# HG changeset patch
# User Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de>
# Date 1259845019 -3600
# Node ID 375e28eedee7fead2abb6036a23652186952d14f
# Parent  184d74813679254e248e8ea3af50dc60069e9f09
Reintroduced varifyT; we still need it for permutation definition.

diff -r 184d74813679 -r 375e28eedee7 LFex.thy
--- a/LFex.thy	Thu Dec 03 13:45:52 2009 +0100
+++ b/LFex.thy	Thu Dec 03 13:56:59 2009 +0100
@@ -216,11 +216,6 @@
 thm akind_aty_atrm.induct
 thm kind_ty_trm.induct
 
-ML {* val defs =
-  @{thms TYP_def KPI_def TCONST_def TAPP_def TPI_def VAR_def CONS_def APP_def LAM_def
-    FV_kind_def FV_ty_def FV_trm_def perm_kind_def perm_ty_def perm_trm_def}
-*}
-
 ML {*
   val quot = @{thms QUOTIENT_KIND QUOTIENT_TY QUOTIENT_TRM}
   val rel_refl = map (fn x => @{thm EQUIV_REFL} OF [x]) @{thms alpha_EQUIVs}
@@ -266,7 +261,6 @@
 apply(tactic {* procedure_tac @{context} @{thm akind_aty_atrm.induct} 1 *})
 apply(tactic {* regularize_tac @{context} @{thms alpha_EQUIVs} 1 *})
 prefer 2
-apply(tactic {* simp_tac ((Simplifier.context @{context} empty_ss) addsimps @{thms perm_kind_def perm_ty_def perm_trm_def}) 1 *})
 apply(tactic {* clean_tac @{context} quot 1 *})
 (*
 Profiling:
diff -r 184d74813679 -r 375e28eedee7 LamEx.thy
--- a/LamEx.thy	Thu Dec 03 13:45:52 2009 +0100
+++ b/LamEx.thy	Thu Dec 03 13:56:59 2009 +0100
@@ -210,7 +210,6 @@
 
 lemma a3: "\<lbrakk>(x\<Colon>lam) = [(a\<Colon>name, b\<Colon>name)] \<bullet> (xa\<Colon>lam); a \<notin> fv (Lam b x)\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> Lam a x = Lam b xa"
 apply (tactic {* lift_tac_lam @{context} @{thm a3} 1 *})
-apply (simp add:perm_lam_def)
 done
 
 lemma alpha_cases: "\<lbrakk>a1 = a2; \<And>a b. \<lbrakk>a1 = Var a; a2 = Var b; a = b\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> P;
@@ -218,7 +217,6 @@
      \<And>x a b xa. \<lbrakk>a1 = Lam a x; a2 = Lam b xa; x = [(a, b)] \<bullet> xa; a \<notin> fv (Lam b x)\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> P\<rbrakk>
     \<Longrightarrow> P"
 apply (tactic {* lift_tac_lam @{context} @{thm alpha.cases} 1 *})
-apply (simp add:perm_lam_def)
 done
 
 lemma alpha_induct: "\<lbrakk>(qx\<Colon>lam) = (qxa\<Colon>lam); \<And>(a\<Colon>name) b\<Colon>name. a = b \<Longrightarrow> (qxb\<Colon>lam \<Rightarrow> lam \<Rightarrow> bool) (Var a) (Var b);
@@ -227,7 +225,6 @@
         \<lbrakk>x = [(a, b)] \<bullet> xa; qxb x ([(a, b)] \<bullet> xa); a \<notin> fv (Lam b x)\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> qxb (Lam a x) (Lam b xa)\<rbrakk>
     \<Longrightarrow> qxb qx qxa"
 apply (tactic {* lift_tac_lam @{context} @{thm alpha.induct} 1 *})
-apply (simp add:perm_lam_def)
 done
 
 lemma var_inject: "(Var a = Var b) = (a = b)"
diff -r 184d74813679 -r 375e28eedee7 QuotMain.thy
--- a/QuotMain.thy	Thu Dec 03 13:45:52 2009 +0100
+++ b/QuotMain.thy	Thu Dec 03 13:56:59 2009 +0100
@@ -1091,7 +1091,7 @@
 fun clean_tac lthy quot =
   let
     val thy = ProofContext.theory_of lthy;
-    val defs = map (#def) (qconsts_dest thy);
+    val defs = map (Thm.varifyT o #def) (qconsts_dest thy);
     val absrep = map (fn x => @{thm QUOTIENT_ABS_REP} OF [x]) quot
     val meta_absrep = map (fn x => @{thm eq_reflection} OF [x]) absrep;
     val reps_same = map (fn x => @{thm QUOTIENT_REL_REP} OF [x]) quot