Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:11:23 +0100 The alpha-equivalence relation for let-rec. Not sure if correct...
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:11:23 +0100] rev 1036
The alpha-equivalence relation for let-rec. Not sure if correct...
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 11:47:37 +0100 Starting with a let-rec example.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 11:47:37 +0100] rev 1035
Starting with a let-rec example.
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 11:21:34 +0100 Minor
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 11:21:34 +0100] rev 1034
Minor
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 10:50:24 +0100 Some cleaning and eqvt proof
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 10:50:24 +0100] rev 1033
Some cleaning and eqvt proof
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 09:25:21 +0100 The trm1_support lemma explicitly and stated a strong induction principle.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 09:25:21 +0100] rev 1032
The trm1_support lemma explicitly and stated a strong induction principle.
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 08:32:24 +0100 More ingredients in Terms.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 08:32:24 +0100] rev 1031
More ingredients in Terms.
Tue, 02 Feb 2010 17:10:42 +0100 Finished the supp_fv proof; first proof that analyses the structure of 'Let' :)
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 02 Feb 2010 17:10:42 +0100] rev 1030
Finished the supp_fv proof; first proof that analyses the structure of 'Let' :)
(0) -1000 -300 -100 -30 -10 -7 +7 +10 +30 +100 +300 +1000 tip