Tue, 14 Jun 2011 11:43:06 +0100 tuned
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Tue, 14 Jun 2011 11:43:06 +0100] rev 2847
tuned
Fri, 10 Jun 2011 15:52:17 +0900 Move working examples before non-working ones
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Fri, 10 Jun 2011 15:52:17 +0900] rev 2846
Move working examples before non-working ones
Fri, 10 Jun 2011 15:45:49 +0900 Optimized proofs and removed some garbage.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Fri, 10 Jun 2011 15:45:49 +0900] rev 2845
Optimized proofs and removed some garbage.
Fri, 10 Jun 2011 15:31:14 +0900 merge
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Fri, 10 Jun 2011 15:31:14 +0900] rev 2844
merge
Fri, 10 Jun 2011 15:30:09 +0900 Slightly modify fcb for list1 and put in common place.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Fri, 10 Jun 2011 15:30:09 +0900] rev 2843
Slightly modify fcb for list1 and put in common place.
Fri, 10 Jun 2011 09:00:24 +0900 Experiments with Let
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Fri, 10 Jun 2011 09:00:24 +0900] rev 2842
Experiments with Let
Thu, 09 Jun 2011 15:34:51 +0900 Eval can be defined with additional freshness
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Thu, 09 Jun 2011 15:34:51 +0900] rev 2841
Eval can be defined with additional freshness
Thu, 09 Jun 2011 15:03:58 +0900 Minor simplification
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Thu, 09 Jun 2011 15:03:58 +0900] rev 2840
Minor simplification
Thu, 09 Jun 2011 11:10:41 +0900 abs_res_fcb will be enough to finish the multiple-recursive proof, if we have a working 'default'.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Thu, 09 Jun 2011 11:10:41 +0900] rev 2839
abs_res_fcb will be enough to finish the multiple-recursive proof, if we have a working 'default'.
Thu, 09 Jun 2011 09:44:51 +0900 More experiments with 'default'
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Thu, 09 Jun 2011 09:44:51 +0900] rev 2838
More experiments with 'default'
(0) -1000 -300 -100 -10 +10 +100 +300 tip