Wed, 17 Mar 2010 09:42:56 +0100 The recursive supp just has one equation too much.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 17 Mar 2010 09:42:56 +0100] rev 1471
The recursive supp just has one equation too much.
Wed, 17 Mar 2010 09:25:01 +0100 Fix for the change of alpha_gen.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 17 Mar 2010 09:25:01 +0100] rev 1470
Fix for the change of alpha_gen.
Wed, 17 Mar 2010 09:18:27 +0100 merge
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 17 Mar 2010 09:18:27 +0100] rev 1469
merge
Wed, 17 Mar 2010 09:17:55 +0100 Generate compound FV and Alpha for recursive bindings.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 17 Mar 2010 09:17:55 +0100] rev 1468
Generate compound FV and Alpha for recursive bindings.
Wed, 17 Mar 2010 08:39:46 +0100 Lifting theorems with compound fv and compound alpha.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 17 Mar 2010 08:39:46 +0100] rev 1467
Lifting theorems with compound fv and compound alpha.
Wed, 17 Mar 2010 08:07:25 +0100 commented out examples that should not work; but for example type-scheme example should work
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Wed, 17 Mar 2010 08:07:25 +0100] rev 1466
commented out examples that should not work; but for example type-scheme example should work
Wed, 17 Mar 2010 06:49:33 +0100 added another supp-proof for the non-recursive case
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Wed, 17 Mar 2010 06:49:33 +0100] rev 1465
added another supp-proof for the non-recursive case
Tue, 16 Mar 2010 20:07:13 +0100 Revert 7c8cd6eae8e2, now all proofs in Term5 go through, both recursive and not.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 16 Mar 2010 20:07:13 +0100] rev 1464
Revert 7c8cd6eae8e2, now all proofs in Term5 go through, both recursive and not.
Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:19:00 +0100 merge
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:19:00 +0100] rev 1463
merge
Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:18:08 +0100 The old recursive alpha works fine.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:18:08 +0100] rev 1462
The old recursive alpha works fine.
Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:13:34 +0100 added the final unfolded result
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:13:34 +0100] rev 1461
added the final unfolded result
Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:02:08 +0100 merge and proof of support for non-recursive case
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:02:08 +0100] rev 1460
merge and proof of support for non-recursive case
Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:20:46 +0100 Added Term5 non-recursive. The bug is there only for the recursive case.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:20:46 +0100] rev 1459
Added Term5 non-recursive. The bug is there only for the recursive case.
Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:11:32 +0100 Alpha is wrong.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:11:32 +0100] rev 1458
Alpha is wrong.
Tue, 16 Mar 2010 16:51:06 +0100 alpha_bn doesn't need the permutation in non-recursive case.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 16 Mar 2010 16:51:06 +0100] rev 1457
alpha_bn doesn't need the permutation in non-recursive case.
(0) -1000 -300 -100 -15 +15 +100 +300 +1000 tip