu, 22 Oct 2009 15:45:05 +0200 | Cezary Kaliszyk | The proof gets simplified | changeset | files |