Wed, 03 Feb 2010 13:00:07 +0100 Definitions for trm5
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 13:00:07 +0100] rev 1046
Definitions for trm5
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:58:02 +0100 another adaptation for the eqvt-change
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:58:02 +0100] rev 1045
another adaptation for the eqvt-change
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:45:06 +0100 merged
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:45:06 +0100] rev 1044
merged
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:44:29 +0100 fixed proofs that broke because of eqvt
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:44:29 +0100] rev 1043
fixed proofs that broke because of eqvt
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:34:53 +0100 Minor fix.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:34:53 +0100] rev 1042
Minor fix.
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:34:01 +0100 merge
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:34:01 +0100] rev 1041
merge
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:29:45 +0100 alpha5 pseudo-injective
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:29:45 +0100] rev 1040
alpha5 pseudo-injective
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:31:58 +0100 fixed proofs in Abs.thy
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:31:58 +0100] rev 1039
fixed proofs in Abs.thy
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:13:22 +0100 merged
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:13:22 +0100] rev 1038
merged
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:06:10 +0100 added a first eqvt_tac which pushes permutations inside terms
Christian Urban <urbanc@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:06:10 +0100] rev 1037
added a first eqvt_tac which pushes permutations inside terms
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:11:23 +0100 The alpha-equivalence relation for let-rec. Not sure if correct...
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:11:23 +0100] rev 1036
The alpha-equivalence relation for let-rec. Not sure if correct...
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 11:47:37 +0100 Starting with a let-rec example.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 11:47:37 +0100] rev 1035
Starting with a let-rec example.
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 11:21:34 +0100 Minor
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 11:21:34 +0100] rev 1034
Minor
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 10:50:24 +0100 Some cleaning and eqvt proof
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 10:50:24 +0100] rev 1033
Some cleaning and eqvt proof
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 09:25:21 +0100 The trm1_support lemma explicitly and stated a strong induction principle.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 09:25:21 +0100] rev 1032
The trm1_support lemma explicitly and stated a strong induction principle.
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 08:32:24 +0100 More ingredients in Terms.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Wed, 03 Feb 2010 08:32:24 +0100] rev 1031
More ingredients in Terms.
Tue, 02 Feb 2010 17:10:42 +0100 Finished the supp_fv proof; first proof that analyses the structure of 'Let' :)
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 02 Feb 2010 17:10:42 +0100] rev 1030
Finished the supp_fv proof; first proof that analyses the structure of 'Let' :)
Tue, 02 Feb 2010 16:51:00 +0100 More in Terms
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 02 Feb 2010 16:51:00 +0100] rev 1029
More in Terms
Tue, 02 Feb 2010 14:55:07 +0100 First experiments in Terms.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 02 Feb 2010 14:55:07 +0100] rev 1028
First experiments in Terms.
Tue, 02 Feb 2010 13:10:46 +0100 LF ported to alpha_gen, equivp solved and one of the missing proofs in support<-> fv solved. Still some supp properties left.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 02 Feb 2010 13:10:46 +0100] rev 1027
LF ported to alpha_gen, equivp solved and one of the missing proofs in support<-> fv solved. Still some supp properties left.
Tue, 02 Feb 2010 12:48:12 +0100 Disambiguating the syntax.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 02 Feb 2010 12:48:12 +0100] rev 1026
Disambiguating the syntax.
Tue, 02 Feb 2010 12:36:01 +0100 Minor uncommited changes from LamEx2.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 02 Feb 2010 12:36:01 +0100] rev 1025
Minor uncommited changes from LamEx2.
Tue, 02 Feb 2010 11:56:37 +0100 Some equivariance machinery that comes useful in LF.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 02 Feb 2010 11:56:37 +0100] rev 1024
Some equivariance machinery that comes useful in LF.
Tue, 02 Feb 2010 11:23:17 +0100 Generalized the eqvt proof for single binders.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 02 Feb 2010 11:23:17 +0100] rev 1023
Generalized the eqvt proof for single binders.
Tue, 02 Feb 2010 10:43:48 +0100 With induct instead of induct_tac, just one induction is sufficient.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 02 Feb 2010 10:43:48 +0100] rev 1022
With induct instead of induct_tac, just one induction is sufficient.
Tue, 02 Feb 2010 10:20:54 +0100 General alpha_gen_trans for one-variable abstraction.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 02 Feb 2010 10:20:54 +0100] rev 1021
General alpha_gen_trans for one-variable abstraction.
Tue, 02 Feb 2010 09:51:39 +0100 With unfolding Rep/Abs_eqvt no longer needed.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 02 Feb 2010 09:51:39 +0100] rev 1020
With unfolding Rep/Abs_eqvt no longer needed.
Tue, 02 Feb 2010 08:16:34 +0100 Lam2 finished apart from Rep_eqvt.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Tue, 02 Feb 2010 08:16:34 +0100] rev 1019
Lam2 finished apart from Rep_eqvt.
Mon, 01 Feb 2010 20:02:44 +0100 merge
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Mon, 01 Feb 2010 20:02:44 +0100] rev 1018
merge
Mon, 01 Feb 2010 16:05:59 +0100 All should be ok now.
Cezary Kaliszyk <kaliszyk@in.tum.de> [Mon, 01 Feb 2010 16:05:59 +0100] rev 1017
All should be ok now.
(0) -1000 -300 -100 -50 -30 +30 +50 +100 +300 +1000 tip