Thu, 04 Feb 2010 14:55:52 +0100 merged
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Thu, 04 Feb 2010 14:55:52 +0100] rev 1060
merged
Thu, 04 Feb 2010 14:55:21 +0100 restored the old behaviour of having an eqvts list; the transformed theorems are stored in eqvts_raw
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Thu, 04 Feb 2010 14:55:21 +0100] rev 1059
restored the old behaviour of having an eqvts list; the transformed theorems are stored in eqvts_raw
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 18:28:50 +0100 More let-rec experiments
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 18:28:50 +0100] rev 1058
More let-rec experiments
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 17:36:25 +0100 proposal for an alpha equivalence
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 17:36:25 +0100] rev 1057
proposal for an alpha equivalence
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 15:17:29 +0100 Lets different.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 15:17:29 +0100] rev 1056
Lets different.
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:39:19 +0100 Simplified the proof.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:39:19 +0100] rev 1055
Simplified the proof.
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:36:48 +0100 merged
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:36:48 +0100] rev 1054
merged
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:36:22 +0100 proved that bv for lists respects alpha for terms
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:36:22 +0100] rev 1053
proved that bv for lists respects alpha for terms
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:28:00 +0100 Finished remains on the let proof.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:28:00 +0100] rev 1052
Finished remains on the let proof.
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:22:25 +0100 merge
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:22:25 +0100] rev 1051
merge
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:19:53 +0100 Lets are ok.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:19:53 +0100] rev 1050
Lets are ok.
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:15:07 +0100 merged
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:15:07 +0100] rev 1049
merged
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:12:50 +0100 added type-scheme example
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:12:50 +0100] rev 1048
added type-scheme example
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 13:00:37 +0100 merge
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 13:00:37 +0100] rev 1047
merge
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 13:00:07 +0100 Definitions for trm5
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 13:00:07 +0100] rev 1046
Definitions for trm5
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:58:02 +0100 another adaptation for the eqvt-change
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:58:02 +0100] rev 1045
another adaptation for the eqvt-change
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:45:06 +0100 merged
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:45:06 +0100] rev 1044
merged
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:44:29 +0100 fixed proofs that broke because of eqvt
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:44:29 +0100] rev 1043
fixed proofs that broke because of eqvt
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:34:53 +0100 Minor fix.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:34:53 +0100] rev 1042
Minor fix.
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:34:01 +0100 merge
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:34:01 +0100] rev 1041
merge
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:29:45 +0100 alpha5 pseudo-injective
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:29:45 +0100] rev 1040
alpha5 pseudo-injective
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:31:58 +0100 fixed proofs in Abs.thy
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:31:58 +0100] rev 1039
fixed proofs in Abs.thy
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:13:22 +0100 merged
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:13:22 +0100] rev 1038
merged
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:06:10 +0100 added a first eqvt_tac which pushes permutations inside terms
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:06:10 +0100] rev 1037
added a first eqvt_tac which pushes permutations inside terms
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:11:23 +0100 The alpha-equivalence relation for let-rec. Not sure if correct...
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:11:23 +0100] rev 1036
The alpha-equivalence relation for let-rec. Not sure if correct...
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 11:47:37 +0100 Starting with a let-rec example.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 11:47:37 +0100] rev 1035
Starting with a let-rec example.
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 11:21:34 +0100 Minor
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 11:21:34 +0100] rev 1034
Minor
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 10:50:24 +0100 Some cleaning and eqvt proof
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 10:50:24 +0100] rev 1033
Some cleaning and eqvt proof
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 09:25:21 +0100 The trm1_support lemma explicitly and stated a strong induction principle.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 09:25:21 +0100] rev 1032
The trm1_support lemma explicitly and stated a strong induction principle.
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 08:32:24 +0100 More ingredients in Terms.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 08:32:24 +0100] rev 1031
More ingredients in Terms.
Tue, 02 Feb 2010 17:10:42 +0100 Finished the supp_fv proof; first proof that analyses the structure of 'Let' :)
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 02 Feb 2010 17:10:42 +0100] rev 1030
Finished the supp_fv proof; first proof that analyses the structure of 'Let' :)
Tue, 02 Feb 2010 16:51:00 +0100 More in Terms
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 02 Feb 2010 16:51:00 +0100] rev 1029
More in Terms
Tue, 02 Feb 2010 14:55:07 +0100 First experiments in Terms.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 02 Feb 2010 14:55:07 +0100] rev 1028
First experiments in Terms.
Tue, 02 Feb 2010 13:10:46 +0100 LF ported to alpha_gen, equivp solved and one of the missing proofs in support<-> fv solved. Still some supp properties left.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 02 Feb 2010 13:10:46 +0100] rev 1027
LF ported to alpha_gen, equivp solved and one of the missing proofs in support<-> fv solved. Still some supp properties left.
Tue, 02 Feb 2010 12:48:12 +0100 Disambiguating the syntax.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 02 Feb 2010 12:48:12 +0100] rev 1026
Disambiguating the syntax.
Tue, 02 Feb 2010 12:36:01 +0100 Minor uncommited changes from LamEx2.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 02 Feb 2010 12:36:01 +0100] rev 1025
Minor uncommited changes from LamEx2.
Tue, 02 Feb 2010 11:56:37 +0100 Some equivariance machinery that comes useful in LF.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 02 Feb 2010 11:56:37 +0100] rev 1024
Some equivariance machinery that comes useful in LF.
Tue, 02 Feb 2010 11:23:17 +0100 Generalized the eqvt proof for single binders.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 02 Feb 2010 11:23:17 +0100] rev 1023
Generalized the eqvt proof for single binders.
Tue, 02 Feb 2010 10:43:48 +0100 With induct instead of induct_tac, just one induction is sufficient.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 02 Feb 2010 10:43:48 +0100] rev 1022
With induct instead of induct_tac, just one induction is sufficient.
Tue, 02 Feb 2010 10:20:54 +0100 General alpha_gen_trans for one-variable abstraction.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 02 Feb 2010 10:20:54 +0100] rev 1021
General alpha_gen_trans for one-variable abstraction.
Tue, 02 Feb 2010 09:51:39 +0100 With unfolding Rep/Abs_eqvt no longer needed.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 02 Feb 2010 09:51:39 +0100] rev 1020
With unfolding Rep/Abs_eqvt no longer needed.
Tue, 02 Feb 2010 08:16:34 +0100 Lam2 finished apart from Rep_eqvt.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 02 Feb 2010 08:16:34 +0100] rev 1019
Lam2 finished apart from Rep_eqvt.
Mon, 01 Feb 2010 20:02:44 +0100 merge
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Mon, 01 Feb 2010 20:02:44 +0100] rev 1018
merge
Mon, 01 Feb 2010 16:05:59 +0100 All should be ok now.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Mon, 01 Feb 2010 16:05:59 +0100] rev 1017
All should be ok now.
Mon, 01 Feb 2010 18:57:39 +0100 repaired according to changes in Abs.thy
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Mon, 01 Feb 2010 18:57:39 +0100] rev 1016
repaired according to changes in Abs.thy
Mon, 01 Feb 2010 18:57:20 +0100 added a single-binder alpha equivalence; showed one half of the equivalence proof between general and single binder case
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Mon, 01 Feb 2010 18:57:20 +0100] rev 1015
added a single-binder alpha equivalence; showed one half of the equivalence proof between general and single binder case
Mon, 01 Feb 2010 16:46:07 +0100 cleaned
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Mon, 01 Feb 2010 16:46:07 +0100] rev 1014
cleaned
Mon, 01 Feb 2010 16:23:47 +0100 updated from huffman
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Mon, 01 Feb 2010 16:23:47 +0100] rev 1013
updated from huffman
Mon, 01 Feb 2010 16:13:24 +0100 updated from nominal-huffman
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Mon, 01 Feb 2010 16:13:24 +0100] rev 1012
updated from nominal-huffman
Mon, 01 Feb 2010 15:57:37 +0100 Fixed wrong rename.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Mon, 01 Feb 2010 15:57:37 +0100] rev 1011
Fixed wrong rename.
Mon, 01 Feb 2010 15:46:25 +0100 merge
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Mon, 01 Feb 2010 15:46:25 +0100] rev 1010
merge
Mon, 01 Feb 2010 15:45:40 +0100 Lambda based on alpha_gen, under construction.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Mon, 01 Feb 2010 15:45:40 +0100] rev 1009
Lambda based on alpha_gen, under construction.
Mon, 01 Feb 2010 15:32:20 +0100 updated from huffman - repo
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Mon, 01 Feb 2010 15:32:20 +0100] rev 1008
updated from huffman - repo
Mon, 01 Feb 2010 13:00:01 +0100 renamed Abst/abst to Abs/abs
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Mon, 01 Feb 2010 13:00:01 +0100] rev 1007
renamed Abst/abst to Abs/abs
Mon, 01 Feb 2010 12:48:18 +0100 got rid of RAbst type - is now just pairs
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Mon, 01 Feb 2010 12:48:18 +0100] rev 1006
got rid of RAbst type - is now just pairs
Mon, 01 Feb 2010 12:06:46 +0100 Monotonicity of ~~gen, needed for using it in inductive definitions.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Mon, 01 Feb 2010 12:06:46 +0100] rev 1005
Monotonicity of ~~gen, needed for using it in inductive definitions.
Mon, 01 Feb 2010 11:39:59 +0100 The current state of fv vs supp proofs in LF.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Mon, 01 Feb 2010 11:39:59 +0100] rev 1004
The current state of fv vs supp proofs in LF.
Mon, 01 Feb 2010 11:16:31 +0100 merge
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Mon, 01 Feb 2010 11:16:31 +0100] rev 1003
merge
Mon, 01 Feb 2010 11:16:13 +0100 More proofs in the LF example.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Mon, 01 Feb 2010 11:16:13 +0100] rev 1002
More proofs in the LF example.
Mon, 01 Feb 2010 11:00:51 +0100 merged
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Mon, 01 Feb 2010 11:00:51 +0100] rev 1001
merged
Mon, 01 Feb 2010 10:00:03 +0100 slight tuning
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Mon, 01 Feb 2010 10:00:03 +0100] rev 1000
slight tuning
Mon, 01 Feb 2010 09:47:46 +0100 renamed function according to the name of the constant
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Mon, 01 Feb 2010 09:47:46 +0100] rev 999
renamed function according to the name of the constant
Mon, 01 Feb 2010 09:04:22 +0100 fixed problem with Bex1_rel renaming
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Mon, 01 Feb 2010 09:04:22 +0100] rev 998
fixed problem with Bex1_rel renaming
Mon, 01 Feb 2010 09:56:32 +0100 Ported LF to the generic lambda and solved the simpler _supp cases.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Mon, 01 Feb 2010 09:56:32 +0100] rev 997
Ported LF to the generic lambda and solved the simpler _supp cases.
Sat, 30 Jan 2010 12:12:52 +0100 merged
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Sat, 30 Jan 2010 12:12:52 +0100] rev 996
merged
Sat, 30 Jan 2010 11:44:25 +0100 introduced a generic alpha (but not sure whether it is helpful)
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Sat, 30 Jan 2010 11:44:25 +0100] rev 995
introduced a generic alpha (but not sure whether it is helpful)
Fri, 29 Jan 2010 19:42:07 +0100 More in the LF example in the new nominal way, all is clear until support.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Fri, 29 Jan 2010 19:42:07 +0100] rev 994
More in the LF example in the new nominal way, all is clear until support.
Fri, 29 Jan 2010 13:47:05 +0100 Fixed the induction problem + some more proofs.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Fri, 29 Jan 2010 13:47:05 +0100] rev 993
Fixed the induction problem + some more proofs.
Fri, 29 Jan 2010 12:16:08 +0100 equivariance of rfv and alpha.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Fri, 29 Jan 2010 12:16:08 +0100] rev 992
equivariance of rfv and alpha.
Fri, 29 Jan 2010 10:13:07 +0100 Added the experiments with fun and function.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Fri, 29 Jan 2010 10:13:07 +0100] rev 991
Added the experiments with fun and function.
Fri, 29 Jan 2010 07:09:52 +0100 now also final step is proved - the supp of lambdas is now completely characterised
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Fri, 29 Jan 2010 07:09:52 +0100] rev 990
now also final step is proved - the supp of lambdas is now completely characterised
Fri, 29 Jan 2010 00:22:00 +0100 the supp of a lambda can now be characterised, *provided* the notion of free variables coincides with support on lambda terms
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Fri, 29 Jan 2010 00:22:00 +0100] rev 989
the supp of a lambda can now be characterised, *provided* the notion of free variables coincides with support on lambda terms
Thu, 28 Jan 2010 23:47:02 +0100 improved the proof slightly by defining alpha as a function and completely characterised the equality between two abstractions
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Thu, 28 Jan 2010 23:47:02 +0100] rev 988
improved the proof slightly by defining alpha as a function and completely characterised the equality between two abstractions
Thu, 28 Jan 2010 23:36:58 +0100 merged
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Thu, 28 Jan 2010 23:36:58 +0100] rev 987
merged
Thu, 28 Jan 2010 23:36:38 +0100 general abstraction operator and complete characterisation of its support and freshness
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Thu, 28 Jan 2010 23:36:38 +0100] rev 986
general abstraction operator and complete characterisation of its support and freshness
Thu, 28 Jan 2010 19:23:55 +0100 Ported existing part of LF to new permutations and alphas.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Thu, 28 Jan 2010 19:23:55 +0100] rev 985
Ported existing part of LF to new permutations and alphas.
Thu, 28 Jan 2010 15:47:35 +0100 attempt of a general abstraction operator
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Thu, 28 Jan 2010 15:47:35 +0100] rev 984
attempt of a general abstraction operator
Thu, 28 Jan 2010 14:20:26 +0100 attempt to prove equivalence between alpha definitions
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Thu, 28 Jan 2010 14:20:26 +0100] rev 983
attempt to prove equivalence between alpha definitions
Thu, 28 Jan 2010 12:28:50 +0100 End of renaming.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Thu, 28 Jan 2010 12:28:50 +0100] rev 982
End of renaming.
Thu, 28 Jan 2010 12:25:38 +0100 Minor when looking at lam.distinct and lam.inject
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Thu, 28 Jan 2010 12:25:38 +0100] rev 981
Minor when looking at lam.distinct and lam.inject
Thu, 28 Jan 2010 12:24:49 +0100 Renamed Bexeq to Bex1_rel
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Thu, 28 Jan 2010 12:24:49 +0100] rev 980
Renamed Bexeq to Bex1_rel
Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:52:10 +0100 Substracting bounds from free variables.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:52:10 +0100] rev 979
Substracting bounds from free variables.
Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:26:36 +0100 Improper interface for datatype and function packages and proper interface lateron.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:26:36 +0100] rev 978
Improper interface for datatype and function packages and proper interface lateron.
Thu, 28 Jan 2010 09:28:20 +0100 merged
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Thu, 28 Jan 2010 09:28:20 +0100] rev 977
merged
Thu, 28 Jan 2010 09:28:06 +0100 minor
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Thu, 28 Jan 2010 09:28:06 +0100] rev 976
minor
Thu, 28 Jan 2010 01:24:09 +0100 test about supp/freshness for lam (old proofs work in principle - for single binders)
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Thu, 28 Jan 2010 01:24:09 +0100] rev 975
test about supp/freshness for lam (old proofs work in principle - for single binders)
Thu, 28 Jan 2010 08:13:39 +0100 Recommited the changes for nitpick
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Thu, 28 Jan 2010 08:13:39 +0100] rev 974
Recommited the changes for nitpick
Wed, 27 Jan 2010 18:26:01 +0100 Correct types which fixes the printing.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 27 Jan 2010 18:26:01 +0100] rev 973
Correct types which fixes the printing.
Wed, 27 Jan 2010 18:06:14 +0100 fv for subterms
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 27 Jan 2010 18:06:14 +0100] rev 972
fv for subterms
Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:39:13 +0100 Fix the problem with later examples. Maybe need to go back to textual specifications.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:39:13 +0100] rev 971
Fix the problem with later examples. Maybe need to go back to textual specifications.
Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:18:30 +0100 Some processing of variables in constructors to get free variables.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:18:30 +0100] rev 970
Some processing of variables in constructors to get free variables.
Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:40:16 +0100 Parsing of the input as terms and types, and passing them as such to the function package.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:40:16 +0100] rev 969
Parsing of the input as terms and types, and passing them as such to the function package.
Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:07:49 +0100 Undid the parsing, as it is not possible with thy->lthy interaction.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:07:49 +0100] rev 968
Undid the parsing, as it is not possible with thy->lthy interaction.
Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:57:11 +0100 merge
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:57:11 +0100] rev 967
merge
Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:56:58 +0100 Some cleaning of thy vs lthy vs context.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:56:58 +0100] rev 966
Some cleaning of thy vs lthy vs context.
Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:06:34 +0100 merged
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:06:34 +0100] rev 965
merged
Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:06:17 +0100 tuned comment
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:06:17 +0100] rev 964
tuned comment
Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:05:42 +0100 completely ported
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:05:42 +0100] rev 963
completely ported
Wed, 27 Jan 2010 13:44:05 +0100 Another string in the specification.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 27 Jan 2010 13:44:05 +0100] rev 962
Another string in the specification.
Wed, 27 Jan 2010 13:32:28 +0100 Variable takes a 'name'.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 27 Jan 2010 13:32:28 +0100] rev 961
Variable takes a 'name'.
Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:21:40 +0100 merge
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:21:40 +0100] rev 960
merge
Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:19:58 +0100 When commenting discovered a missing case of Babs->Abs regularization.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:19:58 +0100] rev 959
When commenting discovered a missing case of Babs->Abs regularization.
Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:19:21 +0100 merged
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:19:21 +0100] rev 958
merged
Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:19:00 +0100 mostly ported Terms.thy to new Nominal
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:19:00 +0100] rev 957
mostly ported Terms.thy to new Nominal
Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:06:43 +0100 merge
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:06:43 +0100] rev 956
merge
Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:06:24 +0100 Commenting regularize
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:06:24 +0100] rev 955
Commenting regularize
Wed, 27 Jan 2010 11:48:04 +0100 very rough example file for how nominal2 specification can be parsed
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Wed, 27 Jan 2010 11:48:04 +0100] rev 954
very rough example file for how nominal2 specification can be parsed
Wed, 27 Jan 2010 11:31:16 +0100 reordered cases in regularize (will be merged into two cases)
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Wed, 27 Jan 2010 11:31:16 +0100] rev 953
reordered cases in regularize (will be merged into two cases)
Wed, 27 Jan 2010 08:41:42 +0100 use of equiv_relation_chk in quotient_term
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Wed, 27 Jan 2010 08:41:42 +0100] rev 952
use of equiv_relation_chk in quotient_term
Wed, 27 Jan 2010 08:20:31 +0100 some slight tuning
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Wed, 27 Jan 2010 08:20:31 +0100] rev 951
some slight tuning
Wed, 27 Jan 2010 07:49:43 +0100 added Terms to Nominal - Instantiation of two types does not work (ask Florian)
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Wed, 27 Jan 2010 07:49:43 +0100] rev 950
added Terms to Nominal - Instantiation of two types does not work (ask Florian)
Wed, 27 Jan 2010 07:45:01 +0100 added another example with indirect recursion over lists
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Wed, 27 Jan 2010 07:45:01 +0100] rev 949
added another example with indirect recursion over lists
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 20:12:41 +0100 just moved obsolete material into Attic
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Tue, 26 Jan 2010 20:12:41 +0100] rev 948
just moved obsolete material into Attic
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 20:07:50 +0100 added an LamEx example together with the new nominal infrastructure
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Tue, 26 Jan 2010 20:07:50 +0100] rev 947
added an LamEx example together with the new nominal infrastructure
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 16:30:51 +0100 Bex1_Bexeq_regular.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 26 Jan 2010 16:30:51 +0100] rev 946
Bex1_Bexeq_regular.
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 15:59:04 +0100 Hom Theorem with exists unique
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 26 Jan 2010 15:59:04 +0100] rev 945
Hom Theorem with exists unique
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 14:48:25 +0100 2 cases for regularize with split, lemmas with split now lift.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 26 Jan 2010 14:48:25 +0100] rev 944
2 cases for regularize with split, lemmas with split now lift.
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 14:08:47 +0100 Simpler statement that has the problem.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 26 Jan 2010 14:08:47 +0100] rev 943
Simpler statement that has the problem.
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 13:58:28 +0100 Found a term that does not regularize.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 26 Jan 2010 13:58:28 +0100] rev 942
Found a term that does not regularize.
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 13:53:56 +0100 A triple is still ok.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 26 Jan 2010 13:53:56 +0100] rev 941
A triple is still ok.
(0) -1000 -120 +120 +1000 tip