Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:57:11 +0100 merge
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:57:11 +0100] rev 967
merge
Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:56:58 +0100 Some cleaning of thy vs lthy vs context.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:56:58 +0100] rev 966
Some cleaning of thy vs lthy vs context.
Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:06:34 +0100 merged
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:06:34 +0100] rev 965
merged
Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:06:17 +0100 tuned comment
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:06:17 +0100] rev 964
tuned comment
Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:05:42 +0100 completely ported
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:05:42 +0100] rev 963
completely ported
Wed, 27 Jan 2010 13:44:05 +0100 Another string in the specification.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 27 Jan 2010 13:44:05 +0100] rev 962
Another string in the specification.
Wed, 27 Jan 2010 13:32:28 +0100 Variable takes a 'name'.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 27 Jan 2010 13:32:28 +0100] rev 961
Variable takes a 'name'.
Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:21:40 +0100 merge
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:21:40 +0100] rev 960
merge
Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:19:58 +0100 When commenting discovered a missing case of Babs->Abs regularization.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:19:58 +0100] rev 959
When commenting discovered a missing case of Babs->Abs regularization.
Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:19:21 +0100 merged
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:19:21 +0100] rev 958
merged
Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:19:00 +0100 mostly ported Terms.thy to new Nominal
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:19:00 +0100] rev 957
mostly ported Terms.thy to new Nominal
Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:06:43 +0100 merge
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:06:43 +0100] rev 956
merge
Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:06:24 +0100 Commenting regularize
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:06:24 +0100] rev 955
Commenting regularize
Wed, 27 Jan 2010 11:48:04 +0100 very rough example file for how nominal2 specification can be parsed
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Wed, 27 Jan 2010 11:48:04 +0100] rev 954
very rough example file for how nominal2 specification can be parsed
Wed, 27 Jan 2010 11:31:16 +0100 reordered cases in regularize (will be merged into two cases)
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Wed, 27 Jan 2010 11:31:16 +0100] rev 953
reordered cases in regularize (will be merged into two cases)
Wed, 27 Jan 2010 08:41:42 +0100 use of equiv_relation_chk in quotient_term
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Wed, 27 Jan 2010 08:41:42 +0100] rev 952
use of equiv_relation_chk in quotient_term
Wed, 27 Jan 2010 08:20:31 +0100 some slight tuning
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Wed, 27 Jan 2010 08:20:31 +0100] rev 951
some slight tuning
Wed, 27 Jan 2010 07:49:43 +0100 added Terms to Nominal - Instantiation of two types does not work (ask Florian)
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Wed, 27 Jan 2010 07:49:43 +0100] rev 950
added Terms to Nominal - Instantiation of two types does not work (ask Florian)
Wed, 27 Jan 2010 07:45:01 +0100 added another example with indirect recursion over lists
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Wed, 27 Jan 2010 07:45:01 +0100] rev 949
added another example with indirect recursion over lists
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 20:12:41 +0100 just moved obsolete material into Attic
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Tue, 26 Jan 2010 20:12:41 +0100] rev 948
just moved obsolete material into Attic
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 20:07:50 +0100 added an LamEx example together with the new nominal infrastructure
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Tue, 26 Jan 2010 20:07:50 +0100] rev 947
added an LamEx example together with the new nominal infrastructure
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 16:30:51 +0100 Bex1_Bexeq_regular.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 26 Jan 2010 16:30:51 +0100] rev 946
Bex1_Bexeq_regular.
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 15:59:04 +0100 Hom Theorem with exists unique
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 26 Jan 2010 15:59:04 +0100] rev 945
Hom Theorem with exists unique
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 14:48:25 +0100 2 cases for regularize with split, lemmas with split now lift.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 26 Jan 2010 14:48:25 +0100] rev 944
2 cases for regularize with split, lemmas with split now lift.
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 14:08:47 +0100 Simpler statement that has the problem.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 26 Jan 2010 14:08:47 +0100] rev 943
Simpler statement that has the problem.
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 13:58:28 +0100 Found a term that does not regularize.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 26 Jan 2010 13:58:28 +0100] rev 942
Found a term that does not regularize.
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 13:53:56 +0100 A triple is still ok.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 26 Jan 2010 13:53:56 +0100] rev 941
A triple is still ok.
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 13:38:42 +0100 Combined the simpsets in clean_tac and updated the comment. Now cleaning of splits does work.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 26 Jan 2010 13:38:42 +0100] rev 940
Combined the simpsets in clean_tac and updated the comment. Now cleaning of splits does work.
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 12:24:23 +0100 Changed the lambda_prs_simple_conv to use id_apply, now last eq_reflection can be removed from id_simps.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 26 Jan 2010 12:24:23 +0100] rev 939
Changed the lambda_prs_simple_conv to use id_apply, now last eq_reflection can be removed from id_simps.
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 12:06:47 +0100 Sigma cleaning works with split_prs (still manual proof).
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 26 Jan 2010 12:06:47 +0100] rev 938
Sigma cleaning works with split_prs (still manual proof).
(0) -300 -100 -50 -30 +30 +50 +100 +300 +1000 tip