Thu, 07 Jan 2010 16:06:13 +0100 some cleaning.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Thu, 07 Jan 2010 16:06:13 +0100] rev 822
some cleaning.
Thu, 07 Jan 2010 15:50:22 +0100 First generalization.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Thu, 07 Jan 2010 15:50:22 +0100] rev 821
First generalization.
Thu, 07 Jan 2010 14:14:17 +0100 The working proof of the special case.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Thu, 07 Jan 2010 14:14:17 +0100] rev 820
The working proof of the special case.
Thu, 07 Jan 2010 10:55:20 +0100 Reduced the proof to two simple but not obvious to prove facts.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Thu, 07 Jan 2010 10:55:20 +0100] rev 819
Reduced the proof to two simple but not obvious to prove facts.
Thu, 07 Jan 2010 10:13:15 +0100 More cleaning and commenting AbsRepTest. Now tests work; just slow.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Thu, 07 Jan 2010 10:13:15 +0100] rev 818
More cleaning and commenting AbsRepTest. Now tests work; just slow.
Thu, 07 Jan 2010 09:55:42 +0100 cleaning in AbsRepTest.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Thu, 07 Jan 2010 09:55:42 +0100] rev 817
cleaning in AbsRepTest.
Wed, 06 Jan 2010 16:24:21 +0100 Further in the proof
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 06 Jan 2010 16:24:21 +0100] rev 816
Further in the proof
Wed, 06 Jan 2010 09:19:23 +0100 Tried to prove the lemma manually; only left with quotient proofs.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 06 Jan 2010 09:19:23 +0100] rev 815
Tried to prove the lemma manually; only left with quotient proofs.
Wed, 06 Jan 2010 08:24:37 +0100 Sledgehammer bug.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 06 Jan 2010 08:24:37 +0100] rev 814
Sledgehammer bug.
Tue, 05 Jan 2010 18:10:20 +0100 merge
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 05 Jan 2010 18:10:20 +0100] rev 813
merge
(0) -300 -100 -10 +10 +100 +300 +1000 tip