Tue, 04 May 2010 05:36:43 +0100 some preliminary changes to the pearl-jv paper
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Tue, 04 May 2010 05:36:43 +0100] rev 2033
some preliminary changes to the pearl-jv paper
Mon, 03 May 2010 08:52:15 +0100 some preliminary notes of the abstract (qpaper); still need to see the motivating example
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Mon, 03 May 2010 08:52:15 +0100] rev 2032
some preliminary notes of the abstract (qpaper); still need to see the motivating example
Mon, 03 May 2010 15:47:30 +0200 Added cheats to classical
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Mon, 03 May 2010 15:47:30 +0200] rev 2031
Added cheats to classical
Mon, 03 May 2010 15:38:20 +0200 Ex2 moved to new parser.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Mon, 03 May 2010 15:38:20 +0200] rev 2030
Ex2 moved to new parser.
Mon, 03 May 2010 15:37:21 +0200 alpha_eqvt_tac fixed to work when the existential is not at the top level.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Mon, 03 May 2010 15:37:21 +0200] rev 2029
alpha_eqvt_tac fixed to work when the existential is not at the top level.
Mon, 03 May 2010 15:36:47 +0200 SingleLet and Ex3 work with NewParser.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Mon, 03 May 2010 15:36:47 +0200] rev 2028
SingleLet and Ex3 work with NewParser.
Mon, 03 May 2010 15:13:15 +0200 Comment
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Mon, 03 May 2010 15:13:15 +0200] rev 2027
Comment
Mon, 03 May 2010 14:31:11 +0200 Another example where only alpha_eqvt fails.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Mon, 03 May 2010 14:31:11 +0200] rev 2026
Another example where only alpha_eqvt fails.
Mon, 03 May 2010 14:30:37 +0200 Register only non-looping rules in eq_iff
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Mon, 03 May 2010 14:30:37 +0200] rev 2025
Register only non-looping rules in eq_iff
Mon, 03 May 2010 14:03:30 +0200 Equivariance fails for single let?
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Mon, 03 May 2010 14:03:30 +0200] rev 2024
Equivariance fails for single let?
(0) -1000 -300 -100 -10 +10 +100 +300 +1000 tip