Fri, 23 Oct 2009 16:01:13 +0200 eqsubst_tac
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Fri, 23 Oct 2009 16:01:13 +0200] rev 162
eqsubst_tac
Fri, 23 Oct 2009 11:24:43 +0200 Trying to get a simpler lemma with the whole infrastructure
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Fri, 23 Oct 2009 11:24:43 +0200] rev 161
Trying to get a simpler lemma with the whole infrastructure
Fri, 23 Oct 2009 09:21:45 +0200 Using RANGE tactical allows getting rid of the quotients immediately.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Fri, 23 Oct 2009 09:21:45 +0200] rev 160
Using RANGE tactical allows getting rid of the quotients immediately.
Thu, 22 Oct 2009 17:35:40 +0200 Further developing the tactic and simplifying the proof
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Thu, 22 Oct 2009 17:35:40 +0200] rev 159
Further developing the tactic and simplifying the proof
Thu, 22 Oct 2009 16:24:02 +0200 res_forall_rsp_tac further simplifies the proof
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Thu, 22 Oct 2009 16:24:02 +0200] rev 158
res_forall_rsp_tac further simplifies the proof
Thu, 22 Oct 2009 16:10:06 +0200 Working on the proof and the tactic.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Thu, 22 Oct 2009 16:10:06 +0200] rev 157
Working on the proof and the tactic.
(0) -100 -30 -10 -6 +6 +10 +30 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 tip