diff -r 41137dc935ff -r 8193bbaa07fe Nominal-General/nominal_eqvt.ML
--- a/Nominal-General/nominal_eqvt.ML	Sun Nov 14 12:09:14 2010 +0000
+++ /dev/null	Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
@@ -1,142 +0,0 @@
-(*  Title:      nominal_eqvt.ML
-    Author:     Stefan Berghofer (original code)
-    Author:     Christian Urban
-
-    Automatic proofs for equivariance of inductive predicates.
-*)
-
-signature NOMINAL_EQVT =
-sig
-  val eqvt_rel_tac: Proof.context -> string list -> term -> thm -> thm list -> int -> tactic
-  val eqvt_rel_single_case_tac: Proof.context -> string list -> term -> thm -> int -> tactic
-  
-  val equivariance: bool -> term list -> thm -> thm list -> Proof.context -> thm list * local_theory
-  val equivariance_cmd: string -> Proof.context -> local_theory
-end
-
-structure Nominal_Eqvt : NOMINAL_EQVT =
-struct
-
-open Nominal_Permeq;
-open Nominal_ThmDecls;
-
-val atomize_conv = 
-  MetaSimplifier.rewrite_cterm (true, false, false) (K (K NONE))
-    (HOL_basic_ss addsimps @{thms induct_atomize});
-val atomize_intr = Conv.fconv_rule (Conv.prems_conv ~1 atomize_conv);
-fun atomize_induct ctxt = Conv.fconv_rule (Conv.prems_conv ~1
-  (Conv.params_conv ~1 (K (Conv.prems_conv ~1 atomize_conv)) ctxt));
-
-
-(** equivariance tactics **)
-
-val perm_boolE = @{thm permute_boolE}
-val perm_cancel = @{thms permute_minus_cancel(2)}
-
-fun eqvt_rel_single_case_tac ctxt pred_names pi intro  = 
-  let
-    val thy = ProofContext.theory_of ctxt
-    val cpi = Thm.cterm_of thy (mk_minus pi)
-    val pi_intro_rule = Drule.instantiate' [] [SOME cpi] perm_boolE
-    val simps1 = HOL_basic_ss addsimps @{thms permute_fun_def minus_minus split_paired_all}
-    val simps2 = HOL_basic_ss addsimps @{thms permute_bool_def}
-  in
-    eqvt_strict_tac ctxt [] pred_names THEN'
-    SUBPROOF (fn {prems, context as ctxt, ...} =>
-      let
-        val prems' = map (transform_prem2 ctxt pred_names) prems
-        val tac1 = resolve_tac prems'
-        val tac2 = EVERY' [ rtac pi_intro_rule, 
-          eqvt_strict_tac ctxt perm_cancel pred_names, resolve_tac prems' ]
-        val tac3 = EVERY' [ rtac pi_intro_rule, 
-          eqvt_strict_tac ctxt perm_cancel pred_names, simp_tac simps1, 
-          simp_tac simps2, resolve_tac prems']
-      in
-        (rtac intro THEN_ALL_NEW FIRST' [tac1, tac2, tac3]) 1 
-      end) ctxt
-  end
-
-fun eqvt_rel_tac ctxt pred_names pi induct intros =
-  let
-    val cases = map (eqvt_rel_single_case_tac ctxt pred_names pi) intros
-  in
-    EVERY' (rtac induct :: cases)
-  end
-
-
-(** equivariance procedure *)
-
-fun prepare_goal pi pred =
-  let
-    val (c, xs) = strip_comb pred;
-  in
-    HOLogic.mk_imp (pred, list_comb (c, map (mk_perm pi) xs))
-  end
-
-(* stores thm under name.eqvt and adds [eqvt]-attribute *)
-
-fun note_named_thm (name, thm) ctxt = 
-  let
-    val thm_name = Binding.qualified_name 
-      (Long_Name.qualify (Long_Name.base_name name) "eqvt")
-    val attr = Attrib.internal (K eqvt_add)
-    val ((_, [thm']), ctxt') =  Local_Theory.note ((thm_name, [attr]), [thm]) ctxt
-  in
-    (thm', ctxt')
-  end
-
-fun equivariance note_flag pred_trms raw_induct intrs ctxt = 
-  let
-    val is_already_eqvt = 
-      filter (is_eqvt ctxt) pred_trms
-      |> map (Syntax.string_of_term ctxt)
-    val _ = if null is_already_eqvt then ()
-      else error ("Already equivariant: " ^ commas is_already_eqvt)
-
-    val pred_names = map (fst o dest_Const) pred_trms
-    val raw_induct' = atomize_induct ctxt raw_induct
-    val intrs' = map atomize_intr intrs
-  
-    val (([raw_concl], [raw_pi]), ctxt') = 
-      ctxt 
-      |> Variable.import_terms false [concl_of raw_induct'] 
-      ||>> Variable.variant_fixes ["p"]
-    val pi = Free (raw_pi, @{typ perm})
-  
-    val preds = map (fst o HOLogic.dest_imp)
-      (HOLogic.dest_conj (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop raw_concl));
-  
-    val goal = HOLogic.mk_Trueprop 
-      (foldr1 HOLogic.mk_conj (map (prepare_goal pi) preds))
-  
-    val thms = Goal.prove ctxt' [] [] goal 
-      (fn {context,...} => eqvt_rel_tac context pred_names pi raw_induct' intrs' 1)
-      |> Datatype_Aux.split_conj_thm 
-      |> ProofContext.export ctxt' ctxt
-      |> map (fn th => th RS mp)
-      |> map zero_var_indexes
-  in
-    if note_flag
-    then fold_map note_named_thm (pred_names ~~ thms) ctxt 
-    else (thms, ctxt) 
-  end
-
-fun equivariance_cmd pred_name ctxt =
-  let
-    val thy = ProofContext.theory_of ctxt
-    val (_, {preds, raw_induct, intrs, ...}) =
-      Inductive.the_inductive ctxt (Sign.intern_const thy pred_name)
-  in
-    equivariance true preds raw_induct intrs ctxt |> snd
-  end
-
-local structure P = Parse and K = Keyword in
-
-val _ =
-  Outer_Syntax.local_theory "equivariance"
-    "Proves equivariance for inductive predicate involving nominal datatypes." 
-      K.thy_decl (P.xname >> equivariance_cmd);
-
-end;
-
-end (* structure *)