Thu, 07 Jan 2010 15:50:22 +0100 First generalization.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Thu, 07 Jan 2010 15:50:22 +0100] rev 821
First generalization.
Thu, 07 Jan 2010 14:14:17 +0100 The working proof of the special case.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Thu, 07 Jan 2010 14:14:17 +0100] rev 820
The working proof of the special case.
Thu, 07 Jan 2010 10:55:20 +0100 Reduced the proof to two simple but not obvious to prove facts.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Thu, 07 Jan 2010 10:55:20 +0100] rev 819
Reduced the proof to two simple but not obvious to prove facts.
Thu, 07 Jan 2010 10:13:15 +0100 More cleaning and commenting AbsRepTest. Now tests work; just slow.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Thu, 07 Jan 2010 10:13:15 +0100] rev 818
More cleaning and commenting AbsRepTest. Now tests work; just slow.
Thu, 07 Jan 2010 09:55:42 +0100 cleaning in AbsRepTest.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Thu, 07 Jan 2010 09:55:42 +0100] rev 817
cleaning in AbsRepTest.
Wed, 06 Jan 2010 16:24:21 +0100 Further in the proof
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 06 Jan 2010 16:24:21 +0100] rev 816
Further in the proof
(0) -300 -100 -30 -10 -6 +6 +10 +30 +100 +300 +1000 tip