
diff -r db158e995bfc -r 9df6144e281b Quot/Examples/LamEx.thy
--- a/Quot/Examples/LamEx.thy	Thu Feb 25 07:48:57 2010 +0100
+++ /dev/null	Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
@@ -1,636 +0,0 @@
-theory LamEx
-imports Nominal "../Quotient" "../Quotient_List"
-begin
-
-atom_decl name
-
-datatype rlam =
-  rVar "name"
-| rApp "rlam" "rlam"
-| rLam "name" "rlam"
-
-fun
-  rfv :: "rlam \<Rightarrow> name set"
-where
-  rfv_var: "rfv (rVar a) = {a}"
-| rfv_app: "rfv (rApp t1 t2) = (rfv t1) \<union> (rfv t2)"
-| rfv_lam: "rfv (rLam a t) = (rfv t) - {a}"
-
-overloading
-  perm_rlam \<equiv> "perm :: 'x prm \<Rightarrow> rlam \<Rightarrow> rlam"   (unchecked)
-begin
-
-fun
-  perm_rlam
-where
-  "perm_rlam pi (rVar a) = rVar (pi \<bullet> a)"
-| "perm_rlam pi (rApp t1 t2) = rApp (perm_rlam pi t1) (perm_rlam pi t2)"
-| "perm_rlam pi (rLam a t) = rLam (pi \<bullet> a) (perm_rlam pi t)"
-
-end
-
-declare perm_rlam.simps[eqvt]
-
-instance rlam::pt_name
-  apply(default)
-  apply(induct_tac [!] x rule: rlam.induct)
-  apply(simp_all add: pt_name2 pt_name3)
-  done
-
-instance rlam::fs_name
-  apply(default)
-  apply(induct_tac [!] x rule: rlam.induct)
-  apply(simp add: supp_def)
-  apply(fold supp_def)
-  apply(simp add: supp_atm)
-  apply(simp add: supp_def Collect_imp_eq Collect_neg_eq)
-  apply(simp add: supp_def)
-  apply(simp add: supp_def Collect_imp_eq Collect_neg_eq[symmetric])
-  apply(fold supp_def)
-  apply(simp add: supp_atm)
-  done
-
-declare set_diff_eqvt[eqvt]
-
-lemma rfv_eqvt[eqvt]:
-  fixes pi::"name prm"
-  shows "(pi\<bullet>rfv t) = rfv (pi\<bullet>t)"
-apply(induct t)
-apply(simp_all)
-apply(simp add: perm_set_eq)
-apply(simp add: union_eqvt)
-apply(simp add: set_diff_eqvt)
-apply(simp add: perm_set_eq)
-done
-
-inductive
-    alpha :: "rlam \<Rightarrow> rlam \<Rightarrow> bool" ("_ \<approx> _" [100, 100] 100)
-where
-  a1: "a = b \<Longrightarrow> (rVar a) \<approx> (rVar b)"
-| a2: "\<lbrakk>t1 \<approx> t2; s1 \<approx> s2\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> rApp t1 s1 \<approx> rApp t2 s2"
-| a3: "\<exists>pi::name prm. (rfv t - {a} = rfv s - {b} \<and> (rfv t - {a})\<sharp>* pi \<and> (pi \<bullet> t) \<approx> s \<and> (pi \<bullet> a) = b)
-       \<Longrightarrow> rLam a t \<approx> rLam b s"
-
-
-(* should be automatic with new version of eqvt-machinery *)
-lemma alpha_eqvt:
-  fixes pi::"name prm"
-  shows "t \<approx> s \<Longrightarrow> (pi \<bullet> t) \<approx> (pi \<bullet> s)"
-apply(induct rule: alpha.induct)
-apply(simp add: a1)
-apply(simp add: a2)
-apply(simp)
-apply(rule a3)
-apply(erule conjE)
-apply(erule exE)
-apply(erule conjE)
-apply(rule_tac x="pi \<bullet> pia" in exI)
-apply(rule conjI)
-apply(rule_tac pi1="rev pi" in perm_bij[THEN iffD1])
-apply(perm_simp add: eqvts)
-apply(rule conjI)
-apply(rule_tac pi1="rev pi" in pt_fresh_star_bij(1)[OF pt_name_inst at_name_inst, THEN iffD1])
-apply(perm_simp add: eqvts)
-apply(rule conjI)
-apply(subst perm_compose[symmetric])
-apply(simp)
-apply(subst perm_compose[symmetric])
-apply(simp)
-done
-
-lemma alpha_refl:
-  shows "t \<approx> t"
-apply(induct t rule: rlam.induct)
-apply(simp add: a1)
-apply(simp add: a2)
-apply(rule a3)
-apply(rule_tac x="[]" in exI)
-apply(simp_all add: fresh_star_def fresh_list_nil)
-done
-
-lemma alpha_sym:
-  shows "t \<approx> s \<Longrightarrow> s \<approx> t"
-apply(induct rule: alpha.induct)
-apply(simp add: a1)
-apply(simp add: a2)
-apply(rule a3)
-apply(erule exE)
-apply(rule_tac x="rev pi" in exI)
-apply(simp)
-apply(simp add: fresh_star_def fresh_list_rev)
-apply(rule conjI)
-apply(erule conjE)+
-apply(rotate_tac 3)
-apply(drule_tac pi="rev pi" in alpha_eqvt)
-apply(perm_simp)
-apply(rule pt_bij2[OF pt_name_inst at_name_inst])
-apply(simp)
-done
-
-lemma alpha_trans:
-  shows "t1 \<approx> t2 \<Longrightarrow> t2 \<approx> t3 \<Longrightarrow> t1 \<approx> t3"
-apply(induct arbitrary: t3 rule: alpha.induct)
-apply(erule alpha.cases)
-apply(simp_all)
-apply(simp add: a1)
-apply(rotate_tac 4)
-apply(erule alpha.cases)
-apply(simp_all)
-apply(simp add: a2)
-apply(rotate_tac 1)
-apply(erule alpha.cases)
-apply(simp_all)
-apply(erule conjE)+
-apply(erule exE)+
-apply(erule conjE)+
-apply(rule a3)
-apply(rule_tac x="pia @ pi" in exI)
-apply(simp add: fresh_star_def fresh_list_append)
-apply(simp add: pt_name2)
-apply(drule_tac x="rev pia \<bullet> sa" in spec)
-apply(drule mp)
-apply(rotate_tac 8)
-apply(drule_tac pi="rev pia" in alpha_eqvt)
-apply(perm_simp)
-apply(rotate_tac 11)
-apply(drule_tac pi="pia" in alpha_eqvt)
-apply(perm_simp)
-done
-
-lemma alpha_equivp:
-  shows "equivp alpha"
-apply(rule equivpI)
-unfolding reflp_def symp_def transp_def
-apply(auto intro: alpha_refl alpha_sym alpha_trans)
-done
-
-lemma alpha_rfv:
-  shows "t \<approx> s \<Longrightarrow> rfv t = rfv s"
-apply(induct rule: alpha.induct)
-apply(simp)
-apply(simp)
-apply(simp)
-done
-
-quotient_type lam = rlam / alpha
-  by (rule alpha_equivp)
-
-
-quotient_definition
-  "Var :: name \<Rightarrow> lam"
-is
-  "rVar"
-
-quotient_definition
-   "App :: lam \<Rightarrow> lam \<Rightarrow> lam"
-is
-  "rApp"
-
-quotient_definition
-  "Lam :: name \<Rightarrow> lam \<Rightarrow> lam"
-is
-  "rLam"
-
-quotient_definition
-  "fv :: lam \<Rightarrow> name set"
-is
-  "rfv"
-
-(* definition of overloaded permutation function *)
-(* for the lifted type lam                       *)
-overloading
-  perm_lam \<equiv> "perm :: 'x prm \<Rightarrow> lam \<Rightarrow> lam"   (unchecked)
-begin
-
-quotient_definition
-  "perm_lam :: 'x prm \<Rightarrow> lam \<Rightarrow> lam"
-is
-  "perm::'x prm \<Rightarrow> rlam \<Rightarrow> rlam"
-
-end
-
-lemma perm_rsp[quot_respect]:
-  "(op = ===> alpha ===> alpha) op \<bullet> op \<bullet>"
-  apply(auto)
-  (* this is propably true if some type conditions are imposed ;o) *)
-  sorry
-
-lemma fresh_rsp:
-  "(op = ===> alpha ===> op =) fresh fresh"
-  apply(auto)
-  (* this is probably only true if some type conditions are imposed *)
-  sorry
-
-lemma rVar_rsp[quot_respect]:
-  "(op = ===> alpha) rVar rVar"
-  by (auto intro: a1)
-
-lemma rApp_rsp[quot_respect]: "(alpha ===> alpha ===> alpha) rApp rApp"
-  by (auto intro: a2)
-
-lemma rLam_rsp[quot_respect]: "(op = ===> alpha ===> alpha) rLam rLam"
-  apply(auto)
-  apply(rule a3)
-  apply(rule_tac x="[]" in exI)
-  unfolding fresh_star_def
-  apply(simp add: fresh_list_nil)
-  apply(simp add: alpha_rfv)
-  done
-
-lemma rfv_rsp[quot_respect]: 
-  "(alpha ===> op =) rfv rfv"
-apply(simp add: alpha_rfv)
-done
-
-section {* lifted theorems *}
-
-lemma lam_induct:
-  "\<lbrakk>\<And>name. P (Var name);
-    \<And>lam1 lam2. \<lbrakk>P lam1; P lam2\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> P (App lam1 lam2);
-    \<And>name lam. P lam \<Longrightarrow> P (Lam name lam)\<rbrakk> 
-    \<Longrightarrow> P lam"
-  by (lifting rlam.induct)
-
-ML {* show_all_types := true *}
-
-lemma perm_lam [simp]:
-  fixes pi::"'a prm"
-  shows "pi \<bullet> Var a = Var (pi \<bullet> a)"
-  and   "pi \<bullet> App t1 t2 = App (pi \<bullet> t1) (pi \<bullet> t2)"
-  and   "pi \<bullet> Lam a t = Lam (pi \<bullet> a) (pi \<bullet> t)"
-apply(lifting perm_rlam.simps)
-ML_prf {*
-  List.last (map (symmetric o #def) (Quotient_Info.qconsts_dest @{context}));
-  List.last (map (Thm.varifyT o symmetric o #def) (Quotient_Info.qconsts_dest @{context}))
-*}
-done
-
-instance lam::pt_name
-apply(default)
-apply(induct_tac [!] x rule: lam_induct)
-apply(simp_all add: pt_name2 pt_name3)
-done
-
-lemma fv_lam [simp]: 
-  shows "fv (Var a) = {a}"
-  and   "fv (App t1 t2) = fv t1 \<union> fv t2"
-  and   "fv (Lam a t) = fv t - {a}"
-apply(lifting rfv_var rfv_app rfv_lam)
-done
-
-
-lemma a1: 
-  "a = b \<Longrightarrow> Var a = Var b"
-  by  (lifting a1)
-
-lemma a2: 
-  "\<lbrakk>x = xa; xb = xc\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> App x xb = App xa xc"
-  by  (lifting a2)
-
-lemma a3: 
-  "\<lbrakk>\<exists>pi::name prm. (fv t - {a} = fv s - {b} \<and> (fv t - {a})\<sharp>* pi \<and> (pi \<bullet> t) = s \<and> (pi \<bullet> a) = b)\<rbrakk> 
-   \<Longrightarrow> Lam a t = Lam b s"
-  by  (lifting a3)
-
-lemma alpha_cases: 
-  "\<lbrakk>a1 = a2; \<And>a b. \<lbrakk>a1 = Var a; a2 = Var b; a = b\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> P;
-    \<And>x xa xb xc. \<lbrakk>a1 = App x xb; a2 = App xa xc; x = xa; xb = xc\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> P;
-    \<And>t a s b. \<lbrakk>a1 = Lam a t; a2 = Lam b s; 
-         \<exists>pi::name prm. fv t - {a} = fv s - {b} \<and> (fv t - {a}) \<sharp>* pi \<and> (pi \<bullet> t) = s \<and> pi \<bullet> a = b\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> P\<rbrakk>
-    \<Longrightarrow> P"
-  by (lifting alpha.cases)
-
-lemma alpha_induct: 
-  "\<lbrakk>qx = qxa; \<And>a b. a = b \<Longrightarrow> qxb (Var a) (Var b);
-    \<And>x xa xb xc. \<lbrakk>x = xa; qxb x xa; xb = xc; qxb xb xc\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> qxb (App x xb) (App xa xc);
-     \<And>t a s b.
-        \<lbrakk>\<exists>pi::name prm. fv t - {a} = fv s - {b} \<and>
-         (fv t - {a}) \<sharp>* pi \<and> ((pi \<bullet> t) = s \<and> qxb (pi \<bullet> t) s) \<and> pi \<bullet> a = b\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> qxb (Lam a t) (Lam b s)\<rbrakk>
-    \<Longrightarrow> qxb qx qxa"
-  by (lifting alpha.induct)
-
-lemma lam_inject [simp]: 
-  shows "(Var a = Var b) = (a = b)"
-  and   "(App t1 t2 = App s1 s2) = (t1 = s1 \<and> t2 = s2)"
-apply(lifting rlam.inject(1) rlam.inject(2))
-apply(auto)
-apply(drule alpha.cases)
-apply(simp_all)
-apply(simp add: alpha.a1)
-apply(drule alpha.cases)
-apply(simp_all)
-apply(drule alpha.cases)
-apply(simp_all)
-apply(rule alpha.a2)
-apply(simp_all)
-done
-
-lemma rlam_distinct:
-  shows "\<not>(rVar nam \<approx> rApp rlam1' rlam2')"
-  and   "\<not>(rApp rlam1' rlam2' \<approx> rVar nam)"
-  and   "\<not>(rVar nam \<approx> rLam nam' rlam')"
-  and   "\<not>(rLam nam' rlam' \<approx> rVar nam)"
-  and   "\<not>(rApp rlam1 rlam2 \<approx> rLam nam' rlam')"
-  and   "\<not>(rLam nam' rlam' \<approx> rApp rlam1 rlam2)"
-apply auto
-apply(erule alpha.cases)
-apply simp_all
-apply(erule alpha.cases)
-apply simp_all
-apply(erule alpha.cases)
-apply simp_all
-apply(erule alpha.cases)
-apply simp_all
-apply(erule alpha.cases)
-apply simp_all
-apply(erule alpha.cases)
-apply simp_all
-done
-
-lemma lam_distinct[simp]:
-  shows "Var nam \<noteq> App lam1' lam2'"
-  and   "App lam1' lam2' \<noteq> Var nam"
-  and   "Var nam \<noteq> Lam nam' lam'"
-  and   "Lam nam' lam' \<noteq> Var nam"
-  and   "App lam1 lam2 \<noteq> Lam nam' lam'"
-  and   "Lam nam' lam' \<noteq> App lam1 lam2"
-apply(lifting rlam_distinct(1) rlam_distinct(2) rlam_distinct(3) rlam_distinct(4) rlam_distinct(5) rlam_distinct(6))
-done
-
-lemma var_supp1:
-  shows "(supp (Var a)) = ((supp a)::name set)"
-  by (simp add: supp_def)
-
-lemma var_supp:
-  shows "(supp (Var a)) = {a::name}"
-  using var_supp1 by (simp add: supp_atm)
-
-lemma app_supp:
-  shows "supp (App t1 t2) = (supp t1) \<union> ((supp t2)::name set)"
-apply(simp only: perm_lam supp_def lam_inject)
-apply(simp add: Collect_imp_eq Collect_neg_eq)
-done
-
-lemma lam_supp:
-  shows "supp (Lam x t) = ((supp ([x].t))::name set)"
-apply(simp add: supp_def)
-apply(simp add: abs_perm)
-sorry
-
-
-instance lam::fs_name
-apply(default)
-apply(induct_tac x rule: lam_induct)
-apply(simp add: var_supp)
-apply(simp add: app_supp)
-apply(simp add: lam_supp abs_supp)
-done
-
-lemma fresh_lam:
-  "(a \<sharp> Lam b t) \<longleftrightarrow> (a = b) \<or> (a \<noteq> b \<and> a \<sharp> t)"
-apply(simp add: fresh_def)
-apply(simp add: lam_supp abs_supp)
-apply(auto)
-done
-
-lemma lam_induct_strong:
-  fixes a::"'a::fs_name"
-  assumes a1: "\<And>name b. P b (Var name)"
-  and     a2: "\<And>lam1 lam2 b. \<lbrakk>\<And>c. P c lam1; \<And>c. P c lam2\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> P b (App lam1 lam2)"
-  and     a3: "\<And>name lam b. \<lbrakk>\<And>c. P c lam; name \<sharp> b\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> P b (Lam name lam)"
-  shows "P a lam"
-proof -
-  have "\<And>(pi::name prm) a. P a (pi \<bullet> lam)" 
-  proof (induct lam rule: lam_induct)
-    case (1 name pi)
-    show "P a (pi \<bullet> Var name)"
-      apply (simp)
-      apply (rule a1)
-      done
-  next
-    case (2 lam1 lam2 pi)
-    have b1: "\<And>(pi::name prm) a. P a (pi \<bullet> lam1)" by fact
-    have b2: "\<And>(pi::name prm) a. P a (pi \<bullet> lam2)" by fact
-    show "P a (pi \<bullet> App lam1 lam2)"
-      apply (simp)
-      apply (rule a2)
-      apply (rule b1)
-      apply (rule b2)
-      done
-  next
-    case (3 name lam pi a)
-    have b: "\<And>(pi::name prm) a. P a (pi \<bullet> lam)" by fact
-    obtain c::name where fr: "c\<sharp>(a, pi\<bullet>name, pi\<bullet>lam)"
-      apply(rule exists_fresh[of "(a, pi\<bullet>name, pi\<bullet>lam)"])
-      apply(simp_all add: fs_name1)
-      done
-    from b fr have p: "P a (Lam c (([(c, pi\<bullet>name)]@pi)\<bullet>lam))" 
-      apply -
-      apply(rule a3)
-      apply(blast)
-      apply(simp)
-      done
-    have eq: "[(c, pi\<bullet>name)] \<bullet> Lam (pi \<bullet> name) (pi \<bullet> lam) = Lam (pi \<bullet> name) (pi \<bullet> lam)"
-      apply(rule perm_fresh_fresh)
-      using fr
-      apply(simp add: fresh_lam)
-      apply(simp add: fresh_lam)
-      done
-    show "P a (pi \<bullet> Lam name lam)" 
-      apply (simp)
-      apply(subst eq[symmetric])
-      using p
-      apply(simp only: perm_lam pt_name2 swap_simps)
-      done
-  qed
-  then have "P a (([]::name prm) \<bullet> lam)" by blast
-  then show "P a lam" by simp 
-qed
-
-
-lemma var_fresh:
-  fixes a::"name"
-  shows "(a \<sharp> (Var b)) = (a \<sharp> b)"
-  apply(simp add: fresh_def)
-  apply(simp add: var_supp1)
-  done
-
-(* lemma hom_reg: *)
-
-lemma rlam_rec_eqvt:
-  fixes pi::"name prm"
-  and   f1::"name \<Rightarrow> ('a::pt_name)"
-  shows "(pi\<bullet>rlam_rec f1 f2 f3 t) = rlam_rec (pi\<bullet>f1) (pi\<bullet>f2) (pi\<bullet>f3) (pi\<bullet>t)"
-apply(induct t)
-apply(simp_all)
-apply(simp add: perm_fun_def)
-apply(perm_simp)
-apply(subst pt_fun_app_eq[OF pt_name_inst at_name_inst])
-back
-apply(subst pt_fun_app_eq[OF pt_name_inst at_name_inst])
-apply(subst pt_fun_app_eq[OF pt_name_inst at_name_inst])
-apply(subst pt_fun_app_eq[OF pt_name_inst at_name_inst])
-apply(simp)
-apply(subst pt_fun_app_eq[OF pt_name_inst at_name_inst])
-back
-apply(subst pt_fun_app_eq[OF pt_name_inst at_name_inst])
-apply(subst pt_fun_app_eq[OF pt_name_inst at_name_inst])
-apply(simp)
-done
- 
-
-lemma rlam_rec_respects:
-  assumes f1: "f_var \<in> Respects (op= ===> op=)"
-  and     f2: "f_app \<in> Respects (alpha ===> alpha ===> op= ===> op= ===> op=)"
-  and     f3: "f_lam \<in> Respects (op= ===> alpha ===> op= ===> op=)"
-  shows "rlam_rec f_var f_app f_lam \<in> Respects (alpha ===> op =)"
-apply(simp add: mem_def)
-apply(simp add: Respects_def)
-apply(rule allI)
-apply(rule allI)
-apply(rule impI)
-apply(erule alpha.induct)
-apply(simp)
-apply(simp)
-using f2
-apply(simp add: mem_def)
-apply(simp add: Respects_def)
-using f3[simplified mem_def Respects_def]
-apply(simp)
-apply(case_tac "a=b")
-apply(clarify)
-apply(simp)
-(* probably true *)
-sorry
-
-function
-  term1_hom :: "(name \<Rightarrow> 'a) \<Rightarrow>
-                (rlam \<Rightarrow> rlam \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'a) \<Rightarrow>
-                ((name \<Rightarrow> rlam) \<Rightarrow> (name \<Rightarrow> 'a) \<Rightarrow> 'a) \<Rightarrow> rlam \<Rightarrow> 'a"
-where
-  "term1_hom var app abs' (rVar x) = (var x)"
-| "term1_hom var app abs' (rApp t u) =
-     app t u (term1_hom var app abs' t) (term1_hom var app abs' u)"
-| "term1_hom var app abs' (rLam x u) =
-     abs' (\<lambda>y. [(x, y)] \<bullet> u) (\<lambda>y. term1_hom var app abs' ([(x, y)] \<bullet> u))"
-apply(pat_completeness)
-apply(auto)
-done
-
-lemma pi_size:
-  fixes pi::"name prm"
-  and   t::"rlam"
-  shows "size (pi \<bullet> t) = size t"
-apply(induct t)
-apply(auto)
-done
-
-termination term1_hom
-  apply(relation "measure (\<lambda>(f1, f2, f3, t). size t)")
-apply(auto simp add: pi_size)
-done
-
-lemma lam_exhaust:
-  "\<lbrakk>\<And>name. y = Var name \<Longrightarrow> P; \<And>rlam1 rlam2. y = App rlam1 rlam2 \<Longrightarrow> P; \<And>name rlam. y = Lam name rlam \<Longrightarrow> P\<rbrakk>
-    \<Longrightarrow> P"
-apply(lifting rlam.exhaust)
-done
-
-(* THIS IS NOT TRUE, but it lets prove the existence of the hom function *)
-lemma lam_inject':
-  "(Lam a x = Lam b y) = ((\<lambda>c. [(a, c)] \<bullet> x) = (\<lambda>c. [(b, c)] \<bullet> y))"
-sorry
-
-function
-  hom :: "(name \<Rightarrow> 'a) \<Rightarrow>
-                (lam \<Rightarrow> lam \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'a) \<Rightarrow>
-                ((name \<Rightarrow> lam) \<Rightarrow> (name \<Rightarrow> 'a) \<Rightarrow> 'a) \<Rightarrow> lam \<Rightarrow> 'a"
-where
-  "hom f_var f_app f_lam (Var x) = f_var x"
-| "hom f_var f_app f_lam (App l r) = f_app l r (hom f_var f_app f_lam l) (hom f_var f_app f_lam r)"
-| "hom f_var f_app f_lam (Lam a x) = f_lam (\<lambda>b. ([(a,b)] \<bullet> x)) (\<lambda>b. hom f_var f_app f_lam ([(a,b)] \<bullet> x))"
-defer
-apply(simp_all add: lam_inject') (* inject, distinct *)
-apply(tactic {* Cong_Tac.cong_tac @{thm cong} 1 *})
-apply(rule refl)
-apply(rule ext)
-apply(tactic {* Cong_Tac.cong_tac @{thm cong} 1 *})
-apply simp_all
-apply(erule conjE)+
-apply(rule_tac x="b" in cong)
-apply simp_all
-apply auto
-apply(rule_tac y="b" in lam_exhaust)
-apply simp_all
-apply auto
-apply meson
-apply(simp_all add: lam_inject')
-apply metis
-done
-
-termination hom
-  apply -
-(*
-ML_prf {* Size.size_thms @{theory} "LamEx.lam" *}
-*)
-sorry
-
-thm hom.simps
-
-lemma term1_hom_rsp:
-  "\<lbrakk>(alpha ===> alpha ===> op =) f_app f_app; ((op = ===> alpha) ===> op =) f_lam f_lam\<rbrakk>
-       \<Longrightarrow> (alpha ===> op =) (term1_hom f_var f_app f_lam) (term1_hom f_var f_app f_lam)"
-apply(simp)
-apply(rule allI)+
-apply(rule impI)
-apply(erule alpha.induct)
-apply(auto)[1]
-apply(auto)[1]
-apply(simp)
-apply(erule conjE)+
-apply(erule exE)+
-apply(erule conjE)+
-apply(clarify)
-sorry
-
-lemma hom: "
-\<forall>f_var. \<forall>f_app \<in> Respects(alpha ===> alpha ===> op =).
-\<forall>f_lam \<in> Respects((op = ===> alpha) ===> op =).
-\<exists>hom\<in>Respects (alpha ===> op =). 
-    ((\<forall>x. hom (rVar x) = f_var x) \<and>
-     (\<forall>l r. hom (rApp l r) = f_app l r (hom l) (hom r)) \<and>
-     (\<forall>x a. hom (rLam a x) = f_lam (\<lambda>b. ([(a,b)]\<bullet> x)) (\<lambda>b. hom ([(a,b)] \<bullet> x))))"
-apply(rule allI)
-apply(rule ballI)+
-apply(rule_tac x="term1_hom f_var f_app f_lam" in bexI)
-apply(simp_all)
-apply(simp only: in_respects)
-apply(rule term1_hom_rsp)
-apply(assumption)+
-done
-
-lemma hom':
-"\<exists>hom.
-  ((\<forall>x. hom (Var x) = f_var x) \<and>
-   (\<forall>l r. hom (App l r) = f_app l r (hom l) (hom r)) \<and>
-   (\<forall>x a. hom (Lam a x) = f_lam (\<lambda>b. ([(a,b)] \<bullet> x)) (\<lambda>b. hom ([(a,b)] \<bullet> x))))"
-apply (lifting hom)
-done
-
-(* test test
-lemma raw_hom_correct: 
-  assumes f1: "f_var \<in> Respects (op= ===> op=)"
-  and     f2: "f_app \<in> Respects (alpha ===> alpha ===> op= ===> op= ===> op=)"
-  and     f3: "f_lam \<in> Respects ((op= ===> alpha) ===> (op= ===> op=) ===> op=)"
-  shows "\<exists>!hom\<in>Respects (alpha ===> op =). 
-    ((\<forall>x. hom (rVar x) = f_var x) \<and>
-     (\<forall>l r. hom (rApp l r) = f_app l r (hom l) (hom r)) \<and>
-     (\<forall>x a. hom (rLam a x) = f_lam (\<lambda>b. ([(a,b)]\<bullet> x)) (\<lambda>b. hom ([(a,b)] \<bullet> x))))"
-unfolding Bex1_def
-apply(rule ex1I)
-sorry
-*)
-
-
-end
-




