Sun, 07 Feb 2010 10:20:29 +0100 fixed lemma name
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Sun, 07 Feb 2010 10:20:29 +0100] rev 1080
fixed lemma name
Sun, 07 Feb 2010 10:16:21 +0100 updated to latest Nominal2
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Sun, 07 Feb 2010 10:16:21 +0100] rev 1079
updated to latest Nominal2
Sat, 06 Feb 2010 12:58:56 +0100 minor
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Sat, 06 Feb 2010 12:58:56 +0100] rev 1078
minor
Sat, 06 Feb 2010 10:04:56 +0100 some tuning
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Sat, 06 Feb 2010 10:04:56 +0100] rev 1077
some tuning
Fri, 05 Feb 2010 15:17:21 +0100 merge
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Fri, 05 Feb 2010 15:17:21 +0100] rev 1076
merge
Fri, 05 Feb 2010 14:52:27 +0100 merge
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Fri, 05 Feb 2010 14:52:27 +0100] rev 1075
merge
Fri, 05 Feb 2010 10:32:21 +0100 Fixes for Bex1 removal.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Fri, 05 Feb 2010 10:32:21 +0100] rev 1074
Fixes for Bex1 removal.
Fri, 05 Feb 2010 15:09:49 +0100 Cleaned Terms using [lifted] and found a workaround for the instantiation problem.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Fri, 05 Feb 2010 15:09:49 +0100] rev 1073
Cleaned Terms using [lifted] and found a workaround for the instantiation problem.
Fri, 05 Feb 2010 11:37:18 +0100 A procedure that properly instantiates the types too.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Fri, 05 Feb 2010 11:37:18 +0100] rev 1072
A procedure that properly instantiates the types too.
Fri, 05 Feb 2010 11:28:49 +0100 More code abstracted away
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Fri, 05 Feb 2010 11:28:49 +0100] rev 1071
More code abstracted away
Fri, 05 Feb 2010 11:19:21 +0100 A bit more intelligent and cleaner code.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Fri, 05 Feb 2010 11:19:21 +0100] rev 1070
A bit more intelligent and cleaner code.
Fri, 05 Feb 2010 11:09:43 +0100 merge
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Fri, 05 Feb 2010 11:09:43 +0100] rev 1069
merge
Fri, 05 Feb 2010 10:45:49 +0100 A proper version of the attribute
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Fri, 05 Feb 2010 10:45:49 +0100] rev 1068
A proper version of the attribute
Fri, 05 Feb 2010 09:06:49 +0100 merged
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Fri, 05 Feb 2010 09:06:49 +0100] rev 1067
merged
Fri, 05 Feb 2010 09:06:27 +0100 eqvts and eqvts_raw are separate thm-lists; otherwise permute_eqvt is problematic as it causes looks in eqvts
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Fri, 05 Feb 2010 09:06:27 +0100] rev 1066
eqvts and eqvts_raw are separate thm-lists; otherwise permute_eqvt is problematic as it causes looks in eqvts
Thu, 04 Feb 2010 18:09:20 +0100 The automatic lifting translation function, still with dummy types,
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Thu, 04 Feb 2010 18:09:20 +0100] rev 1065
The automatic lifting translation function, still with dummy types, but works everywhere in the LF example.
Thu, 04 Feb 2010 17:58:23 +0100 Quotdata_dest needed for lifting theorem translation.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Thu, 04 Feb 2010 17:58:23 +0100] rev 1064
Quotdata_dest needed for lifting theorem translation.
Thu, 04 Feb 2010 17:39:04 +0100 fixed (permute_eqvt in eqvts makes this simpset always looping)
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Thu, 04 Feb 2010 17:39:04 +0100] rev 1063
fixed (permute_eqvt in eqvts makes this simpset always looping)
Thu, 04 Feb 2010 15:19:24 +0100 rollback of the test
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Thu, 04 Feb 2010 15:19:24 +0100] rev 1062
rollback of the test
Thu, 04 Feb 2010 15:16:34 +0100 linked versions - instead of copies
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Thu, 04 Feb 2010 15:16:34 +0100] rev 1061
linked versions - instead of copies
Thu, 04 Feb 2010 14:55:52 +0100 merged
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Thu, 04 Feb 2010 14:55:52 +0100] rev 1060
merged
Thu, 04 Feb 2010 14:55:21 +0100 restored the old behaviour of having an eqvts list; the transformed theorems are stored in eqvts_raw
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Thu, 04 Feb 2010 14:55:21 +0100] rev 1059
restored the old behaviour of having an eqvts list; the transformed theorems are stored in eqvts_raw
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 18:28:50 +0100 More let-rec experiments
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 18:28:50 +0100] rev 1058
More let-rec experiments
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 17:36:25 +0100 proposal for an alpha equivalence
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 17:36:25 +0100] rev 1057
proposal for an alpha equivalence
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 15:17:29 +0100 Lets different.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 15:17:29 +0100] rev 1056
Lets different.
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:39:19 +0100 Simplified the proof.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:39:19 +0100] rev 1055
Simplified the proof.
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:36:48 +0100 merged
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:36:48 +0100] rev 1054
merged
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:36:22 +0100 proved that bv for lists respects alpha for terms
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:36:22 +0100] rev 1053
proved that bv for lists respects alpha for terms
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:28:00 +0100 Finished remains on the let proof.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:28:00 +0100] rev 1052
Finished remains on the let proof.
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:22:25 +0100 merge
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:22:25 +0100] rev 1051
merge
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:19:53 +0100 Lets are ok.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:19:53 +0100] rev 1050
Lets are ok.
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:15:07 +0100 merged
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:15:07 +0100] rev 1049
merged
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:12:50 +0100 added type-scheme example
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:12:50 +0100] rev 1048
added type-scheme example
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 13:00:37 +0100 merge
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 13:00:37 +0100] rev 1047
merge
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 13:00:07 +0100 Definitions for trm5
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 13:00:07 +0100] rev 1046
Definitions for trm5
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:58:02 +0100 another adaptation for the eqvt-change
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:58:02 +0100] rev 1045
another adaptation for the eqvt-change
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:45:06 +0100 merged
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:45:06 +0100] rev 1044
merged
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:44:29 +0100 fixed proofs that broke because of eqvt
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:44:29 +0100] rev 1043
fixed proofs that broke because of eqvt
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:34:53 +0100 Minor fix.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:34:53 +0100] rev 1042
Minor fix.
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:34:01 +0100 merge
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:34:01 +0100] rev 1041
merge
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:29:45 +0100 alpha5 pseudo-injective
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:29:45 +0100] rev 1040
alpha5 pseudo-injective
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:31:58 +0100 fixed proofs in Abs.thy
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:31:58 +0100] rev 1039
fixed proofs in Abs.thy
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:13:22 +0100 merged
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:13:22 +0100] rev 1038
merged
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:06:10 +0100 added a first eqvt_tac which pushes permutations inside terms
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:06:10 +0100] rev 1037
added a first eqvt_tac which pushes permutations inside terms
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:11:23 +0100 The alpha-equivalence relation for let-rec. Not sure if correct...
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:11:23 +0100] rev 1036
The alpha-equivalence relation for let-rec. Not sure if correct...
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 11:47:37 +0100 Starting with a let-rec example.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 11:47:37 +0100] rev 1035
Starting with a let-rec example.
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 11:21:34 +0100 Minor
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 11:21:34 +0100] rev 1034
Minor
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 10:50:24 +0100 Some cleaning and eqvt proof
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 10:50:24 +0100] rev 1033
Some cleaning and eqvt proof
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 09:25:21 +0100 The trm1_support lemma explicitly and stated a strong induction principle.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 09:25:21 +0100] rev 1032
The trm1_support lemma explicitly and stated a strong induction principle.
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 08:32:24 +0100 More ingredients in Terms.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 08:32:24 +0100] rev 1031
More ingredients in Terms.
Tue, 02 Feb 2010 17:10:42 +0100 Finished the supp_fv proof; first proof that analyses the structure of 'Let' :)
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 02 Feb 2010 17:10:42 +0100] rev 1030
Finished the supp_fv proof; first proof that analyses the structure of 'Let' :)
Tue, 02 Feb 2010 16:51:00 +0100 More in Terms
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 02 Feb 2010 16:51:00 +0100] rev 1029
More in Terms
Tue, 02 Feb 2010 14:55:07 +0100 First experiments in Terms.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 02 Feb 2010 14:55:07 +0100] rev 1028
First experiments in Terms.
Tue, 02 Feb 2010 13:10:46 +0100 LF ported to alpha_gen, equivp solved and one of the missing proofs in support<-> fv solved. Still some supp properties left.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 02 Feb 2010 13:10:46 +0100] rev 1027
LF ported to alpha_gen, equivp solved and one of the missing proofs in support<-> fv solved. Still some supp properties left.
Tue, 02 Feb 2010 12:48:12 +0100 Disambiguating the syntax.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 02 Feb 2010 12:48:12 +0100] rev 1026
Disambiguating the syntax.
Tue, 02 Feb 2010 12:36:01 +0100 Minor uncommited changes from LamEx2.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 02 Feb 2010 12:36:01 +0100] rev 1025
Minor uncommited changes from LamEx2.
Tue, 02 Feb 2010 11:56:37 +0100 Some equivariance machinery that comes useful in LF.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 02 Feb 2010 11:56:37 +0100] rev 1024
Some equivariance machinery that comes useful in LF.
Tue, 02 Feb 2010 11:23:17 +0100 Generalized the eqvt proof for single binders.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 02 Feb 2010 11:23:17 +0100] rev 1023
Generalized the eqvt proof for single binders.
Tue, 02 Feb 2010 10:43:48 +0100 With induct instead of induct_tac, just one induction is sufficient.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 02 Feb 2010 10:43:48 +0100] rev 1022
With induct instead of induct_tac, just one induction is sufficient.
Tue, 02 Feb 2010 10:20:54 +0100 General alpha_gen_trans for one-variable abstraction.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 02 Feb 2010 10:20:54 +0100] rev 1021
General alpha_gen_trans for one-variable abstraction.
(0) -1000 -300 -100 -60 +60 +100 +300 +1000 tip