Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Sat, 15 Jan 2011 20:24:16 +0000] rev 2660
nominal_function works now completely for frees and depth; still a propbelm with subst; no unproved assumptions
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Fri, 14 Jan 2011 14:22:25 +0000] rev 2659
strengthened renaming lemmas
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Thu, 13 Jan 2011 12:12:47 +0000] rev 2658
added eqvt_lemmas for subset and psubset
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Mon, 10 Jan 2011 11:36:55 +0000] rev 2657
a few lemmas about freshness for at and at_base
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Mon, 10 Jan 2011 08:51:51 +0000] rev 2656
added a property about finite support in the presense of eqvt_at
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Sun, 09 Jan 2011 05:38:53 +0000] rev 2655
instantiated fundef_ex1_eqvt_at theorem with the indction hypothesis
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Sun, 09 Jan 2011 04:28:24 +0000] rev 2654
solved subgoals for depth and subst function
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Sun, 09 Jan 2011 01:17:44 +0000] rev 2653
added eqvt_at premises in function definition - however not proved at the moment
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Fri, 07 Jan 2011 05:40:31 +0000] rev 2652
added one further lemma about equivariance of THE_default
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Fri, 07 Jan 2011 05:06:25 +0000] rev 2651
equivariance of THE_default under the uniqueness assumption
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Fri, 07 Jan 2011 02:30:00 +0000] rev 2650
derived equivariance for the function graph and function relation
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Thu, 06 Jan 2011 23:06:45 +0000] rev 2649
a modified function package where, as a test, True has been injected into the compatibility condictions
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Thu, 06 Jan 2011 20:25:40 +0000] rev 2648
removed last traces of debugging code
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Thu, 06 Jan 2011 19:57:57 +0000] rev 2647
removed debugging code abd introduced a guarded tracing function
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Thu, 06 Jan 2011 14:53:38 +0000] rev 2646
moved Weakening up....it does not compile when put at the last position
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Thu, 06 Jan 2011 14:02:10 +0000] rev 2645
tuned
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Thu, 06 Jan 2011 13:31:44 +0000] rev 2644
added weakening to the test cases
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Thu, 06 Jan 2011 13:28:40 +0000] rev 2643
cleaned up weakening proof and added a version with finit sets
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Thu, 06 Jan 2011 13:28:19 +0000] rev 2642
same
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Thu, 06 Jan 2011 13:28:04 +0000] rev 2641
some further lemmas for fsets
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Thu, 06 Jan 2011 11:00:16 +0000] rev 2640
made sure the raw datatypes and raw functions do not get any mixfix syntax
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Wed, 05 Jan 2011 17:33:43 +0000] rev 2639
exported the code into a separate file
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Wed, 05 Jan 2011 16:51:27 +0000] rev 2638
strong rule inductions; as an example the weakening lemma works
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Tue, 04 Jan 2011 13:47:38 +0000] rev 2637
final version of the ESOP paper; used set+ instead of res as requested by one reviewer