| Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:42:31 +0100 | Cezary Kaliszyk | Even with pattern simplified to a single clause, the supp equation doesn't seem true. | file | diff | annotate |
| Fri, 12 Mar 2010 12:42:35 +0100 | Cezary Kaliszyk | Still don't know how to prove supp=fv for simplest Let... | file | diff | annotate |
| Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:49:07 +0100 | Cezary Kaliszyk | Finite_support proof no longer needed in LF. | file | diff | annotate |
| Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:47:29 +0100 | Cezary Kaliszyk | Show that the new types are in finite support typeclass. | file | diff | annotate |
| Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:15:29 +0100 | Cezary Kaliszyk | Fixes for term1 for new alpha. Still not able to show support equations. | file | diff | annotate |
| Wed, 10 Mar 2010 15:32:51 +0100 | Cezary Kaliszyk | alpha_eqvt for recursive term1. | file | diff | annotate |
| Mon, 08 Mar 2010 02:40:16 +0100 | Cezary Kaliszyk | Undo effects of simp. | file | diff | annotate |
| Fri, 05 Mar 2010 18:14:04 +0100 | Cezary Kaliszyk | Still unable to show supp=fv for let with one existential. | file | diff | annotate |