Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Fri, 23 Oct 2009 11:24:43 +0200] rev 161
Trying to get a simpler lemma with the whole infrastructure
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Fri, 23 Oct 2009 09:21:45 +0200] rev 160
Using RANGE tactical allows getting rid of the quotients immediately.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Thu, 22 Oct 2009 17:35:40 +0200] rev 159
Further developing the tactic and simplifying the proof
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Thu, 22 Oct 2009 16:24:02 +0200] rev 158
res_forall_rsp_tac further simplifies the proof
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Thu, 22 Oct 2009 16:10:06 +0200] rev 157
Working on the proof and the tactic.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Thu, 22 Oct 2009 15:45:05 +0200] rev 156
The proof gets simplified
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Thu, 22 Oct 2009 15:44:16 +0200] rev 155
Removed an assumption
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Thu, 22 Oct 2009 15:02:01 +0200] rev 154
The proof now including manually unfolded higher-order RES_FORALL_RSP.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Thu, 22 Oct 2009 13:45:48 +0200] rev 153
The problems with 'abs' term.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Thu, 22 Oct 2009 11:43:12 +0200] rev 152
Simplified the proof with some tactic... Still hangs sometimes.