diff -r dc003667cd17 -r 09834ba7ce59 Nominal/Ex/Classical.thy --- a/Nominal/Ex/Classical.thy Mon Jul 04 23:56:19 2011 +0200 +++ b/Nominal/Ex/Classical.thy Tue Jul 05 04:18:45 2011 +0200 @@ -47,269 +47,6 @@ thm trm.supp thm trm.supp[simplified] -lemma Abs_set_fcb2: - fixes as bs :: "atom set" - and x y :: "'b :: fs" - and c::"'c::fs" - assumes eq: "[as]set. x = [bs]set. y" - and fin: "finite as" "finite bs" - and fcb1: "as \* f as x c" - and fresh1: "as \* c" - and fresh2: "bs \* c" - and perm1: "\p. supp p \* c \ p \ (f as x c) = f (p \ as) (p \ x) c" - and perm2: "\p. supp p \* c \ p \ (f bs y c) = f (p \ bs) (p \ y) c" - shows "f as x c = f bs y c" -proof - - have "supp (as, x, c) supports (f as x c)" - unfolding supports_def fresh_def[symmetric] - by (simp add: fresh_Pair perm1 fresh_star_def supp_swap swap_fresh_fresh) - then have fin1: "finite (supp (f as x c))" - using fin by (auto intro: supports_finite simp add: finite_supp supp_of_finite_sets supp_Pair) - have "supp (bs, y, c) supports (f bs y c)" - unfolding supports_def fresh_def[symmetric] - by (simp add: fresh_Pair perm2 fresh_star_def supp_swap swap_fresh_fresh) - then have fin2: "finite (supp (f bs y c))" - using fin by (auto intro: supports_finite simp add: finite_supp supp_of_finite_sets supp_Pair) - obtain q::"perm" where - fr1: "(q \ as) \* (x, c, f as x c, f bs y c)" and - fr2: "supp q \* ([as]set. x)" and - inc: "supp q \ as \ (q \ as)" - using at_set_avoiding3[where xs="as" and c="(x, c, f as x c, f bs y c)" and x="[as]set. x"] - fin1 fin2 fin - by (auto simp add: supp_Pair finite_supp Abs_fresh_star dest: fresh_star_supp_conv) - have "[q \ as]set. (q \ x) = q \ ([as]set. x)" by simp - also have "\ = [as]set. x" - by (simp only: fr2 perm_supp_eq) - finally have "[q \ as]set. (q \ x) = [bs]set. y" using eq by simp - then obtain r::perm where - qq1: "q \ x = r \ y" and - qq2: "q \ as = r \ bs" and - qq3: "supp r \ (q \ as) \ bs" - apply(drule_tac sym) - apply(simp only: Abs_eq_iff2 alphas) - apply(erule exE) - apply(erule conjE)+ - apply(drule_tac x="p" in meta_spec) - apply(simp add: set_eqvt) - apply(blast) - done - have "as \* f as x c" by (rule fcb1) - then have "q \ (as \* f as x c)" - by (simp add: permute_bool_def) - then have "(q \ as) \* f (q \ as) (q \ x) c" - apply(simp add: fresh_star_eqvt set_eqvt) - apply(subst (asm) perm1) - using inc fresh1 fr1 - apply(auto simp add: fresh_star_def fresh_Pair) - done - then have "(r \ bs) \* f (r \ bs) (r \ y) c" using qq1 qq2 by simp - then have "r \ (bs \* f bs y c)" - apply(simp add: fresh_star_eqvt set_eqvt) - apply(subst (asm) perm2[symmetric]) - using qq3 fresh2 fr1 - apply(auto simp add: set_eqvt fresh_star_def fresh_Pair) - done - then have fcb2: "bs \* f bs y c" by (simp add: permute_bool_def) - have "f as x c = q \ (f as x c)" - apply(rule perm_supp_eq[symmetric]) - using inc fcb1 fr1 by (auto simp add: fresh_star_def) - also have "\ = f (q \ as) (q \ x) c" - apply(rule perm1) - using inc fresh1 fr1 by (auto simp add: fresh_star_def) - also have "\ = f (r \ bs) (r \ y) c" using qq1 qq2 by simp - also have "\ = r \ (f bs y c)" - apply(rule perm2[symmetric]) - using qq3 fresh2 fr1 by (auto simp add: fresh_star_def) - also have "... = f bs y c" - apply(rule perm_supp_eq) - using qq3 fr1 fcb2 by (auto simp add: fresh_star_def) - finally show ?thesis by simp -qed - -lemma Abs_res_fcb2: - fixes as bs :: "atom set" - and x y :: "'b :: fs" - and c::"'c::fs" - assumes eq: "[as]res. x = [bs]res. y" - and fin: "finite as" "finite bs" - and fcb1: "as \* f as x c" - and fresh1: "as \* c" - and fresh2: "bs \* c" - and perm1: "\p. supp p \* c \ p \ (f as x c) = f (p \ as) (p \ x) c" - and perm2: "\p. supp p \* c \ p \ (f bs y c) = f (p \ bs) (p \ y) c" - shows "f as x c = f bs y c" -proof - - have "supp (as, x, c) supports (f as x c)" - unfolding supports_def fresh_def[symmetric] - by (simp add: fresh_Pair perm1 fresh_star_def supp_swap swap_fresh_fresh) - then have fin1: "finite (supp (f as x c))" - using fin by (auto intro: supports_finite simp add: finite_supp supp_of_finite_sets supp_Pair) - have "supp (bs, y, c) supports (f bs y c)" - unfolding supports_def fresh_def[symmetric] - by (simp add: fresh_Pair perm2 fresh_star_def supp_swap swap_fresh_fresh) - then have fin2: "finite (supp (f bs y c))" - using fin by (auto intro: supports_finite simp add: finite_supp supp_of_finite_sets supp_Pair) - obtain q::"perm" where - fr1: "(q \ as) \* (x, c, f as x c, f bs y c)" and - fr2: "supp q \* ([as]res. x)" and - inc: "supp q \ as \ (q \ as)" - using at_set_avoiding3[where xs="as" and c="(x, c, f as x c, f bs y c)" and x="[as]res. x"] - fin1 fin2 fin - by (auto simp add: supp_Pair finite_supp Abs_fresh_star dest: fresh_star_supp_conv) - have "[q \ as]res. (q \ x) = q \ ([as]res. x)" by simp - also have "\ = [as]res. x" - by (simp only: fr2 perm_supp_eq) - finally have "[q \ as]res. (q \ x) = [bs]res. y" using eq by simp - then obtain r::perm where - qq1: "q \ x = r \ y" and - qq2: "(q \ as \ supp (q \ x)) = r \ (bs \ supp y)" and - qq3: "supp r \ bs \ supp y \ q \ as \ supp (q \ x)" - apply(drule_tac sym) - apply(subst(asm) Abs_eq_res_set) - apply(simp only: Abs_eq_iff2 alphas) - apply(erule exE) - apply(erule conjE)+ - apply(drule_tac x="p" in meta_spec) - apply(simp add: set_eqvt) - done - have "(as \ supp x) \* f (as \ supp x) x c" sorry (* FCB? *) - then have "q \ ((as \ supp x) \* f (as \ supp x) x c)" - by (simp add: permute_bool_def) - then have "(q \ (as \ supp x)) \* f (q \ (as \ supp x)) (q \ x) c" - apply(simp add: fresh_star_eqvt set_eqvt) - sorry (* perm? *) - then have "r \ (bs \ supp y) \* f (r \ (bs \ supp y)) (r \ y) c" using qq2 - apply (simp add: inter_eqvt) - sorry - (* rest similar reversing it other way around... *) - show ?thesis sorry -qed - - - -lemma Abs_lst_fcb2: - fixes as bs :: "atom list" - and x y :: "'b :: fs" - and c::"'c::fs" - assumes eq: "[as]lst. x = [bs]lst. y" - and fcb1: "(set as) \* f as x c" - and fresh1: "set as \* c" - and fresh2: "set bs \* c" - and perm1: "\p. supp p \* c \ p \ (f as x c) = f (p \ as) (p \ x) c" - and perm2: "\p. supp p \* c \ p \ (f bs y c) = f (p \ bs) (p \ y) c" - shows "f as x c = f bs y c" -proof - - have "supp (as, x, c) supports (f as x c)" - unfolding supports_def fresh_def[symmetric] - by (simp add: fresh_Pair perm1 fresh_star_def supp_swap swap_fresh_fresh) - then have fin1: "finite (supp (f as x c))" - by (auto intro: supports_finite simp add: finite_supp) - have "supp (bs, y, c) supports (f bs y c)" - unfolding supports_def fresh_def[symmetric] - by (simp add: fresh_Pair perm2 fresh_star_def supp_swap swap_fresh_fresh) - then have fin2: "finite (supp (f bs y c))" - by (auto intro: supports_finite simp add: finite_supp) - obtain q::"perm" where - fr1: "(q \ (set as)) \* (x, c, f as x c, f bs y c)" and - fr2: "supp q \* Abs_lst as x" and - inc: "supp q \ (set as) \ q \ (set as)" - using at_set_avoiding3[where xs="set as" and c="(x, c, f as x c, f bs y c)" and x="[as]lst. x"] - fin1 fin2 - by (auto simp add: supp_Pair finite_supp Abs_fresh_star dest: fresh_star_supp_conv) - have "Abs_lst (q \ as) (q \ x) = q \ Abs_lst as x" by simp - also have "\ = Abs_lst as x" - by (simp only: fr2 perm_supp_eq) - finally have "Abs_lst (q \ as) (q \ x) = Abs_lst bs y" using eq by simp - then obtain r::perm where - qq1: "q \ x = r \ y" and - qq2: "q \ as = r \ bs" and - qq3: "supp r \ (q \ (set as)) \ set bs" - apply(drule_tac sym) - apply(simp only: Abs_eq_iff2 alphas) - apply(erule exE) - apply(erule conjE)+ - apply(drule_tac x="p" in meta_spec) - apply(simp add: set_eqvt) - apply(blast) - done - have "(set as) \* f as x c" by (rule fcb1) - then have "q \ ((set as) \* f as x c)" - by (simp add: permute_bool_def) - then have "set (q \ as) \* f (q \ as) (q \ x) c" - apply(simp add: fresh_star_eqvt set_eqvt) - apply(subst (asm) perm1) - using inc fresh1 fr1 - apply(auto simp add: fresh_star_def fresh_Pair) - done - then have "set (r \ bs) \* f (r \ bs) (r \ y) c" using qq1 qq2 by simp - then have "r \ ((set bs) \* f bs y c)" - apply(simp add: fresh_star_eqvt set_eqvt) - apply(subst (asm) perm2[symmetric]) - using qq3 fresh2 fr1 - apply(auto simp add: set_eqvt fresh_star_def fresh_Pair) - done - then have fcb2: "(set bs) \* f bs y c" by (simp add: permute_bool_def) - have "f as x c = q \ (f as x c)" - apply(rule perm_supp_eq[symmetric]) - using inc fcb1 fr1 by (auto simp add: fresh_star_def) - also have "\ = f (q \ as) (q \ x) c" - apply(rule perm1) - using inc fresh1 fr1 by (auto simp add: fresh_star_def) - also have "\ = f (r \ bs) (r \ y) c" using qq1 qq2 by simp - also have "\ = r \ (f bs y c)" - apply(rule perm2[symmetric]) - using qq3 fresh2 fr1 by (auto simp add: fresh_star_def) - also have "... = f bs y c" - apply(rule perm_supp_eq) - using qq3 fr1 fcb2 by (auto simp add: fresh_star_def) - finally show ?thesis by simp -qed - -lemma Abs_lst1_fcb2: - fixes a b :: "atom" - and x y :: "'b :: fs" - and c::"'c :: fs" - assumes e: "(Abs_lst [a] x) = (Abs_lst [b] y)" - and fcb1: "a \ f a x c" - and fresh: "{a, b} \* c" - and perm1: "\p. supp p \* c \ p \ (f a x c) = f (p \ a) (p \ x) c" - and perm2: "\p. supp p \* c \ p \ (f b y c) = f (p \ b) (p \ y) c" - shows "f a x c = f b y c" -using e -apply(drule_tac Abs_lst_fcb2[where c="c" and f="\(as::atom list) . f (hd as)"]) -apply(simp_all) -using fcb1 fresh perm1 perm2 -apply(simp_all add: fresh_star_def) -done - -lemma supp_zero_perm_zero: - shows "supp (p :: perm) = {} \ p = 0" - by (metis supp_perm_singleton supp_zero_perm) - -lemma permute_atom_list_id: - shows "p \ l = l \ supp p \ set l = {}" - by (induct l) (auto simp add: supp_Nil supp_perm) - -lemma permute_length_eq: - shows "p \ xs = ys \ length xs = length ys" - by (auto simp add: length_eqvt[symmetric] permute_pure) - -lemma Abs_lst_binder_length: - shows "[xs]lst. T = [ys]lst. S \ length xs = length ys" - by (auto simp add: Abs_eq_iff alphas length_eqvt[symmetric] permute_pure) - -lemma Abs_lst_binder_eq: - shows "Abs_lst l T = Abs_lst l S \ T = S" - by (rule, simp_all add: Abs_eq_iff2 alphas) - (metis fresh_star_zero inf_absorb1 permute_atom_list_id supp_perm_eq - supp_zero_perm_zero) - -lemma in_permute_list: - shows "py \ p \ xs = px \ xs \ x \ set xs \ py \ p \ x = px \ x" - by (induct xs) auto - - - nominal_primrec crename :: "trm \ coname \ coname \ trm" ("_[_\c>_]" [100,100,100] 100)