Tue, 18 Jan 2011 19:27:30 +0100 defined properly substitution
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Tue, 18 Jan 2011 19:27:30 +0100] rev 2675
defined properly substitution
Tue, 18 Jan 2011 18:04:40 +0100 derived stronger Abs_eq_iff2 theorems
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Tue, 18 Jan 2011 18:04:40 +0100] rev 2674
derived stronger Abs_eq_iff2 theorems
Tue, 18 Jan 2011 17:30:47 +0100 made alpha_abs_set_stronger1 stronger
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Tue, 18 Jan 2011 17:30:47 +0100] rev 2673
made alpha_abs_set_stronger1 stronger
Tue, 18 Jan 2011 17:19:50 +0100 removed finiteness assumption from set_rename_perm
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Tue, 18 Jan 2011 17:19:50 +0100] rev 2672
removed finiteness assumption from set_rename_perm
Tue, 18 Jan 2011 22:11:49 +0900 alpha_abs_set_stronger1
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 18 Jan 2011 22:11:49 +0900] rev 2671
alpha_abs_set_stronger1
Tue, 18 Jan 2011 21:12:25 +0900 alpha_abs_let_stronger is not true in the same form
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 18 Jan 2011 21:12:25 +0900] rev 2670
alpha_abs_let_stronger is not true in the same form
Tue, 18 Jan 2011 11:02:57 +0100 the function translating lambda terms to locally nameless lambda terms; still needs a stronger abs_eq_iff lemma...at the moment only proved for restrictions
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Tue, 18 Jan 2011 11:02:57 +0100] rev 2669
the function translating lambda terms to locally nameless lambda terms; still needs a stronger abs_eq_iff lemma...at the moment only proved for restrictions
(0) -1000 -300 -100 -30 -10 -7 +7 +10 +30 +100 +300 tip