Nominal/Test.thy
Wed, 17 Mar 2010 09:42:56 +0100 Cezary Kaliszyk The recursive supp just has one equation too much.
Wed, 17 Mar 2010 08:07:25 +0100 Christian Urban commented out examples that should not work; but for example type-scheme example should work
Wed, 17 Mar 2010 06:49:33 +0100 Christian Urban added another supp-proof for the non-recursive case
Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:13:34 +0100 Christian Urban added the final unfolded result
Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:02:08 +0100 Christian Urban merge and proof of support for non-recursive case
Tue, 16 Mar 2010 16:51:06 +0100 Cezary Kaliszyk alpha_bn doesn't need the permutation in non-recursive case.
Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:27:47 +0100 Cezary Kaliszyk FV_bn generated for recursive functions as well, and used in main fv for bindings.
Tue, 16 Mar 2010 12:08:37 +0100 Cezary Kaliszyk The proof in 'Test' gets simpler.
Mon, 15 Mar 2010 23:42:56 +0100 Christian Urban merged (confirmed to work with Isabelle from 6th March)
Mon, 15 Mar 2010 17:51:35 +0100 Christian Urban proof for support when bn-function is present, but fb_function is empty
Mon, 15 Mar 2010 17:42:17 +0100 Cezary Kaliszyk fv_eqvt_cheat no longer needed.
Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:32:05 +0100 Cezary Kaliszyk derive "inducts" from "induct" instead of lifting again is much faster.
Mon, 15 Mar 2010 11:50:12 +0100 Cezary Kaliszyk cheat_alpha_eqvt no longer needed; the proofs work.
Mon, 15 Mar 2010 09:27:25 +0100 Cezary Kaliszyk Use eqvt.
Mon, 15 Mar 2010 08:28:10 +0100 Christian Urban added an eqvt-proof for bi
less more (0) -15 tip