Wed, 03 Feb 2010 17:36:25 +0100 proposal for an alpha equivalence
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 17:36:25 +0100] rev 1057
proposal for an alpha equivalence
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 15:17:29 +0100 Lets different.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 15:17:29 +0100] rev 1056
Lets different.
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:39:19 +0100 Simplified the proof.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:39:19 +0100] rev 1055
Simplified the proof.
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:36:48 +0100 merged
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:36:48 +0100] rev 1054
merged
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:36:22 +0100 proved that bv for lists respects alpha for terms
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:36:22 +0100] rev 1053
proved that bv for lists respects alpha for terms
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:28:00 +0100 Finished remains on the let proof.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:28:00 +0100] rev 1052
Finished remains on the let proof.
(0) -1000 -300 -100 -30 -10 -6 +6 +10 +30 +100 +300 +1000 tip