| Mon, 22 Mar 2010 18:38:59 +0100 | Cezary Kaliszyk | Marked the place where a compose lemma applies. | file | diff | annotate |
| Mon, 22 Mar 2010 17:21:27 +0100 | Cezary Kaliszyk | Got rid of alpha_bn_rsp_cheat. | file | diff | annotate |
| Mon, 22 Mar 2010 15:27:01 +0100 | Cezary Kaliszyk | alpha_bn_rsp_pre automatized. | file | diff | annotate |
| Wed, 17 Mar 2010 18:52:59 +0100 | Cezary Kaliszyk | compose_sym2 works also for term5 | file | diff | annotate |
| Wed, 17 Mar 2010 11:11:25 +0100 | Cezary Kaliszyk | Finished all proofs in Term5 and Term5n. | file | diff | annotate |
| Tue, 16 Mar 2010 20:07:13 +0100 | Cezary Kaliszyk | Revert 7c8cd6eae8e2, now all proofs in Term5 go through, both recursive and not. | file | diff | annotate |
| Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:18:08 +0100 | Cezary Kaliszyk | The old recursive alpha works fine. | file | diff | annotate |
| Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:11:32 +0100 | Cezary Kaliszyk | Alpha is wrong. | file | diff | annotate |
| Tue, 16 Mar 2010 16:17:05 +0100 | Cezary Kaliszyk | alpha5_transp and equivp | file | diff | annotate |
| Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:38:14 +0100 | Cezary Kaliszyk | alpha5_symp proved. | file | diff | annotate |
| Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:27:47 +0100 | Cezary Kaliszyk | FV_bn generated for recursive functions as well, and used in main fv for bindings. | file | diff | annotate |
| Tue, 16 Mar 2010 12:08:37 +0100 | Cezary Kaliszyk | The proof in 'Test' gets simpler. | file | diff | annotate |
| Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:09:54 +0100 | Cezary Kaliszyk | looking at trm5_equivp | file | diff | annotate |
| Thu, 11 Mar 2010 13:44:54 +0100 | Cezary Kaliszyk | The alpha5_eqvt tactic works if I manage to build the goal. | file | diff | annotate |
| Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:58:14 +0100 | Cezary Kaliszyk | More tries about the proofs in trm5 | file | diff | annotate |
| Wed, 10 Mar 2010 15:40:15 +0100 | Cezary Kaliszyk | alpha_equivp for trm5 | file | diff | annotate |