Merge + Added LarryInt & Fset3 to tests.
--- a/Quot/Examples/FSet3.thy Fri Dec 11 17:03:52 2009 +0100
+++ b/Quot/Examples/FSet3.thy Fri Dec 11 17:22:26 2009 +0100
@@ -22,7 +22,8 @@
quotient fset = "'a list" / "list_eq"
by (rule list_eq_equivp)
-lemma not_nil_equiv_cons: "\<not>[] \<approx> a # A" sorry
+lemma not_nil_equiv_cons: "\<not>[] \<approx> a # A"
+unfolding list_eq_def by auto
(* The 2 lemmas below are different from the ones in QuotList *)
lemma nil_rsp[quot_respect]:
--- a/Quot/Examples/IntEx2.thy Fri Dec 11 17:03:52 2009 +0100
+++ b/Quot/Examples/IntEx2.thy Fri Dec 11 17:22:26 2009 +0100
@@ -194,8 +194,8 @@
(simp)
lemma add:
- "(ABS_int (x,y)) + (ABS_int (u,v)) =
- (ABS_int (x + u, y + v))"
+ "(abs_int (x,y)) + (abs_int (u,v)) =
+ (abs_int (x + u, y + v))"
apply(simp add: plus_int_def)
apply(fold plus_raw.simps)
apply(rule Quotient_rel_abs[OF Quotient_int])
--- a/Quot/QuotMain.thy Fri Dec 11 17:03:52 2009 +0100
+++ b/Quot/QuotMain.thy Fri Dec 11 17:22:26 2009 +0100
@@ -17,14 +17,14 @@
begin
definition
- ABS::"'a \<Rightarrow> 'b"
+ abs::"'a \<Rightarrow> 'b"
where
- "ABS x \<equiv> Abs (R x)"
+ "abs x \<equiv> Abs (R x)"
definition
- REP::"'b \<Rightarrow> 'a"
+ rep::"'b \<Rightarrow> 'a"
where
- "REP a = Eps (Rep a)"
+ "rep a = Eps (Rep a)"
lemma lem9:
shows "R (Eps (R x)) = R x"
@@ -36,9 +36,9 @@
qed
theorem thm10:
- shows "ABS (REP a) \<equiv> a"
+ shows "abs (rep a) \<equiv> a"
apply (rule eq_reflection)
- unfolding ABS_def REP_def
+ unfolding abs_def rep_def
proof -
from rep_prop
obtain x where eq: "Rep a = R x" by auto
@@ -50,9 +50,9 @@
show "Abs (R (Eps (Rep a))) = a" by simp
qed
-lemma REP_refl:
- shows "R (REP a) (REP a)"
-unfolding REP_def
+lemma rep_refl:
+ shows "R (rep a) (rep a)"
+unfolding rep_def
by (simp add: equivp[simplified equivp_def])
lemma lem7:
@@ -64,21 +64,21 @@
done
theorem thm11:
- shows "R r r' = (ABS r = ABS r')"
-unfolding ABS_def
+ shows "R r r' = (abs r = abs r')"
+unfolding abs_def
by (simp only: equivp[simplified equivp_def] lem7)
-lemma REP_ABS_rsp:
- shows "R f (REP (ABS g)) = R f g"
- and "R (REP (ABS g)) f = R g f"
+lemma rep_abs_rsp:
+ shows "R f (rep (abs g)) = R f g"
+ and "R (rep (abs g)) f = R g f"
by (simp_all add: thm10 thm11)
lemma Quotient:
- "Quotient R ABS REP"
+ "Quotient R abs rep"
apply(unfold Quotient_def)
apply(simp add: thm10)
-apply(simp add: REP_refl)
+apply(simp add: rep_refl)
apply(subst thm11[symmetric])
apply(simp add: equivp[simplified equivp_def])
done
--- a/Quot/ROOT.ML Fri Dec 11 17:03:52 2009 +0100
+++ b/Quot/ROOT.ML Fri Dec 11 17:22:26 2009 +0100
@@ -4,8 +4,10 @@
["QuotMain",
"Examples/FSet",
"Examples/FSet2",
+ "Examples/FSet3",
"Examples/IntEx",
"Examples/IntEx2",
"Examples/LFex",
"Examples/LamEx",
- "Examples/LarryDatatype"];
+ "Examples/LarryDatatype",
+ "Examples/LarryInt"];
--- a/Quot/quotient.ML Fri Dec 11 17:03:52 2009 +0100
+++ b/Quot/quotient.ML Fri Dec 11 17:22:26 2009 +0100
@@ -132,12 +132,12 @@
val rep = Const (rep_name, abs_ty --> rep_ty)
(* ABS and REP definitions *)
- val ABS_const = Const (@{const_name "QUOT_TYPE.ABS"}, dummyT )
- val REP_const = Const (@{const_name "QUOT_TYPE.REP"}, dummyT )
+ val ABS_const = Const (@{const_name "QUOT_TYPE.abs"}, dummyT )
+ val REP_const = Const (@{const_name "QUOT_TYPE.rep"}, dummyT )
val ABS_trm = Syntax.check_term lthy1 (ABS_const $ rel $ abs)
val REP_trm = Syntax.check_term lthy1 (REP_const $ rep)
- val ABS_name = Binding.prefix_name "ABS_" qty_name
- val REP_name = Binding.prefix_name "REP_" qty_name
+ val ABS_name = Binding.prefix_name "abs_" qty_name
+ val REP_name = Binding.prefix_name "rep_" qty_name
val (((ABS, ABS_def), (REP, REP_def)), lthy2) =
lthy1 |> define (ABS_name, NoSyn, ABS_trm)
||>> define (REP_name, NoSyn, REP_trm)
--- a/Quot/quotient_def.ML Fri Dec 11 17:03:52 2009 +0100
+++ b/Quot/quotient_def.ML Fri Dec 11 17:22:26 2009 +0100
@@ -31,18 +31,18 @@
fun get_fun_aux lthy s fs =
case (maps_lookup (ProofContext.theory_of lthy) s) of
SOME info => list_comb (Const (#mapfun info, dummyT), fs)
- | NONE => raise
+ | NONE => raise
(LIFT_MATCH (space_implode " " ["get_fun_aux: no map for type", quote s, "."]))
fun get_const flag lthy _ qty =
(* FIXME: check here that _ and qty are related *)
-let
+let
val thy = ProofContext.theory_of lthy
val qty_name = Long_Name.base_name (fst (dest_Type qty))
in
case flag of
- absF => Const (Sign.full_bname thy ("ABS_" ^ qty_name), dummyT)
- | repF => Const (Sign.full_bname thy ("REP_" ^ qty_name), dummyT)
+ absF => Const (Sign.full_bname thy ("abs_" ^ qty_name), dummyT)
+ | repF => Const (Sign.full_bname thy ("rep_" ^ qty_name), dummyT)
end
@@ -53,17 +53,17 @@
fun get_fun flag lthy (rty, qty) =
if rty = qty then mk_identity qty else
- case (rty, qty) of
+ case (rty, qty) of
(Type ("fun", [ty1, ty2]), Type ("fun", [ty1', ty2'])) =>
let
val fs_ty1 = get_fun (negF flag) lthy (ty1, ty1')
val fs_ty2 = get_fun flag lthy (ty2, ty2')
- in
+ in
get_fun_aux lthy "fun" [fs_ty1, fs_ty2]
- end
+ end
| (Type (s, []), Type (s', [])) =>
if s = s'
- then mk_identity qty
+ then mk_identity qty
else get_const flag lthy rty qty
| (Type (s, tys), Type (s', tys')) =>
if s = s'
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@
else get_const flag lthy rty qty
| (TFree x, TFree x') =>
if x = x'
- then mk_identity qty
+ then mk_identity qty
else raise (LIFT_MATCH "get_fun")
| (TVar _, TVar _) => raise (LIFT_MATCH "get_fun")
| _ => raise (LIFT_MATCH "get_fun")