Fri, 04 Dec 2009 11:33:58 +0100 Change equiv_trans2 to EQUALS_RSP, since we can prove it for any quotient type, not only for eqv relations.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Fri, 04 Dec 2009 11:33:58 +0100] rev 519
Change equiv_trans2 to EQUALS_RSP, since we can prove it for any quotient type, not only for eqv relations.
Fri, 04 Dec 2009 11:06:43 +0100 compose_tac instead of rtac to avoid unification; some code cleaning.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Fri, 04 Dec 2009 11:06:43 +0100] rev 518
compose_tac instead of rtac to avoid unification; some code cleaning.
Fri, 04 Dec 2009 10:36:35 +0100 Got to about 5 seconds for the longest proof. APPLY_RSP_TAC' solves the quotient internally without instantiation resulting in a faster proof.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Fri, 04 Dec 2009 10:36:35 +0100] rev 517
Got to about 5 seconds for the longest proof. APPLY_RSP_TAC' solves the quotient internally without instantiation resulting in a faster proof.
(0) -300 -100 -30 -10 -3 +3 +10 +30 +100 +300 +1000 tip