diff -r f338b455314c -r 0579d3a48304 Nominal/Ex/Typing.thy
--- a/Nominal/Ex/Typing.thy	Thu Jan 06 13:28:19 2011 +0000
+++ /dev/null	Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
@@ -1,149 +0,0 @@
-theory Lambda
-imports "../Nominal2" 
-begin
-
-
-atom_decl name
-
-nominal_datatype lam =
-  Var "name"
-| App "lam" "lam"
-| Lam x::"name" l::"lam"  bind x in l
-
-thm lam.distinct
-thm lam.induct
-thm lam.exhaust lam.strong_exhaust
-thm lam.fv_defs
-thm lam.bn_defs
-thm lam.perm_simps
-thm lam.eq_iff
-thm lam.fv_bn_eqvt
-thm lam.size_eqvt
-
-
-section {* Typing *}
-
-nominal_datatype ty =
-  TVar string
-| TFun ty ty ("_ \<rightarrow> _") 
-
-lemma ty_fresh:
-  fixes x::"name"
-  and   T::"ty"
-  shows "atom x \<sharp> T"
-apply (nominal_induct T rule: ty.strong_induct)
-apply (simp_all add: ty.fresh pure_fresh)
-done
-
-inductive
-  valid :: "(name \<times> ty) list \<Rightarrow> bool"
-where
-  v_Nil[intro]: "valid []"
-| v_Cons[intro]: "\<lbrakk>atom x \<sharp> Gamma; valid Gamma\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> valid ((x, T)#Gamma)"
-
-inductive
-  typing :: "(name\<times>ty) list \<Rightarrow> lam \<Rightarrow> ty \<Rightarrow> bool" ("_ \<turnstile> _ : _" [60,60,60] 60) 
-where
-    t_Var[intro]: "\<lbrakk>valid \<Gamma>; (x, T) \<in> set \<Gamma>\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> \<Gamma> \<turnstile> Var x : T"
-  | t_App[intro]: "\<lbrakk>\<Gamma> \<turnstile> t1 : T1 \<rightarrow> T2; \<Gamma> \<turnstile> t2 : T1\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> \<Gamma> \<turnstile> App t1 t2 : T2"
-  | t_Lam[intro]: "\<lbrakk>atom x \<sharp> \<Gamma>; (x, T1) # \<Gamma> \<turnstile> t : T2\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> \<Gamma> \<turnstile> Lam x t : T1 \<rightarrow> T2"
-
-thm typing.intros
-thm typing.induct
-
-equivariance valid
-equivariance typing
-
-nominal_inductive typing
-  avoids t_Lam: "x"
-  by (simp_all add: fresh_star_def ty_fresh lam.fresh)
-
-
-thm typing.strong_induct
-
-abbreviation
-  "sub_context" :: "(name \<times> ty) list \<Rightarrow> (name \<times> ty) list \<Rightarrow> bool" ("_ \<subseteq> _" [60,60] 60) 
-where
-  "\<Gamma>1 \<subseteq> \<Gamma>2 \<equiv> \<forall>x T. (x, T) \<in> set \<Gamma>1 \<longrightarrow> (x, T) \<in> set \<Gamma>2"
-
-text {* Now it comes: The Weakening Lemma *}
-
-text {*
-  The first version is, after setting up the induction, 
-  completely automatic except for use of atomize. *}
-
-lemma weakening_version2: 
-  fixes \<Gamma>1 \<Gamma>2::"(name \<times> ty) list"
-  and   t ::"lam"
-  and   \<tau> ::"ty"
-  assumes a: "\<Gamma>1 \<turnstile> t : T"
-  and     b: "valid \<Gamma>2" 
-  and     c: "\<Gamma>1 \<subseteq> \<Gamma>2"
-  shows "\<Gamma>2 \<turnstile> t : T"
-using a b c
-proof (nominal_induct \<Gamma>1 t T avoiding: \<Gamma>2 rule: typing.strong_induct)
-  case (t_Var \<Gamma>1 x T)  (* variable case *)
-  have "\<Gamma>1 \<subseteq> \<Gamma>2" by fact 
-  moreover  
-  have "valid \<Gamma>2" by fact 
-  moreover 
-  have "(x,T)\<in> set \<Gamma>1" by fact
-  ultimately show "\<Gamma>2 \<turnstile> Var x : T" by auto
-next
-  case (t_Lam x \<Gamma>1 T1 t T2) (* lambda case *)
-  have vc: "atom x \<sharp> \<Gamma>2" by fact   (* variable convention *)
-  have ih: "\<lbrakk>valid ((x, T1) # \<Gamma>2); (x, T1) # \<Gamma>1 \<subseteq> (x, T1) # \<Gamma>2\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> (x, T1) # \<Gamma>2 \<turnstile> t : T2" by fact
-  have "\<Gamma>1 \<subseteq> \<Gamma>2" by fact
-  then have "(x, T1) # \<Gamma>1 \<subseteq> (x, T1) # \<Gamma>2" by simp
-  moreover
-  have "valid \<Gamma>2" by fact
-  then have "valid ((x, T1) # \<Gamma>2)" using vc by (simp add: v_Cons)
-  ultimately have "(x, T1) # \<Gamma>2 \<turnstile> t : T2" using ih by simp
-  with vc show "\<Gamma>2 \<turnstile> Lam x t : T1 \<rightarrow> T2" by auto
-qed (auto) (* app case *)
-
-lemma weakening_version1: 
-  fixes \<Gamma>1 \<Gamma>2::"(name \<times> ty) list"
-  assumes a: "\<Gamma>1 \<turnstile> t : T" 
-  and     b: "valid \<Gamma>2" 
-  and     c: "\<Gamma>1 \<subseteq> \<Gamma>2"
-  shows "\<Gamma>2 \<turnstile> t : T"
-using a b c
-apply (nominal_induct \<Gamma>1 t T avoiding: \<Gamma>2 rule: typing.strong_induct)
-apply (auto | atomize)+
-done
-
-
-inductive
-  Acc :: "('a::pt \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> bool) \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> bool"
-where
-  AccI: "(\<And>y. R y x \<Longrightarrow> Acc R y) \<Longrightarrow> Acc R x"
-
-
-lemma Acc_eqvt [eqvt]:
-  fixes p::"perm"
-  assumes a: "Acc R x"
-  shows "Acc (p \<bullet> R) (p \<bullet> x)"
-using a
-apply(induct)
-apply(rule AccI)
-apply(rotate_tac 1)
-apply(drule_tac x="-p \<bullet> y" in meta_spec)
-apply(simp)
-apply(drule meta_mp)
-apply(rule_tac p="p" in permute_boolE)
-apply(perm_simp add: permute_minus_cancel)
-apply(assumption)
-apply(assumption)
-done
- 
-
-nominal_inductive Acc .
-
-thm Acc.strong_induct
-
-
-end
-
-
-