Wed, 17 Mar 2010 09:17:55 +0100 Generate compound FV and Alpha for recursive bindings.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 17 Mar 2010 09:17:55 +0100] rev 1468
Generate compound FV and Alpha for recursive bindings.
Wed, 17 Mar 2010 08:39:46 +0100 Lifting theorems with compound fv and compound alpha.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 17 Mar 2010 08:39:46 +0100] rev 1467
Lifting theorems with compound fv and compound alpha.
Wed, 17 Mar 2010 08:07:25 +0100 commented out examples that should not work; but for example type-scheme example should work
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Wed, 17 Mar 2010 08:07:25 +0100] rev 1466
commented out examples that should not work; but for example type-scheme example should work
Wed, 17 Mar 2010 06:49:33 +0100 added another supp-proof for the non-recursive case
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Wed, 17 Mar 2010 06:49:33 +0100] rev 1465
added another supp-proof for the non-recursive case
Tue, 16 Mar 2010 20:07:13 +0100 Revert 7c8cd6eae8e2, now all proofs in Term5 go through, both recursive and not.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 16 Mar 2010 20:07:13 +0100] rev 1464
Revert 7c8cd6eae8e2, now all proofs in Term5 go through, both recursive and not.
Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:19:00 +0100 merge
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:19:00 +0100] rev 1463
merge
Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:18:08 +0100 The old recursive alpha works fine.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:18:08 +0100] rev 1462
The old recursive alpha works fine.
Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:13:34 +0100 added the final unfolded result
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:13:34 +0100] rev 1461
added the final unfolded result
Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:02:08 +0100 merge and proof of support for non-recursive case
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:02:08 +0100] rev 1460
merge and proof of support for non-recursive case
Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:20:46 +0100 Added Term5 non-recursive. The bug is there only for the recursive case.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:20:46 +0100] rev 1459
Added Term5 non-recursive. The bug is there only for the recursive case.
Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:11:32 +0100 Alpha is wrong.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:11:32 +0100] rev 1458
Alpha is wrong.
Tue, 16 Mar 2010 16:51:06 +0100 alpha_bn doesn't need the permutation in non-recursive case.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 16 Mar 2010 16:51:06 +0100] rev 1457
alpha_bn doesn't need the permutation in non-recursive case.
Tue, 16 Mar 2010 16:17:05 +0100 alpha5_transp and equivp
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 16 Mar 2010 16:17:05 +0100] rev 1456
alpha5_transp and equivp
Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:38:14 +0100 alpha5_symp proved.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:38:14 +0100] rev 1455
alpha5_symp proved.
Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:27:47 +0100 FV_bn generated for recursive functions as well, and used in main fv for bindings.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:27:47 +0100] rev 1454
FV_bn generated for recursive functions as well, and used in main fv for bindings.
Tue, 16 Mar 2010 12:08:37 +0100 The proof in 'Test' gets simpler.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 16 Mar 2010 12:08:37 +0100] rev 1453
The proof in 'Test' gets simpler.
Tue, 16 Mar 2010 12:06:22 +0100 Removed pi o bn = bn' assumption in alpha
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 16 Mar 2010 12:06:22 +0100] rev 1452
Removed pi o bn = bn' assumption in alpha
Mon, 15 Mar 2010 23:42:56 +0100 merged (confirmed to work with Isabelle from 6th March)
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Mon, 15 Mar 2010 23:42:56 +0100] rev 1451
merged (confirmed to work with Isabelle from 6th March)
Mon, 15 Mar 2010 17:52:31 +0100 another synchronisation
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Mon, 15 Mar 2010 17:52:31 +0100] rev 1450
another synchronisation
Mon, 15 Mar 2010 17:51:35 +0100 proof for support when bn-function is present, but fb_function is empty
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Mon, 15 Mar 2010 17:51:35 +0100] rev 1449
proof for support when bn-function is present, but fb_function is empty
Mon, 15 Mar 2010 17:42:17 +0100 fv_eqvt_cheat no longer needed.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Mon, 15 Mar 2010 17:42:17 +0100] rev 1448
fv_eqvt_cheat no longer needed.
Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:32:05 +0100 derive "inducts" from "induct" instead of lifting again is much faster.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:32:05 +0100] rev 1447
derive "inducts" from "induct" instead of lifting again is much faster.
Mon, 15 Mar 2010 13:56:17 +0100 build_eqvts works with recursive case if proper induction rule is used.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Mon, 15 Mar 2010 13:56:17 +0100] rev 1446
build_eqvts works with recursive case if proper induction rule is used.
Mon, 15 Mar 2010 11:50:12 +0100 cheat_alpha_eqvt no longer needed; the proofs work.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Mon, 15 Mar 2010 11:50:12 +0100] rev 1445
cheat_alpha_eqvt no longer needed; the proofs work.
Mon, 15 Mar 2010 10:36:09 +0100 LF works with new alpha...?
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Mon, 15 Mar 2010 10:36:09 +0100] rev 1444
LF works with new alpha...?
Mon, 15 Mar 2010 10:07:15 +0100 explicit flag "cheat_equivp"
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Mon, 15 Mar 2010 10:07:15 +0100] rev 1443
explicit flag "cheat_equivp"
Mon, 15 Mar 2010 10:02:19 +0100 Prove alpha_gen_compose_eqvt
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Mon, 15 Mar 2010 10:02:19 +0100] rev 1442
Prove alpha_gen_compose_eqvt
Mon, 15 Mar 2010 09:27:25 +0100 Use eqvt.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Mon, 15 Mar 2010 09:27:25 +0100] rev 1441
Use eqvt.
Mon, 15 Mar 2010 08:39:23 +0100 added preliminary test version....but Test works now
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Mon, 15 Mar 2010 08:39:23 +0100] rev 1440
added preliminary test version....but Test works now
Mon, 15 Mar 2010 08:28:10 +0100 added an eqvt-proof for bi
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Mon, 15 Mar 2010 08:28:10 +0100] rev 1439
added an eqvt-proof for bi
(0) -1000 -300 -100 -50 -30 +30 +50 +100 +300 +1000 tip