Thu, 10 Dec 2009 02:42:09 +0100 With int_of_nat as a quotient_def, lemmas about it can be easily lifted.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Thu, 10 Dec 2009 02:42:09 +0100] rev 679
With int_of_nat as a quotient_def, lemmas about it can be easily lifted.
Thu, 10 Dec 2009 01:48:39 +0100 merged
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Thu, 10 Dec 2009 01:48:39 +0100] rev 678
merged
Thu, 10 Dec 2009 01:47:55 +0100 naming in this file cannot be made to agree to the original (PROBLEM?)
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Thu, 10 Dec 2009 01:47:55 +0100] rev 677
naming in this file cannot be made to agree to the original (PROBLEM?)
Thu, 10 Dec 2009 01:39:47 +0100 Lifted some kind of induction.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Thu, 10 Dec 2009 01:39:47 +0100] rev 676
Lifted some kind of induction.
Wed, 09 Dec 2009 23:32:16 +0100 more proofs in IntEx2
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Wed, 09 Dec 2009 23:32:16 +0100] rev 675
more proofs in IntEx2
Wed, 09 Dec 2009 22:43:11 +0100 Finished one proof in IntEx2.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 09 Dec 2009 22:43:11 +0100] rev 674
Finished one proof in IntEx2.
(0) -300 -100 -30 -10 -6 +6 +10 +30 +100 +300 +1000 tip